#Hellobrother Örneğinde Ulusötesi İç Grup Dayanışma Ağları

Yıl 2023, , 14 - 22, 28.12.2023

Elizabeth Poole , John E. Richardson , Eva Haifa Giraud Ed De Quincey

https://doi.org/10.47951/mediad.1401093

Öz

Bu çalışma, 15 Mart 2019'da meydana gelen Christchurch terör saldırısının ardından Twitter'da paylaşılan #hellobrother etiketi etrafındaki dinamikleri incelemektedir. Çalışma, İslamofobiye karşı karşıt anlatıları araştıran ve Twitter'daki potansiyelleri ile sınırlılıklarını keşfetmeyi hedefleyen daha geniş kapsamlı #Contesting Islamophobia: Representation and Appropriation in Mediated Activism adlı çalışmanın bir parçası olarak ele alınmıştır. Çalışmada Awan (2014) tarafından tanımlanan üç 'tetikleyici olayı' -Brexit, Christchurch terör saldırısı ve Covid pandemisi- başlangıç noktası olarak ele almış, farklı zaman dilimlerinde altı haftalık tweet verisini analiz etmiştir. #hellobrother etiketiyle ilgili veriler, duygusal bir tepkiyi göstererek Twitter'ın imkanları aracılığıyla güçlü uluslararası dayanışma ağlarının oluşumuna zemin hazırlamıştır. Bu durum, potansiyel olarak geçici dayanışma biçimlerinin içsel sınırlarını sadece belirtmekle kalmaz, aynı zamanda sosyal medyanın, belirli anlarda belirli olaylara yönelik olarak karşı anlatılara görünürlük sağlama yeteneğini vurgular. Bu anlar, belirli olaylara ilişkin takip eden özel zaman dilimlerinde normatif özellikler kazanabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İslamofobi, Twitter, Hellobrother, Christchurch Terör Saldırısı, Etki

Etik Beyan

For the purpose of open access, the author(s) has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (where permitted by UKRI, “Open Government Licence” or “Creative Commons Attribution No-derivatives [CC BY-ND] licence” may be stated instead) to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising. The project has been approved by the Ethics Committee at Keele University.

Destekleyen Kurum

Keele University

Proje Numarası

AH/T004460/1

Teşekkür

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by an Arts and Humanities Research Council grant AH/T004460/1.

Transnational In-Group Solidarity Networks in the Case of #Hellobrother

Öz

This paper examines the dynamics of one hashtag, #hellobrother, shared on Twitter following the Christchurch terror attack on 15th March 2019. It was analysed as part of a larger study #Contesting Islamophobia: Representation and Appropriation in Mediated Activism which explores the potentials and limitations of counternarratives against Islamophobia on Twitter. Using three ‘trigger events’ (Awan, 2014), Brexit, the Christchurch terror attack, and the Covid pandemic as its starting point, the study analysed six weeks of tweets at different points in time. The data on #hellobrother demonstrates an affective response which, through the affordances of Twitter, gave rise to strong networks of transnational solidarity. It illustrates both the limitations of its potentially transient solidarities but also the capacity of social media to offer visibility to counternarratives, which at specific moments, following specific events can become normative.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Islamophobia, Twitter, Hellobrother, Christchurch Terror Attack, Affect

Proje Numarası

AH/T004460/1

Kaynakça

• Ahmed S. (2004). Declarations of whiteness: The non-performativity of anti-racism. Borderlands, 3(2). https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/ 13911/.
• Awan, I. (2014) Islamophobia and Twitter: A typology of online hate against Muslims on social media. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 133–50.
• Boyd d. and Crawford K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data. Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
• Evolvi, G. (2019) #Islamexit: inter-group antagonism on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 386-401.
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing Democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.
• Giraud, E. H; Poole, E; Richardson, J.E and de Quincey, E. (in press). Learning from hate: Developing diffractive approaches to big data for interdisciplinary research.
• Jackson, S.J. and Foucault Welles, B (2015). Hijacking #myNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 932–952.
• Jackson, S.J. and Foucault Welles, B. (2016) #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3): 397-418
• Nikunen K. (2019). Media solidarities: Emotion, power and justice in the digital age. Sage.
• Papacharissi, Z. (2014) Affective publics: Sentiment, technology and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Poole, E; Giraud, E, and De Quincey, E. (2019) Contesting #stopIslam: Examining the dynamics of anti-racist hashtag campaigns in contesting right wing populism. Open Library of Humanities, 5(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.406.
• Poole, E., Giraud, E. H., Richardson, J. E., & de Quincey, E. (2023). Expedient, Affective, and Sustained Solidarities? Mediated Contestations of Islamophobia in the Case of Brexit, the Christchurch Terror Attack, and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Social Media + Society, 9(3), 20563051231199452. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231199452
• Richardson, J; Giraud, E; Poole, E. and De Quincey, E. (2024) ‘Hypocrite!’ Affective and argumentative engagement on Twitter, following the Christchurch terrorist attack, Media, Culture and Society.