Bireysel Mutluluk ve İşkoliklik İlişkisi

Öz

Son yıllarda iş hayatında işkoliklik ve mutluluk, üzerinde en çok araştırma yapılan konulardan ikisi olmuşlardır. Araştırmanın amacı, çalışanın bireysel olarak mutluluğu ve işkoliklik eğilimi arasında bir ilişki olup olmadığını belirlemektir. Bunun için araştırmada işkolikliğin ölçülmesi için DUWAS işkoliklik ölçeği, bireysel mutluluğun ölçülmesi için Oxford mutluluk ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Toplam 218 kişiye anket uygulanmış ve ilişkinin yönü ve şiddetini ölçmek için korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda bireysel mutlulukla işkoliklik arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığı tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İşkoliklik, bireysel mutluluk

The Relation Between Happiness and Work Addiction

Öz

In recent years workaholism and happiness, have become two of the main research subjects of working life. The main objective of this research is to examine whether there is any significant relation between happiness and work addiction. To measure workhaholism, DUWAS Dutch work addiction scale and to measure happiness Oxford happiness scale is used. In this study, 218 surveys were conducted. Corelation analysis indicated that there is statistically no significant relation between happiness and work addiction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Workaholic, personal happiness

Kaynakça

1. Acaboğa, A. (2007). Din-Mutluluk İlişkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi SBE, Kahramanmaraş.
2. Aiton, E. J. (1985). Leibniz: A Biography. Adam Hilger LTD, Bristol.
3. Anonim (2003). Economic Review (Pakistan), 10, 5.
4. Anonim (2013). DIY Week, 15-22 November, 17.
5. Anonim (2014). The RoSPA Occupational Safety& Health Journal, 2, 5.
6. Argyle, M., Martin, M. ve Crossland, J. (1989). Happiness as a Function of Personality and Social Encounters. In J. P. Forgas & J. M. Innes (Eds.), Recent advances in Social Psychology: An International Perspective, New York: Elsevier North-Holland, 189- 203.
7. Arkonaç, S. A. (2005). Psikoloji (Zihin Süreçleri Bilimi), Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım, İstanbul.
8. Baysal, A. C. (1993). Çalışma Yaşamında İnsan. Avcıol Basım, İstanbul.

