Akıllı Şehirlerde Yürünebilirliğin Önemi

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 7, 44 - 61, 28.12.2024

Mücella Ateş

https://doi.org/10.51118/konsan.2024.42

Öz

Gelecekte kentsel alanlarda yoğunlaşan insan nüfusu artışıyla birlikte, şehir nüfusu artmakta ve şehirler büyümektedir. Artan şehir nüfusunun ihtiyaçları değişiyor ve kaynaklarımız tükeniyor. Akıllı şehir yaklaşımı bu durumların beraberinde getirdiği problemlere çözüm geliştirmek için ortaya çıkmıştır. Akıllı şehirler, mevcut şehirlerin akıllandırılması, yeni kentsel alanların inşası ve kentsel kullanılmayan alanlara yeni fonksiyon verilmesi olarak üç farklı şekilde uygulanıyor. Akıllı şehirlerin ileri teknoloji ile donatılmasının yanında, yürünebilir olması da çok önemli. Makalede, bir şehre ‘akıllı’ diyebilmek için yürünebilirlik oranının yüksek olması gerektiği vurgulanıyor. Yürünebilirlik, sürdürülebilir bir şehir için bir temel sağlar. Bu çalışmada, şehirlerin ve alanların daha yürünebilir hale gelmesi için nasıl geliştirileceği konusunda dünyanın dört bir yanındaki şehirlerde devam eden tartışmalara ilgili girdilerle katkıda bulunulması amaçlanıyor. Sonuçta, akıllı şehirlerin, yürünebilir şehirler olması gerektiğini söyleniyor ve akıllı şehirlerin planlanmasında rasyonel bir temel oluşturmak için şehir yöneticilerine önerilerde bulunuluyor.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yürünebilirlik, Verimlilik, Akıllı Şehir, Mimari Tasarım.

Walkability in Smart Cities

Öz

With the increasing urban population density in the future, cities are growing, and the need for resources is changing. The emergence of the smart city approach is a result of the growing urban population and the depletion of resources. Smart cities are implemented in three different ways: the smartening of existing cities, the construction of new urban areas, and the assignment of new functions to underutilized urban areas. In addition to being equipped with advanced technology, the walkability of smart cities is crucial. The article emphasizes that high walkability is essential for labeling a city as 'smart.' Walkability provides a foundation for a sustainable city. In this study, we hope to contribute to ongoing discussions in cities worldwide on how to enhance the walkability of cities and areas. Ultimately, we argue that smart cities should be walkable cities and provide recommendations to city officials to establish a rational basis for planning smart cities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Walkability, Efficiency, Smart City, Architectural Design.

