Tarihi Kubbeli Yapıların Çekme Bölgelerinde Karbon Fiber Takviyeli Polimer ve Cam Fiber Takviyeli Polimer Kullanılarak Güçlendirme Yönteminin Sonlu Elemanlar Analizi: Edirnekapı Mihrimah Sultan Camii Kubbesi

Year 2023, , 487 - 509, 26.12.2023

Hatice Öz , Asena Soyluk

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1317703

Abstract

Tarihi yapılar, tarihsel sürdürülebilirlik açısından geçmişten günümüze, günümüzden geçmişe kültürel izleri ve mirası taşıyan dikkat çekici anıtlardır. Korunmaya değer bu varlıkların, kültürel birikimin devamlılığı için belirli müdahale kriterleri altında restore edilmesi ve güçlendirilmesi gerekmektedir. Tarihi yığma yapılar düşey yükler altında oldukça rijit bir performans sergilemelerine rağmen, depremlerin yarattığı sismik kuvvetler gibi yanal yüklere karşı çekme dayanımları düşüktür. Yığma yapıların önemli bir mimari unsuru olan kubbelerin sismik kuvvetlerin etkisi altında hasar görmesi muhtemeldir. Güçlendirme analizleri kubbe çekme bölgelerinde CFRP ve GFRP ile gerçekleştirilmiş ve Elastisite Modülü üzerinden okumalar yapılmıştır. Edirnekapı Mihrimah Sultan Camii, bulunduğu konum ve yaşadığı depremler nedeniyle sismik kuvvetlere duyarlı bir yapı olduğundan sonlu elemanlar modeli analizi için uygun görülmüştür.

Keywords

Sonlu eleman analizleri, Edirnekapı Mihrimah Sultan Camii, CFRP, GFRP, sismik hasar görebilirlik

Finite Element Analysis of Strengthening Method Using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer and Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer in Tensile Zones of Historical Domed Structures: Edirnekapi Mihrimah Sultan Mosque Dome

Abstract

Historic buildings are remarkable monuments that carry cultural traces and heritage from the past to the present and from the present to the past in terms of historical sustainability. These assets worthy of preservation should be restored and strengthened under certain intervention criteria for the continuity of cultural accumulation. Although historical masonry buildings exhibit a very rigid performance under vertical loads, their tensile strength against lateral loads such as seismic forces created by earthquakes is low. Domes, an important architectural element of masonry buildings, are likely to be damaged under the influence of seismic forces. The retrofitting analyses were performed with CFRP and GFRP in the dome tensile zones and readings were made on the Modulus of Elasticity. Since Edirnekapı Mihrimah Sultan Mosque is a structure sensitive to seismic force due to its location and the earthquakes experienced by the structure, it was deemed suitable for finite element model analysis.

Keywords

Finite element analyses, Edirnekapı Mihrimah Sultan Mosque, CFRP, GFRP, seismic vulnerability

Thanks

The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics Committee approval was not required for the study.