9. Blake, A. D., Broschak, J., George, E. (2003). Happy Together? How Using Nonstandard Workers Affects Exit, Voice and Loyalty Among Standard Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 46 (4), 475-485.
10. Buelens, M., Poelmans, S.A.Y. (2004). Enriching the Spence and Robbins, Typology of Workaholism: Demographic, Motivational and Organizational Correlates. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17 (5), 440-458.
11. Burke, R. J., Matthiesen, S. (2004). Short Communication: Workaholism Among Norwegian Journalists: Antecedents and Consequences. Stress and Health, 20, 301- 308.
12. Burwell, R., Chen, C. P. (2002). Applying REBT to Workaholic Clients. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 15 (3), 219-228.
13. Cantarow, E. (1979). Women Workaholics. Mother Jones, 6, 56.
14. Comte-Sponville, A., Farge, A., Delumeau, J. (2012). Mutluluğun En Güzel Tarihi. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, Altan Basım, İstanbul.
15. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95 (3), 542-575.
16. Doğan, T., ve Tel, F. D. (2011). Duwas İşkoliklik Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun (DUWASTR) Geçerlik ve Güvenirliğinin İncelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (1), 61-69.
17. Douglas, E. J., Morris, R. J. (2006). Workaholic or Just Hard Worker? Career Development International, 11 (5), 394-417.
18. Fisher, C. D. (2003). Why Do Lay People Believe That Satisfaction and Performance are Correlated? Possible Sources of a Commonsense Theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (6), 753-777.
19. Gavin, J., Mason, R. (2004). The Value of Happieness in the Workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 3 (4), S:379-392.
20. Goodman, B. (2006). A Field Guide to the Workaholic. Psychology Today, 5-6, 40-41.
21. Hefferon, K ve Boniwell, I. (2014). Pozitif Psikoloji, Kuram, Araştırma ve Uygulamalar. Çeviri Editörü: Tayfun Doğan, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
22. Hewlett, S. A., Luce, C. B. (2006). Extreme Jobs, The Dangerous Allure of the 70- Hour Workweek. Harvard Business Review, 12, 49-59.
23. Hills, P., ve Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A Compact Scale For The Measurement of Psychological Well-Being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33 (7), 1073-1082.
24. Hosie, P., Willemyns, M. , Sevastos, P. (2012). The Impact of Happiness on Managers’ Contextual and Task Performance. Asia Pasific Journal of Human Resources, 50 (3), 268-287.
25. İçöz, A. (2011). Çalışan ve Yönetici İçin İş Hayatı Oyun Kuralları. Cinius Yayınları, İstanbul.
26. Jones, M. D. (2006). Which is a Better Predictor of Job Performance: Job Satisfaction or Life Satisfaction. Journal of Behavioral& Applied Management, 8 (1), 20-42.
27. Kara, M. M. (2010). İş Tatmini İle Mutluluk ve Başarı Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
28. Killinger, B. (1991). Workaholics: The Respectable Addicts. Simon& Schuster, New York, NY.
29. Lama, D. ve Cudler, H.C. (2008). Türkçesi: Meltem Tayga. İş Hayatında Mutluluk Sanatı. Klan Yayınları, İstanbul.
30. Lechky, O. (1991). There Should be More to Life Than Medicine, Aouthor Warns Workaholic MDs. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 145 (7), 857-861.
31. Loftus, F. E., Marshall, M. E., Wortman, C. B. (1992). Psychology. McGraw-Hill, United States Of America.
32. Machlowitz, M. (1980). Workaholics: Living With Tehem, Working With Them. Addison- Wesley, Reading, M.A.
33. McMillan, L.H.W., Brady, E. C., O’Driscoll, M.P., Marsh, N. V. (2002). A Multifaceted Study of Spence and Robbins’ (1992) Workaholism Battery. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75 (3), 357- 368.
34. Oates, W. (1971). Confessions of a Workaholic: The Facts Abouy Work Addiction, World, New York, NY.
35. Robinson, B.E. (1999). The Work Addiction Risk Test: Development of a Tentative Measure of Workaholism. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 199-210.
36. Robinson, B.E. (2000a). A Typology of Workaholics With İmplications For Counsellors. Journal of Addiction& Offender Counselling, 21 (1), 34-48.
37. Robinson, B.E. (2000b). Workaholism: Bridging the Gap Between Workplace, Sociocultural 31-47.
38. Schaufeli, W.B., Taris, T.W. and Bakker, A. (2006). Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide: on the Differences Between Work Engagement and Workaholism. In R. Burke (Ed.): Research Companion to Working Time and Work Addiction, Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA.
39. Scott, K.S., Moore, K.S., Miceli, M.P. (1997). An Exploration of the Meaning and Consequences of Workaholism. Human Relations, 50 (3), 287-314.
40. Seybold, K. C., Salomone, P.R. (1994). Understanding Workaholism: A Review of Causes and Counselling Approaches. Journal of Counselling& Development, 73 (1), 4-9.
41. Spence, J.T., Robbins, A.S. (1992). Workaholism: Definition, Measurement And Preliminary Results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58 (1), 160-178.
42. Tarhan, N., Gümüşel, O., Sayım, A. (2014). Pozitif Psikoloji, Çoklu Zeka Uygulamaları. 4. Baskı, Timaş Yayınları, İstanbul.
43. Taris, T. W., Schreurs, P. J. G. (2009). Well-Being and Organizational Performance: An Organizational-Level Test of the Happy-Productive Worker Hypothesis. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organizations, 23 (2), 120-136.
44. TDK Yeni Tarama Sözlüğü (1983). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
45. Vanderberghe, C., Panaccio, A., Bentein, K., Mignonac, K. And Roussel, P. (2011). Assessing Longitudinal Change of and Dynamic Relationships Among Role Stressors, Job Attitudes, Turnover İntention and Well-being in Neophyte Newcomers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 652-671.
46. Wilson, W. R. (1967). Correlates Of Avowed Happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67 (4), 294-306.
47. Wrigt, T. A., Staw, B. M. (1999). Affect and Favorable Work Outcomes: Two Lonitudinal Tests of The Happy- Productive Worker Thesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 (1), 1-23.
48. Zizek, S. S., Milfelner, B., Cancer, V. (2013). Measurement of Employess Subjective Well- Being as an Aim of Social Responsibility. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26 (6), 549-560.