COGNITIVE MODELS OF PERSECUTORY DELUSIONS

Abstract

Delusions are among frequently encountered symptoms in psychiatric patients. However formal definition of delusions is inconclusive. The difficulty in distinguishing whether a thought is a delusion may partly be a consequence of the lack of operational criteria in commonly used diagnostic systems. This review article aims both to shed light on the cognitive explanations of delusions and thus provide benefit in recognition and comprehension of persecutory delusions in clinical practice. In addition cognitive perspective influence of culture on delusions is also discussed

Keywords

• Persecution delusions, cognition, culture, paranoid thought

Perseküsyon sanrılarını açıklamaya yönelik bilişsel modeller

Öz

Psikiyatri kliniğine başvuran hastalarda sanrılar sıkça karşılaşılan belirtilerden biri olmakla beraber sanrı kavramının tanımı üzerine olan tartışmalar devam etmektedir. Hastada sanrı olup olmadığını ayırt etmede yaşanan güçlük, kısmen, güncel tanı sistemlerinde operasyonel ölçütler yerine sınırları tam olarak belirli olmayan tanımlamalar yapılmasına bağlı olabilir. Bu gözden geçirme yazısı, sanrılara ilişkin bilişsel modelleri aktaran teorik bir kaynak olmanın ötesinde bu modelleri kavramanın - özellikle klinik uygulamada - perseküsyon sanrılarını tanımaya ve anlamaya bir temel teşkil edeceği varsayılarak yazılmıştır. Bilişsel bakış açısının yanı sıra, kültürün sanrı üzerine etkilerine de değinilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ANAHTAR KELİMELER:Perseküsyon sanrısı, biliş, kültür, paranoid düşünce

Kaynakça

1. Bentall RP (1994) Cognitive biases and abnormal beliefs: towards a model of persecutory delusions, in The Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Edited by David AS, Cutting J. Hove, UK, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 337–360.
2. Bentall RP, Kaney S (1989) Content specific information processing and persecutory delusions: a investigation using the emotional Stroop test. Br J Med Psychol, 62:355–364.
3. Chadwick, P.D.J., Trower, P., (1997) To defend or not to defend: a comparison of paranoia and depression. J. Cogn. Psychother. 11: 63–71.
4. David Barron, Adrian Furnham, Laura Weis, Kevin D. Morgan, Tony Towell, Viren Swami (2017) The relationship between schizotypal facets and conspiracist beliefs via cognitive processes. Psychiatry Res, 259:15–20.
5. Dudley REJ, John CH, Young AW, Over DE (1997) Normal and abnormal reasoning in people with delusions. Br J Clin Psychol, 36:243–258.
6. Freeman (2016) Persecutory delusions: a cognitive perspective on understanding and treatment, Lancet Psychiatry, 3: 685–92.
7. Freeman D, Garety PA, Bebbington PE, Smith B, Rollinson R, Fowler D, Kuipers E, Ray K, Dunn G. (2005) Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia in a non-clinical population. Br J Psychiatry, 186:427-35.
8. Freeman, Daniel.; Garety, Philippa A. (2004) Paranoia: The Psychology of Persecutory Delusions, Maudsley Monographs

9. Frith CD (1992) The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Hove, UK, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
10. Garety PA, Freeman D (1999) Cognitive approaches to delusions: a critical review of theories and evidence. Br J Clin Psychol, 38:113–154.
11. Garety PA, Hemsley DR, Wessely S (1991) Reasoning in deluded schizophrenic and paranoid patients: biases in performance on a probabilistic inference task. J Nerv Ment Dis, 179: 194–201. Kaney S, Bentall RP (1989) Persecutory delusions and attributional style. Br J Med Psychol, 62:191–198.
12. Kaney S, Wolfenden M, Dewey ME, Bentall RP (1992) Persecutory delusions and the recall of threatening and non-threatening propositions. Br J Clin Psychol, 31:85–87.
13. Kim KI, Li D, Jiang Z ve ark. (1993) Schizophrenic delusions among Koreans, KoreanChinese and Chinese: a transcultural study. Int J Soc Psychiatry 39:190-199.
14. Kinderman P, Bentall RP (1996) Self-discrepancies and persecutory delusions: evidence for a model of paranoid ideation. J Abnorm Psychol,106:106–114.
15. Kinderman P, Bentall RP (1997) Causal attributions in paranoia and depression: internal, personal and situational attributions for negative events. J Abnorm Psychol, 106:103–107.
16. Leafhead KM, Young AW, Szulecka TK (1996) Delusions demand attention. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1:5–16.
17. Lee J, Park S (2005): Working memory impairments in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. J Abnorm Psychol 114:599–611.
18. Miller, D.T., Ross, M., (1975) Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction. Psychol. Bull. 82, 213–225.
19. Phillips ML, Senior C, David AS (2000) Abnormal processing of ambiguity in paranoid schizophrenia: a visual scan path study. Psychol Med, 30:157–167.
20. Sharp HM, Fear CF, Healy D (1997) Attributional style and delusions: an investigation based on delusional content. Eur Psychiatry, 12:1–7.
21. Suhail K, Cochrane R. (2002) Effect of culture and environment on the phenomenology of delusions and hallucinations. Int J Soc Psychiatry,48:126-138.
22. Tateyama M, Asai M, Kamisada M ve ark. (1993) Comparison of schizophrenic delusions between Japan and Germany. Psychopathology,26:151-158.
23. Thomas F Oltmanns (1988) Approaches to the definition and study of delusions. Delusional Beliefs, s.5.
24. Trower P, Chadwick P. (1995) Pathways to defence of the self: A theory of two types of paranoia. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2:263–278.
25. Tseng W.S. (2003) Clinician’s Guide to Cultural Psychiatry . San Diego, CA, Academic Press.