References

• Aiello, M. A., Contrafatto, S. & Ricciardi, S. (2019). Fiber reinforced polymers for strengthening historical buildings: A review. Procedia Structural Integrity, 23, (p. 152-159).
• Beer, F. P., Johnston Jr, E. R., Mazurek, D. F. & Cornwell, P. J. (2015). Mechanics of material (p.73). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Biscontin, G., Russo, S. & Valente, S. (2009). Masonry strengthening with fiber-reinforced polymers: recent advances and applications. Journal of Composites for Construction, 13(5), 373-384. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000051
• Bournas, D. A., Triantafillou, T. C. & Sofianos, A. I. (2014). Strengthening of masonry structures with fiber- reinforced polymers: Recent advances and perspectives. Composite Structures, 111, 378-392. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.027
• Callister Jr, W. D. & Rethwisch, D. G. (2018). Materials science and engineering: an introduction (pp. 129). John Wiley & Sons.
• Çamlıbel, N. (1998). Analytical Investigation of Structure in Sinan Architecture (Doctoral Dissertation, pp.630). Yıldız University Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul.
• Campione, G., Papia, M. & Pecce, M. (2009). A review of the behaviour of masonry domes reinforced by fibre-reinforced polymers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 162(4), 177-190.
• Çelik, O. C. (2016). Historical Building Repair and Retrofit Guide. BASF.
• Croci, G. (2000). The Conservation and Structural Restoration of Architectural Heritage. Advances in Architecture Series. Computational Mechanics Publication/WIT Press, UK.
• Değirmenci, İ. & Sarıbıyık, M. (2015). Innovative approaches and use of frp materials in strengthening historical buildings. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Science, 338-347.
• Döndüren, M. S., Şişik, Ö. & Demiröz, A. (2017). Types of damage in historical buildings. Selcuk University Journal of Social and Technical Researches, 13, 45–58.
• Elghazouli, A. Y., Garcia, R. & Jimenez, M. J. (2018). Seismic vulnerability of historical masonry buildings. Proceedings of the ICE-Civil Engineering, 171(6), 255-265.
• Elnashai, A. S. (2003). Seismic retrofit of masonry walls using CFRP sheets: An overview of the state of the art. Engineering Structures, 25(9), 1231-1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00105-4
• Fiberline Composites. (2021). What is the difference between GFRP and CFRP? Retrieved from https://fiberline.com/en-en/about-composites/composite-materials/gfrp-vs-cfrp/
• Galati, Nanni, Ceroni & Sacco (2017). "Strengthening of masonry arches with FRP composites: Experimental investigation and numerical simulation.
• Karakaş, Z. S. & Acun Özgünler, S. (2022). Koruma Kararlarını Etkileyen Parametrelerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Anket Çalışması . Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7 (1), 364-382 DOI: 10.30785/mbud.1090550
• Khalil, E. & Bakhoum, M. (2017). Reinforcement of historic masonry domes with composite materials: A review. Procedia Engineering, 199, 2114-2119. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.711
• Kheirikhah, M. M., Faghih Shojaei, M. & Eftekhari, M. M. (2019). Strengthening of masonry domes with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. Journal of Building Engineering, 22, 221-231.
• Le, H. R., Li, J. & Tan, V. B. C. (2019). Strength and stiffness characteristics of GFRP composite plates with different stacking sequences. Composite Structures, 210, 495-508.
• Lourenço, P. B. (2013). Conservation of cultural heritage buildings: Methodology and application to case studies. Revista ALCONPAT, 3(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.21041/ra.v3i2.46
• Lourenço, P. B., Roca, P. & Moden, C. (2010). Masonry Structures: Behavior and Design. Springer Science & Business Media, (p.28-29, 40-41. 45-46).
• Nassery, K. (2018). Carbon vs. Glass Fiber Reinforcement. CompositesWorld. Retrieved from https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/carbon-vs-glass-fiber-reinforcement
• Neto, E. A. D. S. & Brandt, A. M. (2017). Tensile and compressive properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. Materials Research, 20(6), 1607-1614.
• Özmen, H. & Taşdemir, M. A. (2017). Strengthening of historical domes with composite materials: a case study. Journal of Composites for Construction, 21(5), 04017034.
• Pujades, L. G. & Lanzón, M. (2017). Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of historical masonry structures: A review. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(8), 3173-3201.
• Sarıbıyık, A. (2018). Effect of using FRP composites as a hybrid in the strengthening of concretes. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.343562
• Sesigür, H., Çelik, O. & Çılı, F. (2007). Structural components, damage patterns, repair and retrofitting in historic buildings, IMO Istanbul Bulletin, 89, 10-21.
• Shariati, M., Esfahani, M. R. & Kianoush, M. R. (2013). Strengthening of stone masonry domes using CFRP and GFRP composites: An experimental study. Journal of Composites for Construction, 17(2)
• Soyluk, A. & Tuna, M. E. (2011). Dynamic analysis of historical Şehzade Mehmet Mosque for Seismic base isolation application. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi , 26 (3). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gazimmfd/issue/6689/88775
• The Venice Charter. (1964). The International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites. Retrieved May 07, 2023, from https://www.icomos.org/en/participer/179-articles-en- francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/157-thevenice-charter
• Türkmen, M. & Bilgin, H. (2002). Structural Behavior of Domed Cover Systems in Traditional Architecture”, Balıkesir University Faculty of Engineering - Architecture, IV. Engineering Architecture Symposium, Balıkesir, Turkey.
• Zakar, L. & Eyüpgiller, K. K. (2020). Architectural Restoration Conservation Techniques and Methods (Mimari Restorasyon Koruma Teknik Ve Yöntemleri). (p. 50 and p. 83).