The Effects of Adding Inactive Yeast Culture (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae) to Rations Prepared with Different Quality Roughages on Fattening Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Some Rumen Parameters and Carcass Yield in Lambs

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 60 Sayı: 2, 37 - 45, 06.01.2021

Duygu Budak , Aydan Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.46897/livestockstudies.846383

Öz

This study was performed with the participation of 26.22±1.07 kg average weighted 36 singleton lambs. 6 Groups were formed; 3 with IYM (7 g/day) and 3 without IYM. Lambs were kept in individual divisions and given 150 g/day roughage (alfa alfa hay (AH), meadow hay (MH), wheat straw (WS), concentrated feed and water ad libitum. Treatment lasted 70 days in total; temperature and humidity were recorded daily. Fattening performance, carcass parameters and ruminal pH levels were not affected by the treatment (P>0.05). Additive increased the weight of the hearts which were fed with AH (P<0.05). Effects of roughage and additive interactions on the acetic, propionic and volatile fatty acids was found as significant (P<0.01). IYM, increased the rates of acetic acid/propionic acid feeding with AH and MH (P<0.05). Ammonia concentration and digestibility of crude cellulose and hemicellulose was affected by the type of roughage (P<0.05). Digestibility of acid detergent fibre (P<0.01) and cellulose (P<0.001) was increased with additives. There is no difference among the groups in terms of water consumption (P>0.05). It’s concluded that, temperature and humidity is an efficient environmental factor on the fattening performance and IYM have positive effects on some cell-wall components digestibility and rumen parameters.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Roughage, Inactivated yeast, Digestibility, Rumen parameters, Temperature, Lamb

Destekleyen Kurum

Ankara Üniversitesi BAP

Proje Numarası

15L0447004

Teşekkür

Authors thanks to Ankara University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit for their support. (This work was supported by Ankara University Scientific Research Projects Coordination, grant number: 15L0447004)

