Belediyelerde İnovasyon: “Living Lab” Örneği

Öz

Bu makale belediyelerde inovasyon faaliyetinin anlaşılmasını, yaygın ve sürdürülebilir seviyeye gelmesini, bu yönde kentleri inovasyon laboratuarı olarak gören, sunulan ürün ve hizmetlerle vatandaşların yaşam kalitelerini artırmayı hedefleyen, vatandaş ve diğer aktörlerin katılımını önemseyerek inovasyonu demokratikleştiren, Avrupa Birliği tarafından inovasyon aracı şeklinde betimlenen “Living Lab” ekosisteminin tanıtılmasını, living lab oluşumunun inovasyon aracı olarak kullanılabilirliğinin sorgulanmasını amaçlamaktadır. Teorik ve görgül araştırmayı içeren çalışmada büyükşehir belediyelerine yönelik alan araştırması ile inovasyon projeleriyle living lab ağı tarafından ödüle layık görülmüş Türkiye’de ilk ve tek etkin living lab olan Başakşehir Living Lab ile Finlandiya, İngiltere, İspanya living lablerinin inovasyon projelerine ve karşılaştırmalı analizine yer verilmiştir. Alan araştırmaları ile belediyelerde gelecekte yapılacak inovasyon çalışmalarına katkı sağlanması hedeflenmiştir. Araştırma bulguları belediyelerde hizmet, süreç inovasyonlarını içeren akıllı şehircilik kapsamında yer alan inovasyon çalışmaları ile sosyal inovasyon alanında projelerin hayata geçirildiğini göstermektedir. Living lablerde ise projelerin yarıdan fazlasının teknoloji ağırlıklı olduğu Başakşehir Living Lab ekosisteminin diğer living lablere göre inovasyon projeleri bağlamında yakın seviyede bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma bulguları uluslararası belge ve politikalarda önemi vurgulanan ve teşvik edilen inovasyonun ihtiyaç, istek ve teknolojik gelişmeler vb. faktörlerin etkisiyle belediyelerde uygulanmasının kaçınılmaz olduğunu, kentlerin inovasyon laboratuarı haline getirilmesi gerektiğini ve bu doğrultuda living lab ekosisteminin belediye inovasyonunu hızlandırıcı yönde etkilediğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Living Lab
• İnovasyon
• Belediyelerde İnovasyon
• Akıllı Şehircilik
• Kamuda İnovasyon

Innovation in Municipalities: Case of Living Lab

Öz

The purpose of this article is to introduce the “Living Lab” ecosystem and to describe innovation in municipalities. Living labs are becoming more common and long-lasting. The concept views cities as innovation laboratories, with the goal of improving citizens’ quality of life through the products and services provided, as well as democratising innovation by emphasising citizen and other stakeholder participation. The EU has described it as an innovation tool. The study, which includes theoretical and visual research, is about the Basaksehir Living Lab. The Living Lab network recognised this lab in a field study aimed at metropolitan municipalities as well as innovation projects, with a comparison to those in Finland, the United Kingdom, and Spain. The field studies were designed to contribute to future innovation studies to be conducted in municipalities. For the qualitative study, the “case study” method was chosen. The study’s findings show that innovation research within urban planning, as well as social innovation projects, have materialised. However, more than half of the projects in the Living Labs are technological in nature. The study’s findings suggest that due to factors such as requirements, needs, and technological developments, innovation, whose importance is emphasised and encouraged in international documentation and policies, is unavoidable in municipalities. Cities must be transformed into innovation laboratories, and the Living Lab ecosystem, in fact, has a catalysing effect on municipal innovation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innovation
• Innovation in Municipalities
• Living Lab
• Smart City
• Innovation in Public Sector

Kaynakça

1. ABI Research (2018), (https://www.abiresearch.com/market-research/product/1028389-smart-city-ranking/#, Accessed: 06 Mayıs 2018).
2. ABI Research (2018), (https://www.abiresearch.com/market-research/product/1028389-smart-city-ranking/#, Accessed: 06 Mayıs 2018).
