Sosyobilimsel argümantasyona yönelik pedagojik alan bilgisi (PAB) bileşenlerinin etkileşimindeki değişimin incelenmesi: Deneyimlerin etkisi

Yıl 2022, , 152 - 179, 31.05.2022

Ali Yiğit Kutluca

https://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.1057670

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğrenme ve öğretme deneyimlerinin ve kıdemlerinin sosyo-bilimsel argümantasyona yönelik pedagojik alan bilgisi (PAB) bileşenleri arasındaki etkileşimi nasıl değiş-tirdiğini incelemektir. Bu amaçlara ulaşmak için resimsel bir metodolojik yaklaşım olan PAB Haritalama kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırma beş sınıf öğretmeninin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Toplam 10 hafta süren bu çoklu durum çalışmasında tüm öğretmenler sosyobilimsel argümantasyon ve PAB ile ilgili öğrenme ve öğretme sürecine dâhil edilmişlerdir. Sürecin başında ve sonunda katılımcılara Ders Yapılandırma Görevi (DYG) ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme soruları uygulanmıştır. Bu uygulamalardan gelen veriler uygun bir şekilde bütünleştirilerek PAB bileşenlerine göre alt kategorilere ayrılmıştır. Bu veriler, doğrudan derinle-mesine PAB analizi, tümevarım yöntemi, numaralandırma yaklaşımı, PAB haritalama ve sürekli karşılaştır-ma yöntemi aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, deneyimlerin sosyobilimsel argümantasyona yönelik PAB bileşenleri arasındaki etkileşimlere farklı şekillerde katkıda bulunduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Öğrenme ve öğretme deneyimleri, öğrenci anlayışları bilgisi bileşeninin önemini arttırmıştır. Ayrıca bu sürecin mesleki deneyimi az olan sınıf öğretmenlerini daha az etkilediği, mesleki deneyimi daha fazla olan sınıf öğretmenlerini ise daha fazla etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Sosyobilimsel argümantasyon süreçleri göz önüne alındığında, kendine özgü bir yapıya sahip olan PAB bileşenleri arasındaki etkileşimlerin değişmesinde kıdem eşiğinden söz edilebilir. Mevcut literatür ışığında tartışılan bu sonuçların eğitsel çıkarımlarına da değinilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

sosyobilimsel argümantasyon, SBK, pedagojik alan bilgisi, PAB

Examination of changes in interaction of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) components for socioscientific argumentation: The effect of experiences

Öz

The purpose of this research is to examine how elementary teachers' learning and teaching experiences and seniority change pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) integrations for socioscientific argumentation. PCK Mapping, which is a pictorial methodology approach, was used to achieve these aims. This research is a multiple case study, which is one of the qualitative research patterns. In this study, which lasted for a total of 10 weeks, five elementary teachers were included in the learning and teaching process related to socioscientific argumentation and PCK. The data were collected from all participants through the lesson plan and PCK interview protocol at the beginning and end of the course. Data from these applications have been appropriately integrated and subcategorized according to PCK components. These data were analysed through in-depth analysis of explicit PCK, inductive method, enumerative approach, PCK mapping and the constant comparative method. The results revealed that experiences contributed in different ways to the integration of PCK for socioscientific argumentation. Experiences increased the importance of the knowledge of students’ understanding. Furthermore, it was determined that while this course less affected the elementary teachers with little professional experience, it more affected the elementary teachers with more professional experience. In view of socioscientific argumentation processes, seniority threshold can be mentioned in the change of the integration of PCK which has an idiosyncratic nature. The educational implications of these results, which have been discussed in the light of the existing literature, have been also mentioned.

