Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme

Ekin Deniz Uzun

doi:10.33433/maruhad.1161165

Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme

Öz

Bu makale, günümüz dünyasında sınır adaleti ve mültecilik kavramlarını Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi’nin (AİHM) Mahkeme İçtüzüğü madde 39’da yer alan geçici tedbir kararları ile bağlantılı olarak inceler. Makale mülteci-devlet ilişkisi analizini sınır adaleti terminolojisi bünyesinde konumlandırır. Bununla amaç, uluslararası hukuk düzleminde, devletlerin sınır güvenliği kaygılarına ve mültecilerin sığınma başvurularını değerlendirmek yükümlülüklerine ışık tutmaktır. Devam eden tartışma, sınır adaleti kavramının eleştirel bir incelemesini sağlar ve Avrupa kıtasındaki bazı devletlerin mültecilerin sığınma başvurusu yapmalarını engelleyici yönde tutum gösterdikleri ve onlara karşı hukuka aykırı eylemlerde bulundukları durumları örneklendirerek tartışmasını derinleştirir. Bahsi geçen hukuka aykırı haller, mültecilerin kara veya denizde geri itilmeleri örneklerinde toplanır. Bu bağlamda, AİHM’nin mahkeme içtüzüğünde acil müdahale gerektiren durumlar için uygulanmak üzere düzenlenmiş olan geçici tedbir kararları, geri itme olayları dikkate alınarak irdelenecektir. Çünkü bu kararlar, geri itme operasyonları gibi devletlerin hukuka aykırı eylemlerini durdurucu ve dolayısıyla mülteciyi koruyucu etki gösterebilecek niteliktedir. Nihayetinde makale, uluslararası hukuk bünyesinde mültecilerin korunması için mevcut olan düzenlemeleri, bahsi geçen devletlerin hukuka aykırı uygulamaları ve AİHM’nin bu devlet uygulamaları karşındaki etkinliği ile ortaya çıkan sonuçları kritik bir gözle bir araya getirerek, öneri ve tespitleriyle birlikte analizini tamamlar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Abu Zubaydah v Litvanya App no 46454/11 (ECtHR, 31 May 2018) Abdollahi v Turkiye App no 23980/08 (ECtHR, 3 November 2009)
AA v Greece App no 12736/20 (ECtHR, 7 Mart 2020)
Achiume E T, ‘Migration as Decolonization (2019) 71 Standford Law Review
Altıok B and Tosun S, ‘Understanding Foreign Policy Strategies during Migration Movements: A Comparative Study of Iraqi and Syrian Mass Refugee Inflows to Turkey’ [2019] Taylor & Francis Turkish Studies
Aleksanyan v Russia App no 46468/06 (ECtHR, 22 December 2008)
Aksel D B and İçduygu A, ‘Borders and the Mobility of Migrants in Turkey’ accessed 25 October 2021
Amnesty International, ‘Greece: Violence, Lies, And Pushbacks Refugees and Migrants Still Denied Safety and Asylum at Europe’s Borders’ accessed 6 September 2021
Arendt H, The Origins of Totalitarianism (Brace and Co 1951)

