Evaluation of the Relationship Between Rumen pH and Fecal Score in Cows with Subakut Ruminal Acidosis

Öz

Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) is emerging disorder of dairy cattle operations. This study aimed to determine the relation between rumen pH and fecal scores of cows in early lactation period and to determine the suspected SARA status in dairy cows in this farm. For this propose, a total of 50 animals in early lactation period (0-70 days) were enrolled to the study.Rumen pH and fecal scores were determined by a portable pH meter and inspection method, respectivley. It was determined that there was a weak correlation between rumen pH and fecal scores (r = 0.50, p <0.05) in cows with SARA and 20/50 (40%) cows in early lactation period diagnosed SARA.In conclusion, correlations between rumen pH and fecal score were evaluated and it was determined that fecal scoring could be a weak parameter to SARA diagnosis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Subacute Rumen Acidosis. Cattle,Early Lactation,Rumen pH,Fecal Score

Subakut Ruminal Asidozisli Sığırlarda Rumen Ph’ sı İle Dışkı Skoru Arasındaki İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Subakut ruminal asidozis (SARA) süt sığırı işletmelerinin önemli bir bozukluğu olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışma ile bir işletmedeki erken laktasyon döneminde bulunan hayvanların rumen pH’ ları ile fekal skorları arasındaki değişimin belirlenmesi ve söz konusu işletmedeki süt sığırlarındaki şüpheli SARA durumunun tespitinin yapılması amaçlandı. Bu kapsamda işletmedeki erken laktasyon döneminde (0-70. günler) bulunan toplam 50 hayvan seçildi. Subakut ruminal asidozisin tanısı rumen sıvısının pH değeri (dijital pH metre) fekal skorlama ise inspeksiyon yöntemi ile gerçekleştirildi. Çalışma kapsamında erken laktasyon döneminde bulunan 20/50 (%40) hayvanda SARA bulunduğu ve SARA tanısı konulan hayvanların rumen pH’ sı ile fekal skorları arasında zayıf düzeyde anlamlı korelasyon (r=0.50 p<0.05) olduğu saptandı. Sonuç olarak sara ile ilişkili biyobelirteçlerden rumen pH ve fekal skor arasındaki korelasyonlar değerlendirilmiş olup dışkı skorlamasının SARA’ nın tanısına zayıf düzeyde yön verebilecek parametreler arasında bulunabileceği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Subakut Rumen Asidozu,Sığır,Erken Laktasyon,Rumen pH,Fekal Skor

Kaynakça

1. Abdela N. 2016. Sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA) and its consequence in dairy cattle: A review of past and recent research at global prospective. Achievements in the Life Sciences. 10(2): 187-196.
2. Allen MS. 1997. Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 1447-1462.
3. Armentano L, Pereira M. 1997. Measuring theeffectiveness of fiber by animal response trials. J Dairy Sci. 80(7):1416-25.
4. Bell NJ, Knowles TG, Whay HR, Main DJ, Webster AJF. 2009. The development, implementation and testing of a lameness control programme based on HACCP principles 364 and designed for heifers on dairy farms. Vet J. 180:178-188.
5. Bicalho RC, Oikonomou G. 2013. Control and prevention of lameness associated with claw lesions in dairy cow. Livest Sci. 156: 96–105.
6. Cook N, Oetzel G, Nordlund K. 2006. Modern techniques for monitoring high-producing dairy cows 1. Principles of herd-level diagnoses. London-Brıtısh Veterınary Assocıatıon, Dairy Sci. 28(9): 510.
7. Enemark JMD. 2008. The monitoring, prevention and treatment of sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA): a review. Vet J. 176:32–43.
8. Garrett EF, Perreira MN, Nordlund KV, Armentano LE, Goodger WJ, Oetzel GR. 1999. Diagnostic methods for the detection of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 82:1170–1178.

