Düzeltme
PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Kaynak Göster

A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM)

Yıl 2021, Cilt 14, Sayı 4, 528 - 528, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1001767

Öz

In the article published in Kocatepe Veterinary Journal with the "Kocatepe Vet J (2020) 13(3):272-280" and the DOI number "10.30607/kvj.766330", the "Acknowledgements" section was inadvertently forgotten and the following text must be add. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This Project was supported by the scientific research committe of Afyon Kocatepe University (Project no: 18.KARIYER.286). The authors thank to Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation Training Practice and Research Center, Afyon Kocatepe University Veterinary Health Practice and Research Center and 5th District Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks for their cooperations.

Kaynakça

  • Ceballos, G., García, A., Ehrlich, P.R. (2010). The sixth extinction crisis: loss of animal populations and species. Journal of Cosmology, 2010, Vol 8, 1821-1831.
  • Dubois, S., Fraser, D. (2003). Defining and measuring success in wildlife rehabilitation, Wildlife Rehabilitation, 21: 123-132.
  • Grogan, A., Kelly, A. (2013). A review of RSPCA research into wildlife rehabilitation, Veterinary Record, 1-4, DOI: 10.1136/vr.101139.
  • Kandir, E.H., Aslan A. (2017). An investigation on releasing treated wild animals into the nature in Turkey, Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15(4):1757-1763. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1504_17571763.
  • Kelly, A., Bland, M. (2006). Admissions, diagnoses, and outcomes for eurasian sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) brought to a wildlife rehabilitation center in England. Journal of Raptor Research 40, 231-235.
  • Kelly, A., Halstead, C., Hunter, D., et al. (2011). Factors affecting the likelihood of release of injured and orphaned woodpigeons (Columba palumbus). Animal Welfare 20, 523-534.
  • Kirkwood, J.K. (2003). Introduction: wildlife casualties and the veterinary surgeon. In: BSAVA Manual of Wildlife Casualties. Eds E. Mullineaux, D. Best and J. E. Cooper. BSAVA Publications, Gloucester, MA, USA. pp 1-5.
  • Marchesini, R. (2016). Animals of the city. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 21, pp. 79-91.
  • McKinney, M.L. (2002). Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation: The impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience. 52(10):883–890.
  • Miller, E. A. (2012). Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation. 4th edn. National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association and International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council, St. Cloud, MN, USA.
  • Molina-Lo´pez RA, Mañosa S, Torres-Riera A, Pomarol M, Darwich L (2017). Morbidity, outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of wildlife rehabilitation in Catalonia (Spain), PLoS One, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181331.
  • Moore, A.T., Joosten, S. (1997). Principles of Wildlife Rehabilitation—The Essential Guide for Novice and Experienced Rehabilitators. St. Cloud, MN: National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association.
  • Mullineaux, E (2014). Veterinary treatment and rehabilitation of indigenous wildlife, Journal of Small Animal Practice, Vol 55:293-300.
  • Robertson C and Harris S (1995). The Behaviour After Release of Captive-reared Fox Cubs. Animal Welfare, 4(4): 295-306 (12).
  • Ruth, I (2012). Wildlife Care Basics for Veterinary Hospitals Before the Rehabilitator Arrives, https://www.hsvma.org/assets/pdfs/hsvma_wildlife_care_handbook.pdf.
  • Schenk AN, Souza MJ (2014). Major anthropogenic causes for and outcomes of wild animal presentation to a wildlife clinic in East Tennessee, USA, 2000–2011. PLoS One; 9(3):1-3, e93517, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093517
  • Smith S (2016). Principles of capture, handling and transportation. In: BSAVA Manual of Wildlife Casualties. 2rd ed, British Small Animal Veterinary Association, England: pp 17 -26.
  • Soulsbury CD, White CLP (2015). Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities, Wildlife Research, 42(7):541-553.
  • Taylor-Brown A, Booth R, Gillett A, Mealy E, Ogbourne SM, Polkinghorne A, Conroy GC (2019). The impact of human activities on Australian wildlife, Research Article, PLoS One, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206958.
  • Tseng FS (2002). Neonatal Wildlife Care, [accessed 05 January 2020] https://michvma.org/resources/Documents/MVC/2017%20Proceedings/tseng%2002.pdf
  • Williamson S and Lepczyk C (2017). Mortality and injury rates of wildlife reported by rehabilitators across Alabama, Auburn University Journal of Undergraduate Scholarship, 1-6.
  • Wimberger K and Downs CT (2010). Annual intake trends of a large urban animal rehabilitation centre in South Africa: a case study. Animal Welfare 19, 501-513

Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Yaban Hayatı Kurtarma Rehabilitasyon Eğitim Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezindeki (AKUREM) Yabani Öksüz Yavrular Üzerine Bir Retrospektif Araştırma

Yıl 2021, Cilt 14, Sayı 4, 528 - 528, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1001767

Öz

Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi'nde "Kocatepe Vet J (2020) 13(3):272-280" ve DOI numarası "10.30607/kvj.766330" ile yayınlanan makalemde, "Teşekkürler" bölümü sehven unutulmuştur. Aşağıdaki yazının eklenmesi gereklidir. TEŞEKKÜR Bu Proje Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Komisyonu tarafından desteklenmiştir (Proje no: 18.KARIYER.286). Yazarlar, işbirliklerinden dolayı Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Yaban Hayatı Kurtarma Rehabilitasyon Eğitim Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Veteriner Sağlığı Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi ve 5. Bölge Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Müdürlüğü'ne teşekkür eder.

Kaynakça

  • Ceballos, G., García, A., Ehrlich, P.R. (2010). The sixth extinction crisis: loss of animal populations and species. Journal of Cosmology, 2010, Vol 8, 1821-1831.
  • Dubois, S., Fraser, D. (2003). Defining and measuring success in wildlife rehabilitation, Wildlife Rehabilitation, 21: 123-132.
  • Grogan, A., Kelly, A. (2013). A review of RSPCA research into wildlife rehabilitation, Veterinary Record, 1-4, DOI: 10.1136/vr.101139.
  • Kandir, E.H., Aslan A. (2017). An investigation on releasing treated wild animals into the nature in Turkey, Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15(4):1757-1763. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1504_17571763.
  • Kelly, A., Bland, M. (2006). Admissions, diagnoses, and outcomes for eurasian sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) brought to a wildlife rehabilitation center in England. Journal of Raptor Research 40, 231-235.
  • Kelly, A., Halstead, C., Hunter, D., et al. (2011). Factors affecting the likelihood of release of injured and orphaned woodpigeons (Columba palumbus). Animal Welfare 20, 523-534.
  • Kirkwood, J.K. (2003). Introduction: wildlife casualties and the veterinary surgeon. In: BSAVA Manual of Wildlife Casualties. Eds E. Mullineaux, D. Best and J. E. Cooper. BSAVA Publications, Gloucester, MA, USA. pp 1-5.
  • Marchesini, R. (2016). Animals of the city. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 21, pp. 79-91.
  • McKinney, M.L. (2002). Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation: The impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience. 52(10):883–890.
  • Miller, E. A. (2012). Minimum Standards for Wildlife Rehabilitation. 4th edn. National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association and International Wildlife Rehabilitation Council, St. Cloud, MN, USA.
  • Molina-Lo´pez RA, Mañosa S, Torres-Riera A, Pomarol M, Darwich L (2017). Morbidity, outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of wildlife rehabilitation in Catalonia (Spain), PLoS One, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181331.
  • Moore, A.T., Joosten, S. (1997). Principles of Wildlife Rehabilitation—The Essential Guide for Novice and Experienced Rehabilitators. St. Cloud, MN: National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association.
  • Mullineaux, E (2014). Veterinary treatment and rehabilitation of indigenous wildlife, Journal of Small Animal Practice, Vol 55:293-300.
  • Robertson C and Harris S (1995). The Behaviour After Release of Captive-reared Fox Cubs. Animal Welfare, 4(4): 295-306 (12).
  • Ruth, I (2012). Wildlife Care Basics for Veterinary Hospitals Before the Rehabilitator Arrives, https://www.hsvma.org/assets/pdfs/hsvma_wildlife_care_handbook.pdf.
  • Schenk AN, Souza MJ (2014). Major anthropogenic causes for and outcomes of wild animal presentation to a wildlife clinic in East Tennessee, USA, 2000–2011. PLoS One; 9(3):1-3, e93517, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093517
  • Smith S (2016). Principles of capture, handling and transportation. In: BSAVA Manual of Wildlife Casualties. 2rd ed, British Small Animal Veterinary Association, England: pp 17 -26.
  • Soulsbury CD, White CLP (2015). Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities, Wildlife Research, 42(7):541-553.
  • Taylor-Brown A, Booth R, Gillett A, Mealy E, Ogbourne SM, Polkinghorne A, Conroy GC (2019). The impact of human activities on Australian wildlife, Research Article, PLoS One, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206958.
  • Tseng FS (2002). Neonatal Wildlife Care, [accessed 05 January 2020] https://michvma.org/resources/Documents/MVC/2017%20Proceedings/tseng%2002.pdf
  • Williamson S and Lepczyk C (2017). Mortality and injury rates of wildlife reported by rehabilitators across Alabama, Auburn University Journal of Undergraduate Scholarship, 1-6.
  • Wimberger K and Downs CT (2010). Annual intake trends of a large urban animal rehabilitation centre in South Africa: a case study. Animal Welfare 19, 501-513

