Uçuş Görevlilerinin Emniyet Tutumlarına İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Emniyet tutumu, çalışanların emniyet politikaları ve önlemleri hakkındaki inançlarını ve duygularını yansıtır. Emniyet tutumları, çalışanların güvenlik davranışları üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahiptir. Uçuş görevlileri uçuş içi emniyet ve hizmetlerde hayati bir rol oynar. Ticari uçakları içeren ölümcül kazaların çoğunun, uçuş ekibi arasındaki iletişim ve ekip çalışmasındaki başarısızlıklardan kaynaklandığı bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, uçuş güvenliği tutumlarında havayolu uçuş ekibinde kadın ve erkek arasında bir farklılaşma olup olmadığını ortaya çıkarmaktır. Çalışmada Ford ve diğ. (2014) tarafından geliştirilen Uçuş emniyet tutumu anketi kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmada gönüllü olan 58 uçuş görevlisine anket uygulanmıştır. Uçuş güvenliği tutumlarındaki iki kategorik değişken arasındaki önemli farklılıklar, parametrik olmayan testlerden biri olan Mann-Whitney U testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre erkeklerin uçuş güvenliği tutumları, kadınların uçuş güvenliği tutumlarından daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma, emniyet tutumu konusunda Türkiye’de yapılan bir çalışma olması yönüyle literatüre katkı sağlayacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Havacılık
• Havayolu
• Uçuş Görevlileri
• Emniyet Tutumları
• Türkiye

An Evaluation of Flight Attendants’ Safety Attitudes

Öz

Safety attitude reflects employee beliefs and feelings about safety policies and measures. Safety attitudes have a significant influence on employee safety behaviour. Flight attendants play a vital role in in-flight safety and services. It is known that most fatal accidents involving commercial aircraft are caused by failures in communication and teamwork among flight attendants. This study aims to find out whether there is a differentiation between men and women in airline flight crew in-flight safety attitudes. In the study, the flight safety attitude questionnaire which was developed by Ford et al. (2014) was used. The questionnaire was applied to 58 volunteer flight attendants in the study. Significant differences between the two categorical variables in-flight safety attitudes were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test which is one of the non-parametric tests. According to the results of the analysis, it was determined that the flight safety attitudes of men were higher than the flight safety attitudes of women. The research will contribute to the literature as it is a study conducted in Turkey on safety attitudes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aviation
• Airline
• Flight Attendants
• Safety Attitudes
• Turkey

Kaynakça

1. AASE, Karina, SKJERVE, Ann Britt and ROSNESS, Ragnar (2005), “Why Good Luck Has A Reason: Mindful Practices in Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling”, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Organizational Learning and Knowledge: The Passion for Learning and Knowing (Ed. S. Gherardi, D. Nicolini), University of Trento E-Books, Trento, ss.193-210.
2. AIR ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATION BRANCH (1990), Report on the Accident to Boeing 737-400, Report No: 4/1990, Air Accidents Investigation Branch, East Midlands (UK).
3. AVIATION SAFETY NETWORK (2005), “Helios Flight 522 Accident Description”, Aviation Safety Network Report, http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20050814-0 (Access Date: 22.02.2021).
4. BALCI, Ali (2001), Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma: Yöntem, Teknik ve İlkeler, Pegem Yayınları, Ankara.
5. BARON, Robert (2012), “Double Trouble”, E-Article (21.05.2012), Available at https://www.abag.org.br/news/documents/Seg_Voo-Learn.pdf (Access Date: 22.02.2021).
6. BROWN, Losi and RANTZ, William (2010), “The Efficacy of Flight Attendant/Pilot Communication in A Post-9/11 Environment: Viewed from both Sides of The Fortress Door”, International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, S.10(1), ss.227-248.
7. CHANG, Cheng-Ping, and CHIU, Ju-Mei (2009), “Flight Attendants’ Emotional Labor And Exhaustion in The Taiwanese Airline Industry”, Journal of Service Science and Management, S.2(4), ss.305-311.
8. CHEN, Ching-Fu and CHEN, Shu-Chuan (2014), “Investigating the Effects of Job Demands and Job Resources on Cabin Crew Safety Behaviors”, Tourism Management, S.41, ss.45-52.

