A UTILITARIAN RESOLUTION OF THE PARETIAN LİBERAL PARADOX

Yıl 1999, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 11, 101 - 103, 20.01.1999

Ahmet Kara

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.685716

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu makale, kişi hak ve özgürlükleri ile Pareto etkinlik arasında belirli şartlarda bir çelişki öngören “Paretian Liberal Paradoksu“nun, ilgili hak ve özgürlüklerin pozitif net toplam (toplumsal) fayda üretmeleri koşulu altında ortadan kalkacağım kanıtlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Utilitarian resolution, Paretian liberal paradox

Kaynakça

• [1] Sen, A. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
• [2] Aldrich, J. 1977. "The Dilemma of a Paretian Liberal: Some Consequences of Sen’s Theorem." Public Choice 30: 1-22.
• [3] Breyer, F. 1977. "The liberal Paradox, Decisiveness over Issues and Domain Restrictions." Z. Nationalokonomie 37: 45-60.
• [4] Gaertner, W., P. K. Pattanaik and K. Suzumura. 1992. An Individual Rights Revisited.0 Economica 59(234): 161-77.
• [5] Gibbard, A. 1974. "A Pareto Consistent Libertarian Claim." Journal of Economic Theoıy 7: 388-410.
• [6] Kelsey, D. 1988. "What is Responsible for the Paretian Epidemic." Social Choice and Welfare 5:303-306.
• [7] Pressler, J. 1987. "Rights and Social Choice: Is There a Paretian Libertarian Paradox." Economics and Philosophy 3:1-22.
• [8] Seidl, C. 1990. AOn the Impossibility of a Generalization of the Libertarian Resolution of the Liberal Paradox.@ Journal-of-Economics (Zeitschrift- fur- Nationalokonomie) 51(1): 71-88.
• [9] Mueller D.C. 1996. "Constitutional and Liberal Rights." Analyse and Kritik 18: 96-117.
• [10] Ng, Y.K. 1971. "The Possibility of a Paretian Liberal: Impossibility Theorems and Cardinal Utility." Journal of Political Economy 79: 1397-1402.