YEŞİL FİNANS YAZINININ MEVCUT DURUMU VE GELECEĞİ: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 62, 79 - 112, 30.07.2024

Funda Çevirgen Eylem Bayrakçı

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.1440257

Öz

Politika yapıcıların, hükümetlerin ve düzenleyici kuruluşların iklim değişikliği, küresel ısınma, enerji verimliliği ve sürdürülebilirlik konularına yönelik artan ilgisi, yeşil finans uygulamalarının incelenmesi ihtiyacını da artırmıştır. Bu çalışma, bibliyometrik analiz yoluyla yeşil finansın mevcut durumu ve gelecekteki yönleri hakkında kapsamlı bir analiz sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada Web of Science veri tabanından 1705 yeşil finans literatürü alınmıştır. Analiz için, yeşil finansın farklı bibliyometrik boyutlarını belirlemek amacıyla VOSviewer programı kullanılmıştır. Analizlerin sonucunda, yeşil finans alanının hızlı bir gelişme gösterdiği ve Çin’in kapsamlı gücü ile ilk sırada yer aldığı görülmüştür. Bu alandaki makaleler çoğunlukla Çin, Pakistan ve İngiltere’de olup; Türkiye 13. sırada yer almaktadır. İşbirliklerine bakıldığında konunun disiplinler arası ve küresel bağlamda ele alındığı görülmüştür. Anahtar kelimelerin analizine göre, “yeşil finans, “Çin”, “sürüdürülebilir büyüme”, “yenilebilir enerji” ve “yeşil tahvil” en çok kullanılan anahtar kelimelerdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yeşil Finans, Bibliyometrik Analiz, Web of Science, VOSviewer

CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE OF GREEN FINANCE LITERATURE: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Öz

The growing interest of policymakers, governments, and regulatory institutions towards climate change, global warming, energy efficiency, and sustainability has increased the need to examine green finance implementations. The study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current status and future directions of green finance through bibliometric analysis. 1705 green finance studies from the literature were taken from the Web of Science database. The VOSviewer program was used for the analysis to determine different bibliometric dimensions of green finance. As a result of the analysis, it was found out that the field of green finance has been developing rapidly, and China ranks first with its comprehensive power. Papers published in this field are mostly from China, Pakistan, and England; Türkiye ranks 13th. When examining the collaborations, it was seen that the issue was addressed in an interdisciplinary and global context. According to the analysis of keywords, “green finance”, “China”, “sustainable growth”, “renewable energy” and “green bond” are the most used keywords.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Green Finance, Bibliometric Analysis, Web of Science, VOSviewer