3. Abowd, G. (1999), Classroom 2000: An experiment with the instrumental of living educational environment, IBM Systems Journal, 38(4), s. 8-30, ss. 1-52 (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.45.7642, Accessed: 04 Eylül 2018).
4. Adana Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (http://www.adana.bel.tr/stratejik-plan/, 09 Şubat 2018).
5. Adesida, O., G.i K.- Sebina, J. R.- Santos (2016),” Innovation Africa”, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, UK, ISBN:9781785603112, s. 108, (ss. 1-352).
6. Akıllı Ankara Projeleri (2016), (http://www.milliyet.com.tr/akilli-ankara-projeleri-2019-a-kadar-ankara-yerelhaber-1355414/, 10 Şubat 2018).
7. Alberta Eyaleti (2017), (http://www.municipalaffairs.alberta.ca/1595#2017awards, Accessed: 12 Şubat 2018).
8. Alberti, A. and G. Bertucci (2006), “Replicating Innovations in Governance: An Overview Innovations in Governance and Public Administration”, United Nations,

9. Albury, D (2005), “Fostering Innovation in Public Services”, Public Money&Management, 25(1), s. 53, 55, (ss. 51-56), DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00450.x, Accessed: 01.06.2017).
10. Alliance for Innovation (2016), (https://transformgov.org/documents/tempe-grease-cooperative, Accessed: 12 Şubat 2018).
11. Almirall, E., M. Lee and J. Wareham (2012), Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies, Technology Innovation Mangement Review, s. 12, 14, 18, (ss. 12-18). (https://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Almirall_et_al_TIMReview_September2012.pdf, Accessed: 28.12.2016).
12. Alsos, G. A., T. Clausen and E. Isaksen (2015), Innovation in Public Sector Organizations: The Role Of Push And Pull Factors, s. 1-2, (ss. 1-20), (https://conference.druid.dk/acc_papers/kd1ol7yfsts5noah3uu74vcsuscr.pdf, Accessed: 13 Eylül 2017).
13. Altınkarınca Ödülleri (2018), (http://altinkarinca.com.tr/ (28 Şubat 2018).
14. Antalya Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2016), (http://ge.antalya.bel.tr/, Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
15. Antalya Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2016),(https://www.antalya.bel.tr/Content/UserFiles/Files/Raporlar%2FFaaliyetRaporlari%2F2016_antalya_buyuksehir_belediyesi_faaliyet_raporu.pdf, Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
16. Applicability, The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, s. 28, (ss. 21-46), (https://web.a.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope, Accessed: 01.03.2018).
17. Arpacı, İ (2009), “Managing Public Innovation=Toward Developing A New Model For Public Organizations”, s. 830, (ss. 824-833), (http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071&context=mcis2009, Accessed: 01.06.2017).
18. Arundel, A, and D. Huber (2013), From Too Little To Too Much İnnovation? Issues In Measuring Innovation In The Public Sector Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.009, s. 147, (ss.146-159).
19. Arundel, A., C. Bloch and B. Ferguson (2015), Measuring Innovation In The Public Sector, s. 1-3, (ss. 1-22), https://www.oecd.org/sti/087%20- Accessed: 16.10.2017). Asian Correspondent (2018), (https://asiancorrespondent-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/asiancorrespondent.com/2018/05/sorry-dubai-london-singapore-is-the-1-smart-city/amp/, Accessed: 06 Mayıs 2018).
20. Aydın Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (http://aydin.bel.tr/Content/files/2015-2019_stratej%C4%B1k_plan.pdf, Accessed: 07 Şubat 2018).
21. Aydın Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/aydinda-uc-boyutlu-yaya-gecidi-hizmete-girdi,fkRBIdh1zUuvZFOOwyXaYw, Accessed: 07 Şubat 2018).
22. Balıkesir Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2014), (https://www.balikesir.bel.tr/butce-ve-strateji/stratejik-plan, 09 Şubat 2018). Başakşehir Living Lab (2018), (http://basaksehir-livinglab.com/BLL/hakkimizda/living-lab-nedir/, Accessed: 14 Ocak 2018).
