Kurumsal Kimliğin Bibliyometrik Analizi: Vosviewer ile Bilim Haritalama Yaklaşımı

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 33, 1014 - 1037, 20.12.2025

Ayben Gül

https://doi.org/10.38155/ksbd.1800724

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, kurumsal kimlik literatürünün entelektüel, sosyal ve kavramsal yapısını bibliyometrik analiz ve bilim haritalama teknikleri kullanarak kapsamlı bir şekilde incelemektir. Web of Science veri tabanından 1970-2025 yılları arasında yayınlanan 954 akademik makale VOSviewer yazılımı ile analiz edilerek, alanın evrimi haritalandırılmış, temel dayanakları belirlenmiş ve ortaya çıkan araştırma eğilimleri keşfedilmiştir. Performans analizi yayın eğilimlerini, en etkili yazarları, kurumları ve ülkeleri ortaya koyarken; ortak yazarlık, ortak atıf, bibliyografik eşleştirme ve anahtar kelime birlikte geçme analizleri ile bilim haritalama gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular, kurumsal kimlik söylemini şekillendiren temel entelektüel dönüm noktalarını, en etkili akademisyenleri ve işbirliği ağlarını ortaya koymakta; ortak atıf analizi temel teorik kümeleri belirlerken, anahtar kelime analizi kavramsal yapıyı haritalandırmakta ve alanın daha stratejik, dinamik ve paydaş odaklı perspektiflere doğru evrimleştiğini göstermektedir. VOSviewer kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen bu ilk kapsamlı bilim haritası, kurumsal kimlik alanının yapısını netleştiren, entelektüel birikimini vurgulayan ve gelecekteki araştırma soruları için yol haritası çizen bütüncül ve objektif bir literatür panoraması sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kurumsal Kimlik , Bibliyometrik Analiz , VOSviewer , Bilim Haritalama

Bibliometric Analysis of Corporate Identity: A Science Mapping Approach With Vosviewer

Öz

This study aims to comprehensively examine the intellectual, social, and conceptual structure of corporate identity literature using bibliometric analysis and science mapping techniques. A total of 954 academic articles published between 1970-2025 from the Web of Science database were analyzed using VOSviewer software to map the field's evolution, identify fundamental foundations, and explore emerging research trends. Performance analysis revealed publication trends and the most influential authors, institutions, and countries, while science mapping was conducted through co-authorship, co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and keyword co-occurrence analyses. The findings reveal key intellectual turning points shaping corporate identity discourse, the most influential academics, and collaboration networks; co-citation analysis identifies fundamental theoretical clusters while keyword analysis maps the conceptual structure and demonstrates the field's evolution toward more strategic, dynamic, and stakeholder-oriented perspectives. This first comprehensive science map using VOSviewer provides a holistic and objective literature panorama that clarifies the structure of the corporate identity field, emphasizes intellectual accumulation, and draws a roadmap for future research questions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Corporate Identity , Bibliometric Analysis , VOSviewer , Science Mapping

Kaynakça

• Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 263–295). Greenwich: JAI.
• Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers' relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76-88.
• Balmer, J. M. T. (2001). Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing: Seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 248-291.
• Balmer, J. M. T., & Greyser, S. A. (2006). Corporate marketing: Integrating corporate identity, corporate branding, corporate communications, corporate image and corporate reputation. European Journal of Marketing, 40(7/8), 730-741.
• Balmer, J. M. T. (2014). Wally Olins (1930–2014), corporate identity ascendancy and corporate brand hegemony. Journal of Brand Management, 21(6), 460-468.
• Balmer, J. M. T. (2021). Identity, internal images, and corporate identification matters. Journal of Business Research, 134, 119-128.
• Balmer, J. M. T. (2021). Corporate brand orientation: Identity, internal images, and corporate identification matters. Industrial Marketing Management, 97, 135-147.
• Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
• Chun, R. (2005). Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 91-109.
• Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402.
• Cornelissen, J. P., Haslam, S. A., & Balmer, J. M. T. (2007). Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: Towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings and products. British Journal of Management, 18(s1), S1-S16.
• Dowling, G. R., & Otubanjo, T. (2011). Corporate and organizational identity: two sides of the same coin. AMS Review, 1(3-4), 171-182.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
• Foroudi, P., Akarsu, T. N., Marvi, R., & Balmer, J. M. T. (2024). Corporate identity management: A study of employees' perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 175, 114889.
• Foroudi, P., Cuomo, M. T., & Melewar, T. C. (2024). Corporate identity management: A study of employees' perceptions and its interplay with corporate reputation. Journal of Business Research, 176, 114101.
• He, H. W., & Balmer, J. M. T. (2013). A grounded theory of the corporate identity and corporate strategy dynamic: A corporate marketing perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 47(3/4), 401-430.
• Markwick, N., & Fill, C. (1997). Towards a framework for managing corporate identity. European Journal of Marketing, 31(5/6), 396-409.
• Melewar, T. C., & Jenkins, E. (2002). Defining the corporate identity construct. Corporate Reputation Review, 5(1), 76-90.
• Melewar, T. C. (2003). Determinants of the corporate identity construct: A review of the literature. Journal of Marketing Communications, 9(4), 195-220.
• Melewar, T. C., & Karaosmanoglu, E. (2006). Seven dimensions of corporate identity: A categorisation from the practitioners' perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 40(7/8), 846-869.
• Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228.
• Morris, S. A., & Van der Veer Martens, B. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 213-295.
• Neamțu, D. M. (2024). The organizational identity in the digital age: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2024). The Proceedings of the International Management Conference, 18(1), 1-10.
• Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115-131.
• Olins, W. (1978). The Corporate Personality: An Inquiry into the Nature of Corporate Identity. Design Council.
• Pakanen, E. (2025). Employees' perceptions of artificial intelligence: Is digital transformation inherently beneficial in the context of artificial intelligence adoption? (Master's thesis). University of Vaasa.
• Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
• Shams, R. (2024). Developing brand identity and sales strategy in the digital era. Industrial Marketing Management, 120, 1-10.
• Stuart, H. (1999). Towards a definitive model of the corporate identity management process. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(4), 200-207.
• Suvatjis, J., de Chernatony, L., & Halikias, J. (2012). Assessing the six-station corporate identity model: A polymorphic model. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(3), 153-166.
• Tourky, M., Foroudi, P., & Gupta, S. (2021). Conceptualizing corporate identity in a dynamic environment. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 24(2), 113-131.
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice (pp. 285-320). Springer.
• Van Rekom, J. (1997). Deriving an operational measure of corporate identity. European Journal of Marketing, 31(5/6), 410-422.
• Van Riel, C. B. M. (1995). Principles of Corporate Communication. Prentice Hall.
• Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635.
• Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 219-234.
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.