Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning

Meliha Şimşek

doi:10.20875/sb.93275

Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, tekdilliliğin etkisindeki yabancı dil öğretimine almaşık bir yöntem önerisi sunmaktır. İngilizcenin ana dil olduğu ülkeler, İngilizcenin yabancı dil olarak öğretildiği ülkelere kendi normlarına göre geliştirdikleri yöntemleri ithal etmektedir. Ancak bunların uygulamada yerel koşulların gereksinimlerini karşılayamadığı görülmektedir. Bu nedenle, Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme Chomsky’nin Minimalist Programına ve Yapılandırmacılığa dayanarak geliştirilmiştir. Yöntemin amacı, izlencesi, öğretim etkinlikleri, öğretmen ve öğrenci rolleri ile temel işlem süreci, Richards ve Rodgers’ın (2002) modeline göre betimlenmiştir. Bu modelde, İngilizce kipsellik öğrencilerin ana dil kavramlarından yararlanılarak öğretilmiş ve paralel tümceler, ikidilli metinler, dil değiştirme, çift-dil görevleri, ikidilli basitleştirme tabloları, sözcükleştirme/ekleştirme ve çeviri gibi etkinliklerle ana dilin dillerarası bir strateji olarak kullanımı sağlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tekdillilik; Dil Değiştirme; Minimalist Program; Yapılandırmacılık

Kaynakça

Atkinson, D. (1993). Teaching monolingual classes. Essex: Longman Group UK Limited.
Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English-only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27 (1), 9- 32. Retrieved January 2, 2009, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3586949
Bacherman, D. M. (2007). The use of students’ first language in second-language learning in a computer-based environment. Doctoral dissertation, Walden University, Minneapolis. Retrieved November 9, 2008, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (Publication No. AAT 3240051).
Butzkamm, W. (t.y.). The bilingual method: An overview. Retrieved May 17, 2010, from http://www.fremdsprachendidaktik.rwth-aachen.de/Ww/bilmethod.html
Butzkamm, W. (2000). Bilingual method. In Michael Byram (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning, (pp. 84-87). New York: Routledge. Retrieved August 10, 2011, from http://www.fremdsprachendidaktik.rwth-aachen.de/Ww/b2000_bilingual.html
Butzkamm, W. (2003). The role of the mother tongue in FL classrooms: Death of a dogma. Language Learning Journal, (28), 29-39. Retrieved June 5, 2010, from http://www.ittmfl.org.uk/modules/teaching/1a/paper1a4.pdf
Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (3), 459-480. Retrieved November 23, 2009, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3586980

