Araştırma Makalesi

Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction?

Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3 20 Kasım 2023
PDF İndir
EN TR

Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction?

Öz

Objective: In this study, we describe the management and outcome of children with intussusception and analyze the sonographic findings that can be used to differentiate transient, self-limited small bowel intussusception from the cases with an indication for surgery. Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pediatric patients with the diagnosis of invagination who had been followed up in the pediatric surgery service between 2012-2017. Results: The median age was 39.5±35.9 (range 2-171) months. Among these patients, 57 (64%) had been followed up without surgery, and the remaining patients (n= 32, 36%) had undergone surgery. The median age of patients who had not undergone surgery was significantly greater than that of the patients who had undergone surgery (52.2±38.4 vs. 16.75±12.6; p<0.001). Twenty (35.1%) patients in the non-surgical group had developed abdominal pain after discharge, whereas none of the patients in the surgical group had developed abdominal pain postoperatively. An analysis of the differences between the groups with respect to the length of the invaginated segment revealed that length of that segment were significantly greater in the surgically managed cases (p=<0.001). A ROC curve based on the length of the invaginated intestinal segment revealed that, 41.5 mm was the best cutoff point for invaginated intestinal length, which resulted in a sensitivity of 68.8% and a specificity of 96.5%. Conclusion: In our study, unlike other studies, the surgical threshold of the invagination length was revised as 4.15 cm. Thus, patients below this value may not have an immediate indication for surgery.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Intussusception, follow-up, ultrasonography, length

Kaynakça

  1. Jiang J, Jiang B, Parashar U, Nguyen T, Bines J, Patel MM. Childhood intussusception: a literature review. PLoS One . 2013;22;8(7):e68482.
  2. Justice FA, Auldist AW, Bines JE. Intussusception: trends in clinical presentation and management J Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2006;21(5):842-6.
  3. Zhang Y, Bai YZ, Li SX, Liu SJ, Ren WD, Zheng LQ. Sonographic findings predictive of the need for surgical management in pediatric patients with small bowel intussusceptions. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011;396(7):1035–40.
  4. Munden MM, Bruzzi JF, Coley BD, Munden RF. Sonography of pediatric small-bowel intussusception: differentiating surgical from nonsurgical cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(1):275–9.
  5. Ko SF, Lee TY, Ng SH, et al. Small bowel intussusception in symptomatic pediatric patients: experiences with 19 surgically proven cases. World J Surg. 2002;26(4): 438-43.
  6. Koh EP, Chua JH, Chui CH, Jacobsen AS. A report of 6 children with small bowel intussusception that required surgical intervention. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(4):817-20.
  7. Doi O, Aoyama K, Hutson JM. Twenty-one cases of small bowel intussusception: the pathophysiology of idiopathic intussusception and the concept of benign small bowel intussusception. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(2):140-3.
  8. Siaplaouras J, Moritz JD, Gortner L, Alzen G. Small bowel intussusception in childhood. Klin Padiatr. 2003;215(2):53-6.
  9. Arslan S, Turan C, Doganay S, et al. The effectiveness of pneumoreduction for intussusception. Ann Ital Chir. 2014;85(5):459-63
  10. Strouse PJ, DiPietro MA, Saez F. Transient small-bowel intussusception in children on CT. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33(5):316-20.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Katı, Ö., Güngör, Ş., Kandur, Y., & Güler, A. G. (2023). Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction? Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.1151371
AMA
1.Katı Ö, Güngör Ş, Kandur Y, Güler AG. Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction? KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 2023;18(3):37-40. doi:10.17517/ksutfd.1151371
Chicago
Katı, Ömer, Şükrü Güngör, Yaşar Kandur, ve Ahmet Gökhan Güler. 2023. “Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction?”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 18 (3): 37-40. https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.1151371.
EndNote
Katı Ö, Güngör Ş, Kandur Y, Güler AG (01 Kasım 2023) Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction? Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 18 3 37–40.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Katı, Ş. Güngör, Y. Kandur, ve A. G. Güler, “Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction?”, KSÜ Tıp Fak Der, c. 18, sy 3, ss. 37–40, Kas. 2023, doi: 10.17517/ksutfd.1151371.
ISNAD
Katı, Ömer - Güngör, Şükrü - Kandur, Yaşar - Güler, Ahmet Gökhan. “Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction?”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 18/3 (01 Kasım 2023): 37-40. https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.1151371.
JAMA
1.Katı Ö, Güngör Ş, Kandur Y, Güler AG. Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction? KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 2023;18:37–40.
MLA
Katı, Ömer, vd. “Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction?”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 18, sy 3, Kasım 2023, ss. 37-40, doi:10.17517/ksutfd.1151371.
Vancouver
1.Ömer Katı, Şükrü Güngör, Yaşar Kandur, Ahmet Gökhan Güler. Management of Intussusception: Follow-up or Reduction? KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 01 Kasım 2023;18(3):37-40. doi:10.17517/ksutfd.1151371