9. Goff JP. 2006. Major advances in our understanding ofnutritional influences on bovine health. J. Dairy Sci. 89: 1292-1301.
10. Greenough PR. 2007. Bovine laminitis and lameness: a hands-on approach. España, Elsevier. A Hands on Approach. p328.
11. Harris DJ, Hibburt CD, Anderson GA, Younis PJ, Fitspatrick DH, Dunn AC, Parsons IW, McBeath NR. 1988. The incidence, cost and factors associated with foot lameness in dairy cattle in south-western Victoria. Aust Vet J. 65:171-176.
12. Heinrichs AJ, DR Buckmaster, Lamers BP. 1999. Processing, mixing and particle size reduction offorages for dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 77: 180-186.
13. Kononoff PJ, Heinrichs AJ, DR Buckmaster. 2003. Modification of the Penn state forage and total mixedration particle separator and the effects of moisture content on its measurements. J. Dairy Sci.86: 1858-1863.
14. Lammers BP, Heinrichs AJ. 1996. A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forage and total mixed rations. J. Dairy Sci. 79: 922-928.
15. Lean IJ, Golder HM, Hall MB. 2014. Feeding,evaluating and controlling rumen function. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 30(3):539-75.
16. Li S, Gozho GN, Gakhar N, Khapour E, Krause DO, Plaizier JC. 2012. Evaluation of diagnostic measures for subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. Can J Anim Sci. 92(3):353.
17. Li S, Khapour E, Krause DO, Kroeker A, Rodriguez-Lecompte JC, Gozho N, Plaizier JC. 2012. Effects of subacute ruminal acidosis challenges on fermentation and endotoxins in the rumen and hindgut of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 95:294-303.
18. Melendez P, Back SA. 2006. Particle size evaluation and its association with feed intake, milk yield and chewing activity in mid-lactation Holstein cows. Bov. Pract.40: 39-45.
19. Melendez P, Rodriguez O, Madrid S, Donovan A. 2002. The association between forage particle size at initial feeding and the weigh-back and chewing activity in dairy cattle. Bov. Pract. 36: 66-70.
20. Melendez P, Roy E. 2015. The Association between Total Mixed Ration Particle Size and Fecal Scores in Holstein Lactating Dairy Cows. Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida. FL 32610.
21. Mgbeahuruike AC. 2011. Fecal characteristics and production of dairy cows in early lactation. Department of Animal Environment and Health Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. ISSN 1403-2201.
22. Morgante M, Gianesella M, Casella S, Ravarotto L, Stelletta C, Giudice E. 2009. Blood gas analyses, ruminal and blood pH, urine and faecal pH in dairy cows during subacute ruminal acidosis. Comp Clin Pathol.18:229-232.
23. Nocek JE. 1997. Bovine acidosis: Implications on laminitis. J. Dairy Sci.80: 1005-1028.
24. Oetzel GR. 2004. Monitoring and testing dairy herds for metabolic disease. Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice. 20(3): 651-674.
25. Pilachai R, Schonewille JTH, Thamrongyoswittayakul C, Aiumlamai S, Wachirapakorn C, Everts H, Hendriks WH. 2013. Diet factors and subclinical laminitis score in lactating cows of smallholder dairy farms in Thailand. Livest Sci.155(2–3):197–204.
26. Richert RM, Cicconi KM, Gamroth MJ, Schukken YH, Stiglbauer KE, Ruegg PL. 2013. Perceptions and risk factors for lameness on organic and small conventional dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 96(8):5018–5026.
27. Ural DA, Cengiz O, Ural K, Ozaydin S. 2013. Dietary clinoptilolite addition as a factor fort he improvement of milk yield in dairy cows. J Anim Vet Adv.12(1):85-87.
28. Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA. 2006. Physicallyeffective fiber: Method of determination and effects Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skara, Sweden.
29. Zebeli Q, Aschenbach M, Tafaj J, Ametaj BN. 2012. Invited review: Role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 95: 1041-1056.