Avrupa’da Telif Haklarının İnsan Hakları Boyutlarının Yapıçözümü

Öz

Mahkemeler, insan hakları kuruluşları, hukukçu akademisyenler ve insan haklarını savunanlar, insan haklarıyla fi krî mülkiyet arasındaki ilişkiyi birçok farklı bakış açısıyla incelemektedirler. Telif hakkı, fi krî mülkiyet haklarının daha geniş bütünlüğü bağlamında, insan hakları dünyasında nasıl kavramlaştırılmaktadır? Bu çalışma, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Avrupa Birliği Temel Haklar Şartı gibi bazı temel uluslararası belgelerin satırları arasında bu soruyu yeniden ele almaktadır. Böylece bu çalışma, ilgili insan hakları kuruluşları ve mahkemelerinin telif haklarının insan hakları yönlerini nasıl algıladığına ve ayırt e􀄴 iğine dair yapı çözümüne dayalı bir değerlendirmek sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fikri mülkiyet hakları
• Telif hakkı
• İnsan hakkı
• İfade özgürlüğü
• Mülkiyet hakkı
• Manevî haklar
• Malî haklar

DECONSTRUCTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DIMENSIONS OF COPYRIGHT IN EUROPE

Abstract

Courts, human rights bodies, legal scholars and human rights advocates have discussed the interface between human rights and intellectual property rights through multiple lenses. How has copyright, within the larger context of intellectual property rights, been conceptualised in the world of human rights? This article revisits this question along the lines of some fundamental international instruments, such as: the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Thus, it provides a deconstructive assessment on how the respective human rights bodies and courts have perceived and identifi ed the human rights a􀄴 ributes of copyright with a new perspective

Keywords

• Intellectual property rights
• Copyright
• Human rights
• Freedom of expression
• Right to property
• Moral rights
• Financial rights

Kaynakça

1. “Ashby Donald and others v France”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 45, no. 3, (2014): 354-360.
2. ““Pirate Bay” European Convention on Human Rights, Art. 10 – Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden, 2013”’ International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 44, no. 4, (2013): 724.
3. ADENEY, Elizabeth. The Moral Rights of Authors and Performes: An International and Comparative Analysi,s (Oxford, OUP, 2006).
4. ALÌ, Gabriele Spina. “Intellectual Property and Human Rights: A Taxonomy of Their Interactions”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 51, no. 4, (2020): 411-445.
5. ANGELOPOULOS, Christina. “MTE v Hungary: New ECtHR Judgment on Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression” (March 5, 2016), available at h􀄴 p://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2016/03/05/mte-v-hungary-newecthr- judgment-on-intermediary-liability-and-freedom-of-expression/.
6. ARAI-Takahashi, Yutaka. The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp, Intersentia, 2002).
7. BARAZZA, Stefano. “Authorship of Cinematographic Works and Ownership of Related Rights: Who Holds the Stage? Martin Luksan v Petrus van der Let, Case C-277/10, European Court of Justice (ECJ), 9 February 2012”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 7, no. 6, (2012): 396.
8. BEITER, Klaus. “The Right to Property and the Protection of Interests in Intellectual Property—A Human Rights Perspective on the European Court of Human Rights’ Decision in Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Portugal”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 39, no. 6, (2008): 714– 721.