Arendt H, The Jewish Writings (Jerome Kahn and Ron H. Feldman eds, 1st edn, Schocken Books 2007)
Akandji-Kombe J F, ‘Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights A Guide to the Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights’ accessed 4 April 2022
Adelman J, ‘Pariah: Can Hannah Arendt Help Us Rethink Our Global Refugee Crisis?’ (The Wilson Quarterly, 2016) accessed 25 March 2022
Azevedo R T and others, ‘When the Lens Is Too Wide: The Political Consequences of the Visual Dehumanization of Refugees’ (2021) 8 Humanities And Social Sciences Communıcatıons accessed 23 November 2021
Baranowska G, ‘The Deadly Woods Legalizing Pushbacks at the Polish-Belarusian Border’ (VerfBlog, 29 October 2021) accessed 16 November 2021
Blomley N, ‘From “What?” To “so What?”: Law and Geography in Retrospect’ in Jane Holder and Carolyn Harrison (eds), Law and Geograph, vol 5 (Oxford University Press: Current Legal Issues)
Berry M, Garcia- Blanco I, and Moore K, ‘Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the EU: A Content Analysis of Five European Countries’ (United Nations High Commission for Refugees 2015) accessed 11 February 2022.
Communiqué to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Under Article 15 of the Rome Statute, ‘The Situation in Nauru and Manus Island: Liability for Crimes Against Humanity in the Detention of Refugees and Asylum Seekers’ accessed 5 April 2022
Cincurova S, ‘Fears Grow for Child Refugees Stranded on Belarus-Poland Border’ Al Jazeera (11 November 2021) accessed 23 November 2021
Cantor D and Durieux J F (eds), Refuge from Inhumanity? War Refugees and International Humanitarian Law (BRILL 2014)
Costello C, ‘Safe Country? Says Who?’ (2016) 28 International Journal of Refugee Law
Council of Europe, ‘Chart of Signatures and Ratifications of Treaty 046’ accessed 28 March 2021
DA and Diğerleri v Polonya App no 51246/17 (ECtHR, 8 July 2021)
Demirtas-Bagdonas Ö, ‘Reading Turkey’s Foreign Policy on Syria: The AKP’s Construction of a Great Power Identity and the Politics of Grandeur’ 40 Taylor & Francis Turkish Studies
D’Ambrosio M, ‘They’re Not Refugees – They’re People in Flight’ NJ Opinion (26 October 2021) accessed 3 November 2021
Dosenrode S, ‘Europeanization’, Oxford Research Encyclopedias (2020) accessed 4 November 2021
Dubow T and Kuschminder K, ‘“I Don’t Have Any Other Choice” – Refugee Women’s Journeys to Europe’ (Women & Migration, 25 November 2021) accessed 8 December 2021
ECRE European Council on Refugees and Exiles, ‘Greece: Pushbacks by Sea to Go Before ECtHR, Access to Procedures Restricted on Land, Rule of Law Concerns in Asylum System Persist, Commission Challenges Legality of the Safe Third Country Concept’ (ECRE, Ocak 2022) accessed 28 March 2022
Eleftheriadis P, ‘Pushbacks and Lawlessness’ (EJIL:Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 25 March 2022) accessed 28 March 2022
European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, ‘Migrants and Refugees in Libya Face Crimes against Humanity: The ICC Must Investigate’ accessed 5 April 2022
European Court of Human Rights, ‘Court Indicates Interim Measures in Respect of Iraqi and Afghan Nationals at Belarusian Border with Latvia and Poland’ accessed 4 April 2022
Erdoğan M, ‘Syrians in Turkey: Social Acceptance and Integration’ [2014] Hacettepe Üniversitesi Göç ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Merkezi accessed 10 February 2022
European External Action Service (EEAS), ‘Libyan Coast Guard and Navy Monitoring- Four Monthly Report August- November 2021’ (Council of Europe 2022) Restreint UE/EU Restricted EEAS (2022) 1 accessed 4 April 2022
European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) and European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), ‘Research on ECHR Rule 39 Interim Measures’ accessed 10 March 2022
Faiola A, Noack R, and Adam K, ‘Suddenly Welcoming, Europe Opens the Door to Refugees Fleeing Ukraine’ (Şubat 2022) accessed 21 March 2022
FG v İsveç App No 43611/11 (ECtHR, 16 January 2014)
Galvin J, ‘Is the EU Funding a “War on Migration”? Here’s the Evidence’ (The Outlaw Ocean Project, February 2022) accessed 18 March 2022
Ghezelbash D, ‘Hyper-Legalism and Obfuscation: How States Evade Their International Obligations Towards Refugees’ (2020) 68 The American Journal of Comparative Law
Grahl-Madsen A, ‘Refugees and Refugee Law in a World in Transition’ (1982) 3 Michigan Journal of International Law
Grahl-Madsen A, ‘Identifying the World’s Refugees’ (1983) 467 The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Sage Journals
Gera V and Scislowska M, ‘Tensions Rise in Migrant Standoff at Poland-Belarus Border’ [2021] The Washington Post accessed 16 November 2021
Geçici Koruma Yönetmeliği, Kanun Numarası: 6458, Kabul Tarihi: 13.10.2014, RG 22.10.2014/29153.
Georgia D, ‘Desecuritizing Migration in Greece: Contesting Securitization through “Flexicuritization”’ [2021] International Migration accessed 2 February 2022
Górczyńska M, ‘Legal Analysis of the Situation on the Polish-Belarusian Border Situation On’ (2021) accessed 13 December 2021
