Meta Analysis In Medical Sciences

Öz

Meta analysis is a statistical analysis of results obtained from independent studies to combine the findings. It provides more powerful and precise estimates than any individual study contributing to the pooled analysis. In this review paper, the definition and aims of meta analysis, the steps of meta analysis and its advantages and negative criticisms towards the meta analysis are given. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Meta analysis,effect size,fixed effect model,random effect model

Sağlık Bilimlerinde Meta Analiz

Öz

Meta analizi bulguları birleştirmek amacıyla bağımsız çalışmalardan elde edilen sonuçların istatistiksel analizidir. Meta analizi bireysel bir çalışmaya göre daha güçlü ve daha kesin tahmin yapma olanağı sağlar. Bu derlemede meta analizinin tanımı ve amaçları, meta analizinde izlenmesi gereken adımlar, meta analizinin avantajları ve meta analizine yönelik olumsuz eleştiriler verilmektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Meta analiz,etki büyüklüğü,sabit etki modeli,tesadüfi etki modeli

Kaynakça

1. Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher. 1976; 5(10): 3-8.
2. Pearson K. Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. Br Med J. 1904; 3: 1243-1246.
3. Tippett L. The Methods of Statistics. Williams and Norgate Ltd. London. 1931.
4. Pearson K. On a method of determining whether a sample of size n supposed to have been drawn from a parent population having a known probability integral has probably been drawn at random. Biometrika. 1933; 25(3/4): 379-410.
5. Yates F, Cochran WG. The analysis of groups of experiments. J Agric Sci. 1938; 28: 556-580.
6. Cohen J. The earth is round (p < .05). Am Psychol. 1994; 49: 997-1003.
7. Blettner M, Sauerbrei W, Schlehofer B, Scheuchenpflug T, Friedenreich C. Traditional Reviews, Meta analysis and pooled analysis in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999; 28: 1- 9.
8. Cooper HM. Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Rev Educ Res. 1982; 52: 291-302.

9. Paterson BL, Canam C, Thorne ES, Jillings CR. Meta Study of Qualitative Health Research. SAGE Publications Inc. USA. 2001.
10. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ. 1988.
11. Fisher RA. On the probable error of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron. 1921; 1: 3-32.
12. Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954; 10: 101-129.
13. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Methods for Meta Analysis in Medical Research. John Wiley. New York. 2000.
14. Glass GV. Meta-analysis: An approach to the synthesis of research results. J Res Sci Teach. 1982; 19(2): 93-112.