ŞİRKET BİRLEŞMELERİNİN BİR PARÇASI OLARAK ELDE EDİLEN VE AKTİFLEŞTİRİLEN MADDİ OLMAYAN DURAN VARLIKLARIN DEĞERLEMESİ VE İNGİLTERE TECRÜBESİ

Öz

Uluslararası Muhasebe Standardı 38 2004 yılında önemli ölçüde değiştirilmiştir. Bu değişikliklerle standarttamaddi olmayan duran varlığın ömrü, tanımı, değerlemesi ve amortismanı hakkında bir çok yenilik getirilmiştir.Maddi olmayan duran varlıklar hakkında getirilen değişiklerin en önemlilerinden biri işletme birleşmesinin birparçası olarak elde edilen maddi olmayan duran varlığın belirtilen şartlara uygun olduğu taktirde ayrı bir kalemde gerçeğe uygun değeri ile aktifleştirilmesidir. Böylelikle bu değişikliklerle birlikte maddi olmayan duran varlıkların değerlemesi oldukça önem kazanmıştır. Bu makalede Uluslararası Değerleme Standartlarına UDS göremaddi olmayan duran varlıkların değerleme yöntemleri ve Uluslararası Finansal Raporlama Standardı’na UFRS göre işletme birleşmesinin bir parçası olarak elde edilen maddi olmayan duran varlıkların nasıl değerlemeye tabi tutulacağı araştırılmıştır. Buna ek olarak 1980’lerin ortalarında İngiltere’de işletme birleşmesinin birparçası olarak elde edilen markaların ayrı bir kalem olarak aktifleştirilmesine izin verilmesi ile ortaya çıkan durum incelenmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Maddi Olmayan Duran Varlıklar, Değerleme, Maliyet Yaklaşımı, Piyasa Yaklaşımı, Gelir Yaklaşımı

Öz

The IAS 38 has changed significantly in the year 2004. With these alterations a number of improvements arebrought with this standard concerning the economic life, description, valuation and depreciation amortization of the intangible assets. One of the most important alterations about the intangible assets is that the intangibleasset acquired as part of a business combination can be capitalized with its real value if it is in convenience withthe asserted conditions. With these changes the valuation of intangible assets has gained significant importance.In this article, the valuation methods of intangible assets according to the International Valuation Standards andhow the intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination are going to be valued according to theIFRSs are investigated. Together with these, the situation occurred in the 1980s England, when the trade marksacquired in a business combination are allowed to be capitalized as a single asset, is examined

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Intangible Assets, Valuation, Cost Approach, Market Approach, Income Approach

Kaynakça

1. Abel, Mark. “Theme III: Methodologies for Determining the Value of Industrial Property Asssets-Viewpoint of an Institution for the Management of Industrial Property Rights”,WIPO National Seminar on the Valuation of Industrial Property Asset, Beijing, 1996
2. Bertolotti, Nick. “Methodology for Determining the Value of Industrial Property Assets – Viewpoints of a Pro- fessional Consultant Engaged in Valuating Industrial Property Asset” WIPO National Seminar on the Valuati- on of Industrial Property Assets, Beijing, 1996
3. Bonduelle, Yann; Valuing Intangible Assets- Impairment Tests, Pricewaterhouse Coopers, London 2003
4. Bouteiller, Christophe. “The Evaluation of Intangible Asset: Advocating for an Option Based Approach”, 6. Al- tenative Perspective on Finance Conference, Hamburg, 2002 http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/manage- ment/apfa/Hamburg%20Papers/Bouteiller.pdf
5. Coggin, Dana T. “Let’s Not Abandon the Cost Approach”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 62, Issue 1, 1994, p.144
6. Diamond, Michael A.; Nicolaisen, Donald T. “Intangibles”, Handbook of International Accounting, Ed. by Frederic D.S. Choi, Newyork, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1991
7. Dotzour, Mark G; Freitag, Mark R, “The cost approach in residential appraising: Make it optional”, The Apprai- sal Journal, Vol.63, Issue 2, 1995, ss.182-186
8. Egginton, Don A. “Toward Some Principle for Intangible Asset Acccounting”, Accounting and Bussiness Re- search , Vol: 20, No: 79, 1990

