Algılanan Romantik İlişki Kalitesi Ölçeği’nin (ARİKÖ) Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2018, Sayı: 46, 22 - 40, 19.04.2018

Ali Serdar Sağkal , Yalçın Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.329888

Cited By: 14

Öz

Bu
araştırmanın amacı, Algılanan Romantik İlişki Kalitesi Yapıları Envanteri’nin
(The Perceived Relationship Quality Components [PRQC] Inventory)  6 maddeli kısa formunun Algılanan Romantik
İlişki Kalitesi Ölçeği (ARİKÖ) adıyla Türkçe’ye uyarlanması, geçerlik ve
güvenirlik çalışmalarının yapılmasıdır. Araştırmada, uygun örnekleme yöntemiyle
ulaşılan, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi’nde eğitimine devam eden ve romantik
ilişkisi bulunan toplam 366 katılımcı (n =
279 kadın, %76.2; n = 87 erkek,
%23.8) yer almıştır. Katılımcıların yaşları 18 ile 25 (Ort = 20.22, ss = 1.56) arasında değişmiştir. Medyan
romantik ilişki süresi 1 yıl ve üzeri olarak hesaplanmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör
analizi sonuçları, ARİKÖ’nün 6 maddeli ve tek boyutlu orijinal faktör yapısının
hedef örneklemde de doğrulandığını göstermiştir. ARİKÖ ile ölçüt ölçme araçları
arasında saptanan orta ve yüksek düzey anlamlı korelasyon katsayıları,
ARİKÖ’nün yeterli ölçüt-bağıntılı geçerliğe sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Güvenirlik
çalışmasında, ARİKÖ’nün Cronbach alfa katsayısı .86, yapı güvenirliği .87 ve
test-tekrar test güvenirliği .81 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Tüm bu araştırma
bulguları, ARİKÖ’nün 18-25 yaş aralığında bulunan beliren yetişkinlerin
algıladıkları genel romantik ilişki kalitesinin ölçümünde araştırmacılar ve
uygulayıcılar tarafından kullanılabilecek kısa, geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme
aracı olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Romantik ilişki, romantik ilişki kalitesi, geçerlik, güvenirlik