Kaynakça

• AlMenhali, A., & Nobanee, H. (2021). Green finance: concept and applications. 29 Ocak 2024 tarihinde https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354371962_Green_Finance_Concept_and_Applications adresinden alındı
• Al-Sheryani, K., & Nobanee, H. (2020, 15 Şubat). Green finance: A mini-review. 19 Ocak 2024 tarihinde SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3538696 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3538696 adresinden alındı
• Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0.
• Baker, D. (1990). Citation analysis: A methodological review. Social Work Research and Abstracts , 26(3), 3–10. doi:10.1093/swra/26.3.3.
• Berensmann, K., & Lindenberg, N. (2016). Green finance: Actors, challenges and policy recommendations (Briefing Paper 23/2016). Germany: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE).
• Bhatnagar, S., & Sharma, D. (2022). Evolution of green finance and its enablers: A bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 162(4), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112405.
• Bhatnagar, S., Sharma, D., & Agrawal, S. (2021). Can Industry 4.0 revolutionize the wave of green finance adoption: A bibliometric analysis. Agrawal, R., Jain, J.K., Yadav, V.S., Manupati,V.K. & Varela, L. (Ed.). Recent Advances in Smart Manufacturing and Materials Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (s.s. 515-525). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-3033-0.
• Cai, R., & Guo, J. (2021). Finance for the environment: A scientometrics analysis of green finance. Mathematics, 9, 1-15. doi: 10.3390/math9131537.
• Carchiolo, V., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., & Mangioni, G. (2022). Co-authorship networks analysis to discover collaboration patterns among Italian researchers. Future Internet, 14(187), 1-15. doi: 10.3390/fi14060187.
• Cobo, M., Lopez-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. doi:10.1002/asi.21525
• Cui, Y. (2017). Analyzing green finance incentives: an empirical study of the Chinese banking sector. (Yayınlanmamış Yükseklisans Tezi). University of Waterloo Sustainability Management, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
• Damar, M., & Aydın, Ö. (2023). Kavramsal Olarak Bibliyometri, Bilimetri, Bilimsel Performans Analizi - Bilimsel Haritalama ve Bibliyometrik Veri Tabanları. K. Tüğen, & E. Kızıltaş Uzunali içinde, Disiplinlerarası Akademik Araştırmalar III: Gıda Üretimi, Gıda Güvenliği, İşgücü Piyasası, Yönetim Muhasebesi ve Bilgi Teknolojilerindeki Gelişmeler (s. 84-109). Ankara: Iksad Publications.
• Debrah, C., Darko, A., & Chan, A. (2023). A bibliometric qualitative literature review of green finance gap and future research directions. Climate and Development, 15(5), 432-455. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2022.2095331.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
• ESCARUS. (2018). Dönüşen Dünyada Fırsatları Yakalamak: Sürdürülebilir Finans Görünümü 2018. 20 Ekim 2023 tarihinde https://www.escarus.com/i/content/302_2_S%C3%BCrd%C3%BCr%C3%BClebilir%20Finans%20G%C3%B6r%C3%BCn%C3%BCm%C3%BC%202018.pdf adresinden alındı
• Fonseca, B. d., Sampaio, R. B., Fonseca, M. V., & Zicker, F. (2016). Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(34), 1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5.
• Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M., Moral-Muñoz, J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. (2018). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied intelligence, 48(5), 1275-1287. doi:10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y.
• Gülmez, D., Özteke, İ., & Gümüş, S. (2021). Uluslararası dergilerde yayımlanan Türkiye kaynaklı eğitim araştırmalarının genel görünümü: Bibliyometrik analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(206), 213-239. doi:10.15390/EB.2020.9317.
• Höhne, N., Khosla, S., Fekete, H., & Gilbert, A. (2012). Mapping of green finance delivered by IDFC members in 2011 (Project number: CLIDE12246). Cologne Germany: Ecofys.
• Hafner, S., Jones, A., Anger-Kraavi, A., & Pohl, J. (2020). Closing the green finance gap – A systems perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 26-60.
• He, L., Liu, R., Zhong, Z., Wang, D., & Xia, Y. (2019). Can green financial development promote renewable energy investment efficiency? A consideration of bank credit. Renewable Energy , 143, 974-984. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.059.
• Hjørland, B. (2013). Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing and Management, 49, 1313–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001.
• Huang, X., Yang, Z., Zhang, J., Wang, R., Fan, J., Zhang, H., . . . Huang, H. (2022). Bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science: current perspectives and potential trends of SMAD7 in oncology. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 9, 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.712732.
• IFC. (2013). Mobilizing Public and Private Funds for Inclusive Green Growth Investment in Developing Countries - An Expanded Stocktaking Report Prepared for the G20 Development Working Group. IFC Climate Business Department.
• Irfan, M., Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., & Yang, X. (2022). Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121882. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121882.
• ISO. (2022). Green and Sustainable Finance. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO Central Secretariat.
• Jarneving, B. (2005). A Comparison of Two Bibliometric Methods for Mapping of the Research Front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0270-7
• Khan, M., Riaz, H., Ahmed, M., & Saeed, A. (2022). Does green finance really deliver what is expected? An empirical perspective. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 586-593.
• Klioutchnikov, I., & Kliuchnikov, O. (2021). Green finance: Pandemic and climate change. E3S Web of Conferences, 234(42), 1-5. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202123400042.
• Kumar, S. (2015). Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(1), 55-73. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-09-2014-0116 .
• Kwong, R., Kwok, M. L., & Wong, H. (2023). Green fintech as a future research direction: A bibliometric analysis on green finance and fintech. Sustainability, 15(20), 14683. doi: 10.3390/su152014683.
• Le, T.-H., Le, H.-C., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2020). Does financial inclusion impact CO2 emissions? Evidence from Asia. Finance Research Letters, 34, 101451. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101451.