23. Başakşehir Living Lab (2018), (http://basaksehir-livinglab.com/BLL/blog/2017/07/31/basaksehir-living-lab-inovasyon-yarismasi-2017/
24. Başakşehir Living Lab (2018), (http://www.basaksehir.bel.tr/manset/1471/yeralti-cop-konteynerleri-yayginlasiyor?open=0, Accessed: 15 Ocak 2018).
25. Başakşehir Living Lab (2018),( http://basaksehir-livinglab.com/BLL/projeler/, Accessed: 15 Ocak 2018).
26. Bergvall-Kareborn, B., M. Hoist and A. Stahlbrost (2009), Concept Design with Living Lab Approach, 42nd Hawaii International Conference on, s. 1-10, ss. 1–10. (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org, DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.123, Accessed: 04 Eylül 2018).
27. Bloch. C. (2009), Measuring Public Innovation in The Nordic Countries, s. 4-5, (ss. 1-63), (http://nyskopunarvefur.is http://nyskopunarvefur.is/files/filepicker/9/201102_mepin_report_web.pdf, Accessed: 16.10.2017).
28. Bursa Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2016), (https://www.bursa.bel.tr/dosyalar/birimek/akilli-belediyecilik-ve-akilli-sehircilik-uygulamalari.diger.79hP5VaEDB..pdf, Accessed: 07 Şubat 2018).
29. Bursa Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2016), (https://www.bursa.bel.tr/dosyalar/birimek/strateji/faaliyet_raporlari/2016-2.pdf, Accessed: 07 Şubat 2018).
30. Businesstech (2016), (https://businesstech.co.za/news/industry-news/118372/south-africas-move-towards-smart-cities/, Accessed: 28 Şubat 2018).
31. Center for Public Service Innovation, (2015), s. 5, (http://www.cpsi.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/FINALSALGAPUBLICATIONLOWRES.pdf, Accessed: 12 Şubat 2018).
32. Chesbrough, H. (2011), Bringing Open Innovation to Services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52 (2), s. 87, (ss. 84-90). (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264412678_Fostering_Quality_of_Life_through_Social_Innovation_A_Living_Lab_Methodology_Study_Case Accessed: 28.12.2016).
33. City Observatory (2018), (http://ifuturecities.com/glasgowatlas/#visualizations, Accessed: 07 Ocak 2018).
34. City Observatory (2018), (http://ifuturecities.com/projects/predictive-crime/, Accessed: 08 Ocak 2018).
35. City Observatory (2018), (http://ifuturecities.com/projects/sensingthecity/, Accessed: 07 Ocak 2018).
36. City Observatory (2018), (http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/livinglab/city-observatory, Accessed: 07 Ocak 2018).
37. City Observatory (2018), (http://www.urbanobservatory.org/compare, Accessed: 07 Ocak 2018).
38. City Observatory (2018), (https://www.stepupsmartcities.eu/ToolsandInspiration/STEPUPSustainableEnergyProjectsGuide/tabid/5250/Default.aspx, Accessed: 07 Ocak 2018).
39. CNN (2018), (https://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/12/africa/africa-new-smart-cities/index.html, Accessed: 28 Şubat 2018).
40. Corelabs, (https://www.fmh.utl.pt/sportlivinglab/ Corelabs, Accessed: 04 Eylül 2018).
41. Denizli Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (http://akillisehir.denizli.bel.tr/ucretsizinternetveceptelefonusarj.html, Accessed: 07 Şubat 2018).
42. Denizli Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (http://www.denizli.bel.tr/userfiles/file/stratejik_plan_2015-2019.pdf, Accessed: 07 Şubat 2018).
43. Diyarbakır Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2018), (http://www.diyarbakir.bel.tr/kurumsal/misyon-vizyon.html, Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
44. Edwards-Schachter, M. E., C. E. Matti and E.Alcantara (2012), Fostering Quality of Life through Social Innovation: A Living Lab Methodology Study Case, Review of Policy Research, 29(6), s. 682ss. 672-692, DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00588.x, Accessed: 28.12.2016.
