MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS

Al Fauzi Rahmat

TR EN

Toplu Eylem Araştırmasının Önemli Konularının Haritalanması: Yayınların Bilimsel Analizi

Öz

Bu makale, toplu eylem araştırması ile ilgili terimleri analiz etmeyi ve Scopus veri tabanında ilk yayının ortaya çıktığı 1992 yılından günümüze kadar geçen on yıllar içinde evrimini ve değişimini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Geçmişteki bilim insanları, çeşitli araştırma alanlarında kolektif eylemi incelemişlerdir, ancak scientometrics kullanan çığır açan makale bulunamamıştır. Bu nedenle, bu makale, toplu eylem araştırmalarından seçilen anahtar kelimelere dayalı olarak çalışmayı terimler içinde netleştirmek için özgün bir makaledir ve 1150 makaleye ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen verileri tanımlayıp açıklamak adına, verileri görselleştirmek için VOSViewer aracının scientometrics yaklaşımını kullandık. Bulgular, kolektif eylem endişesinin, araştırma için çeşitli bakış açıları oluşturmak için önceki uzmanları cezbettiğini gösteriyor ve bu çalışmanın, keşfedildikten sonraki birkaç yıl içinde giderek daha fazla dikkat çekeceğini tahmin ediyoruz. Daha da önemlisi, ortak yazarlık ve ağ iş birliğini, bazı bakış açılarına göre alıntıları ve ayrıca yıllık güncel toplu eylem konularını kaydettik. Ayrıca, liderlik, meşruiyet, dayanışma, dayanıklılık, kapasite geliştirme, savunuculuk, düzenleme, hesap verebilirlik, güç ve güven gibi geçmiş bilim insanlarının kolektif eylem araştırması yapmak için kullandıkları terimleri sergiledik.

Anahtar Kelimeler

toplu eylem , güç , güven , dayanıklılık , haritalama , scientometrics

MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the terms related to collective action research and to identify their evolution and change in the decades from 1992, when the first publication appeared in the Scopus database, to the present. Past scholars have examined collective action in several fields of research, but the breakthrough paper using scientometrics has not been found. Therefore, this paper is an original to clarify the work within terms based on selected keywords from collective action research, and it yielded 1150 articles. To demonstrate, we used a scientometrics approach of the VOSViewer tool for data visualization. The findings indicate that the concern of collective action has attracted experts to generate various points of view for research, and we forecast that this study will become increasingly noticeable in the coming few years since it was explored. Importantly, we recorded co-authorship and network collaboration, citation by some point of view, as well as annual current issues of collective action. Moreover, we exhibited terms that scholars used to conduct collective action research, such as leadership, legitimacy, solidarity, resilience, capacity-building, advocacy, regulation, accountability, power, and trust.

Keywords

collective action , power , trust , mapping , scientometrics

Kaynakça

Baldwin, E., Rountree, V., & Jock, J. (2018). Distributed resources and distributed governance: Stakeholder participation in demand side management governance. Energy Research and Social Science, 39, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.013
Begeny, C. T., van Breen, J., Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., & Iyer, A. (2022). The power of the Ingroup for promoting collective action: How distinctive treatment from fellow minority members motivates collective action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104346
Behrens, L. L., & Naylor, M. D. (2020). “We are Alone in This Battle”: A Framework for a Coordinated Response to COVID-19 in Nursing Homes. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 32(4–5), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.1773190
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information Communication and Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Berkowitz, H., Crowder, L. B., & Brooks, C. M. (2020). Organizational perspectives on sustainable ocean governance: A multi-stakeholder, meta-organization model of collective action. Marine Policy, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104026
Bernroider, E. W. N., Harindranath, G., & Kamel, S. (2022). From connective actions in social movements to offline collective actions: an individual level perspective. Information Technology and People, 35(8), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2020-0556
Boda, C. S., O’Byrne, D., Harnesk, D., Faran, T., & Isgren, E. (2022). A collective alternative to the Inward Turn in environmental sustainability research. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 12(2), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00738-6
Carmona-Moya, B., Calvo-Salguero, A., & Aguilar-Luzón, M.-C. (2021). Eimeca: A proposal for a model of environmental collective action. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115935
Choma, B. L., Hodson, G., Sumantry, D., Hanoch, Y., & Gummerum, M. (2021). Ideological and psychological predictors of covid-19-related collective action, opinions, and health compliance across three nations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5585
Cody, K. C., Smith, S. M., Cox, M., & Andersson, K. (2015). Emergence of Collective Action in a Groundwater Commons: Irrigators in the San Luis Valley of Colorado. Society and Natural Resources, 28(4), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.970736