Gibney M, ‘Refugees and Justice between States’ (2015) 14 European Journal of Political Theory
Gemalmaz M S, Ulusalüstü İnsan Hakları Hukukunun Genel Teorisine Giriş (6th edn, Legal 2007)
González Morales F, ‘Report on Means to Address the Human Rights Impact of Pushbacks of Migrants on Land and at Sea’ accessed 18 September 2021
Goodwin-Gill G S, ‘Concluding Comments: Revisiting the Principles of Protection for Migrants, Refugees and Other Displaced Persons, One Year On’ [2021] Cornell International Law Journal accessed 3 November 2021
Goldner L I and Nagy B, ‘External Border Control Techniques in the EU as a Challenge to the Principle of Non-Refoulement’ (2021) 17 European Constitutional Law Review
Hathaway J C, ‘Can International Refugee Law Be Made Relevant Again?’ (1998) 41 Law Quad. Notes accessed 15 March 2022
Heller C and Pezzani L, ‘The Mediterranean Mobility Conflict: Violence and Anti-Violence at the Borders of Europe’ [2018] Humanity Journal accessed 8 March 2022
Helfer L R, ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law
Henning Becker v Denmark App no 7011/75 (ECommHR, 3 November 1975) erişim tarihi 4 Nisan 2022
Hirsi Jamaa and Diğerleri v Italy App no 27765/09 (ECtHR, 23 February 2012)
Herrera B C and Haeck Y, ‘Staying the Return of Aliens from Europe through Interim Measures: The Case-Law of the European Commission and the European Court of Human Rights’ (2011) 13 European Journal of Migration and Law Higgins A and Santora M, ‘Cold and Marooned in a Police State as Desperation Takes Hold’ The New York Times (16 November 2021)
Hirsi Jamaa and Diğerleri v Italy App no 27765/09 (ECtHR, 23 February 2012)
Hathaway J C, ‘International Refugee Law: The Michigan Guidelines on the Internal Protection Alternative’ accessed 15 March 2022 International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) and European Council for Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) v Yunanistan Başvuru no 173/2018 (Avrupa Sosyal Haklar Komitesi, 26 Ocak 20219 para 134-146 accessed 5 April 2022.
‘Incident or Information Report’ accessed 8 December 2021
‘Is Belarus Using Migrants as Part of a “Hybrid War” against the EU?’ Euronews (Ağustos 2021) accessed 2 March 2022
Ilcan S, ‘The Borderization of Waiting: Negotiating Borders and Migration in the 2011 Syrian Civil Conflict’ [2020] SAGE Journals Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space accessed 28 March 2022
İnsan Haklarının ve Temel Özgürlüklerin Korunmasına İlişkin Sözleşme (değiştirildiği şekliyle Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi (AİHS), Protocol no 11 ve no 14 ile değiştirilen, 4 Kasım 1950, ETS 5
Joyner C C, ‘Terrorizing the Terrorists: An Essay on the Permissibility of Torture’ in Nadya Sadat and Michael P Scharf (eds), The theory and practice of international criminal law: essays in honor of M. Cherif Bassiouni (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2008)
Kebe and Diğerleri v Ukrayna App no 12552/12 (ECtHR, 12 January 2017)
Kotef H, ‘Violent Attachments’ (2020) 48 SAGE Political Theory
Khalid S, ‘Q&A: Understanding Europe’s Response to Ukrainian Refugee Crisis’ Al Jazeera (10 March 2022) accessed 11 March 2022
Kawakibi S, ‘The Syrian Crisis and Its Repercussions: Internally Displaced Persons and Refugees’ (European University Institute, Florence Robert Schuman Centre For Advanced Studies Migration Policy Centre (MPC)) MPC Research Report 2013/03 accessed 25 March 2022
Kim S, ‘Non-Refoulement and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: State Sovereignty and Migration Controls at Sea in the European Context’ (2017) 30 Leiden Journal of International Law
Keller H, Fischer A, and Kühne D, ‘Debating the Future of the European Court of Human Rights after the Interlaken Conference: Two Innovative Proposals’ 21 The European Journal of International Law
Kelman H C, ‘The Policy Context of International Crimes’ in Andre Nollkaemper and Harmen van der Wilt (eds), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2009)
Kuschminder K and Triandafyllidou A, ‘Smuggling, Trafficking, and Extortion: New Conceptual and Policy Challenges on the Libyan Route to Europe’ 52 Antıpode Wiley Online library accessed 8 December 2021
Kirişçi K, ‘The Question of Asylum and Illegal Migration in European Union-Turkish Relations’ (2003) 4 Turkish Studies
LA and Others v Greece App no 12237/20 (ECtHR, 5 Mart 2020)
Lauterpacht S E and Bethlehem D, ‘The Scope and Content of the Principle of Non- Refoulement’ in UNHCR (eds) Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge University Press 2003)
Lambert H, ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Protection of Refugees: Limits and Opportunities’ 24 Refugee Survey Quarterly
Legeay H, Ferstman C, and Rodriguez-Pinzon D, ‘Panel I: The Use of Interim Measures by the Committee against Torture: Towards a Comprehensive Instrument for the Protection of Victims and Witnesses in Torture Cases’ (2013) 20 Human Rights Brief
Larking E, Refugees and the Myth of Human Rşghts Life Outside the Pale of the Law (Ashgate Publishing Limited 2014)
