Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 19 - 24, 30.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.797290

Öz

Objective: It is stated in the literature that some patients have dyspeptic complaints after months from cholecystectomy. The reason for this situation has not been established. It is more often attributed to the bile leakage from the duodenum to the stomach. Therefore, in our study we investigated whether the surgical technique applied during cholecystectomy caused postoperative duodenogastric reflux. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effects of Calot's triangle dissection type (high dissection, low dissection) on post-operative duodenogastric reflux due to Oddi’s sphincter dysfunction during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Material and Methods: In the study, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in two groups. One day before cholecystectomy, all patients underwent gastroscopy. During cholecystectomy, dissection of gallbladder was carried out close to the gallbladder in the first group (high dissection), while dissection was carried out close to ductus choledochus in the second group (low dissection). Two months after the operation, all patients were called back and gastroscopy was performed. Whether there was bile reflux from pylorus to the stomach was checked.
Results: Of the patients, 78.3% were female and 21.7% were male. The average age was 51.5 years (min-max: 25-76 years). Most of the patients (n:19, 31.7%) were in the 4th decade. Post-operative bile reflux was detected in 25 (41.7%) of all patients. Duodenogastric reflux was detected in 6 patients in group 1 and 19 patients in group 2. While there was a statistically significant relationship between the occurrence of postoperative reflux and dissection type, age, ASA score and presence of diabetes, no relationship was found with gender.
Conclusion: If less duodenogastric reflux is desired after cholestectomy, we recommend dissection rather close to the gallbladder during cholecystectomy.

Teşekkür

The authors thank Mr. Ali Duran for excellent language assistance.

Kaynakça

  • 1. McCabe ME, Dilly CK. New causes for the old problem of bile reflux gastritis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2018;16(9):1389-92.
  • 2. Madura JA. Primary bile reflux gastritis: diagnosis and surgical treatment. American Journal Surgery. 2003;186(3):269-73.
  • 3. Mercan E, Duman U, Tihan D, Dilektasli E, Senol K. Cholecystectomy and duodenogastric reflux: interacting effects over the gastric mucosa. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):1-5.
  • 4. Schaefer M, Krähenbühl L, Farhadi J, Büchler M. Cholelithiasis--laparoscopy or laparotomy? Therapeutische Umschau Revue Therapeutique. 1998;55(2):110-5.
  • 5. Manifold D, Anggiansah A, Owen W. Effect of cholecystectomy on gastroesophageal and duodenogastric reflux. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2000;95(10):2746-50.
  • 6. Latenstein CSS, Wennmacker SZ, de Jong JJ, van Laarhoven CJHM, Drenth JPH, de Reuver PR. Etiologies of long-term Postcholecystectomy symptoms: a systematic review. Gastroenterology research and practice. 2019;14;2019:4278373.
  • 7. Chen H, Li X, Ge Z, Gao Y, Chen X, Cui Y. Rabeprazole combined with hydrotalcite is effective for patients with bile reflux gastritis after cholecystectomy. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2010;24(3):197-201.
  • 8. Emre Ş, Topuzlu Tekant G, Şenyüz OF. Laparoskopik kolesistektomi. Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi. 2016;30(Supp: 3):197-202.
  • 9. Brunicardi FC, Anderson DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JH, Pollock RE. Schwartz's principles of surgery. 10th ed. New York. McGraw-Hill, 2015.
  • 10. Sleisenger MH, Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management. 9th ed. Philadelphia. Saunders/Elsevier, 2010.
  • 11. Buddingh K, Morks A, ten Cate Hoedemaker H, Blaauw C, Van Dam G, Ploeg R et al. Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical endoscopy. 2012;26(1):79-85.
  • 12. Bourgouin S, Mancini J, Monchal T, Calvary R, Bordes J, Balandraud P. How to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Proposal for a simple preoperative scoring system. American Journal Surgery. 2016;212(5):873-81.

Kolesistektomi Sırasında Cerrahi Tekniğin Duodenogastrik Reflü Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 19 - 24, 30.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.797290

