SOLUTİON OF THE SUPPLİER SELECTİON PROBLEM WİTH THE AHP-BASED MAIRCA METHOD

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 37, 42 - 63, 30.05.2023

Nazife Şahin Macit

https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.1195851

Cited By: 3

Öz

The process of identifying, evaluating and contracting with suppliers, which plays an important role in the success of any organization, causes organizations to consume enormous amounts of financial resources. In order to reduce purchasing risk, maximize the total value for the buyer, and develop long-term relationships between buyers and suppliers, companies need to give due importance to the supply chain. Since the variety of uncontrollable and unpredictable criteria in the supplier selection problem affects the evaluation and decision-making process, such problems are very complex and different approaches are used for their solution. In this study, it is aimed to choose the best supplier that provides milk and dairy products for a supermarket operating in Kelkit district of Gümüşhane province. First, the necessary literature was searched, then the purchasing manager of the enterprise was interviewed and the criteria to be used in solving the problem were selected from the relevant literature, and 5 supplier items related to milk and dairy products were determined to be evaluated. The weighting of the criteria was made with the AHP method and it was revealed that the most important criteria were product quality, solving the quality problem, packaged delivery and the amount of defect-free product. Afterwards, 5 supplier alternatives were evaluated with the MAIRCA method. As a result of the evaluation, it was determined that the best alternative supplier was A2.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Supplier Selection, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), MAIRCA

TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ PROBLEMİNİN AHP TEMELLİ MAIRCA YÖNTEMİ İLE ÇÖZÜMÜ

Öz

Herhangi bir organizasyonun başarısı için önemli rol oynayan tedarikçilerin belirlenmesi, değerlendirilmesi ve onlarla sözleşme yapılması süreci organizasyonların finansal kaynaklarını muazzam miktarda kullanmasına sebep olmaktadır. Satın alma riskini azaltmak, alıcı için toplam değeri maksimize etmek ve alıcılar ile tedarikçiler arasında uzun vadeli ilişkiler geliştirmek açısından firmaların tedarik zincirine gereken önemi vermesi gerekmektedir. Tedarikçi seçimi probleminde kontrol edilemeyen ve öngörülemeyen kriterlerin çeşitli olması değerlendirme ve karar verme sürecini etkilediğinden dolayı bu tarz problemler çok karmaşıktır ve çözümü için farklı yaklaşımlar kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Gümüşhane ilinin Kelkit ilçesinde faaliyet gösteren bir süpermarket için süt ve süt ürünlerinin tedarikini sağlayan en iyi tedarikçinin seçimi amaçlanmıştır. İlk olarak gerekli literatür taraması yapılmış, sonra işletmenin satın alma müdürü ile görüşülüp problemin çözümünde kullanılacak olan kriterler ilgili literatürden seçilmiş, süt ve süt ürünleri ile alakalı 5 tedarikçi kalemi değerlendirilmek için belirlenmiştir. Kriterlerin ağırlıklandırılması AHP yöntemi ile yapılmış ve en önemli kriterlerin ürün kalitesi, kalite sorununu çözümleme, ambalajlı teslim ile hatasız ürün miktarı olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Sonrasında 5 tedarikçi alternatifi MAIRCA yöntemi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Değerlendirme sonucunda en iyi alternatif tedarikçinin A2 olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tedarikçi Seçimi, Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP), MAIRCA

Kaynakça

• Schramm, V. B., Cabral, L. P. B. ve Schramm, F. (2020). Approaches for supporting sustainable supplier selection: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123089.
• Mina, H., Kannan, D., Zanjani, S. M. G. ve Biuki, M. (2021). Transition towards circular supplier selection in petrochemical industry: a hybrid approach to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125273.
• UmaDevi, K., Elango, C. ve Rajesh, R. (2012). Vendor selection using AHP. Procedia Engineering, 38, 1946-1949.
• Kubde, R. A. ve Bansod, S. V. (2012). The analytic hierarchy process based supplier selection approach for collaborative planning forecasting and replenishment systems. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 1(7).
• Manucharyan, H. (2021). Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: a literatüre critique. INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION (IJM&P), 12(1).
• Phumchusri, N. ve Tangsiriwattana, S. (2018). Optimal supplier selection model with multiple criteria: a case study in the automotive parts industry. ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 23(1).
• Sumanto, Indriani, K., Marita, L. S. ve Christian, A. (2020). Supplier selection very small aperture terminal using AHP-TOPSIS framework. Journal of Intelligent Computing and Health Informatics, 1(2), 39-45.
• De Felice, F., Deldoost, M. H., Faizollahi, M. ve Petrillo, A. (2015). Performance measurement model for the supplier selection based on AHP. International Journal of Engineering Business Management,7(17).
• Anggani, P. C., Baihaqi, I. ve Anggrahini, D. (2017). Supplier selection using analytical hierarchy process at PT. Indolakto. JURNAL SAINS DAN SENI ITS, 6(1).
• Rahmi, S. R. ve Firman, F. (2019). Analysis of supplier selection by using the AHP and PROMETHEE methods in Regional Public Hospital Padang (RSUD Padang). Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 97.
• Sarıçam, C. ve Yilmaz, S. M. (2021). An integrated framework for supplier selection and performance evaluation for apparel retail industry. Textile Research Journal, 0(0), 1–19.
• Alsuwehri, Y. N. (2011). Supplier evaluation and selection by using the analytic hierarchy process approach. An EMGT Field Project report submitted to the Engineering Management Program and the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Science. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/8749/Alsuwehri,%20Yaser%20N.%20EMGT%20Field%20Project.pdf;sequence=1 Polat, G. ve Eray, E. (2015). An integrated approach using AHP-ER to supplier selection in railway projects. Procedia Engineering, 123, 415 – 422.
• Fei, L. (2020). D-ANP: a multiple criteria decision making method for supplier selection. Applied Intelligence, 50,2537–2554.
• Hwang, H. S., Chuang, C. L. ve Jong, M. (2003). Supplier selection and planning model using AHP. International Journal of the Information Systems for Logistics and Management (IJISLM) 1(1), ISAHP 2005, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 8-10.
• Khaireddin, M. A. (2016). Building and applying a proposed model for suppliers' selection using multi-criteria approach: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). International Journal of Statistics and Systems, 11(1), 47-65.
• Jain, V., Sangaiah, A. K., Sakhuja, S., Thoduka, N. ve Aggarwal, R. (2018). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: a case study in the Indian automotive industry. Neural Comput & Applic, 29,555–564.
• Chi, H. T. X. ve Trinh, D. H. N. (2016). Supplier selection by using AHP-TOPSIS and goal programming: a case study in Casumina Rubber Company – Vietnam. MATEC Web of Conferences, 68, 06002.
• Wang, C. N., Tsai, H. T., Ho, T. P., Nguyen, V. T. ve Huang, Y. F. (2020). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model for supplier evaluation and selection for oil production projects in Vietnam. Processes, 8, 134.
• Kumar, J. ve Roy, N. (2011). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for a power transmission industry to vendor selection decisions. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887), 12 (11).
• Saidbek, S. (2017). Supplier selection in service industry using analytical hierarchy process. [Master of Science]. Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimağusa, North Cyprus.
• JI, M. ve AM, C. (2013). Supplier evaluation and selection: a review of the literature since 2007. Management C. Hernandez, A. Lopez-Paredes ve J. M. Perez Rios (Ed.) Managing Complexity Challenges for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. INSISOC, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
• Çöl, G. ve Hasgül, S. (2013). An integrated approach to supplier selection using AHP and FUZZY PROMETHEE. TOJSAT: The Online Journal of Science and Technology, 3(3).
• Ecer, F. ve Küçük, O. (2008). Tedarikçi seçiminde analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi ve bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(1), 355-369. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/2821/38057
• Pachemska, T. A., Lapevski, M. ve Timovski, R. (2014 November 21-22). Analytical hierarchical process (AHP) method application in the process of selection and evaluation [Bildiri sunumu]. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, GABROVO.
• Mukherjee, K. (2017). Supplier selection an MCDA-based approach. (1rd ed.). Springer New Delhi.
• Ecer, F. (2020). Sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçimi: FUCOM sübjektif ağırlıklandırma yöntemi temelli MAIRCA yaklaşımı. Mehmet Akif Ersoy İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 26-48.
• Aksoy, E. (2021). An Analysis on Turkey's merger and acquisition activities: MAIRCA method. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 12(1), 1-11.
• Badi, I. ve Ballem, M. (2018). Supplier selection using rough BWM-MAIRCA model: a case study in pharmaceutical supplying in LIBYA. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(2).
• Ulutaş, A. (2019). SWARA ve MAIRCA yöntemleri ile catering firması seçimi. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(4), 1467-1479.
• Bozanic, D., Randelovic, A., Radovanovic, M. ve Tesic, D. (2020). A hybrid LBWA - IR-MAIRCA multi-criteria decision-making model for determination of (constructive elements of weapons. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Mechanical Engineering, 18(3), 399-418.
• Nguyen, H. Q., Nguyen, V. T., Phan, D. P., Tran, Q. H. ve Vu, N. P. (2022). Multi-criteria decision making in the PMEDM process by using MARCOS, TOPSIS, and MAIRCA methods. Applied Sciences, 12, 3720.
• Fidan, H. (2021). Critic ve mairca çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ile uluslararası hedef pazar seçimi. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 23(41), 291-309.
• Ecer, F. (2022). An extended MAIRCA method using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for coronavirus vaccine selection in the age of COVID-19. Neural Computing and Applications, 34, 5603–5623.
• Ayçin, E. (2020). Personel seçim sürecinde CRITIC ve MAIRCA yöntemlerinin kullanılması. İşletme, 1(1), 1-12.
• Pamucar, D. S., Tarle, S. P. ve Parezanovic, T. (2018). New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL-MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre. Economic Research, 31(1), 1641-1665.
• Ayçin, E. (2020). Çok kriterli karar verme: bilgisayar uygulamaları çözümler. (2. Bs.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık Tic. LTD. ŞTİ.
• Hruska, R., Prusa, P. ve Babic, D. (2014). The use of AHP method for selection of supplier. Transport, 29(2), 195–203.