Cook, V. (1989). Reciprocal language teaching: Another alternative. Modern English Teacher, 16 (3/4), 48-53. Retrieved January 2, 2009, from http://homepage.ntlworld.com/vivian.c/Writings/Papers/ReciprocalLT.htm
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33 (2), 185-209. Retrieved March 10, 2009, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3587717.
Cook, V. (2001). Second language learning and language teaching. London: Arnold.
Cook, V. & Newson, M. (1997). Chomsky’s universal grammar: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (1), 39- 60. Retrieved October 15, 2009, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3587901.
Ellis, R. (1999). Input-based approaches to teaching grammar: A review of classroom-oriented research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 64-80. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FAPL%2FAPL19%2FS026719059919004 4a.pdf&code=8882424d3b2d1fad215d621ee092fd38
Ellis, R. (2002a). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? SSLA, 24, 223-236. Retrieved May 12, 2012, from http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FSLA%2FSLA24_02%2FS027226310200 2073a.pdf&code=60c328038b94d5c779829c68c457666d
Ellis, R. (2002b). Methodological options in grammar teaching materials. In Hinkel, E. & Fotos, S. (Eds), New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms, (pp. 155- 179). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Lead down the garden path. (2012) In The Free Dictionary By Farlex. Retrieved July 24, 2012, from http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/lead+down+the+garden+path>
Ferrer, V. (t.y.). Using the mother tongue to promote noticing: Translation as a way of scaffolding learner language, 1-6. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://www.teachenglishworldwide.com/Articles/Ferrer_mother%20tongue%20to%20promote %20noticing.pdf
Gabrielatos, C. (2001). L1 use in ELT: Not a skeleton, but a bone of contention. Bridges, 6, 33-35. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.gabrielatos.com/L1UseInELT-Bridges.pdf
Gill, S. (2005). The L1 in the L2 classroom. HLT Magazine, 5. Retrieved August 15, 2010, from http://www.hltmag.co.uk/sep05/mart03.htm.
Govindasamy, S. (1994). The effect of contrastive grammar instruction on clarity and coherence in the writings of Malay ESL college students. Doctoral dissertation, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey. Retrieved November 9, 2008, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (Publication No. AAT 9514120).
Granger, C. & Beaumont, D. (1994). Generation 2000 student’s book 3. Oxford: Heinemann.
Grant, N. (1993). Preface. In N. Grant (Ed.), Teaching monolingual classes (p. v). Essex: Longman Group UK Limited.
Herschensohn, J. (2000). The second time around minimalism and L2 acquisition. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Hilles, S. (1991). Access to universal grammar in second language acquisition. In Eubank, L. (Ed), Point Counterpoint Universal Grammar in the Second Language (pp. 305-338). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kanatlar, G. M. (2005). L1 use in beginner level EFL speaking classes and its effect on elementary level students’ oral performances. Doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları No. 1654. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Basımevi.
Klapper, J. (1998). Language learning at school and university: the great grammar debate continues (II). Language Learning Journal, 18 (1), 22-28. Retrieved December 23, 2008, from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all?content=10.1080/09571739885200211
Kobayashi, H. & Rinnert, C. (1992). Effects of first language on second language writing: translation versus direct composition. Language Learning, 42, 183-209. Retrieved December 12, 2012, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb00707.x/abstract
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: from grammar to grammaring. Boston: Heinle.
Lotto L. & De Groot, A. M. B. (1998). Effects of learning method and word type on acquiring vocabulary in an unfamiliar language. Language Learning Journal, 48 (1), 31-69. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2458654
Macaro, E. (2005). Codeswitching in the L2 classroom: a communication and learning strategy. In E. Llurda (Ed.), Non-Native Teachers, Perceptions, Challenges and Contributions to the Profession, (pp. 63-84). Retrieved December 29, 2009, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/p595301320268941/
Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native teacher. Hong Kong: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
Meyer, H. (2008). The pedagogical implications of L1 use in the L2 classroom. Retrieved January 23, 2009, from http://www.kyoai.ac.jp/college/ronshuu/no-08/meyer1.pdf
Miles, R. (2004). Evaluating the use of L1 in the English language classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.bhamlive3.bham.ac.uk/Documents/collegeartslaw/cels/essays/matefltesldissertatio ns/Milesdiss.pdf
Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145. Retrieved April 21, 2012, from http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FAPL%2FAPL24%2FS026719050400006 6a.pdf&code=4965c639ba5e2efc79829c68c457666d
Nolasco, R. (1999). New streetwise intermediate student's book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Neill, R. (1991). The plausible myth of learner-centredness: Or the importance of doing ordinary things well. English Language Teaching Journal, 45 (4), 293-304.
Pennington, M. C. (2002). Grammar and communication: New directions in theory and practice. In Hinkel, E. & Fotos, S. (Eds), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 77-98). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Polio, C. G. & Duff, P. A. (1994). Teachers’ language use in university foreign language classrooms: A qualitative analysis of English and target language alternation. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (3), 313-326. Retrieved October 29, 2009, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/330110
Prince, P. (1996). Second language vocabulary learning: the role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 478-493. Retrieved March 8, 2010, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/329727
Radford, A. (1998). Syntactic theory and the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramachandran, S. D. & Rahim, H. A. (2004). Meaning recall and retention: the impact of the translation method on elementary level learners’ vocabulary learning. RELC Journal, 35 (2), 161-178. Retrieved June 20, 2009, from: http://rel.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/2/161
Rell, A. B. (2005). The role of the first language (L1) in the second language (L2) classroom. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved November 9, 2008, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (Publication No. AAT 3175179).
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, H. H. (1991). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stevick, E. (1980). Teaching languages: A way and ways. Newbury House, Rowley, Massachusetts.
Swan, M. (1985). A critical look at the communicative approach (2). ELT Journal, 39 (2), 76-87. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www.chubut.edu.ar/descargas/ingles/swan_article.pdf
Şimşek, M. R. (2010). The Effects of L1 Use in the Teaching of L2 Grammar Concepts on the Students’ Achievement. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 6 (2), 142-169. Retrieved January 10, 2011, from http://eku.comu.edu.tr/eku_eski/index/6/2/mrsimsek.pdf
Şimşek, M. R. (in press). Autonomized Grammar Instruction Through L1 Use. Paper presented at the 1st Zirve University International ELT Conference: INDEPENDENT LEARNING. Gaziantep, Turkey.
Taylor, A. M. (2002) A meta-analysis on the effects of L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University, Indiana. Retrieved November 9, 2008, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (Publication No. AAT 3099215).
Turnbull, M. & Dailey-O’Cain, J. (2009). First language use in second and foreign language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Vaezi, S. ve Mirzaei, M. (2007). The effect of using translation from L1 to L2 as a teaching technique on the improvement of EFL learners' linguistic accuracy - focus on form. HLT Magazine, 5. Retrieved December 10, 2012, from http://www.hltmag.co.uk/sep07/mart03.htm
Viakinnou-Brinson, L. (2006). To teach or not to teach in the target language only? The effect of target language only and code-switching on the grammatical performance of elementary level French students. Doctoral Dissertation, Emory University, Georgia. Retrieved November 9, 2008, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text database. (Publication No. AAT 3234055).
Weschler, R. (1997). Uses of Japanese (L1) in the English classroom: introducing the functional- translation method. The Internet TESL Journal, 3 (11). Retrieved December 20, 2008, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Weschler-UsingL1.html
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yavuz, M. A. & Şimşek, M. R. (2008). Yabancı Dil Öğretim Yöntemlerinin Eytişimsel İncelemesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10 (4), 47-64. http://www.sbe.deu.edu.tr/dergi/cilt10.sayı4/10.4%20yavuz%20şimşek.pdf adresinden 17 Mayıs 2009 tarihinde indirilmiştir.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Meliha Şimşek