Öz

Amaç: Kolesistektomiden aylar sonra bazı hastalarda dispeptik şikayetlerin olduğu literatürde belirtilmektedir. Bu durumun sebebi tam olarak ortaya konamamıştır. Daha çok duodenumdan mideye doğru olan safra kaçağına bağlanmaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışmamızda kolesistektomi sırasında uygulanan ameliyat tekniğinin ameliyat sonrası duodenogastrik reflüye sebep olup olmadığını araştırdık. Bu çalışmada laparaskopik kolesistektomi sırasında Calot üçgeni diseksiyon tipinin (yüksek diseksiyon, alçak diseksiyon) ameliyat sonrası duodenogastrik reflüye sebep olan Oddi sfinkteri yetmezliğine etkilerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya safra kesesi taşı tanısıyla laparoskopik kolesistektomi planlanmış 60 hasta alındı. Çalışma, her grupta 30 hasta olmak üzere iki grup olarak planlandı. Gruplardaki denekler randomize olarak belirlendi. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) skoru 1-2 ve ameliyat öncesi gastroskopi ile duodenogastrik safra reflüsü saptanmayan hastalar çalışmaya dahil edildi. Birinci gruba alınan hastalara kolesistektomi sırasında safra kesesine yakın diseksiyon (yüksek diseksiyon), ikinci gruba alınan hastalar da ise koledoğa yakın diseksiyon (alçak diseksiyon) yapılarak kolesistektomi uygulandı. Hastalar ameliyattan iki ay sonra tekrar çağrılıp gastroskopi yapıldı. Pilordan mideye safra reflüsü olup olmamasına bakıldı.
Bulgular: Hastaların %78.3’ü kadın ve %21.7’si erkekti. Yaş ortalamaları (minimum- maksimum) 51.5 yıl (25-76 yıl) idi. En çok 4. dekatta %31.7 (n:19) hasta mevcuttu. Tüm hastaların 25’inde (%41.7) ameliyat sonrası safra reflüsü tespit edildi. 1. grupta 6 hastada, 2. grupta 19 hastada duodenogastrik reflü saptandı. Ameliyat sonrası reflü oluşması ile yapılan diseksiyon tipi, yaş, ASA skoru ve diyabet varlığı arasındaki istatiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki bulunmuşken, cinsiyet ile ilişki tespit edilememiştir.
Sonuç: Kolestektomi sonrası daha az duodenogastrik reflü gelişmesi isteniyorsa kolesistektomi sırasında safra kesesine oldukça yakın diseksiyon yapılmasını önermekteyiz.

Kaynakça

  • 1. McCabe ME, Dilly CK. New causes for the old problem of bile reflux gastritis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2018;16(9):1389-92.
  • 2. Madura JA. Primary bile reflux gastritis: diagnosis and surgical treatment. American Journal Surgery. 2003;186(3):269-73.
  • 3. Mercan E, Duman U, Tihan D, Dilektasli E, Senol K. Cholecystectomy and duodenogastric reflux: interacting effects over the gastric mucosa. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):1-5.
  • 4. Schaefer M, Krähenbühl L, Farhadi J, Büchler M. Cholelithiasis--laparoscopy or laparotomy? Therapeutische Umschau Revue Therapeutique. 1998;55(2):110-5.
  • 5. Manifold D, Anggiansah A, Owen W. Effect of cholecystectomy on gastroesophageal and duodenogastric reflux. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2000;95(10):2746-50.
  • 6. Latenstein CSS, Wennmacker SZ, de Jong JJ, van Laarhoven CJHM, Drenth JPH, de Reuver PR. Etiologies of long-term Postcholecystectomy symptoms: a systematic review. Gastroenterology research and practice. 2019;14;2019:4278373.
  • 7. Chen H, Li X, Ge Z, Gao Y, Chen X, Cui Y. Rabeprazole combined with hydrotalcite is effective for patients with bile reflux gastritis after cholecystectomy. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2010;24(3):197-201.
  • 8. Emre Ş, Topuzlu Tekant G, Şenyüz OF. Laparoskopik kolesistektomi. Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi. 2016;30(Supp: 3):197-202.
  • 9. Brunicardi FC, Anderson DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JH, Pollock RE. Schwartz's principles of surgery. 10th ed. New York. McGraw-Hill, 2015.
  • 10. Sleisenger MH, Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management. 9th ed. Philadelphia. Saunders/Elsevier, 2010.
  • 11. Buddingh K, Morks A, ten Cate Hoedemaker H, Blaauw C, Van Dam G, Ploeg R et al. Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical endoscopy. 2012;26(1):79-85.
  • 12. Bourgouin S, Mancini J, Monchal T, Calvary R, Bordes J, Balandraud P. How to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Proposal for a simple preoperative scoring system. American Journal Surgery. 2016;212(5):873-81.
Toplam 12 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yavuz Pirhan 0000-0002-8234-6739

Volkan Taşova 0000-0003-3368-4421

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Eylül 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Pirhan, Y., & Taşova, V. (2021). THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, 23(1), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.797290
AMA Pirhan Y, Taşova V. THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY. Kırıkkale Üni Tıp Derg. Nisan 2021;23(1):19-24. doi:10.24938/kutfd.797290
Chicago Pirhan, Yavuz, ve Volkan Taşova. “THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY”. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine 23, sy. 1 (Nisan 2021): 19-24. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.797290.
EndNote Pirhan Y, Taşova V (01 Nisan 2021) THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine 23 1 19–24.
IEEE Y. Pirhan ve V. Taşova, “THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY”, Kırıkkale Üni Tıp Derg, c. 23, sy. 1, ss. 19–24, 2021, doi: 10.24938/kutfd.797290.
ISNAD Pirhan, Yavuz - Taşova, Volkan. “THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY”. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine 23/1 (Nisan 2021), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.797290.
JAMA Pirhan Y, Taşova V. THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY. Kırıkkale Üni Tıp Derg. 2021;23:19–24.
MLA Pirhan, Yavuz ve Volkan Taşova. “THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY”. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, c. 23, sy. 1, 2021, ss. 19-24, doi:10.24938/kutfd.797290.
Vancouver Pirhan Y, Taşova V. THE EFFECT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY. Kırıkkale Üni Tıp Derg. 2021;23(1):19-24.

Bu Dergi, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Yayınıdır.