9. FEI Reseach Foundation Issue Alert, Intangibles: What Their Valuation is Really Worth, 2002
10. Gajland, David. “Valuation of Intellectual Property Assets: Significant, Parameters, Methodologies and Limita- tions, WIPO Asian Regional Seminar on the Promotion of the Use of the Intellectual Property System by the Private Sector, Daeduk, Republic of Korea, 1998
11. Iwan, Gregory A. “The Cost Approach - Inflexible or Infeasible?”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 61, Issue 1, , p.136-137
12. Kaplan, Robert S.; Norton David P. Strategy Maps, Boston, Harvard Business School Press, 2004
13. King, Alfred M; Henry, Jay M. ?Valuing Intangible Assets Through Appraisals”, Strategic Finance, Vol.81, Iss. 5, Nov, 1999
14. Lawrence, Steve. “The historical Development of Accounting Standards - Part5”, Professional Scheme, Lianyuan, Ma. “Valuation of Intellectual Property Assets; Valuation Techniques: Parameters, Methodologies and Limitations”, WIPO Asian Regional Forum on the Intellectual Property Strategy for the Promotion of In- novative and Inventive Activities, Beijing, 2000
15. Lück, Gert. “Theme I: The Importance of Assessing the Value of Industrial Property Assets – Viewpoint of a Right Holder (Inventor, Enterprise or Institution)” WIPO National Seminar on the Valuation of Industrial Property Assets, Beijing 1996
16. Marchitelli, Richard “Rethinking the Cost Approach”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 60, Issue 3, 1992, ss.424-426
17. Muller, Karl A. “ An examination of the voluntary recognition of the acquired brand names in the United King- dom”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, No: 26, October 1999
18. Mundy, Bill. “The Specific Methods and the Appraisal Process”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 60, Issue 3, 1992, s.493-499
19. Oetzel, Terrell R. “Some Thoughts on the Cost Approach”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 61, Issue 1, 1993, ss.132
20. Parr, Russell. “Module 6: IP Valuation Issues and Strategies”, Singapore-WIPO Joint Training Course for Asi- a and the Pacific Region on Intellectual Property and Technopreneurship Development, Singapore, 1999
21. Price Waterhouse Coopers, Shedding Light on IFRS: IFRS 3 The new Business Combination Standard, 2002
22. Reilly, Robert F.; Schweihs, Robert P. Valuing Intangible Assets, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1999
23. Robinson, Rudy R; Lucas, Scott R. “Appraising Special-Purpose Industrial Facilities for Ad-Valorem Purposes”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 71, Issue 4, 2003, pp.323-324
24. Santo, Jacquelyn Dal. “Intelectual Property Income Projections: Approaches and Methods”, The Handbo- ok of Business Valuation and Intellectual Property Valuation, Ed. Robert F Reilly, Robert P. Schweihs, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2004
25. Schwartzben, Dov; Finkler, Steven A. “Combining Accounting Approaches to Practice Valuation”, Healthcare Financial Management, Vol. 52, Issue 6, 1998, ss.72-76
26. Shortridge, Rebecca Toppe; Schroeder, Amanda; Wagoner, Erin. “Fair-Value Accounting- Analyzing the Chan- ging Environment” The CPA Journal Online, April 2006
27. Smith, Gordon J.“Assesment and Valuation of Inventions and Research Results for Their Use and Commerciali- zation”, International Workshop on Management and Commercialization of Inventions and Technology, Monterrey, 2002
28. Smith, Gordon V. Trade Valuation, New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1996
29. Smith, Gordon V. Parr L. Rusell: Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets, New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Third Ed., 2000
30. Sveiby, Erik. “Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets”, http://www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMethods.htm, 2005
31. Tollington, Tony. “UK Brand Asset recognition Beyond – Transaction or Events”, Long Range Planning, No: Issue 4, August 2001
32. Wyett, John. “A guide to FRS 10 Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, Professional Scheme Yang, J. M. ?The Valuation of Intangibles”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 2, NO. 3, 1927, ss.224-228 www.ivsc.org www.tmsk.org.tr