Colding, J., Barthel, S., Ljung, R., Eriksson, F., & Sjöberg, S. (2022). Urban Commons and Collective Action to Address Climate Change. Social Inclusion, 10(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4862
Duque Franco, I., Ortiz, C., Samper, J., & Millan, G. (2020). Mapping repertoires of collective action facing the COVID-19 pandemic in informal settlements in Latin American cities. Environment and Urbanization, 32(2), 523–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820944823
Fang, X., Freyer, T., Ho, C.-Y., Chen, Z., & Goette, L. (2022). Prosociality predicts individual behavior and collective outcomes in the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science and Medicine, 308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115192
Feiock, R. C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12023
Fischer, E., & Qaim, M. (2012). Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya. World Development, 40(6), 1255–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018
Gilbert, M. (2006). Rationality in collective action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393105284167
Hotte, N., Kozak, R., & Wyatt, S. (2019). How institutions shape trust during collective action: A case study of forest governance on Haida Gwaii. Forest Policy and Economics, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.007
Iemmi, V. (2021). Global collective action in mental health financing: Allocation of development assistance for mental health in 142 countries, 2000–2015. Social Science and Medicine, 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114354
Jagers, S. C., Harring, N., Löfgren, Å., Sjöstedt, M., Alpizar, F., Brülde, B., … Steffen, W. (2020). On the preconditions for large-scale collective action. Ambio, 49(7), 1282–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01284-w
Larson, A. M., Sarmiento Barletti, J. P., & Heise Vigil, N. (2022). A place at the table is not enough: Accountability for Indigenous Peoples and local communities in multi-stakeholder platforms. World Development, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105907
Levitt, P., & Lamba-Nieves, D. (2011). Social remittances revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2011.521361
Luo, A., Zuberi, M., Liu, J., Perrone, M., Schnepf, S., & Leipold, S. (2021). Why common interests and collective action are not enough for environmental cooperation – Lessons from the China-EU cooperation discourse on circular economy. Global Environmental Change, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102389
Maruyama, T., Kageyama, A., & Kunieda, N. (2022). Region-wide initiative to expand girls’ enrollment in primary education in Niger: A case of collective impact for educational development. International Journal of Educational Development, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102580
Meilasari-Sugiana, A. (2012). Collective action and ecological sensibility for sustainable mangrove governance in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Political Ecology, 19(1), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.2458/v19i1.21726
Meinzen-Dick, R., Raju, K. V, & Gulati, A. (2002). What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in India. World Development, 30(4), 649–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00130-9
Nowlin, M. C. (2022). Who should “do more” about climate change? Cultural theory, polycentricity, and public support for climate change actions across actors and governments. Review of Policy Research, 39(4), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12468
Pizzi, A., & Brunet, I. (2012). Collective action, self-management, and the social economy. The recovered companies of Argentina . Revista de Estudios Sociales, 42, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.7440/res42.2012.06
Pugel, K., Javernick-Will, A., Koschmann, M., Peabody, S., & Linden, K. (2020). Adapting collaborative approaches for service provision to low-income countries: Expert panel results. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072612
Salvador Casara, B. G., Suitner, C., & Jetten, J. (2022). The impact of economic inequality on conspiracy beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104245
Sandler, T. (2015). Collective action: fifty years later. Public Choice, 164(3–4), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0252-0
Scott, C. A., & Silva-Ochoa, P. (2002). Collective action for water harvesting irrigation in the Lerma-Chapala Basin, Mexico. Water Policy, 3(6), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00017-X
Shortall, R., Mengolini, A., & Gangale, F. (2022). Citizen Engagement in EU Collective Action Energy Projects. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105949
Smith, E. M., González, R., & Frigolett, C. (2021). Understanding Change in Social-Movement Participation: The Roles of Social Norms and Group Efficacy. Political Psychology, 42(6), 1037–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12733
Sposito, M. P. (2010). Transversalities in the study on young people in Brazil: Education, collective action, and culture. Educacao e Pesquisa, 36(SUPPL. 1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022010000400008
Steiner, J. J., & Spear, A. M. (2020). Multilevel responses to sexual violence in schools in west Africa. IDS Bulletin, 51(2), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2020.131
Tembata, K., & Takeuchi, K. (2018). Collective decision making under drought: An empirical study of water resource management in Japan. Water Resources and Economics, 22, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2017.11.001
Turiansky, A. (2021). Collective action in games as in life: Experimental evidence from canal cleaning in Haiti. Journal of Development Economics, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102722
Twine, E. E., Rao, E. J. O., Baltenweck, I., & Omore, A. O. (2019). Are Technology Adoption and Collective Action Important in Accessing Credit? Evidence from Milk Producers in Tanzania. European Journal of Development Research, 31(3), 388–412. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0158-z
van Ryneveld, M., Whyle, E., & Brady, L. (2022). What Is COVID-19 Teaching Us About Community Health Systems? A Reflection From a Rapid Community-Led Mutual Aid Response in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(Special Issue), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.34172/IJHPM.2020.167
Wlodarczyk, A., Basabe, N., Páez, D., & Zumeta, L. (2017). Hope and anger as mediators between collective action frames and participation in collective mobilization: The case of 15-M. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(1), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i1.471