Kaynakça

• Abd-El Ghani, A.A., (2004). Influence of diet supplementation with yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance of Zaraibi goats. Small Rum. Res. 52: 223-229.
• Akyıldız, A. R. (1984). Yemler bilgisi laboratuvar kılavuzu. Ankara Üniversitesi Zir. Fak. Yay. 286s. Ankara.
• Alshaikh, M.A., Alsiadi, M.Y., Zahran. S.M., Mogawer, H.H., Aalshowime, T.A. (2002). Effect of feeding yeast culture from different sources on the performance of lactating holstein cow in Saudi Arabia. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 15: 352–356.
• Angeles, C., Mendoza, M.G.D., Cobos, P.M.A., Crosby, G.M.M., Castrejon, P.F.A. (1998). Comparison of commercial yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on ruminal fermentation and digestion in sheep fed on corn stover diet. Small Rum. Res. 31: 45-50.
• Anonymous (2016). htttps://intweb. tse.org.tr/standard. TS No: TS9610 Hayvan yemleri- metabolik (çevrilebilir) enerji tayini kimyasal metod. Kabul tarihi: 03.12.1991
• Anonymous, (2006). SPSS 15.0 Command syntax reference. SPSS Inc Copyright © 2006 by SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL 60606-6412 www.spss.com.
• Arcos-Garcia, J.L., Castrejon, F.A., Mendoza, G.D., Perez Gavilan, E.P. (2000). Effect of two commercial yeast cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal fermentation and digestion in sheep fed sugar cane tops. Livest Prod. Sci. 63: 153-157.
• A.O.A.C., (1984). Official methods of analysis (14th Ed.) association of official analytical chemists. Washington. DC. p:1112.
• Chaney, A.L., Marbaeh, E.P. (1962). Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin. Chem. 8: 130-132.
• Dağsöz, A.K., Bayraktar, K.G. (1999). Türkiye’de derece-gün sayıları ve enerji politikamız. yapıda yalıtım konferansı bildiriler kitabı. İstanbul.
• Denev, S.A., Peeva, T., Radulova, P., Stancheva, N., Staykova, G., Beev, G., Todorova, P., Tchobanova, S. (2007). Yeast cultures in ruminant nutrition. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 13: 357-374.
• Dolezal, P., Dolezal, J., Trinacty, J. (2005). The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal fermentation in dairy cows. Czech J. Anim. Sci.50: 503-510.
• Düzgüneş, O., Kesici, T., Gürbüz, F. (1987). İstatistik metodları-I. A.Ü. Zir. Fak. Yay. 861. Ders Kitabı: 299. 218 s. A.Ü. Basımevi. Ankara.
• Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple f test. Biometrics 11: 1-42.
• Elseed, F., Abusamra, M.A. (2007). Effects of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on NDF digestibility and rumen fermentation of forage sorghum hay in Nubian goat’s kids. Res. J. Agric. & Biol. Sci. 3(3):133-137.
• Ezema, C. (2013). Probiotics in animal production: A review. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health 5(11): 308-316.
• Ghoneem, W.M.A., Mahmoud, A.E.M. (2014). Effect of inactivated and dried yeast on productive performance of Barki lambs. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. ©2014 Academic J. Inc.
• Gomes, L.C., Alcalde, C.R.., Lima, L.R., Lima, L.S., Souza, R., Possamai, A.P.S. (2014). Nutritive value of diets containing inactive dry yeast for lactating Saanen goats. R. Bras. Zootec. 43(1):36-43.
• Göncü, S., Önder, D., Koluman, N., Mevliyaoğulları, E. (2015). Sıcak ve nemli koşullara uygun hayvan barınak özellikleri. Tüsedad 5(30): 42-47.
• Grochowska, S., Nowak, W., Mikuła, R., Kasprowicz-Potocka, M. (2012). The Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal fermentation in sheep fed high- or low-NDF rations. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 21: 276–284.
• Haddad, S.G., Goussous, S.N. (2005). Effect of yeast culture supplementation on nutrient intake, digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 118: 343-348.
• Hill, S.R., Hopkins, B.A., Davidson, S. (2009). The addition of cottonseed hulls to the starter and supplementation of live yeast or mannanoligosaccharide in the milk for young calves. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 790-798.
• Inge, N.A., Bogaert, V., Maeseneire, L.D. (2009). Extracellular polysaccharides produced by yeast and yeast-like fungi. yeast biotechnology: Diversity App. 651-671.
• Jurkovich, V., Brydl, E., Kutasi, J., Harnos, A., Kovacs, P., Könyves L., Muravölgyi, Febel, H. (2014). The effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains on the rumen fermentation in sheep fed with diets of different forage to concentrate ratios. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 42 (4): 481-486.
• Karademir G., Karademir, B. (2003). Yem katkı maddesi olarak kullanılan biyoteknolojik ürünler. Lalahan Hay. Araşt. Enst. Derg. 43: 61-74.
• Kawas, J.R., García-Castillo, F., Garza-Cazares, H., FimbresDurazo, Olivares-Sáenz, E., Hernández-Vidal, G., Lu, C.D. (2007). Effects of sodium bicarbonate and yeast on productive performance and carcass characteristics of light-weight lambs fed finishing diets. Small Rum. Res. 67: 157-163.
• Kocaman, İ., Konukçu, F., İstanbulluoğlu, A. (2007). Hayvan barınaklarında isı ve nem dengesi. KSÜ Fen & Müh. Derg. 10(1): 137-140.
• Kocaoğlu, G.B., Kara, K. (2010). Ruminant beslemede alternatif yem katkı maddelerinin kullanımı: 2. organik asit, yağ asiti, adsorban. Erciyes Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg. 7: 43-52.