45. ENOLL (2015), The European Network of Living Labs, s. 1, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23 (http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/node/1429, Accessed: 01 Haziran 2017).
46. ENOLL (2018), (http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/news/best-living-lab-project-2016-awards, Accessed: 11 Ocak 2018). Erişti, S.D.B (2013), A. Kuzu, I. K. Yurdakul, Y. Akbulut, A. A. Kurt. Ed. A. A. Kurt, Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayını no:1708 http://www.mku.edu.tr/files Accessed: 30 Ocak 2018).
47. Erzurum Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (http://www.erzurum.bel.tr/IcerikDetay-stratejik_plan/15/I.html, 09 Şubat 2018).
48. Eskişehir Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (http://www.eskisehir.bel.tr/dosyalar/stratejik_plan/2019.pdf, 09 Şubat 2018).
49. Etr Ödülleri (2009), (http://www.etrodulleri.org/index.php/basvuru/2-etr/107-14-etuerkiye-etr-oeduelleri-tbmm-de-sahiplerini-buldu, 12 Şubat.2018).
50. European Commission (2009), Living Labs For User-Driven Open Innovation, s. 5, 25-30, (ss. 1-64), (http://www.eurosportello.eu/sites/default/files/Living%20Lab%20brochure_jan09_en_0.pdf, 11 Aralık 2017).
51. European Commission, (2016), (https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/living-labs-and-open-innovation/, Accessed: 13 Eylül 2017).
52. Fagerberg, Jan (2005), “The Oxford Handbook of Innovation” , Ed. D.C. Mowery, R.R.Nelson, USA: Oxford University Press Inc, ISBN:0-19-926455-4, s. 2.
53. Folstad, A. (2008), Living Labs For Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review, s. 106, 114, 116, (ss. 2-34), (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259255452, Accessed: 14.10.2017).
54. Forbes, (2014), (https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobmorgan/2014/05/13/simple-explanation-internet-things-that-anyone-can-understand/#e2011991d091, Accessed: 24 Ağustos 2017).
55. Forum Virium Helsinki (2017), (https://forumvirium.fi/en/introduction/building-an-open-and-smart-helsinki/, Accessed: 08 Ocak 2018).
56. Forum Virium Helsinki (2018), (http://www.hri.fi/en/news/hri-wins-eus-prize-for-innovation/, Accessed: 09 Ocak 2018).
57. Forum Virium Helsinki (2018), (https://dev.hel.fi/projects/, Accessed: 08 Ocak 2018).
58. Forum Virium Helsinki (2018), (https://forumvirium.fi/en/bright-ageing-smart-lighting-improve-wellbeing-elderly/, Accessed: 09 Ocak 2018).
59. Forum Virium Helsinki (2018), (https://forumvirium.fi/en/d-cent-co-operative-platform-for-citizens/, Accessed: 10 Ocak 2018).
60. Forum Virium Helsinki (2018), (https://forumvirium.fi/en/envyou-project-strives-for-more-comprehensive-knowledge-about-pollution-in-helsinki/, Accessed: 09 Ocak 2018).
61. Forum Virium Helsinki (2018), (https://forumvirium.fi/en/introduction/building-an-open-and-smart-helsinki/, Accessed: 08 Ocak 2018).
62. Forum Virium Helsinki (2018), https://forumvirium.fi/en/six-finnish-cities-join-forces-to-become-better-and-smarter/, Accessed: 09 Ocak 2018).
63. Future Saudi Cities (2017), (https://www.futuresaudicities.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Content-in-EN.pdf, Accessed: 28 Şubat 2018).
64. Gaziantep Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (https://gantep.bel.tr/files/stratejik-plan-2015-2019.pdf, 09 Şubat 2018).
65. Gaziantep Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (https://gantep.bel.tr/haber/gelecegin-inovasyon-onculeri-gaziantepte-yetisecek-3498.html , Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
66. Godin, B. (2008), Innovation: The History of a Category, Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation, Working Paper No. 1, s. 35-37, (ss. 1-67), (www.csiic.ca/PDF/IntellectualNo1.pdf Accessed: 06.05.2017).