Kaynakça

• Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3-21.
• Anagnostopoulou, E., Bothos, E., Magoutas, B., Schrammel, J., Mentzas, G. (2018). Persuasive Technologies for Sustainable Urban Mobility: State of the Art and Emerging Trends, Sustainability, 1-22.
• Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart City Policies: A Spatial Approach, Cities, 3-11.
• Ateş, M., Erinsel Önder, D. (2019). Akıllı Şehir Kavramı ve Dönüşen Anlamı Bağlamında Eleştiriler, Megaron, 41-50. Banister, D. (2008). The Sustainable Mobility Paradigm, Transport Policy, 73–80.
• Bauman, A., Sallis, J.F., Owen, N. (2002). Environmental and Policy Measurement in Physical Activity Research, In Physical Activity Assessments for Health-related Research (Ed.), Greg Welk, Human Kinetics, London, 241–251.
• Beatley, T. (2000). Green Urbanism: Learning From European Cities, Island Press. Washington DC, 50-65.
• Benevolo, C., Dameri, R.P., D’auria, B. (2016). Smart Mobility in Smart City. In Empowering Organizations, Springer, Cham, 13-28.
• Bhattacharyya, D.B., Mitra, S. (2013). Making Siliguri a Walkable City, Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2737 – 2744.
• C. Yencha (2019). Valuing Walkability: New Evidence From Computer Vision Methods, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 21-32.
• Cairns, S., Atkins, S., Goodwin, P. (2001). Disappearing Traffic? The Story So Far, Municipal Engineer, 13-22.
• Camero, A., Alba, E. (2019). Smart City and Information Technology: A review, Cities, 84–94.
• Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65-82.
• Cohen, B., Amoros, J.E. (2014). Municipal Demand-Side Policy Tools and the Strategic Management of Technology Life Cycles, Technovation, 797–806.
• Commission of the European Communities (2013). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions- Together towards competitive and resource-efficient urban mobility, 913.
• Coombes E., Jones A. (2016). Gamification of Active Travel to School: A Pilot Evaluation of the Beat the Street Physical Activity Intervention, Health & Place, 62-69
• Conticelli, E., Maimaris, A., Papageorgiou, G., Tondelli, S. (2029). Planning and Designing Walkable Cities: A Smart Approach (eds) Smart Planning: Sustainability and Mobility in the Age of Change, Green Energy and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77682-8_15
• Ewing, R., Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Quality Related to Walkability, Journal of Urban Design, 65-84.
• Fang Z., Li Q., Shaw S. (2015). What About People in Pedestrian Navigation?, Geo-spatial Information Science, 135-150.
• Forsyth, A., Krizek, K. (2010). Promoting Walking and Bicycling: Assessing the Evidence to Assist Planner, Built Environment, 429-446.
• Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N., Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna University of Technology.
• Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Meijers, E. (2007). City-Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities, Center Regional Science, TU Vienna, 1-12.
• Gilderbloom, J. I., Riggs, W. W., Meares, W. L. (2015). Does Walkability Matter? An Examination of Walkability’s Impact on Housing, Cities, 13-24.
• Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for Smarter Cities, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 1–16.
• Heaton, J., Parlikad, A. K. (2019). A Conceptual Framework for the Alignment of Infrastructure Assets to Citizen Requirements Within a Smart Cities Framework, Cities, 32–41.
• Hillnhütter, H. (2016). Pedestrian Access to Public Transport. PhD thesis Nr. 314. Det teknisk- naturvitenskaplige fakultet, Universitetet i Stavanger.
• Hoehner, C. M., Brennan Ramirez, L. K., Elliott, M. B., Handy, S. L., Brownson, R. C. (2005). Perceived and Objective Environmental Measures and Physical Activity Among Urban Adults, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 105–116.
• Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up?, City, 303–320.
• Galle, J., Halpern, D., Nitoslawski,S., Duarte, F., Ratti, C., Pilla, F. (2021). Mapping the diversity of street tree inventories across eight cities internationally using open data, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 61.
• Kamel, M. A. E. (2013). Encouraging Walkability in Cities: Smart Urban Solutions, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 288–310.
• Kenworthy, J. R. (2006). The Eco-City: Ten Key Transport and Planning Dimensions for Sustainable City Development, Environment & Urbanization, 67–85.
• Kerestecioğlu, F., Akın, S. (2022). İstanbul’da Üst Ölçekli Planlarda Turizm Alanlarının Değişiminin Kente Etkisi: Kültür Alanları, Jass Studies-The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 15(90), 227-252.
• Keshavarzi, G. (2018). Walking in Smart City, Online https://ppms.trec.pdx.edu/media/project_files/GKeshavarzi__WALKING_IN_A_SMART_CITY_-_NITC_Fellowship.pdf Erişim Tarihi:11.01.2024
• Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., Steenbruggen, J. (2017). The Significance of Digital Data Systems for Smart City Policy. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 13–21.
• Kummitha, R. K. R. (2018). Entrepreneurial Urbanism and Technological Panacea: Why Smart City Planning Need to go Beyond Corporate Visioning? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 330–339.
• Leinberger, C. B., Rodriguez, M. (2019). Ranking Walkable Urbanism in America's Largest Metros. In P. Lynch & C. B. Leinberger (Eds.), Foot Traffic Ahead (pp. 9-11). George Washington University Press.
• Leslie, E., Coffee, N., Frank, L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., Hugo, G. (2007). Walkability of Local Communities: Using Geographic Information Systems to Objectively Assess Relevant Environmental Attributes, Health & Place, 111–122.
• Lim, C., Kim, K. J., Maglio, P. P. (2018). Smart Cities With Big Data: Reference Models, Challenges, and Considerations, Cities, 86–99.
• Line, T., Jain, J., Lyons, G. (2011). The Role of ICTs in Everyday Mobile Lives, Journal of Transport Geography, 1490–1499.
• Litman, T. (2018). Generated Traffic and Induced Travel. Implications for Transport Planning, Online http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf Erişim Tarihi:21.01.2024
• Litman, T. A. (2003). Economic Value of Walkability, Transportation Research Record, 3–11.
• Macpherson, H. (2016). Walking Methods in Landscape Research: Moving Bodies, Spaces of Disclosure and Rapport. Landscape Research, 425-432.
