-

Öz

The purpose of this study is to adapt the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire (ICQ) which was originally developed by Buhrmester, Furman, Wittenberg, and Reis to Turkish and investigate the validity and reliability of the scale. The data was collected from 604 (354 female, 250 male) university students enrolled at Mersin University. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the construct validity of the scale.Results of the study indicated that the scale composed of five factors namely, “initiating relationships”, “emotional support”, “asserting influence”, “self-disclosure”, and “conflict management”. The results also showed that internal consistency coefficients of the factors as estimated by Cronbach alpha were ranged from .74 (self disclosure) to .83 (conflict management) and test-retests (three weeks interval) coefficients were ranged from .72 (emotional support) to .89 (initiating relationship).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• interpersonal competence, social competence, university students, validity, reliability.

Kişilerarası Yetkinlik Ölçeği-Kısa Formu: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Buhrmester, Furman, Wittenberg ve Reis tarafından geliştirilen Kişilerarası Yetkinlik Ölçeği’ni (KYÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlayarak geçerlik ve güvenirliğini incelemektir. Araştırmanın verileri, Mersin Üniversitesi’nin çeşitli fakültelerinde öğrenim gören 604 (354 kadın, 250 erkek) üniversite öğrencisinden elde edilmiştir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini sınamak üzere açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yöntemleri kullanılmıştır.  Faktör analizi sonuçları ölçeğin,  “ilişki başlatma”, “duygusal destek”, “etki bırakma”, “kendini açma” ve “çatışma yönetimi” olarak adlandırılan beş faktörden oluştuğunu göstermiştir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlığına ilişkin bulgulara göre, ölçekte yer alan faktörlerin Cronbach Alfa güvenirlik katsayıları .74 (kendini açma) ile .83 (çatışma yönetimi) arasında değişmekte olup, ölçeğin toplam puanından elde edilen değer ise .87’dir. KYÖ’nün test tekrarı güvenirliği için üç hafta arayla yapılan ölçümlerde faktörlerin korelasyon katsayılarının ise .72 (duygusal destek) ile .89 (ilişki başlatma) aralığında değer aldıkları görülmüştür. Ölçeğin test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayısı ise .89 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, yapılan geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları doğrultusunda beş faktörlü bu ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kişilerarası yetkinlik, sosyal yetkinlik, üniversite öğrencileri, geçerlik, güvenirlik.

Kaynakça

1. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
2. Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (2000). Social intelligence - empathy = aggression? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(2), 191–200.
3. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Buhrmester, D. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Development,61, 1101-1111.
5. Buhrmester, D., Furman, W., Wittenberg, W.T., & Reis, H.T. (1988). Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 991-1008. Butler, J. C., Doherty, M. S., & Potter, R. M. (2007). Social antecedents and consequences of interpersonal rejection sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1376-1385.
6. Cohen, S., Sherrod, D. R., & Clar k, M. S. (1986). Social skills and the stress-protective role of social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 963-973.
7. Cooley, E. L., Buren, A. V., & Cole, S. P. (2010). Attachment styles, social skills, and depression in college women. Journal of College Counseling, 13, 50-62.
8. Cummings, J. A., Hayes, A. M., Cohen, L. H., Laurenceau, J. P., Saint, D. S., & Gricol, K. (2013). Interpersonal competence and daily stress generation in individuals with avoidant personality disorder symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(2), 135-158.

9. Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., McClaskey, C. L., & Brown, M. M. (1986). Social competence in children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 51(2), 80-83.
10. Eberhart, N. K., & Hammen, C. L. (2006). Interpersonal predictors of onset of depression during the transition to adulthood. Personal Relationships, 13(2), 195-206.
11. Eberhart, N. K., & Hammen, C. L. (2009). Interpersonal predictors of stress generation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 544–556.
12. Górska, M. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire (ICQ-R). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 186–192.
13. Gasteiger-Klicpera, B., & Klicpera, C. (1999). Soziale Kompetenzenbei Kindern mit Anpassungsschwierigkeiten [Social competence of children with peer relationship problems]. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 27, 93–102.
14. Gudleski, G.D., & Shean, G.D. (2000). Depressed and nondepressed students: Difference in interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 134, 56–62.
15. Gurtman,M. B. (1999). Social competence: An interpersonal analysis and reformulation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 233–245.
16. Herzberg, D.S., Hammen, C., Burge, D., Daley, S.E., Davila, J., & Lindberg, N. (1998). Social competence as a predictor of chronic interpersonal stress. Personal Relationship, 5, 207–218.
17. Jackson, T., Flasherty, S.R., & Kosuth, R. (2000). Culture and self-presentation as predictors of shyness among Japanese and American female college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 475–482. Jackson, T., Towson, S., & Narduzzi, K. (1997). Predictors of shyness: a test of variables associated with self-presentational models. Social Behavior and Personality, 25(2): 149-154.
18. Jackson, T., Fritch, A., Nagasaka, T., & Gunderson, J. (2002). Towards explaining the association between shyness and loneliness: a path analysis with American college students. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(3): 263-270.
19. Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 user’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
20. Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
21. Kanning, U. P. (2006). Development and validation of a German-Language version of the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire (ICQ). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 43–51.
22. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
23. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
24. Koydemir, S. (2006). Predictors of shyness among university students: Testing a self-presentational model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
25. Lamke, L.K., Sollie, D.L., Durbin, R.G., & Fitzpatrick, J.A. (1994). Masculinity, femininity and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of interpersonal competence. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 11, 535–554.
26. Mosher, C., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2007). College students’ life priorities: The influence of gender and gender-linked personality traits. Gender Issues, 24, 21-33.
27. Moss, B. F., & Schwebel, A. I. (1993). Defining intimacy in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 42(1), 31-37.
28. Ogbu, J. (1981). Origins of human competence: A cultural ecological perspective. Child Development, 52, 413-429.
29. Ponzetti, J. J., & Cate, R. M. (1988). The relationship of personal attributes and friendship variables in predicting loneliness. Journal of College Student Development, 29(4), 292-298.
30. Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 649-660.
31. Rose-Krasnor, L. (1997). The nature of social competence: A theoretical review. Social Development, 6, 111-1
32. Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
33. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
34. Tanaka, J. S. & Huba, G. J. (1984). Confirmatory hierarchical factor analyses of psychological distress measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 621-635.
35. Waters, E. & Sroufe, L. A. (1983). Social competence as a developmental construct. Developmental Review, 3, 79–97.
36. Wiggins, J.S.,&Trapnell, P.D. (1996). Adyadic-interactional perspective on the five-factor model. In J.S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 88–162). New York: Guilford.
37. Yeates, K. O. & Selman, R. L. (1989). Social competence in the schools: Toward an integrative developmental model for intervention. Developmental Review, 9(1), 64-100.
38. Yüksel, G. (1998). Sosyal Beceri Envanteri’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 2(19), 39-48.