67. Guzman, J. G., A. F. Carpio, R. C. Palacios and M. V. Diego (2013), Living Labs for User Driven Innovation, Research- Technology Management, 56(3), s. 29, (ss. 29-39), https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5603087.
68. Hatay Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2014), (http://www.hatay.bel.tr/media/1547/2015-2019-stratejik-plani.pdf, 09 Şubat 2018).
69. IBM (2018), (https://www.ibm.com/ibm/gh/en/accra-smarter-city.html, Accessed: 28 Şubat 2018).
70. ICMA (2016), (https://icma.org/articles/announcing-2016-innovation-award-winners, Accessed: 12 Şubat 2018).
71. Innovation Prize for Africa (2018), (http://innovationprizeforafrica.org/, Accessed: 28 Şubat 2018).
72. İBB, (https://www.ibb.istanbul/News/Detail/34099, 10 Şubat 2018).
73. İHA (2022), https://www.iha.com.tr/ankara-haberleri/baskent-karta-bir-odul-daha-ankara-3435054/ (28 Ocak 2022).
74. İSBAK, (http://isbak.istanbul/diger-uygulamalar/sosyal-projeler/akilli-konteyner/, 10 Şubat 2018).
75. İSBAK, (http://isbak.istanbul/diger-uygulamalar/sosyal-projeler/hikayematik, 10 Şubat 2018).
76. İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), http://erisilebilir.istanbul/calismalar/1/ISTANBUL%20BUYUKSEHIR%20BELEDIYESI, 10 Şubat 2018).
77. İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), http://www.ibb.gov.tr/tr-TR/kurumsal/Birimler/StratejikPlanlamaMd/Documents/2010_2014/stratejikplan15_19.pdf, 09 Şubat 2018).
78. İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), http://www.izmir.bel.tr/CKYuklenen/eskisite/file/MALI_HIZMETLER/2015_19StratejikPlan_web.pdf ,2018 (10 Şubat 2018).
79. Kahramanmaraş Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (https://kahramanmaras.bel.tr/stratejik-plan, 09 Şubat 2018).
80. Kamuda Stratejik Yönetim (2015), (http://www.sp.gov.tr/tr/stratejik-plan/s/827/Van+Buyuksehir+Belediyesi+2015-2019, Accessed: 08 Şubat 2018).
81. Kamuda Stratejik Yönetim (2015), (http://www.sp.gov.tr/tr/stratejik-plan/s/1298/Manisa+Buyuksehir+Belediyesi+2015-2019, 09 Şubat 2018).
82. Kamuda Stratejik Yönetim (2015), (http://www.sp.gov.tr/tr/stratejik-plan/s/689/Trabzon+Buyuksehir+Belediyesi+2007-2009, 09 Şubat 2018).
83. Kamuda Stratejik Yönetim (2015), (http://www.sp.gov.tr/upload/xSPStratejikPlan/files/n3MZs+Hatay_BSB.pdf, Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
84. Kamuda Stratejik Yönetim (2015), (http://www.sp.gov.tr/upload/xSPStratejikPlan/files/rTUm0+Ankara_stratejik_plan_2015_2019.pdf, 09 Şubat 2018).
85. Kamuda Stratejik Yönetim (2015), (http://www.sp.gov.tr/upload/xSPStratejikPlan/files/rTUm0+Ankara_stratejik_plan_2015_2019.pdf, 10 Şubat 2018).
86. Karasar, Niyazi (2017), Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, 32. Basım. Ankara: Nobel
87. Kayseri Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2016), (https://www.kayseri.bel.tr/uploads/pdf/2016-yili-%20faaliyet-raporu.pdf, Accessed: 08 Şubat 2018).
88. Kayseri Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2016), (https://www.kentbilgisistemi.com/kayseri-buyuksehir-belediyesi-akilli-durak-projesi-526.html, Accessed: 08 Şubat 2018).