• Maddox, T. (2017). Smart City Technology Market Set to Reach $775 billion by 2021, Online https://www.techrepublic.com/article/smart-citytechnology-market-set-to-reach-775-billion-by-2021/ Erişim Tarihi:21.01.2024
• Mattern, S. (2021). A City Is Not a Computer: Other Urban Intelligences. Princeton, 21-32.
• Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation (2015). Nasjonale Forventninger Til Regional Kommunal Planlegging [National Expectations To Regional And Municipal Planning]. Online https://www.regjeringen.no Erişim Tarihi:21.01.2024
• Monterde Bort, H., Johanssen, C., Leden, L., Basbas, S. (2018). ITS and On-Trip Tasks While Walking. In R. Papa, R. Fistola, & C. Gargiulo (Eds.), Smart Planning: Sustainability and Mobility in the Age of Change (pp. 147-162). Springer.
• Næss, P. (2012). Urban Form and Travel Behavior: Experience From a Nordic Context. Journal of Transport and Land-Use, 21-45.
• Nam, T., Pardo, A. (2011). Smart City as Urban Innovation: Focusing on Management, Policy, and Context, In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 185–194).
• Nam, T., Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 282-291.
• Newman, P., Kenworthy, J. (2015). The End of Automobile Dependence. How Cities are Moving Beyond Car-Based Planning. Island Press.
• Noland, R., Lem, L. (2002). A Review of the Evidence for Induced Travel and Changes in Transportation and Environmental Policy in the US and the UK. Transportation Research D, 1-26.
• Odendaal, N. (2003). Information and Communication Technology and Local Governance: Understanding the Difference Between Cities in Developed and Emerging Economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 585–607.
• Papa, E., Lauwers, D. (2015). Smart mobility: Opportunity or threat to innovate places and cities. In International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS), 1-5.
• Papa, R., Garguilo, C., Galderisi, A. (2013). Towards and urban planners’perspective on smart city. TeMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 5–17.
• Pardo, T., Nam, T., Burke, B. (2012). E-government Interoperability: Interaction of Policy, Management, and Technology Dimensions, Social Science Computer Review, 7–23.
• Pivo, G., Xudong, A. (2016). Sustainable Development and Commercial Real Estate Financing: Evidence from CMBS Loans, Online http://capla.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/.pdf Erişim Tarihi:22.01.2024
• Planning Department (2016). Hong Kong 2030: A Smart, Green and Resilient City Strategy, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 21-98.
• Ragon, M. (2010). Modern Mimarlık ve Şehircilik Tarihi, İstanbul, 267-268.
• Rosi, A., Cavallini, E., Gamboz, N., Russo, R. (2016). On The Generality Effect of Experiencing Prior Gains and Prior Losses on The Iowa Gambling Task: A Study On Young and Old Adults, Judgm. Decis. Mak., 185–196.
• Rosi, M., Strmšek, L., Dragan, D., Rosi, B. (2021). Walkable Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities. 21st International Scientific Conference Business Logistics in Modern Management, Croatia, October 7-8, 2021.
• Ruhlandt, R. W. S., Levitt, R., Jain, R., Hall, D. (2020). Drivers of Data and Analytics Utilization Within (Smart) Cities: A Multimethod Approach, Journal of Management in Engineering, 1-19.
• Sallis, J., Bauman, A., Pratt, M. (1998). Environmental and Policy Interventions to Promote Physical Activity, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 379–397.
• Shang, J., Wang, Z., Li, L., Chen, Y., Li, P. (2018). A Study on the Correlation Between Technology Innovation and the New-Type Urbanization in Shaanxi Province, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 266–273. Sharron M. (2021). A City is Not a Computer: Other Urban Intelligences, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 200-215.
• Speck, J. (2012). Walkable City, How Downtown can Save America, one Step at a Time, North Point Press. Strategies, A. (2017). National Community and Transportation Preferences Survey. National Association of Realtors, 9-51.
• Tennøy, A., Øksenholt, K. V., Aarhaug, J. (2014). Transport Effects and Environmental Consequences of Central Workplace Location. Transportation Research Procedia, 14-24.
• United Nations, General Assembly (UN-GA). (2015). Transforming Uur World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Online https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/ Erişim Tarihi:01.02.2024
• Van Bastelaer, B. (1998). Digital Cities and Transferability of Results. In 4th EDC Conference on digital cities, Salzburg, 61-70.
• Viale Pereira, G., Cunha, M. A., Lampoltshammer, T. J., Parycek, P., Testa, M. G. (2017). Increasing Collaboration and Participation in Smart City Governance: A Crosscase Analysis of Smart City Initiatives, Information Technology for Development, 526–553.
• Visvizi, A., Abdel-Razek, S. A., Wosiek, R., Malik, R. (2021). Conceptualizing Walking and Walkability in the Smart City Through a Model Composite Smart City Utility Index, Energies, 8193-8205.
• Walker, J. (2012). Human Transit. How Clearer Thinking About Public Transit can Enrich Our Communities and Our Lives, Island Press.
• Wenjing Y., Lam, P. (2021). An Evaluation of ICT Benefits Enhancing Walkability in a Smart City, Landscape and Urban Planning, 169-181.
• Wolfram, M. (2012). Deconstructing Smart Cities: An Intertextual Reading of Concepts and Practices for Integrated Urban and ICT Development. REAL CORP 2012, Schwechat.
• Wunsch, M., Stibe, A., Millonig, A., Seer, S., Dai, C., Schechtner, K., Chin, R. C. C. (2015). What Makes You Bike? Exploring Persuasive Strategies to Encourage Low-Energy Mobility. 10th International Conference, Chicago, June 3-5.
• Yencha, C. (2019). Valuing Walkability: New Evidence From Computer Vision Methods, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 689–709.
• Yin, L. (2017). Street Level Urban Design Qualities for Walkability: Combining 2D and 3D GIS Measures, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 288-296.
• Zhao, F., Olushola I. F., Tolulope I. O., Onwumere, I. (2021). Smart City Research: A Holistic and State-of-the-Art Literature Review, 264-2.
• Zhao, P., Yen, Y., Bailey, E., Tayyab Sohail, M. (2019). Analysis of Urban Drivable and Walkable Street Networks of the ASEAN Smart Cities Network, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8.