Yayımlanma Tarihi

25 Ocak 2013

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Ağustos 2012

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2012 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 7

DOI

https://doi.org/10.20875/sb.93275

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA97TE78SG

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Şimşek, M. (2013). Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(7), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.20875/sb.93275

AMA

1.Şimşek M. Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning. MAKU SOBED. 2013;4(7):1-24. doi:10.20875/sb.93275

Chicago

Şimşek, Meliha. 2013. “Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 4 (7): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.20875/sb.93275.

EndNote

Şimşek M (01 Ocak 2013) Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 4 7 1–24.

IEEE

[1]M. Şimşek, “Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning”, MAKU SOBED, c. 4, sy 7, ss. 1–24, Oca. 2013, doi: 10.20875/sb.93275.

ISNAD

Şimşek, Meliha. “Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 4/7 (01 Ocak 2013): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.20875/sb.93275.

JAMA

1.Şimşek M. Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning. MAKU SOBED. 2013;4:1–24.

MLA

Şimşek, Meliha. “Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 4, sy 7, Ocak 2013, ss. 1-24, doi:10.20875/sb.93275.

Vancouver

1.Meliha Şimşek. Erek Dilin Dilbilgisi Öğretimine Kavram-Temelli Bir Yaklaşım: Anadil Destekli Dil Öğrenme - A Concept-Based Approach To L2 Grammar Instruction: L1-Assisted Language Learning. MAKU SOBED. 01 Ocak 2013;4(7):1-24. doi:10.20875/sb.93275