89. Kocaeli Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), https://www.kocaeli.bel.tr/tr/main/pages/stratejik-planlar/28, 09 Şubat 2018).
90. Konya Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (http://www.konya.bel.tr/dosyalar/sp2015-2019.pdf, 09 Şubat 2018).
91. Kusiak, A (2007), Innovation: The Living Laboratory Perspective, 4 (6), s. 864, (ss. 863-876), (https://www.researchgate.net, Accessed: 04.01.2016).
92. Library Living Lab (2018), (http://librarylivinglab.cvc.uab.cat/home/que-es/how-we-work/?lang=en, Accessed: 11 Ocak 2018).
93. Lievens, B., H. Schaffers, P.Turkama, A. Stahlbröst ve P.Ballon (2011), Cross Border Living Lab, (2015), s. 12, (http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/node/1429, Accessed: 03 Ocak 2018).
94. Living Lab, http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/llmap_cc, Accessed: 03 Ocak 2018).
95. Living Labs Networks to Support SMSs Accessing New Markets. eChallenges e-2011 Conference Proceedings Paul Cunningham and Miriam Cunningham (Eds) IIMC International Information Management Corporation, ISBN: 978-1-905824-27-4 s. 3, (https://www.researchgate.net, Accessed: 28.12.2016).
96. Malatya Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (http://www.malatya.bel.tr/yayin/2015_2019_stratejik_plan_/files/assets/basic-html/index.html#58, Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
97. Malmberg, K. ve I. Vaittinen (2017), Living Lab Methodology Handbook, s. 11-12, (ss. 1-40), (https://tr.scribd.com/document/366265932/U4IoT-LivingLabMethodology-Handbook, Accessed: 28.12.2016).
98. Mardin Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2016), (http://mardin.bel.tr/FileStorage/files/Faaliyet_Raporu.pdf, Accessed: 08 Şubat 2018).
99. Mardin Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2016), (http://www.mardin.bel.tr/tr-tr/haber/el-emegi-goz-nuru-urunlerin-satis-merkezi-amber/32025, Accessed: 08 Şubat 2018).
100. Mastelic, J. M. Sahakian and R. Bonazzi. (2015), How to Keep a Living Lab alive ? Emerald Group Publishing, 17(4), s. 14, (ss 12-25), https://doi.org/10.1108/info-01-2015-0012, https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/info-01-2015-0012, Accessed: 03 Ocak 2018).
101. Mersin Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (https://www.mersin.bel.tr/upload/dokumanlar/MBB%202015-2019%20Stratejik%20Plan.pdf, Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
102. Muğla Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (https://www.mugla.bel.tr/uploads/sayfatr/2015_2019_stratejik_plan.pdf, 09 Şubat 2018).
103. Mulgan, G. and D. Albury (2003), “Innovation In The Public Sector, s. 31, 34, 36, (ss. 1-40) (http://www.sba.oakland.edu/FACULTY/MATHIESON/MIS524/RESOURCES/READINGS/INNOVATION/INNOVATION_IN_THE_PUBLIC_SECTOR.PDF, Accessed: 01.06.2017).
104. National Awards for Local Government (2017), s. 24, (http://regional.gov.au/local/awards/award_book.aspx, Accessed: 12 Şubat 2018).
105. Nelson, K. L., C. H. Wood and G. T. Gabris (2011), Innovation Management in Local Government: An Empirical Analysis of Suburban Municipalities. Internatıonal Journal Of Organization Theory And Behavior, 14 (3), s. 312, (ss. 301-328)
106. Nordic Innovation, (http://www.nordicinnovation.org/Publications/measuring-public-innovation-in-the-nordic-countries-mepin/, Accessed: 01 Nisan 2019).
107. OECD (1992), (https://www.oecd.org/sti/outlook/e-outlook/stipolicyprofiles/competencestoinnovate/public-sectorinnovation.htm, Accessed: 20 Mayıs 2017).
108. OECD Regulatory Reform and Innovation (2017), https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/2102514.pdf, Accessed: 02 Ocak 2017).
109. OECD, Observatory of Public Sector Innovation, (https://www.oecd.org/governance/observatory-public-sector-innovation/h2020/, Accessed: 30 Haziran 2017).