Latin Amerika’da Mülteciler ve Silahlı Çatışmalardan ve Diğer Şiddet Durumlarından Kaçan Kişilerin Korunmasına İlişkin Cartagena Bildirgesi (22 Kasım 1984) OAS Doc OEA/Ser L/V/II 66/doc 10
Legal Centre Lesvos, ‘Crimes Against Humanity in the Aegean’ (2021) accessed 17 May 2021
Liss C, ‘Turning A Blind Eye? // The Rescue of Migrants in the Mediterranean’ (Prif Spotlight Peace Research Institute Frankfurt 2019) 3 accessed 8 December 2021
Łubiński P, ‘Hybrid Warfare or Hybrid Threat – The Weaponization of Migration as an Example of the Use of Lawfare – Case Study of Poland’ (2021) 51 Polish Political Science Yearbook accessed 15 March 2022
Leyens J P and others, ‘The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups’ (2000) 4 Personality and Social Psychology Review
Mamatkulov and Askarov v Turkey App no 46827/99, 46951/99 (ECtHR, 4 February 2005)
MK and Diğerleri v Polonya App no 40503/17, 42902/17 and 43643/17 (ECtHR, 23 July 2020)
McAdam J, ‘Protecting People Displaced by the Impacts of Climate Change: The UN Human Rights Committee and the Principle of Non-Refoulement’ (2020) 114 American Journal of International Law
Mann I, ‘Border Justice in the Age of Pandemic’ (Just Security, August 2020) accessed 7 March 2022
Mann I, ‘Attack by Design: Australia’s Offshore Detention System and the Literature of Atrocity’ [2021] European Journal of International Law accessed 14 April 2021
Mann I, ‘A Lost Opportunity for Border Justice at the European Court of Human Rights’ (EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, February 2022) accessed 18 March 2022
MA v İsviçre App no 52589/13 (ECtHR, 18 November 2014)
Majetschak L and Riemer L, ‘Poland’s Power Play at Its Borders Violates Fundamental Human Rights Law’ (EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 16 November 2021) accessed 8 December 2021
McClelland M, ‘How to Build a Perfect Refugee Camp’ The New York Times Magazine (13 February 2014) accessed 26 October 2021
Mahkeme Yazı İşleri Müdürlüğü, ‘Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Mahkeme İç Tüzüğü’ accessed 10 March 2022
Martin T, ‘The Origins of Soviet Ethnic Cleansing’ (1998) 4 Harvard University Journal of Modern History accessed 10 February 2022
Moore W H, ‘Whither Will They Go? A Global Study of Refugees’ Destinations, 1965-1995’ (2007) 51 International Studies Quarter accessed 17 March 2022
Moorehead C, Human Cargo: Journeys among Refugees (London, Chatto & Windus 2005)
Milanovic M, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (Oxford Scholarship Online 2011)
Martin T, ‘The Origins of Soviet Ethnic Cleansing’ (1998) 4 Harvard University Journal of Modern History
Majetschak L and Riemer L, ‘Poland’s Power Play at Its Borders Violates Fundamental Human Rights Law’ (EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 16 November 2021) accessed 8 December 2021
Mahkeme Yazı İşleri Müdürlüğü, ‘Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Mahkeme İç Tüzüğü’ accessed 10 March 2022
Mirkhanova M, ‘People in Exile: The Oral History of Meskhetian Turks (Akhyskha Turkleri)’ (2006) 26 Tandfonline Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs
Massari A, ‘Threatening – The Refugee as a Threat’, Visual Securitization Humanitarian Representations and Migration Governance (Springer 2021) accessed 28 March 2022
Natter K, ‘Fifty Years of Maghreb Emigration How States Shaped Algerian, Moroccan and Tunisian Emigration’ accessed 28 March 2022
Orchard C and Miller A, ‘Protection in Europe for Refugees from Syria’ (University of Oxford Refugee Studies Center 2014) Forced Migration Policy Briefing 10 accessed 10 February 2022
Owen D, ‘Refugees and Responsibilities of Justice’ (2018) 11 Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric
Orwell G, ‘You And The Atom Bomb’ (The Orwell Foundation, Kasım 1945) accessed 15 March 2022
Özkan I, Göç -İltica ve Sığınma Hukuku (Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Kanunu ve Uluslararası İşgücü Kanunu Ile Getirilen Değişikliklerle) (3rd edn, Seçkin Yayınevi 2018)
Paladi v Moldova Cumhuriyeti App no 39806/05 (ECtHR, 10 March 2009)
PBS NewsHours, President George W. Bush’s Address to a Joint Session of Congress Following 9/11- Sept. 20, 2001 (2001) accessed 28 January 2022
Park B, ‘Strategic Location, Political Dislocation: Turkey, The United States, And Northern Iraq’ (2003) 7 Middle East Review of International Affairs
Pavel C, ‘What Rule of Law Ideal Is Fit for International Law?’ (EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 8 November 2021) accessed 8 November 2021
Press Unit, ‘Factsheet – Interim Measures’ accessed 15 March 2022
Paz M, ‘‘Between the Kingdom and the Desert Sun: Human Rights, Immigration, and Border Walls’ (2016) 34 Berkeley Journal of International Law
Paz M, ‘The Law of Walls’ (2017) 28 The European Journal of International Law
Papademetriou D G and Miller M J, The Unavoidable Issue: US Immigration Policy in the 1980s (Institute for the Study of Human Issues 1983)