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Veteriner Hekimlik
Bölüm DÜZELTME
Yazarlar

Emine Hesna KANDIR (Sorumlu Yazar)
AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0002-2712-6792
Türkiye


Tuğrul Çağrı GÜL
AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0003-3387-0101
Türkiye

Destekleyen Kurum Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi
Proje Numarası 18.KARIYER.286
Teşekkür This Project was supported by the scientific research committe of Afyon Kocatepe University (Project no: 18.KARIYER.286). The authors thank to Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation Training Practice and Research Center, Afyon Kocatepe University Veterinary Health Practice and Research Center and 5th District Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks for their cooperations.
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2021
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021, Cilt 14, Sayı 4

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @düzeltme { kvj1001767, journal = {Kocatepe Veterinary Journal}, issn = {1308-1594}, eissn = {2147-6853}, address = {}, publisher = {Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi}, year = {2021}, volume = {14}, pages = {528 - 528}, doi = {10.30607/kvj.1001767}, title = {A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM)}, key = {cite}, author = {Kandır, Emine Hesna and Gül, Tuğrul Çağrı} }
APA Kandır, E. H. & Gül, T. Ç. (2021). A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM) . Kocatepe Veterinary Journal , 14 (4) , 528-528 . DOI: 10.30607/kvj.1001767
MLA Kandır, E. H. , Gül, T. Ç. "A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM)" . Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 14 (2021 ): 528-528 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kvj/issue/64946/1001767>
Chicago Kandır, E. H. , Gül, T. Ç. "A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM)". Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 14 (2021 ): 528-528
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM) AU - Emine Hesna Kandır , Tuğrul Çağrı Gül Y1 - 2021 PY - 2021 N1 - doi: 10.30607/kvj.1001767 DO - 10.30607/kvj.1001767 T2 - Kocatepe Veterinary Journal JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 528 EP - 528 VL - 14 IS - 4 SN - 1308-1594-2147-6853 M3 - doi: 10.30607/kvj.1001767 UR - https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1001767 Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM) %A Emine Hesna Kandır , Tuğrul Çağrı Gül %T A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM) %D 2021 %J Kocatepe Veterinary Journal %P 1308-1594-2147-6853 %V 14 %N 4 %R doi: 10.30607/kvj.1001767 %U 10.30607/kvj.1001767
ISNAD Kandır, Emine Hesna , Gül, Tuğrul Çağrı . "A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM)". Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 14 / 4 (Aralık 2021): 528-528 . https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1001767
AMA Kandır E. H. , Gül T. Ç. A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM). Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 2021; 14(4): 528-528.
Vancouver Kandır E. H. , Gül T. Ç. A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM). Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 2021; 14(4): 528-528.
IEEE E. H. Kandır ve T. Ç. Gül , "A Retrospective Study on Wild Orphan Animals in Afyon Kocatepe University Wildlife Rescue Rehabilitation, Training, Practice and Research Center (AKUREM)", Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, c. 14, sayı. 4, ss. 528-528, Ara. 2021, doi:10.30607/kvj.1001767

13520    13521       13522   1352314104

14105         14106        14107       14108