9. CHEN, Shu-Chuan (2017), "Paternalistic Leadership And Cabin Crews’ Upward Safety Communication: The Motivation of Voice Behavior", Journal of Air Transport Management, S.62, ss.44-53.
10. COX, Sue and COX, Tom (1991), “The Structure of Employee Attitudes to Safety: A European Example”, Work & Stress, S.5(2), ss.93-106.
11. FORD, Jane, HENDERSON, Robert and O'HARE, David (2013), “Barriers to Intra-Aircraft Communication and Safety: The Perspective of The Flight Attendants”, The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, S.23(4), ss.368-387.
12. FORD, Jane, HENDERSON, Robert and O'HARE, David (2014), “The Effects of Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training on Flight Attendants' Safety Attitudes”, Journal of safety research, S.48, ss.49-56.
13. FORD, Jane, O’HARE, David and HENDERSON, Robert (2013), “Putting the “We” into Teamwork: Effects of Priming Personal or Social Identity on Flight Attendants’ Perceptions of Teamwork and Communication”, Human Factors, S.55(3), ss.499-508.
14. GABBOTT, Mark, YELENA, Tsarenko and WAI, Hoe Mok (2011), "Emotional Intelligence as a Moderator of Coping Strategies And Service Outcomes in Circumstances of Service Failure", Journal of Service Research, S.14(2), ss.234-248.
15. GEREDE, Ender (2006), “Havacılık Emniyeti ve Havacılık Güvenliği Kavramları Arasındaki İlişki ve Farkların Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Yönetim Dergisi, S.17(54), ss.26-37.
16. GREGORICH, Steven, HELMREICH, Robert and WILHELM, John (1990), “The Structure of Cockpit Management Attitudes”, Journal of Applied Psychology, S.75(6), ss.682–690.
17. GÜRBÜZ, Sait ve ŞAHİN, Faruk (2018), Research Methods for Social Sciences, Seçkin Publishing, Ankara, 4th Edition.
18. HELMREICH, Robert (1984), “Cockpit Management Attitudes”, Human Factors, S.26(5), ss.583-589.
19. HELMREICH, Robert and FOUSHEE, Clayton (1993), “Why Crew Resource Management? Empirical and Theoretical Bases of Human Factors Training in Aviation”, Cockpit Resource Management (Ed. E. Wiener, B. Kanki, R. Helmreich), Academic Press, San Diego – CA, ss.3-45.
20. HELMREICH, Robert and FOUSHEE, Clayton (2010), “Why CRM? Empirical and Theoretical Bases of Human Factors Training”, Crew Resource Management, Academic Press, San Diego – CA, ss.3-57.
21. HELMREICH, Robert, MERRITT, Ashleigh and WILHELM, John (1999), “The Evolution of Crew Resource Management Training in Commercial Aviation", International Journal of Aviation Psychology, S.9(1), ss.19-32.
22. HENNING, Jaime B., CAROLYN, J. Stufft, STEPHANIE, C. Payne, MINDY, E. Bergman, MANNAN, Sam and NIR, Keren (2009), "The Influence of Individual Differences on Organizational Safety Attitudes", Safety Science, S.47(3), ss.337-345.
23. INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION (2014), Icao Cabin Crew Safety Training Manual, International Civil Aviation Organization Publisher, Montreal (Canada), Doc.1002 - AN/502, http://www.aviationchief.com/uploads/9/2/0/9/92098238/icao_doc_10002_-_cabin_crew_safety_training_manual_1.pdf (Access Date: 24.11.2020).
24. JIMENEZ, Camilo, KASPER, Karissa, RIVERA, Javier, TALONE, Andrew and JENTSCH, Florian (2015), “Crew Resource Management (CRM) What Aviation Can Learn From the Application of CRM in Other Domains”, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, S.59(1), ss.946-950.
25. KIRKPATRICK, Donald (1976), “Evaluation of Training”, Training and Development Handbook (Ed. Robert Craig, Lester Bittel), McGraw-Hill Publisher, New York, ss.1-27.
26. KISS, Captain De Vere Michael (2019), “Hypoxic Performance Decrements in Pilots with Undiagnosed Atherosclerosis”, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Human-Centered Design Institute - Florida Institute of Technology, West University Boulevard, Melbourne (USA).
27. LI-HUA, Kao, MARGARET, Stewart and KAI-HUI, Lee (2009), “Using Structural Equation Modeling to Predict Cabin Safety Outcomes among Taiwanese Airlines”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, S.45(2), ss.357-365.
28. MANN, Henry B. and WHITNEY, Donald R. (1947), "On A Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables Is Stochastically Larger Than The Other", The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, S.18, ss.50-60.
29. MALHOTRA, Naresh (1996), Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey.
30. MENGENCI, Cengiz (2014), “Ekip Kaynak Yönetimi ve Sivil Havayolu Kazaları: Türkiye Örneği”, Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, S.1(2), ss.44-61.
31. MING, Ji, BO, Liu, HONGWEI, Li, SHIYUN, Yang and YING, Li (2019), “The Effects of Safety Attitude and Safety Climate on Flight Attendants’ Proactive Personality with Regard to Safety Behaviors”, Journal of Air Transport Management, S.78, ss.80-86.
32. MOSHANSKY, Virgil (1992), “Commission of Inquiry into the Air Ontario Accident at Dryden, Ontario, Final Report, Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa - Ontario (Canada).
33. MUNOZ-MARRON, Daniel (2018), “Human Factors in Aviation: CRM (Crew Resource Management)”, Papeles del Psicólogo/Psychologist Papers, S.39(3), ss.191-199.
34. MURPHY, Alexandra (2001), “The Flight Attendant Dilemma: An Analysis of Communication and Sensemaking During in-Flight Emergencies”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, S.29(1), ss.30-53.
35. NACHAR, Nadim (2008), “The Mann-Whitney U: A Test For Assessing Whether Two Independent Samples Come From The Same Distribution”, Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, S.4(1), ss.13-20.
36. ÖZEN, Yener and GÜL, Abdulkadir (2010), “Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmalarında Evren-Örneklem Sorunu”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, S.15, ss.394-422.
37. PUNCH, Keith (2011), Sosyal Araştırmalara Giriş: Nicel ve Nitel Yaklaşımlar (Çev. Dursun Bayrak, Bader Arslan, Zeynep Akyüz), Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara, 2.Baskı.
38. SALAS, Eduardo, BURKE, Shawn, BOWERS, Clint Alan and WILSON, Katherine (2001), “Team Training in the Skies: Does Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training Work?”, Human Factors, S.43(4), ss.641-674.
39. SKJERVE, Ann Britt (2008), “The Use of Mindful Safety Practices at Norwegian Petroleum Installations”, Safety Science, S.46(6), ss.1002-1015.
40. STAKE, Robert (1995), The Art of Case Study Research, Sage Publisher, Thousand Oaks – CA.
41. TSOLAKIS, Akrivos (2006), “Helios Airways Flight HCY522 Boeing 737-31S at Grammatiko, Hellas on 14 August 2005”, Air Accident Investigation & Aviation Safety Board Report, Hellenic Republic Ministry of Transport & Communications, Athens - Greece.
42. US AIRWAYS (2000), Boeing 737-300/400 Pilot’s Handbook, US Airways in House Printing, Pittsburgh - PA.
43. YELGIN, Çetin and ERGÜN, Nalan (2020), "Job Demands Perceived by Cabin Crew in Airline Companies: A Case in Turkey", Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, S.22.2 ss.200-218.