A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM)

Yıl 2021, Cilt 14, Sayı 4, 528 - 528, 31.12.2021

Emine Hesna KANDIR Tuğrul Çağrı GÜL

https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1001767

Öz

In the article published in Kocatepe Veterinary Journal with the "Kocatepe Vet J (2020) 13(3):272-280" and the DOI number "10.30607/kvj.766330", the "Acknowledgements" section was inadvertently forgotten and the following text must be add. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This Project was supported by the scientific research committe of Afyon Kocatepe University (Project no: 18.KARIYER.286). The authors thank to Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation Training Practice and Research Center, Afyon Kocatepe University Veterinary Health Practice and Research Center and 5th District Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks for their cooperations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Afyonkarahisar, biodiversity, conservation, rescue, Turkey, wildlife

Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Yaban Hayatı Kurtarma Rehabilitasyon Eğitim Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezindeki (AKUREM) Yabani Öksüz Yavrular Üzerine Bir Retrospektif Araştırma

Öz

Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi'nde "Kocatepe Vet J (2020) 13(3):272-280" ve DOI numarası "10.30607/kvj.766330" ile yayınlanan makalemde, "Teşekkürler" bölümü sehven unutulmuştur. Aşağıdaki yazının eklenmesi gereklidir. TEŞEKKÜR Bu Proje Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Komisyonu tarafından desteklenmiştir (Proje no: 18.KARIYER.286). Yazarlar, işbirliklerinden dolayı Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Yaban Hayatı Kurtarma Rehabilitasyon Eğitim Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Veteriner Sağlığı Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi ve 5. Bölge Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Müdürlüğü'ne teşekkür eder.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Afyonkarahisar, biyoçeşitlilik, koruma, kurtarma, Türkiye, yaban hayatı

Kaynakça

• Ceballos, G., García, A., Ehrlich, P.R. (2010). The sixth extinction crisis: loss of animal populations and species. Journal of Cosmology, 2010, Vol 8, 1821-1831.
• Dubois, S., Fraser, D. (2003). Defining and measuring success in wildlife rehabilitation, Wildlife Rehabilitation, 21: 123-132.
• Grogan, A., Kelly, A. (2013). A review of RSPCA research into wildlife rehabilitation, Veterinary Record, 1-4, DOI: 10.1136/vr.101139.
• Kandir, E.H., Aslan A. (2017). An investigation on releasing treated wild animals into the nature in Turkey, Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15(4):1757-1763. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1504_17571763.
• Kelly, A., Bland, M. (2006). Admissions, diagnoses, and outcomes for eurasian sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) brought to a wildlife rehabilitation center in England. Journal of Raptor Research 40, 231-235.
• Kelly, A., Halstead, C., Hunter, D., et al. (2011). Factors affecting the likelihood of release of injured and orphaned woodpigeons (Columba palumbus). Animal Welfare 20, 523-534.
• Kirkwood, J.K. (2003). Introduction: wildlife casualties and the veterinary surgeon. In: BSAVA Manual of Wildlife Casualties. Eds E. Mullineaux, D. Best and J. E. Cooper. BSAVA Publications, Gloucester, MA, USA. pp 1-5.
• Marchesini, R. (2016). Animals of the city. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 21, pp. 79-91.
• McKinney, M.L. (2002). Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation: The impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience. 52(10):883–890.
• Miller, E. A. (2012). Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation. 4th edn. National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association and International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council, St. Cloud, MN, USA.
• Molina-Lo´pez RA, Mañosa S, Torres-Riera A, Pomarol M, Darwich L (2017). Morbidity, outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of wildlife rehabilitation in Catalonia (Spain), PLoS One, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181331.
• Moore, A.T., Joosten, S. (1997). Principles of Wildlife Rehabilitation—The Essential Guide for Novice and Experienced Rehabilitators. St. Cloud, MN: National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association.
• Mullineaux, E (2014). Veterinary treatment and rehabilitation of indigenous wildlife, Journal of Small Animal Practice, Vol 55:293-300.
• Robertson C and Harris S (1995). The Behaviour After Release of Captive-reared Fox Cubs. Animal Welfare, 4(4): 295-306 (12).
• Ruth, I (2012). Wildlife Care Basics for Veterinary Hospitals Before the Rehabilitator Arrives, https://www.hsvma.org/assets/pdfs/hsvma_wildlife_care_handbook.pdf.
• Schenk AN, Souza MJ (2014). Major anthropogenic causes for and outcomes of wild animal presentation to a wildlife clinic in East Tennessee, USA, 2000–2011. PLoS One; 9(3):1-3, e93517, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093517
• Smith S (2016). Principles of capture, handling and transportation. In: BSAVA Manual of Wildlife Casualties. 2rd ed, British Small Animal Veterinary Association, England: pp 17 -26.
• Soulsbury CD, White CLP (2015). Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities, Wildlife Research, 42(7):541-553.
• Taylor-Brown A, Booth R, Gillett A, Mealy E, Ogbourne SM, Polkinghorne A, Conroy GC (2019). The impact of human activities on Australian wildlife, Research Article, PLoS One, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206958.
• Tseng FS (2002). Neonatal Wildlife Care, [accessed 05 January 2020] https://michvma.org/resources/Documents/MVC/2017%20Proceedings/tseng%2002.pdf
• Williamson S and Lepczyk C (2017). Mortality and injury rates of wildlife reported by rehabilitators across Alabama, Auburn University Journal of Undergraduate Scholarship, 1-6.
• Wimberger K and Downs CT (2010). Annual intake trends of a large urban animal rehabilitation centre in South Africa: a case study. Animal Welfare 19, 501-513