110. Ogonowski, C. T. Jakobi, G. Stevens, J. Meurer (2015), Living Lab As A Service: Das Living Lab als Dienstleistungsbaukasten zur Nutzer-zentrierten Entwicklung und Evaluation innovativer Smart Home Lösungen. Mensch und Computer 2015 Workshopband, Stuttgart: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, s. 701, (ss. 701-711), (https://dl.gi.de/bitstream/handle/20.500.12116/8128/Ogonowski_etal_2015.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y, Accessed: 04 Eylül 2018).
111. Online Etymology Dictionary, (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=innovate&allowed, Accessed: 17 Haziran 2016).
112. Ordu Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (https://www.ordu.bel.tr/uploads/stratejik-plan.pdf, 09 Şubat 2018).
113. Oslo Klavuzu (2005), Yenilik Verilerinin Toplanması ve Uygulanması İçin İlkeler, 3. Baskı, OECD ve Eurostat Ortak Yayımı, Tübitak, Ankara, ISBN 975-403-362-5-1, s. 50.
114. Patel, I (2006), “Understanding Innovations and Best Practices. Innovations in Governance and Public Administration”, United Nations, New York, ISBN:92-1-123158-2, s. 34, (ss. 27-45).
115. Pratiwi, P. (2016), “Local Government Innovations as Alternative Wave of Centralized Bureaucratic Reform in Indonesia”. Junior Researcher and Local Government Innovation Facilitator National Institute of Public Administration, Republic of Indonesia 2016 KAPS International Conference, s. 3, (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308521128, Accessed: 03 Mayıs 2017).
116. Redhouse İngilizce-Türkçe Sözlük, “Innovation”, SEV Matbaacılık ve Yayıncılık A.Ş., 1997, ISBN:975-8176-10-2, s.607, (ss.1152).
117. Saint-Exupery, A. (2009), Internet of Things Strategic Research Roadmap, s. 6, (ss. 1-50), http://www.sintef.no/globalassets/upload/ikt/9022/cerp-iot-sra_iot_v11_pdf.pdf, Accessed: 24 Ağustos 2017).
118. Sakarya Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (http://www.sakarya.bel.tr/a/Haber/buyuksehirden-ulasima-dijital-rahatlik/8490, Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
119. Sakarya Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), http://www.sakarya.bel.tr/uploads/stratejik/6MrPNOycS3.pdf, 09 Şubat 2018).
120. Samsun Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (https://www.samsun.bel.tr/Icerik/Dosya/www.samsun.bel.tr_13_KM3D72FW_2015__2019_stratejik_plan.pdf, 09 Şubat 2018).
121. Schaffers, H. and S. Kulkki (2007), Living Labs, An open innovation concept fostering rural development, Tech Monitor. s. 1, (ss. 30-38) (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230730371, Accessed: 14.10.2017).
122. Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard Economic Studies, USA, ISBN:13:978-0-87855-698-4, ss.66-78.
123. Schuurman, D. (2015), Bridging the gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the value of Living Labs as a means to structure user contribution and manage distributed innovation, s. 11, 12, 184, 185, (ss. 1-362), (https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5931264/file/5931265, Accessed: 14.10.2017).
124. Schuurman, D., L. De Marez and P. Ballon (2013), Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems: Insights from the LeYLab, Technology Innovation Management Review, s. 30, ss. 28-36, https://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Schuurman_et_al_TIMReview_November2013.pdf, Accessed: 28.12.2016).
125. Shearmur, R. and V. Poirier (2015), Exploring Municipal Innovation: Technological And Original Innovation In Municipalities, Institut national de la recherche scientifique Centre, s. 8, (ss. 1-27), (http://espace.inrs.ca/2677/1/Inedit01-15.pdf, Accessed: 06.05.2017).
126. Stahlbröst, A. and M. Holst (2012), The Living Lab Methodology Handbook, s. 10, 20, (ss. 1-39), (https://www.ltu.se/cms_fs/1.101555!/file/LivingLabsMethodologyBook_web.pdf Accessed: 16.10.2017).
