Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Latin Kilise Babaları Perspektifinden Hristiyanlıkta Boşanma ve Yeniden Evlenme

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 257 - 278, 30.06.2025

Öz

Hristiyanlıkta boşanma ve yeniden evlenme olgusu, kaynağını Kitab-ı Mukaddes’ten almaktadır. Söz konusu konuyla ilgili Kitab-ı Mukaddes ifadeleri kilise babalarınca literal ve alegorik olarak yorumlanmış ve Hristiyanlar için belirleyici olmuştur. Bu minvalde çalışmanın konusunu Latin kilise babaları perspektifinden Hristiyanlıkta boşanma ve yeniden evlenme olgusu oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma Tertullian, Lactantius, Ambrose, Jerome ve Augustine gibi erken dönem Latin kilise babalarının boşanma ve yeniden evlenme konusundaki açıklamalarıyla sınırlandırılmıştır. Çalışmanın hipotezi, Hristiyanlıkta boşanma ve yeniden evlenme konusundaki İsa ve Pavlus’un söylemlerinin yanı sıra erken dönem kilise babalarının yorumlarının da belirleyici olduğudur. Ayrıca çalışma, mezkur kilise babalarının boşanma ve yeniden evlenme konusunda ittifak ettikleri ve ayrıştıkları yönleri ortaya koymayı hedeflemiştir. Çalışmada dinler tarihinin tarihsel, deskriptif ve hermenötiksel metotları kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın birincil kaynaklarını başta Kitab-ı Mukaddes olmak üzere kilise babalarının eserleri; ikincil kaynaklarını ise, konuyla ilgili modern batı literatürü oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma sayesinde kilise babalarının boşanma ve yeniden evlenme konusunda farklı görüşler ortaya koydukları saptanmış; aynı zamanda Ambrose dışında diğer kilise babalarının eşitlikçi bir anlayış sergiledikleri görülmüştür. Dolayısıyla çalışma, Hristiyanlıktaki boşanma ve yeniden evlenme konusunu Latin kilise babaları perspektifinden ortaya koyması açısından önem arz etmektedir.

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmanın hazırlanma sürecinde bilimsel ve etik ilkelere uyulduğu ve yararlanılan tüm çalışmaların kaynakçada belirtildiği beyan olunur.

Teşekkür

Merhabalar sayın hocam, sunacağınız katkılardan dolayı teşekkür eder, çalışmalarınızda kolaylıklar dilerim.