• Lee, C.-C., & Lee, C.-C. (2022). How does green finance affect green total factor productivity? Evidence from China. Energy Economics Volume, 107, 105863. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105863.
• Lindenberg, N. (2014, April). Definition of Green Finance. 18 Ocak 2024 tarihinde Convention on Biological Diversity: https://www.cbd.int/financial/gcf/definition-greenfinance.pdf adresinden alındı
• Meo, M., & Karim, M. (2022). The role of green finance in reducing CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, 169-178. doi:10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.002
• Mohanty, S., Nanda, S. S., Soubhari, T., Vishnu, N., Biswal, S., & Patnaik, S. (2023). Emerging research trends in green finance: A bibliometric overview. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(108), 1-17. doi: 10.3390/jrfm16020108.
• Muchiri, M. K., Erdei-Gally, S., Fekete-Farkas, M., & Lakner, Z. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of green finance and climate change in post-Paris Agreement Era. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15 (561), 1-13. doi: 10.3390/ jrfm15120561.
• Nawaz, M., Seshadri, U., Kumar, P., Aqdas, R., & Patwary, A. (2021). Nexus between green finance and fclimate change mitigation in N-11 and BRICS countries: empirical estimation through difference in differences (DID) approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 6504-6519.
• Nicholls, A. (2021). Sustainable finance: a primer and recent developments. Asian Development Outlook.
• Okubo, Y. (1997). Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples. Technology and Industry Working Papers 1997/01, OECD , Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development, Paris, doi: 10.1787/208277770603.
• Ozili, P. (2021). Digital finance, green finance and social finance: Is there a link? Financial Internet Quarterly, 17(1), 1-7. doi: 10.2478/fiqf-2021-0001.
• Öztürk, O. (2021). Bibliyometrik araştırmaların tasarımına ilişkin bir çerçeve. Öztürk, O. & Gürler, G. (Ed.). Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz. (ss. 33-50). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Rapi, K., Maisarah, S., Rambe, S., Chandra, W., & Rahmana, A. (2021). Green finance for the era of post COVID-19: A systematic literature . Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 198, 190-195.
• Sezgin, A., Orbay, K., & Orbay, M. (2022). Educational research review from diverse perspectives: A bibliometric analysis of Web of Science (2011–2020). SAGE Open, 12(4), 1-13. doi: 10.1177/21582440221141628.
• Sharan, A. (2018). Study of Green Finance Ecosystem In India. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India.
• Sharma, R., Mehta, K., & Ahuja, S. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of green finance: present state and future directions. Mehta, K., Sharma, R. & Yu, P.S. (Ed.). Revolutionizing Financial Services and Markets Through FinTech and Blockchain (ss. 135-154). Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global.
• Soundarrajan, P., & Vivek, N. (2016). Green finance for sustainable green economic growth in India. Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika, 62(1), 35-44. doi: 10.17221/174/2014-AGRICECON.
• Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., & Yoshino, N. (2019). The way to induce private participation in green finance and investment. Finance Research Letters, 31, 98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.04.016.
• Usdiken, B., & Pasadeos, Y. (1995). Organizational analysis in North America and Europe: A comparison of co-citation networks. Organization Studies, 16(3), 503-526. doi:10.1177/017084069501600306.
• van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538. doi: 10.1007/ s11192-009-0146-3.
• van Raan, A. (2014). Advances in bibliometric analysis: Research performance assessment and science mapping. Blockmans, W., Engwall, L. & Weaire, D. (Ed.). Bibliometrics: Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance (Cilt 87, ss. 17-28). London: Wenner-Gren International Series, Portland Press Ltd.
• Wang, M., Li, X., & Wang, S. (2021). Discovering research trends and opportunities of green finance and energy policy: A data-driven scientometric analysis. Energy Policy, 154, 112295. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112295.
• Wang, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2016). The Role of Green Finance in Environmental Protection: Two Aspects of Market Mechanism and Policies. Energy Procedia, 104, 311-316.
• Yin, J., Gong, L., & Wang, S. (2018). Large-scale assessment of global green innovation research trends from 1981 to 2016: A bibliometric study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 827–841. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.169.
• Yu, C.-H., Wu, X., Zhang, D., Chen, Shi, & Zhao, J. (2021). Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energy Policy, 153(C), 112255. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112255.
• Yu, X., Mao, Y., Huang, D., Sun, Z., & Li, T. (2021). Mapping global research on green finance from 1989 to 2020: A bibliometric study. Hindawi Advances in Civil Engineering, 3(6), 1-13. doi: 10.1155/2021/9934004.
• Zhang, D., Mohsin, M., Rasheed, A. K., Chang, Y., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2021). Public spending and green economic growth in BRI region: Mediating role of green finance. Energy Policy, 153(15), 112256. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112256.
• Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., & Managi, S. (2019). A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions. Finance Research Letters, 29, 425-430. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.02.003.
• Zhang, S., Wu, Z., Wang, Y., & Hao, Y. (2021). Fostering green development with green finance: An empirical study on the environmental effect of green credit policy in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113159. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113159.
• Zhao, T., Zhou, H., Jiang, J., & Yan, W. (2022). Impact of green finance and environmental regulations on the green innovation efficiency in China. Sustainability, 14, 1-17. doi: 10.3390/su14063206.
• Zhou, X., Tang, X., & Zhang, R. (2020). Impact of green finance on economic development and environmental quality: A study based on provincial panel data from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 19915–19932. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08383-2.
• Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. doi:10.1177/1094428114562629