9. BROWN, Abbe E. L. Intellectual Property, Human Rights and Competition: Access to Essential Innovation and Technology (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012).
10. BRUNNER, Lisa. “The Liability of an Online Intermediary for Third Party Content The Watchdog Becomes the Monitor: Intermediary Liability after Delfi v Estonia”, Human Rights Law Review 16, no. 1, (2016): 163-174,
11. CARPENTER, Megan M. “Trademarks and Human Rights: Oil and Water? Or Chocolate and Peanut Bu􀄴 er”, Trademark Reporter 99, (2009): 892–930.
12. CHAPMAN, Audrey R. “Approaching Intellectual Property as a Human Right: Obligations Related to Article 15 (1) (c)”, in Approaching Intellectual Property as a Human Right, ed. Evgueni Guerassimov (UNESCO Publishing, 2001).
13. COBAN, Ali Riza. Protection of Property Rights Within the European Convention on Human Rights, (Ashgate Publishing, 2004).
14. DAVIES, Gillian and Kevin Garne􀄴 . Moral Rights, (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).
15. DRAHOS, Peter. “Intellectual Property and Human Rights”, Intellectual Property Quarterly 3, (1999): 361.
16. EMBERLAND, Marius. The Human Rights of Companies: Exploring the Structure of ECHR Protection, (Oxford, OUP, 2006).
17. EU Focus, “ISP May Be Ordered To Block Website Infringing Copyright”, EU Focus, no. 319, (2014): 27-28.
18. GEIGER Christophe. “Constitutionalising Intellectual Property Law? - The Infl uence of Fundamental Rights on Intellectual Property in the European Union”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 37, no. 4, (2006): 371–406.
19. GEIGER, Christophe and Elena Izyumenko. “Copyright on the Human Rights’ Trial: Redefi ning the Boundaries of Exclusivity Through Freedom of Expression”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 45, no. 3, (2014): 316–342.
20. GEIGER, Christophe (ed). Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property, (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015).
21. GEIGER, Christophe and Elena Izyumenko. “Freedom of expression as an external limitation to copyright law in the EU: the Advocate General of the CJEU shows the way” EIPR 41, no. 3, (2019): 131-137.
22. GEIGER, Christophe and Elena Izyumenko. “Shaping Intellectual Property Rights Through Human Rights Adjudication: The Example of the European Court of Human Rights”, Mitchell Hamline Law Review 46, no. 3, (2020): 527-612.
23. GEIGER, Christophe and Elena Izyumenko. “The Constitutionalization of Intellectual Property Law in the EU and the Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online Decisions of the CJEU: Progress, but Still Some Way to Go!”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 51, (2020): 282–306.
24. GEIGER, Christophe. “Intellectual Property Shall Be Protected!? Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: A Mysterious Provision with An Unclear Scope”, European Intellectual Property Review 31, no. 3, (2009): 115.
25. GERVAIS, Daniel J. “Making Copyright Whole: A Principled Approach to Copyright Exceptions and Limitation”, University of O􀄴 awa Law & Technology Journal 5, (2008): 1
26. GOEBEL, B. “Trademarks as Fundamental Rights—Europe”, Trademark Reporter 99, (2009): 931–955; Jennifer W. Reiss, “Commercializing Human Rights: Trademarks in Europe After Anheuser-Busch v Portugal”, Journal of World Intellectual Property 14, no. 2, (2011): 176-201.
27. GOLDSMITH, Harry. “Human Rights and Protection of Intellectual Property”, Trademark and Copyright Journal of Research and Education 12, no. 2, (1968): 889.
28. GREER, Steven. The Exceptions to Articles 8 to 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Human Rights Files No 15) (Council of Europe Publishing, 1997).
29. GRIFFITHS, Jonathan and Luke McDonagh. “Fundamental Rights & European IP law – The Case of Art 17(2)”, in Constructing European Intellectual Property, ed. Christope Geiger (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2013), 80.
30. GRIFFITHS, Jonathan and Uma Suthersanen (eds). Copyright and Free Speech, (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005).
31. GRIFFITHS, Jonathan. “Constitutionalising or Harmonising? The Court of Justice, the Right to Property and European Copyright Law”, European Law Review 38, no. 1, (2013): 76.