Kaynakça

  • Ambrose. “The Treatise Concerning Widows”. NPNF2-10. Ambrose: Selected Works and Letters. ed. Philip Schaff. 10/673-700. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 2004.
  • Arendzen, J. P. “Ante-Nicene Interpretations of the Sayings on Divorce”. The Journal of Theological Studies 20/79 (1919), 230-241.
  • Augustine. “Adulterous Marriages”. çev. Charles T. Huegelmeyer. The Fathers of the Church: St. Augustine Treatises on Marriage and Other Subjects. ed. Joseph Deferrari. 27/61-132. Washington, D.C: The Catholic University of America Press, 1955.
  • Augustine. “Adulterous Marriages”. çev. Ray Kearney. Marriage and Virginity. 142-188. New York: New City Press, 1999.
  • Augustine. “On Marriage and Concupiscence”. NPNF1-05. St. Augustine: Anti Pelagian Writings. ed. Philip Schaff. 5/522-564. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1886.
  • Bardis, Panos D. “Early Christianity and the Family”. Sociological Bulletin 13/2 (1964), 1-23.
  • Case, Shirley Jackson. “Divorce and Remarriage in the Teaching of Jesus”. The Biblical World 45/1 (1915), 18-22.
  • Crouzel, Henri. “Divorce and Remarriage in the Early Church: Some Reflections on Historical Methodology”. çev. Michelle K. Borras. Communio: International Catholic Review 41 (2014), 472-503.
  • Çetin, Hülya. “Dağdaki Vaazda Boşanma”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi 3/2 (2012), 227-238.
  • Daniel-Hughes. “‘Only in the Lord’?: Debates over Paul’s View of Remarriage in Early Christianity”. Science et Esprit 66/2 (2014), 269-283.
  • Fitzmyer, Joseph A. “The Matthean Divorce Texts and Some New Palestinian Evidence”. Theological Studies 37 (1976), 197-226.
  • Hunter, David G. “Augustine’s Doubts on Divorce: Reconsiderations on Remarriage”. Augustinian Studies 48/1-2 (2017), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies201741827
  • Hunter, David G. “Historical Theology and the Problem of Divorce and Remarriage Today”. Journal o f Moral Theology 10/2 (2021), 34-59.
  • Jerome. “The Letters of St. Jerome: Letter LV. To Amandus”. NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome. ed. Philip Schaff. 6/244-249. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1892. 278 • Divorce and Remarriage in Christianity from the Perspective of the Latin Church Fathers https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/marifetname
  • Jerome. “The Letters of St. Jerome: Letter LXXVII. To Oceanus”. NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome. ed. Philip Schaff. 6/336-345. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1892.
  • Kutsal Kitap ve Deuterokanonik (Apokrif) Kitaplar. İstanbul: Kitabı Mukaddes Şirketi, 2003.
  • Lactantius. “The Divine Institutes”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. ed. Alexander Roberts vd. 7/9-223. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1913.
  • Lactantius. “The Epitome of the Divine Institutes”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. ed. Alexander Roberts vd. 7/224-228. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1913.
  • Maille, Patrick H. Early Christianity and the Family. Texas: Texas Tech University, Master Thesis, 1998.
  • Nathan, Geoffrey S. The Family in Late Antiquity: The Rise of Christianity and the Endurance of Tradition. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.
  • Oluwashola, Jacob Peter - Paul, Kolawole Oladotun. “Jesus’ Teaching on Divorce in Matthew 19:3”. The American Journal of Biblical Theology 22/17 (2021), 1-10.
  • Reynolds, Philip Lyndon. Marriage in the Western Church: The Christianization of Marriage during the Patristic and Early Medieval Periods. Leiden, New York, Köln: E.J. Brill, 1994.
  • Rordorf, Willy. “Marriage in the New Testament and in the Early Church”. Journal of Ecclesiastical History 20/2 (1969), 193-210.
  • Schatkin, Margaret A. “Divorce”. Encyclopedia of Early Christianity (Second Edition). ed. Everett Ferguson. 340-341. Great Britain: Routledge, 1999.
  • Songela, Joel Hamuli. “Divorce and Remarriage in Scripture”. Africa Journal of Evangelical Theology 32/2 (2013), 91-106.
  • Tertullian. “Against Marcion”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. ed. Alexander Roberts vd. 3/269-475. Buffalo: The Christian Literature Publishing Company, 1885.
  • Tertullian. “On Modesty”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. ed. Alexander Roberts vd. 4/74-101. Boston: The Christian Literature Publishing Company, 1885.
  • Tertullian. “On Monogamy”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. 4/59-72. Buffalo: The Christian Literature Publishing Company, 1885.
  • Tertullian. “To His Wife”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. ed. Alexander Roberts vd. 4/39-49. Buffalo: The Christian Literature Publishing Company, 1885.
  • Vawter, Bruce. “Divorce and the New Testament”. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 39/4 (1977), 528-542.
  • Yasdıman, Hakkı Ş. “Pavlus’un Evlilik Hakkındaki Görüşü”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 8 (2001), 77-91.

Divorce and Remarriage in Christianity from the Perspective of the Latin Church Fathers

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 257 - 278, 30.06.2025

Öz

The phenomenon of divorce and remarriage in Christianity derives its origin from the Bible. The Bible’s statements on the subject in question were interpreted literally and allegorically by the church fathers and became decisive for Christians. In this context, the subject of this study is the phenomenon of divorce and remarriage in Christianity from the perspective of the Latin Church Fathers. The study is limited to the statements on divorce and remarriage of early Latin church fathers such as Tertullian, Lactantius, Ambrose, Jerome, and Augustine. The hypothesis of the study is that in Christianity, the discourses of Jesus and Paul on divorce and remarriage, as well as the comments of the early church fathers, are decisive. In addition, the study aimed to reveal the aspects on which the aforementioned church fathers agree and disagree on divorce and remarriage. In the study, historical, descriptive and hermeneutic methods of the history of religions were used. The primary sources of the study are the works of the church fathers, especially the Bible; the secondary sources are modern western literature on the subject. The study found that church fathers had different views on divorce and remarriage; it was also seen that, with the exception of Ambrose, the other church fathers displayed an egalitarian approach. Therefore, the study is important in terms of revealing the issue of divorce and remarriage in Christianity from the perspective of the Latin Church Fathers.