Pasqualucci J M, ‘Interim Measures in International Human Rights: Evolution and Harmonization’ (2005) 38 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Rieter E, Preventing Irreparable Harm Provisional Measures in International Human Rights Adjudication (Antwerp/Oxford: Intersentia 2010)
Ress G, ‘The Effect of Decisions and Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Domestic Legal Order’ (2005) 40 Tex Int’l LJ
Reisoğlu S, ‘Right to Life’ (1998) III Perceptions Journal of International Affairs accessed 31 March 2022
Registrar of the Court, ‘Requests for Interim Measures Concerning the Situation at the Borders with Belarus’ accessed 18 March 2022
Registrar of the European Court of Human Rights, ‘Court Indicates Interim Measure in Respect of Afghan Nationals at the Lithuanian Belarusian Border’ accessed 4 April 2022
Republic of Poland Ministry of the Inferior and Administration, ‘Poland Provided the ECHR with Its Position on the Order for Interim Measures’ (30 September 2021) accessed 4 April 2022
‘Rules of Court Practice Directions Requests for Interim Measures’ accessed 11 March 2022
Rygiel K, Baban F, and Ilcan S, ‘The Syrian Refugee Crisis: The EU-Turkey “Deal” and Temporary Protection’ (2016) 16 SAGE Global Social Policy
Rasche L, ‘Ukraine‘s Refugee Plight A Paradigm Shift for the EU’s Asylum Policy?’ (Hertie School Jacques Delors Centre 2022) Policy Brief accessed 28 March 2022
Solomon S, ‘Migrant Boats on the High Seas and Their Interception through Psychologically Coercive Measures: Is There a Case to Extraterritorially Apply Human Rights Law?’ (2019) 37 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
Shaw S J, The Jews of the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic (Palgrave Macmillan 1991)
Salah Sheekh v the Netherlands Başvuru no 1948/04 (AİHM, 23 Mayıs 2007)
Salomon S, ‘We Need to Talk about Citizenship, and Race’ (Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 9 November 2020) accessed 21 April 2021
Slovic P, ‘“If I Look at the Mass I Will Never Act”: Psychic Numbing and Genocide’ (2007) 2 Judgment and Decision Making
Shacknove A E, ‘Who Is a Refugee?’ (1985) 95 The University of Chicago Press
Schachter O, International Law in Theory and Practice (Developments in International Law) (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff 1991)
Tsakiris M, ‘Refugees in the Media: How the Most Commonly Used Images Make Viewers Dehumanise Them’ [2021] The Conversation accessed 13 December 2021
Topak Ö E, ‘The Biopolitical Border in Practice: Surveillance and Death at the Greece-Turkey Borderzones’ (2014) 32 SAGE Journals Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
Tiedemann P, ‘Are There Moral Duties toward Refugees? Considerations in Legal Ethics’ (2021) 10 MDPI Laws accessed 28 October 2021
The Conversation, ‘Did the US Commit Crimes in Afghanistan? International Prosecutors Want to Find Out’ The Conversation (19 March 2020) accessed 25 January 2022
The Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘Greek Authorities Should Investigate Allegations of Pushbacks and Ill-Treatment of Migrants, Ensure an Enabling Environment for NGOs and Improve Reception Conditions’ (12 May 2021) accessed 28 March 2022
The World Organization for Human Rights USA, ‘Torture by the United States The Status of Compliance by the U.S. Government with the International Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment’ accessed 22 January 2022
UN News Global Perspective Human stories, ‘UN Says at Least 70 Migrants Dead or Missing off Libyan Coast’ (United Nations, 17 March 2022) accessed 18 March 2022
UNHCR, ‘Toolkit On How To Request Interim Measures Under Rule 39 of The Rules of the European Court Of Human Rıghts For Persons In Need Of Internatıonal Protectıon’ accessed 11 March 2022
UNHCR, ‘Handbook On Procedures And Criteria For Determining Refugee Status And Guidelines On International Protection
Under The 1951 Convention And The 1967 Protocol Relating To The Status of Refugees’ accessed 25 May 2021
UNHCR, ‘Routes Towards The Western and Central Mediterranean Sea Working on Alternative to Dangerous Journey for Refugees’ (2021) UNHCR’s Updated Risk Mitigation Strategy and Appeal accessed 29 March 2022
UNHCR, ‘Syria Emergency’ (2022) accessed 10 February 2022
UNHCR, ‘The 1951 Refugee Convention’ (UNHCR) accessed 28 March 2022
Waisman V, ‘Human Trafficking: State Obligations to Protect Victims’ Rights, the Current Framework and a New Due Diligence Standard’ (2010) 33 Hastings International & Comparative Law Review 385
Washington J, The Dispossessed A Story of Asylum And The Us-Mexican Border And Beyond (Penguin Random House 2020)
Welander M, ‘The Politics of Exhaustion and The Externalization of British Border Control.An Articulation of a Strategy Designed to Deter, Control and Exclude’ (2020) 59 International Migration Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Kanunu, Kanun Numarası: 6458, Kabul Tarihi: 4.4.2013, RG 11.4.2013/28615.
Zolberg A R, Astri Suhrke, and Sergio Aguayo, Escape from Violence: Conflict and the Refugee Crisis in the Developing World (Oxford University Press 1992).