32. GRIFFITHS, Jonathan. “European Union copyright law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights—Advocate General Szpunar’s Opinions in (C-469/17) Funke Medien, (C-476/17) Pelham GmbH and (C-516/17) Spiegel Online”, ERA Forum 20, (2019): 35–50.
33. GROSHEIDE, Willem. “Moral Rights”, in Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright, ed. Estelle Derclaye (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009), 247.
34. GROSHEIDE, Willem. “Intellectual Property Rights and Human Rights: Related Origin and Development” in Intellectual Property and Human Rights: A Paradox, ed. Willem Grosheide (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010).
35. GROSHEIDE, Willem. Intellectual Property and Human Rights: A Paradox, (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010).
36. HANUZ, Bianca. “Liability implications of extending the communication to the public right to third-party re-posting of images already freely available online with right holder permission”, European Intellectual Property Review 41, no. 3, (2019): 190-196.
37. HELFER, Laurence R. “Toward a Human Rights Framework for Intellectual Property”, Davis L Rev 40, (2007): 971–1020.
38. HELFER, Laurence R. “The New Innovation Frontier? Intellectual Property and the European Court of Human Rights”, in Intellectual Property And Human Rights, Enhanced Edition Of Copyright And Human Rights, ed. Paul L. C. Torremans (Zuidpoolsingel, Kluwer, 2008), 39.
39. HELFER, Laurence R. and Graeme W. Austin. Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Mapping the Global Interface (Cambridge, CUP, 2011).
40. HÖRNLE, Julia. “On Whose Side Does the Internet Access Provider Stand? Blocking Injunctions Against Communication Service Providers. Case C-314/12, UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film”, Communications Law 19, no. 3, (2014): 99-100.
41. HUSOVEC, Martin. “ECtHR Rules On Liability of ISPs as A Restriction of Freedom of Speech”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 9, no. 2, (2014): 108-109.
42. HUSOVEC, Martin. “General Monitoring of Third-Party Content: Compatible with Freedom of Expression?” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 11, no. 1, (2016) 17-20.
43. JAMES, Steven. “Digesting Lush v Amazon and UPC Telekabel: Are We Asking Too Much Of Online Intermediaries?”, Entertainment Law Review 25, no. 5, (2014): 175-178; Christina Angelopoulos, “Are blocking injunctions against ISPs allowed in Europe? Copyright Enforcement in the post-Telekabel EU Legal Landscape”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 9, no. 10, (2014): 812-821.
44. JONES, J. “Internet Pirates Walk the Plank with Article 10 Kept at Bay: Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v Sweden”, EIPR 35, no. 11, (2013): 695–700.
45. JONGSMA, Daniël “Parody After Deckmyn – A Comparative Overview of the Approach to Parody Under Copyright Law in Belgium, France, Germany and The Netherlands”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 48, (2017): 652–682.
46. JÜTTE, Bernd Justin. “CJEU Permits Sampling of Phonograms under a De Minimis Rule and the Quotation Exception”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 14, no. 11, (2019): 827–829.
47. LEGG, Andrew. The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (Oxford, OUP, 2012).
48. MACOVEI, M. Freedom of Expression: A Guide to The Implementation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Human Rights Handbooks No 2) (Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing, 2001).
49. MINERO, Gemma. “European Union: case note on “UPC Telekabel Wien””, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 45, no. 7, (2014): 848-851.
50. NEWMAN, Simon. “The Development of Copyright and Moral Rights in the European Legal Systems”, European Intellectual Property Review 33, no. 11, (2011): 682.
51. OHLY, Ansgar. “Economic Rights”, in Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright, 212–41.
52. PEUKERT, Alexander. “Intellecual Property as an End in Itself?”, European Intellectual Property Review 33, no. 2, (2011): 69.
53. PEUKERT, Alexander. “The Fundamental Right to (Intellectual) Property and the Discretion of the Legislature” in Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property, 135.