Kaynakça

  • Ambrose. “The Treatise Concerning Widows”. NPNF2-10. Ambrose: Selected Works and Letters. ed. Philip Schaff. 10/673-700. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 2004.
  • Arendzen, J. P. “Ante-Nicene Interpretations of the Sayings on Divorce”. The Journal of Theological Studies 20/79 (1919), 230-241.
  • Augustine. “Adulterous Marriages”. çev. Charles T. Huegelmeyer. The Fathers of the Church: St. Augustine Treatises on Marriage and Other Subjects. ed. Joseph Deferrari. 27/61-132. Washington, D.C: The Catholic University of America Press, 1955.
  • Augustine. “Adulterous Marriages”. çev. Ray Kearney. Marriage and Virginity. 142-188. New York: New City Press, 1999.
  • Augustine. “On Marriage and Concupiscence”. NPNF1-05. St. Augustine: Anti Pelagian Writings. ed. Philip Schaff. 5/522-564. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1886.
  • Bardis, Panos D. “Early Christianity and the Family”. Sociological Bulletin 13/2 (1964), 1-23.
  • Case, Shirley Jackson. “Divorce and Remarriage in the Teaching of Jesus”. The Biblical World 45/1 (1915), 18-22.
  • Crouzel, Henri. “Divorce and Remarriage in the Early Church: Some Reflections on Historical Methodology”. çev. Michelle K. Borras. Communio: International Catholic Review 41 (2014), 472-503.
  • Çetin, Hülya. “Dağdaki Vaazda Boşanma”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi 3/2 (2012), 227-238.
  • Daniel-Hughes. “‘Only in the Lord’?: Debates over Paul’s View of Remarriage in Early Christianity”. Science et Esprit 66/2 (2014), 269-283.
  • Fitzmyer, Joseph A. “The Matthean Divorce Texts and Some New Palestinian Evidence”. Theological Studies 37 (1976), 197-226.
  • Hunter, David G. “Augustine’s Doubts on Divorce: Reconsiderations on Remarriage”. Augustinian Studies 48/1-2 (2017), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies201741827
  • Hunter, David G. “Historical Theology and the Problem of Divorce and Remarriage Today”. Journal o f Moral Theology 10/2 (2021), 34-59.
  • Jerome. “The Letters of St. Jerome: Letter LV. To Amandus”. NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome. ed. Philip Schaff. 6/244-249. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1892. 278 • Divorce and Remarriage in Christianity from the Perspective of the Latin Church Fathers https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/marifetname
  • Jerome. “The Letters of St. Jerome: Letter LXXVII. To Oceanus”. NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome. ed. Philip Schaff. 6/336-345. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1892.
  • Kutsal Kitap ve Deuterokanonik (Apokrif) Kitaplar. İstanbul: Kitabı Mukaddes Şirketi, 2003.
  • Lactantius. “The Divine Institutes”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. ed. Alexander Roberts vd. 7/9-223. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1913.
  • Lactantius. “The Epitome of the Divine Institutes”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. ed. Alexander Roberts vd. 7/224-228. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1913.
  • Maille, Patrick H. Early Christianity and the Family. Texas: Texas Tech University, Master Thesis, 1998.
  • Nathan, Geoffrey S. The Family in Late Antiquity: The Rise of Christianity and the Endurance of Tradition. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.
  • Oluwashola, Jacob Peter - Paul, Kolawole Oladotun. “Jesus’ Teaching on Divorce in Matthew 19:3”. The American Journal of Biblical Theology 22/17 (2021), 1-10.
  • Reynolds, Philip Lyndon. Marriage in the Western Church: The Christianization of Marriage during the Patristic and Early Medieval Periods. Leiden, New York, Köln: E.J. Brill, 1994.
  • Rordorf, Willy. “Marriage in the New Testament and in the Early Church”. Journal of Ecclesiastical History 20/2 (1969), 193-210.
  • Schatkin, Margaret A. “Divorce”. Encyclopedia of Early Christianity (Second Edition). ed. Everett Ferguson. 340-341. Great Britain: Routledge, 1999.
  • Songela, Joel Hamuli. “Divorce and Remarriage in Scripture”. Africa Journal of Evangelical Theology 32/2 (2013), 91-106.
  • Tertullian. “Against Marcion”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. ed. Alexander Roberts vd. 3/269-475. Buffalo: The Christian Literature Publishing Company, 1885.
  • Tertullian. “On Modesty”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. ed. Alexander Roberts vd. 4/74-101. Boston: The Christian Literature Publishing Company, 1885.
  • Tertullian. “On Monogamy”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. 4/59-72. Buffalo: The Christian Literature Publishing Company, 1885.
  • Tertullian. “To His Wife”. Ante-Nicene Fathers. ed. Alexander Roberts vd. 4/39-49. Buffalo: The Christian Literature Publishing Company, 1885.
  • Vawter, Bruce. “Divorce and the New Testament”. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 39/4 (1977), 528-542.
  • Yasdıman, Hakkı Ş. “Pavlus’un Evlilik Hakkındaki Görüşü”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 8 (2001), 77-91.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Dinler Tarihi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Nuh Yılmaz 0000-0002-6048-0363

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 26 Haziran 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Mart 2025
Kabul Tarihi 25 Nisan 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

ISNAD Yılmaz, Nuh. “Latin Kilise Babaları Perspektifinden Hristiyanlıkta Boşanma ve Yeniden Evlenme”. Marifetname 12/1 (Haziran2025), 257-278.

Marifetname Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.