• Kowalık, B., Skomial, J., Miltko, R., Majewska, M. (2015). The effect of live Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast in the diet of rams on the digestibility of nutrients, nitrogen and mineral retention and blood serum biochemical parameters. Turk J. Vet. Anim. Sci. (2016) 40: © TÜBİTAK.
• Lila, Z.A., Mohammed, N., Yasui, T., Kurokawa, Y., Kanda, S., Itabashi, H. (2004). Effects of twin strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 1847–1854.
• Lima, L.S., Alcalde, C.R., Gomes, L.C., Souza, R., Rigolon, L.P., Nakamura, C.V. (2012). Effect of inactive dry yeast from sugar cane as protein source on rumen fermentation in saanen goats. Arg. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 64(1): 145-154.
• Moharrery, A., Asadi, E. (2009). Effects of supplementing malate and yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on the rumen enzyme profile and growth performance of lambs. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 18: 283-295.
• Niyas, P.A., Chaidanya, K., Shaji, S., Sejian, V., Bhatta, R., Bagath, M., Rao, G., Kurien, E., Girish, V. (2015). Adaptation of livestock to environmental challenges. J. Vet. Sci. Med. Diagn. 4: 3.
• NRC, (2007). Nutrient requirements of small ruminants. Animal Nutrition Series. National Research Council. Washington. D.C.
• Oeztuerk, H. (2009). Effects of live and autoclaved yeast cultures on ruminal fermentation in vitro. J. Anim. Feed. Sci. 18: 142–150.
• Opsi, F., Fortina, R., Tassone, S., Bodas, R., Lopez, S. (2012). Effects of inactivated and live cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on in vitro ruminal fermentation of diets with different forage: concentrate ratio. J. Agr. Sci. 150: 271–283.
• Parker, D.B., Brown, M.S. (2003). Water consumption for livestock and poultry production. Encyclopaedia of Water Sci. 1-5.
• Patra, A.K. (2012). The use of live yeast products as microbial feed additives in ruminant nutrition. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 7(5): 366-375.
• Pina, D.S., Valadares Filho, S.C., Valadares, R.F.D., Campos, J.M.S., Detmann, E., Marcondes, M.I., Oliveira, A.S., Teixeira, R.M.A. (2006). Consumo e digestibilidade aparente total dos nutrientes. produção e composição do leite de vacas alimentadas com dietas contendo diferentes fontes de proteína. R. Bras. Zootec. 35:1543-1551.
• Playne, M.J. (1985). Determination on ethanol volatile fatty acids, lactic and succinic acids in fermentatıon liquids by gas chromatography. J. Sci. Food Agr. 36(6): 638-644.
• Rentfrow, G. (2010). How much meat to expect from a carcass. Anim. Food Sci. University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Lexington, KY, 40546 ASC-179.
• Rufino, L.D.A., Pereira, O.G., Ribeiro, K.G., Valadares Filho, S.C. (2013). Effect of substitution of soybean meal forinactive dry yeast on diet digestibility, lamb’s growth and meat quality. Small Rum. Res. 111: 56-62.
• Schoeman, S.J., Visse, J.A. (1995). Water intake and consumption in sheep differing in growth potential and adaptability. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 25(2): 75-79.
• Şehu, A., Yalçın, S., Önol, A.G. (1998). Kaba yemlerin bazı özelliklerinden yararlanarak kuzularda kuru madde tüketimi ve canlı ağırlık artışının belirlenmesi. Turk J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 22: 475-483©TÜBİTAK.
• Tang, S.X., Tayo, G.O., Tan, Z.L., Sun, Z.H., Shen, L.X., Zhou, C.S., Xiao, W.J., Ren, G.P., Han, X.F., Shen, S.B. (2008). Effects of yeast culture and fibrolytic enzyme supplementation on in vitro fermentation characteristics of low-quality cereal straws. J. Anim. Sci. 86: 1164-1172.
• Thrune, M., Bach, A., Ruiz-Moreno, M., Stern M.D., Linn, J.G. (2009). Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal pH and microbial fermentation in dairy cows: yeast supplementation on rumen fermentation. Livestock Sci. 124(1): 261–265.
• Tripathi, M.K., Karim, S.A. (2011). Effect of yeast cultures supplementation on live weight change, rumen fermentation, ciliate protozoa population, microbial hydrolytic enzymes status and slaughtering performance of growing lamb. Livestock Sci. 135: 17-25.
• Türkmen, İ.İ., Biricik, H., Deniz, G., Gezen, Ş.Ş., Tuncer, Ş.D., Çolpan, İ., Küçükersan, M.K., Küçükersan, S., Yalçın, S.,
• Şehu, A., Saçaklı, P., Ergün, A., Yıldız, G. (2011). Temel yem bilgisi ve hayvan besleme. Anadolu Ünv. Yay. 70-88, 1. Baskı. Eskişehir, Turkey.
• Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Fiber and physicochemical properties of feeds in: nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University press. pp. 140-155.
• Vyas, D., Uwizeye, A., Mohammed, R., Yang, W.Z., Walker, N.D., Beauchemin, K.A. (2014). The effects of active dried and killed dried yeast on subacute ruminal acidosis, ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestibility in beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 92: 724–732.
• Yağanoğlu, A.V. (2011). Hayvan barınaklarında çevre koşullarının düzenlenmesi. Atatürk Üniv. Zir. Fak. Derg. 17(1): 121-129.
• Zain, M., Jamarun, N., Arnim, A., Ningrat, R.W.S., Herawati, R. (2011). Effect of yeast (Saccharomyce cerevisiae) on fermentability, microbial population and digestibility of low quality roughage in vitro. Archiva Zootech. 14(4): 51-58.
• Zdunczyk, Z., Gruzauskas, R., Juskiewicz, J., Dauksiene, A., Raceviciute-Stupeliene, A., Jarule, V. (2013). Effect of dıetary probiotic, prebiotic mannanoligosaccharides and their combination on caecal parameters in hens. Vet. Med. Zoot. 63 (85).