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Hukuk

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ekin Deniz Uzun ^*
0000-0002-9757-0223
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Aralık 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

12 Ağustos 2022

Kabul Tarihi

8 Aralık 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33433/maruhad.1161165

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA57WY86AD

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Uzun, E. D. (2022). Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 28(2), 744-773. https://doi.org/10.33433/maruhad.1161165

AMA

1.Uzun ED. Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2022;28(2):744-773. doi:10.33433/maruhad.1161165

Chicago

Uzun, Ekin Deniz. 2022. “Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme”. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi 28 (2): 744-73. https://doi.org/10.33433/maruhad.1161165.

EndNote

Uzun ED (01 Aralık 2022) Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi 28 2 744–773.

IEEE

[1]E. D. Uzun, “Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 28, sy 2, ss. 744–773, Ara. 2022, doi: 10.33433/maruhad.1161165.

ISNAD

Uzun, Ekin Deniz. “Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme”. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi 28/2 (01 Aralık 2022): 744-773. https://doi.org/10.33433/maruhad.1161165.

JAMA

1.Uzun ED. Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2022;28:744–773.

MLA

Uzun, Ekin Deniz. “Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme”. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 28, sy 2, Aralık 2022, ss. 744-73, doi:10.33433/maruhad.1161165.

Vancouver

1.Ekin Deniz Uzun. Sınır Adaleti ve AİHM’nin Geçici Tedbir Kararları Üzerine Kritik Bir İnceleme. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi. 01 Aralık 2022;28(2):744-73. doi:10.33433/maruhad.1161165

Cited By

Türkçe Sözlük’ten Türkçe Sözlük’e Katkılar

MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1437088