Anahtar Kelimeler

socioscientific argumentation, SSI, pedagogical content knowledge, PCK

Kaynakça

• Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041
• Akın, F. N., & Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E. (2018). The nature of the interplay among components of pedagogical content knowledge in reaction rate and chemical equilibrium topics of novice and experienced chemistry teachers. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 80-105. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00165G
• Alonzo, A. C., Berry, A., & Nilsson, P. (2019). Unpacking the complexity of science teachers’ PCK in action: Enacted and personal PCK. In Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 271-286). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_12
• Aydeniz, M., & Kirbulut, Z. D. (2014). Exploring challenges of assessing pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.890696
• Aydin, S., Demirdogen, B., Akin, F. N., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Tarkin, A. (2015). The nature and development of interaction among components of pedagogical content knowledge in practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.008
• Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020). Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199-1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627
• Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp. 147-161). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_6
• Bayram-Jacobs D, Henze I, Evagorou M, et al. (2019). Science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge development during enactment of socioscientific curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56, 1207–1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21550
• Bravo, P., & Cofré, H. (2016). Developing biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through learning study: the case of teaching human evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 38(16), 2500-2527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1249983
• Carlson, J., Daehler, K. R., Alonzo, A. C., Barendsen, E., Berry, A., Borowski, A., ... & Wilson, C. D. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 77-94). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_2
• Carson, K., & Dawson, V. (2016). A teacher professional development model for teaching socioscientific issues. Teaching Science, 62(1), 28-35. https://doi/10.3316/informit.270511920952144
• Chan, K. K. H., & Yung, B. H. W. (2018). Developing pedagogical content knowledge for teaching a new topic: More than teaching experience and subject matter knowledge. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 233-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9567-1
• Clermont, C. P., Krajcik, J. S., & Borko, H. (1993). The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300104
• Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022487193044004004
• Denzin, N. K. (2015). Triangulation. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. https://doi.Org/10.1002/9781405165518
• Dolan, T. J., Nichols, B. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Using socioscientific issues in primary classrooms. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174719
• Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 163-166.
• Evagorou, M. (2011). Discussing a socioscientific issue in a primary school classroom: The case of using a technology-supported environment in formal and nonformal settings. In Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 133-159). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_8
• Evagorou, M., & Mauriz, B. P. (2017). Engaging elementary school pre-service teachers in modeling a socioscientific issue as a way to help them appreciate the social aspects of science. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.99074
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). Internal validity. How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
• Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers' prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357-383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20283
• Furtak, E. M., Bakeman, R., & Buell, J. Y. (2018). Developing knowledge-in-action with a learning progression: Sequential analysis of teachers' questions and responses to student ideas. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.001
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education (pp. 38-52). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735665
• Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158
• Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.
• Hanuscin, D. L., de Araujo, Z., Cisterna, D., Lipsitz, K., & van Garderen, D. (2020). The re-novicing of elementary teachers in science? Grade level reassignment and teacher PCK. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(7), 780-801. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1778845
• Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Lederman, N. G. (2021). Developing an instrument to assess pedagogical content knowledge for biological socioscientific issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103217
• Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: a reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching, 11(3), 273-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13450600500105502
• Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285
• Kind, V. (2019). Development of evidence-based, student-learning-oriented rubrics for pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 911-943. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1311049
• Kind, V., & Chan, K. K. (2019). Resolving the amalgam: connecting pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 964-978. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1584931
• Kinskey, M., & Zeidler, D. (2021). Elementary preservice teachers’ challenges in designing and implementing socioscientific issues-based lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 350-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1826079
• Kutluca, A. Y. (2021). Investigation of the interactions among preschool teachers' components of pedagogical content knowledge for early science teaching. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 10(1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol10.1.10.2021
• Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp. 95-132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4
• McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R., & Loper, S. (2017). Moving beyond pseudoargumentation: Teachers’ enactments of an educative science curriculum focused on argumentation. Science Education, 101(3), 426– 457. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21274
• McNeill, K. L. (2009). Teachers' use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20294
• McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936-972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081
• McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20364
• Minken, Z., Macalalag, A., Clarke, A., Marco-Bujosa, L., & Rulli, C. (2021). Development of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge during lesson planning of socioscientific issues. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(2), 113-165.
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). Science lesson instructional program (Elementary and middle schools 3,4,5,6,7, and 8 grades). Ankara, Turkey.
• National Research Council [NRC]. (2013). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
• Neumann, K., Kind, V., & Harms, U. (2019). Probing the amalgam: the relationship between science teachers’ content, pedagogical and pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 847-861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1497217
• Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699-721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9239-y
• Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281-1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802186993
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron?. Quality & Quantity, 41(2), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3
• Özden, M. (2015). Prospective elementary school teachers’ views about socioscientific issues: A concurrent parallel design study. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 333-354.
• Park, S., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21022
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008a). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008b). National Board Certification (NBC) as a catalyst for teachers' learning about teaching: The effects of the NBC process on candidate teachers' PCK development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 812-834. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20234
• Park, S. (2019). Reconciliation between the refined consensus model of PCK and extant PCK models for advancing PCK research in science. In Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 117-128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_4
• Park, S., & Suh, J. K. (2019). The PCK map approach to capturing the complexity of enacted PCK (ePCK) and pedagogical reasoning in science teaching. In Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 185-197). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_8
• Park, S., & Suh, J. (2015). From portraying toward assessing PCK: Drives, dilemmas, and directions for future research. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re‐examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 104– 119). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735665
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636
• Reynolds, W. M., & Park, S. (2021). Examining the relationship between the Educative Teacher Performance Assessment and preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21676
• Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II (pp. 559-572). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267
• Sadler, T. D. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 323-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4
• Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20306
• Sengul, O., Enderle, P. J., & Schwartz, R. S. (2020). Science teachers’ use of argumentation instructional model: linking PCK of argumentation, epistemological beliefs, and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 42(7), 1068-1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1748250
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
• Shulman, L. S. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 13-23). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735665
• Sickel, A. J., & Friedrichsen, P. (2018). Using multiple lenses to examine the development of beginning biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching natural selection simulations. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 29-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9558-2
• Simonneaux, L. (2014). Questions socialement vives and socioscientific issues: New trends of research to meet the training needs of postmodern society. In Topics and trends in current science education (pp. 37-54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7281-6_3
• Smith, P. S., & Banilower, E. R. (2015). Assessing PCK: A new application of the uncertainty principle. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re‐examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 88–103). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735665
• Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
• Suh, J. K., & Park, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and sustainability of an innovative science teaching approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.021
• Tesch, R. (2013). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software. Routledge.
• Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: from the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644
• Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(6), 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6%3C673::AID-TEA5%3E3.0.CO;2-J
• Yacoubian, H. A., & Khishfe, R. (2018). Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: a dialogue between two researchers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 796-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1449986
• Zangori, L., Foulk, J., Sadler, T. D., & Peel, A. (2018). Exploring elementary teachers’ perceptions and characterizations of model-oriented issue-based teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(7), 555-577. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1482173
• Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
• Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58.