127. Suudi Arabistan Belediye Portalı (2018), (https://apps.balady.gov.sa/Idea/, Accessed: 28 Şubat 2018).
128. Suudi Arabistan Belediye ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı (2018), (https://www.momra.gov.sa/ Accessed: 28 Şubat 2018).
129. Şanlıurfa Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (https://www.sanliurfa.bel.tr/files/1/58a2b66b3f34e.pdf 2015, Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
130. Şanlıurfa Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (https://www.sanliurfa.bel.tr/icerik/48/4/mikro-kredi, Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
131. TDK, Türkçe Sözlük (http://www.tdk.gov.tr, Accessed: 11 Mart 2016).
132. Tekirdağ Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2015), (http://www.tekirdag.bel.tr/content/file/statejik_plan/statejik_plan.pdf, Accessed: 09 Şubat 2018).
133. Tempe Belediyesi (2018), (http://www.tempe.gov/city-hall/communication-and-media-relations/tempe-newsroom/-npage-7, Accessed: 12 Şubat 2018).
134. Tepebaşı Belediyesi (http://www.tepebasi.bel.tr/Projedetay.asp?hid=136, 09 Şubat 2018).
135. United Nations (2014), http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/world-urbanization-prospects-2014.html, Accessed: 15 Ağustos 2017).
136. United Nations (2016), (http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/the_worlds_cities_in_2016_data_booklet.pdf, Accessed: 28 Eylül 2017).
137. United Nations, World Population Prospects, (2017), (https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2017_KeyFindings.pdf, Accessed: 13 Eylül 2017).
138. Van De Ven, A. H (1986), Central Problems in the Management of Innovation, 32 (5), s. 590, (ss. 590-607), (https://www.jstor.org/stable/2631848?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents, Accessed: 04.01.2016).
139. Veeckman, C. and S. Van Der Graaf (2015), “The City as Living Laboratory: Empowering Citizens with the Citadel Toolkit”, Technology Innovation Management Review, s. 6,7, (ss. 6-17), DOI: 10.22215/timreview/877, (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326309850, Accessed: 13.10.2017).
140. Veli Pekka Niitamo, (http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/news/father-european-living-lab-movement-veli-pekka-vellu-niitamo-has-passed-away, Accessed: 05 Aralık 2016).
141. Vicini, S., S. Bellini and A. Sanna (2013), User-driven Service Innovation in a Smarter City Living Lab, International Conference on Service Science, 10(1109), s. 254-255, ss.:254-259, DOI: 10.1109/ICSS.2013.35, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6519801, Accessed: 06 Kasım 2018).
142. Walker, R. M. (2006), “Innovation Type And Diffusion: An Empırıcal Analysis Of Local Government”, 84(2), s. 314, (ss. 311-335), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x, Accessed: 03 Haziran 2017).
143. Wihlman, T., M. Hoppe, U. Wihlman, H. Sandmark (2016), “Innovation Management in Swedish Municipalities”, 2 (1), s. 50, (ss. 43-62), (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304495535, Accessed: 03 Mayıs 2017).
144. Wihlman, T., M. Hoppe, U. Wihlman, H. Sandmark (2016), “Innovation Management in Swedish Municipalities”, 2 (1), s. 54, 56 (ss. 43-62), (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304495535, Accessed: 03 Haziran 2017).
145. Wu, J., L. Ma., Y. Yang (2011), Innovation In The Chinese Public Sector: Typology and Distribution. Public Administration, Public Administration, 91(2), s.347, (ss. 347-365), (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02010.x, Accessed: 20 Mart 2016).
146. Yi Wu, H. (2012), An Empirical Study of UK Living Labs. International Association for Management of Technology, Taiwan, s. 2, (ss. 1-21) https://dces.essex.ac.uk/staff/vic/papers/misc/2012_IAMOT_AnEmpiricalStudyOfUKLiving%20Labs_Full%20Version_HY%20Wu_2012.pdf, Accessed: 03 Ocak 2018).