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Al Fauzi Rahmat ^*
0000-0002-3114-6884
Indonesia

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Ocak 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

3 Ekim 2022

Kabul Tarihi

30 Aralık 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA77GR97JZ

APA

Rahmat, A. F. (2023). MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 183-193. https://izlik.org/JA77GR97JZ

AMA

1.Rahmat AF. MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS. KUSBD. 2023;13(1):183-193. https://izlik.org/JA77GR97JZ

Chicago

Rahmat, Al Fauzi. 2023. “MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS”. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13 (1): 183-93. https://izlik.org/JA77GR97JZ.

EndNote

Rahmat AF (01 Ocak 2023) MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13 1 183–193.

IEEE

[1]A. F. Rahmat, “MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS”, KUSBD, c. 13, sy 1, ss. 183–193, Oca. 2023, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA77GR97JZ

ISNAD

Rahmat, Al Fauzi. “MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS”. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13/1 (01 Ocak 2023): 183-193. https://izlik.org/JA77GR97JZ.

JAMA

1.Rahmat AF. MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS. KUSBD. 2023;13:183–193.

MLA

Rahmat, Al Fauzi. “MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS”. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 13, sy 1, Ocak 2023, ss. 183-9, https://izlik.org/JA77GR97JZ.

Vancouver

1.Al Fauzi Rahmat. MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS. KUSBD [Internet]. 01 Ocak 2023;13(1):183-9. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA77GR97JZ

İletişim

Telefon Numarası: +90 0318 357 35 92

Faks Numarası: +90 0318 357 35 97

e-mail: sbd@kku.edu.tr

Posta Adresi: Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü, Merkez Yerleşke, 71450, Yahşihan-KIRIKKALE

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Toplu Eylem Araştırmasının Önemli Konularının Haritalanması: Yayınların Bilimsel Analizi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

MAPPING PIVOTAL ISSUES of COLLECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH: SCIENTOMETRICS ANALYSIS of PUBLICATIONS

Abstract

Keywords

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster