PERİPARTUM HİSTEREKTOMİ OLGULARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: TÜRKİYE'NİN BATI BÖLGESİNDEKİ ÜÇÜNCÜ BASAMAK BİR SAĞLIK MERKEZİNİN DENEYİMLERİ

Yıl 2022, , 25 - 32, 17.01.2022

Ümit Çabuş , Cihan Kabukçu , Deniz Aydın Ceylan

https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.788390

Öz

AMAÇ: Son üç yıl içinde kliniğimizde uygulanan peripartum histerektomi olgularını retrospektif olarak incelemeyi ve peripartum histerektominin insidansını, risk faktörlerini, endikasyonlarını, uygulanan cerrahi yöntemleri, komplikasyonları ve sonuçlarını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.
GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmaya Ocak 2017 ve Ocak 2020 tarihleri arasında Pamukkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesinde peripartum histerektomi uygulanan hastalar dahil edildi. Peripartum kanaması olan ancak konservatif yaklaşımlar uygulanarak (defektif plasenta insersiyon alanının sütürasyonu veya segmental rezeksiyonu, uterus kompresyon sütürleri, intrauterin balon uygulamaları, uterin veya internal iliak arter ligasyonu vb.) peripartum histerektomi yapılmayan hastalar çalışmaya dahil edilmedi. Hasta bilgileri, hasta dosyaları ve hastane kayıt sisteminden elde edildi. Hastaların demografik ve klinik verileri analiz edilerek değerlendirildi.
BULGULAR: Üç yıllık süre içinde kliniğimizde toplam 3220 doğum gerçekleşti. Bu hastalardan yirmibir tanesine peripartum histerektomi uygulanmış olup insidansı 6,5/1000 idi. Postpartum kanama grubunda peripartum histerektomi için en sık endikasyon plasenta yerleşim ve invazyon anomalileriydi (% 90,4) ve bu anomaliler arasında da en sık görülen histopatolojik tanı plasenta previa ve plasenta increta (% 33,33) birlikteliğiydi. Masif transfüzyon, mesane hasarı, relaparatomi ve yara yeri enfeksiyonu PH uygulanan hastalarda en sık görülen morbidite nedenleriydi.
SONUÇ: Günümüzde plasenta yerleşim ve invazyon anomalileri peripartum kanamaların en sık nedeni olmaya başlamıştır. Peripartum histerektomi ise abnormal plasentasyon için temel tedavi şekli olmaya devam etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Postpartum kanama, Anormal plasentasyon, Peripartum histerektomi

EVALUATION OF PERIPARTUM HYSTERECTOMY CASES: EXPERIENCES OF A TERTIARY HEALTH CENTER IN WESTERN REGION OF TURKEY

Öz

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to retrospectively examine the cases of peripartum hysterectomy performed in our clinic in the last three years and to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, indications, surgical methods, complications, and results of peripartum hysterectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who had undergone a peripartum hysterectomy in Pamukkale University Medical Faculty Hospital between January 2017 and January 2020 were included in the study. We excluded all patients with the massive peripartum hemorrhage who were treated with conservative approaches (such as suturing or segmental resection of the defective placenta insertion area, uterine compression sutures, intrauterine balloon applications, and uterine or internal iliac artery ligation) rather than hysterectomy. Data of the patients were obtained from patient files and hospital medical records. The demographic and clinical data of the patients were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: During the three years, a total of 3220 births took place in our hospital. Peripartum hysterectomy was performed in twenty-one patients; the incidence was 6.5/1000. The most common indication for peripartum hysterectomy in the postpartum hemorrhage group was placental location and invasion anomalies (90.4%) and among these anomalies, the most common histopathological diagnosis was the association of placenta previa and placenta increta (33.33%). Massive transfusion, bladder damage, relaparotomy, and wound infection were the major causes of morbidity in patients with peripartum hysterectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Recently, placental location and invasion anomalies have become the most common cause of peripartum hemorrhages. Peripartum hysterectomy is the leading treatment method for patients with abnormal placentation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

postpartum hemorrhage, abnormal placentation, peripartum hysterectomy

Kaynakça

• 1. World Health Organization (WHO). Maternal mortality, 19 September 2019, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality. (Accessed April 6, 2020).
• 2. Shields LE, Goffman D, Caughey AB. Postpartum hemorrhage. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, Number 183, October 2017.
• 3. Bateman BT, Berman MF, Riley LE, Leffert LR. The epidemiology of postpartum hemorrhage in a large, nationwide sample of deliveries. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(5):1368-73.
• 4. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in cesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 20165;11(2): e0148343.
• 5. Van den Akker T, Brobbel C, Dekkers OM, Bloemenkamp KW. Prevalence, indications, risk indicators, and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(6):1281-94.
• 6. Özcan HÇ, Uğur MG, Balat Ö, Tepe NB, Sucu S. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: single-center ten-year experience. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal &Neonatal Medicine. 2017;30(23):2778-83.
• 7. Jauniaux E, Ayres-de-Campos D, Langhoff-Roos J, Fox KA, Collins S. FIGO placenta accreta diagnosis and management expert consensus panel. FIGO classification for the clinical diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 ;146(1):20-4.
• 8. Sebghati M, Chandraharan E. An update on the risk factors for and management of obstetric hemorrhage. Women's Health (Lond). 2017;13(2):34-40.
• 9. Bodelon C, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Schiff MA, Reed SD. Factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):115–23.
• 10. Kazi S. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A great obstetric challenge. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(6):1567-70.
• 11. Arulpragasam K, Hyanes G, Epee-Bekima M. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a Western Australian population: Ten-year retrospective case-note analysis. ANZJOG. 2019;59(4):533-7.
• 12. Knight M; UKOSS. Peripartum hysterectomy in the UK: management and outcomes of the associated hemorrhage. BJOG. 2007;114(11):1380-7.
• 13. Jakobsson M, Tapper AM, Colmorn LB, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: results from the prospective Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study (NOSS). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(7):745-54.
• 14. Turgut A, Sak ME, Özler A, et al. Acil peripartum histerektomiler: 189 olgu deneyimimiz. Perinatoloji Dergisi. 2013;21(4):113-8.
• 15. Temizkan O, Angın D, Karakuş R, Şanverdi İ, Polat M, Karateke A. Changing trends in emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary obstetric center in Turkey during 2000–2013. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2016; 17: 26-34.
• 16. Finazzo F, D'antonio F, Masselli G, et al. Interobserver agreement in MRI assessment of severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 ;55(4):467-73.
• 17. Çalışkan AC, Akpınar E, Aytan H, Demirtürk F. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a 4-year review. Nobel Med. 2010; 6(3): 20-3.
• 18. Tahlak MA, Abdulrahman M, Hubaishi NM, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in the Dubai health system: A fifteen-year experience. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 15:1-7.
• 19. Sharma B, Sikka P, Jain V, Jain K, Bagga R, Suri V. Peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary care hospital: Epidemiology and outcomes. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 ;33(3):324-8.
• 20. Machado LS. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: Incidence, indications, risk factors, and outcome. North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2011;3(8):358-61.
• 21. Erfani H, Fox KA, Clark SL, et al. Maternal outcomes in unexpected placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a single-center experience with a multidisciplinary team. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(4): 337.e1-337.e5.
• 22. Kalelioglu I, Corbacıoglu Esmer A, Has R, et al. Plasenta invazyon anomalisinin yönetimi ve sezaryen histerektomi: tersiyer bir merkezin sekiz yıllık deneyim. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol. 2013;10(3):143-5.
• 23. Collins SL, Alemdar B, van Beekhuizen HJ, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of abnormally invasive placenta: recommendations from the International Society for Abnormally Invasive Placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(6):511-26.
• 24. Briery CM, Rose CH, Hudson WT, et al. Planned vs emergent cesarean hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(2): 154.e1-5.
• 25. Maraschini A, Lega I, D'Aloja P, Buoncristiano M, Dell'Oro S, Donati S; Regional obstetric surveillance system working group. Women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy due to obstetric hemorrhage: A prospective population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(2):274-82.
• 26. Matsubara S, Kuwata T, Usui R, et al. Important surgical measures and techniques at cesarean hysterectomy for placenta previa accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 ;92(4):372-7.
• 27. Lauroy A, Verhaeghe C, Vidal F, Parant O, Legendre G, Guerby P. Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional technique in peripartum hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(1):229-34.
• 28. Özcan HÇ, Balat Ö, Uğur MG, Sucu S, Tepe NB, Kazaz TG. Use of bladder filling to prevent urinary system complications in the management of placenta percreta: a randomized prospective study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018;78(2):173-178.
• 29. Hoffman MS, Karlnoski RA, Mangar D, et al. Morbidity associated with nonemergent hysterectomy for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202:628.e1–5.