Kaynakça

• Acker, M. & Davis, M. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the Triangular Theory of Love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 21-50.
• Adams, J. & Jones, W. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1177- 1196. doi: 1 0.1 037/0022-3514.72.5.1177.
• Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
• Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
• Aron, A. & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535-551.
• Barrett, A. E. (2000). Marital trajectories and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 451– 464.
• Bennett, K. M. (2006). Does marital status and marital status change predict physical health in older adults? Psychological Medicine, 36, 1313-1320.
• Boon, S. D. & Holmes, J. G. (1991). The Dynamics of ınterpersonal trust: resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In R. A. Hinde & J. Groebel (Eds.), Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
• Carroll, J. S., Willoughby, B., Badger, S., Nelson, L. J., McNamara Barry, C., & Madsen, S. D. (2007). So close, yet so far away: The impact of varying marital horizons on emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 219–247.
• Cohen, P., Kasen, S., Chen, H., Hartmark, C., & Gordon, K. (2003). Variations in patterns of developmental transitions in the emerging adulthood period. Developmental Psychology, 39, 657–669. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.657.
• Collins, W. A. & Laursen, B. (2004). Changing relationships, changing youth: Interpersonal contexts of adolescent development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 55-62.
• Curun, F. (2001). The effects of sexism and sex role orientation on romantic relationship satisfaction (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
• Demir, M. (2008). Sweetheart, you really make me happy: Romantic relationship quality and personality as predictors of happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 257–277. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9051-8.
• Demir, M. & Weitekamp, L. A. (2007). I am so happy cause today I found my friend: Friendship and personality as predictors of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 85(2), 181-211. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9012-7.
• Deiner, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
• Fehr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557-579.
• Fehr, B. & Russell, J. A. (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 425-438.
• Fincham F. D. (2003). Marital conflict correlates, structure, and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science,12, 23–27.
• Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340-354.
• Fraley, R. C. & Davis, K. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults' close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4,131–144.
• Furstenberg, F. F. Jr. (2010). On a new schedule: Transitions to adulthood and family change. Future of the Children, 20, 67–87.
• Glenn, N. & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for mr. right. An Institute for American Values Report to the Independent Women's Forum.
• Hawk, B. N. & McCall, R. B. (2014). Perceived relationship quality in adolescents following early social-emotional deprivation. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 19(3), 439-459.
• Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93-98.
• Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 784-794.
• Holt-Lunstad, J., Birmingham, W., & Jones, B. Q. (2008). Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 239-244.
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
• Köker, S. (1991). Normal ve sorunlu ergenlerin yasam doyumu düzeyinin karşılaştırılması (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Krane, D., & Cottreau, A. (1998). Generation 2001: A survey of the first college graduating class of the new millennium. New York, NY: Harris and Associates, Inc.
• Levy, M. B. & Davis, K. E. (1988). Lovestyles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 439-472.
• Maselko, J., Bates, L., Avendaño, M., & Glymour, M. (2009). The intersection of sex, marital status, and cardiovascular risk factors in shaping stroke incidence: Results from the health and retirement study. Journal of The American Geriatrics Society, 57(12), 2293-2299. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02555.x.
• Meeus, W. H. J., Branje, S. J. T., van der Valk, E., & de Wied, M. (2007). Relationships with intimate partner, best friend, and parents in adolescence and early adulthood: A study of the salience of the intimate partnership. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 569–580.
• Meier, A. & Allen, G. (2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Sociological Quarterly, 50, 308–335. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01142.x.
• Overall, N. C. (2017). Does partners’ negative-direct communication during conflict help sustain perceived commitment and relationship quality across time? Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi: 10.1177/1948550617712030
• Puentes, J., Knox, D., & Zusman, M. E. (2008). Participants in “friends with benefits” relationships. College Student Journal, 42(1), 176-180.
• Revenson, T. A., Kayser, K., & Bodenmann, G. (2005). Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Rohrer, J. E., Bernard, M. E., Zhang, Y., Rasmussen, N. H., & Woroncow, H. (2008). Marital status, feeling depressed and self-rated health in rural female primary care patients. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14(2), 214-217. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00835.x.
• Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Shulman, S. & Connolly, J. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 27-39. doi: 10.1177/2167696812467330.
• Simon, R. W. (2002). Revisiting the relationships among gender, marital status, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1065-1096.
• Simon, R. W., & Barrett, A. E. (2010). Nonmarital romantic relationships and mental health in early adulthood: Does the association differ for women and men? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(2), 168–182. doi:10.1177/0022146510372343.
• Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Understanding romantic relationships among emerging adults: The significant roles of cohabitation and ambiguity. In F. D. Fincham & M. Cui (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 234–251). Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
• Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
• Şahin, A., Kitapçı, H., Şahin, A., Ciğerim, E., & Bayhan, K. (2016). Perceived relationship ınvestment and relationship quality: The mediating role of commitment velocity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 288-295.
• Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Tanner, J. L. (2006). Recentering during emerging adulthood: A critical turning point in life span human development. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Waite, L. J. & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York, NY: Doubleday.
• Watkins, C. D., Nicholls, M. J., Batres, C., Xiao, D., Talamas, S., & Perrett, D. I. (2017). Own attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimension. Cognition, 163, 146-154.
• Whisman, M. A. & Baucom, D. H. (2012). Intimate relationships and psychopathology. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15, 4–13. doi: 10.1007/s10567-011-0107-2.
• Whitehead, B. D. & Popenoe, D. (2001). ‘‘Who wants to marry a soulmate?’’ The state of our unions. New Brunswick, NJ: The National Marriage Project.
• Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. & Petherick, J. (2006). Intimacy, dating goals and relationship satisfaction during adolescence and emerging adulthood: Identity formation, age and sex as moderators. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 189–199.