54. RAINEY, Bernade􀄴 e, Elizabeth Wicks, and Clare Ovey. Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford, OUP, 7th edn, 2017).
55. ROGNSTAD, Ole-Andreas, Christophe Geiger, Marie-Christine Janssens, Alain Strowel and Raquel Xalabarder. “The delicate scope of economic rights in EU copyright law: opinion of the European Copyright Society in light of case C-161/17, Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Renckhoff (Cordoba Case)”, European Intellectual Property Review 41, no. 6, (2019): 335.
56. ROSATI, Eleonora. “Just a Laughing Ma􀄴 er? Why the Decision in Deckmyn is Broader than Parody”, Common Market Law Review 52, no. 2, (2015): 511-529.
57. ROSS, Alexander “Case C-161/17 Land Nordrhein- Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff - Court of Justice loses control of the concept of communication to the public”, Entertainment Law Review 30, no. 1, (2019): 24-26.
58. RUSE-KHAN, Henning Grosse. “Overlaps and Confl ict Norms in Human Rights Law: Approaches of European Courts to Address Intersections with Intellectual Property Rights”, in Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property, 76.
59. SGANGA, Caterine. “A decade of fair balance doctrine, and how to fi x it: copyright versus fundamental rights before the CJEU from Promusicae to Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online”, EIPR 41, (2019): 682.
60. SHAVER, Lea. “The Right to Science and Culture” Wisconsin Law Review 1, (2010): 121-184.
61. SHAVER, Lea and Caterina Sganga, “The Right to Take Part in Cultural Life: On Copyright and Human Rights” Wisconsin International Law Journal 27, no. 4, (2010): 637–662.
62. SINJELA, Mpasi (ed). Human Rights and Intellectual Property Rights: Tensions and Convergences, (Leiden, Martin Nijhoff Publishers, 2007).
63. SMITH, Joel, Andrew Moir and Rachel Montagnon. “ISPs And Blocking Injunctions: UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft mbH (C-314/12)”, European Intellectual Property Review 36, no. 7, (2014): 470-473.
64. SNIJDERS, Thom and Stijn van Deursen. “The Road Not Taken – the CJEU Sheds Light on the Role of Fundamental Rights in the European Copyright Framework – a Case Note on the Pelham, Spiegel Online and Funke Medien Decisions”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 50, (2019): 1176–1190.
65. STIRLING, Tiff any. “Do Shoot The Messenger: Site-Blocking Injunctions Against Internet Service Providers Upheld by the CJEU UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft GmbH UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH (“UPC”) v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft GmbH (C-314/12) [2014] E.C.D.R. 12”, Entertainment Law Review 25, no. 6, (2014): 219-221.
66. SYNODINOU, Tatiana-Eleni. “Intermediaries’ Liability for Online Copyright Infringement in The EU: Evolutions and Confusions”, Computer Law & Security Review 31, (2015): 63-67.
67. TORREMANS Paul L. C. (ed). Intellectual Property and Human Rights, (Zuidpoolsingel, Kluwer Law International, 2020).
68. TORREMANS, Paul L. C. “Ashby Donald and Others v France, Application 36769/08, ECtHR, 5th Section, Judgment of 10 January 2013”, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property 4, no. 1, (2014): 95–99.
69. TORREMANS, Paul L. C. “Is Copyright a Human Right?”, Michigan State Law Review, (2007): 277.
70. VOORHOOF, Dirk and Eva Lievens. “Off ensive Online Comments - New ECtHR Judgment”, (February 15, 2016), available at h􀄴 p://echrblog.blogspot. co.uk/2016/02/off ensive-online-comments-new-ecthr.html;
71. WEINERT, Eileen. “Delfi AS v Estonia: Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights Hands down Its Judgment: Website Liable for User- Generated Comments”, Entertainment Law Review 26, no. 7, (2015): 246-250.
72. WEINERT, Eileen. “MTE v Hungary: the fi rst European Court of Human Rights ruling on liability for user comments after Delfi AS v Estonia”, Entertainment Law Review 27, no. 4, (2016): 135-139.
73. YU, Peter K. “Intellectual Property and Human Rights 2.0”, University of Richmond Law Review 53, (2019): 1375-1453.
74. YU, Peter K. “Reconceptualising Intellectual Property Interests in a Human Rights Framework”, Davis L Rev 40, (2007): 1039–1149.
75. YU, Peter K. “Ten Common Questions About Intellectual Property and Human Rights”, Georgia State University Law Review 23, (2007): 711.