ARAŞTIRMALARIN RAPORLAŞTIRILMASI: BİR TEZ VEYA BİLİMSEL MAKALE NASIL YAZILIR?

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 6 - 39, 30.06.2020

Ali Baltacı

Öz

Bu araştırmada, sosyal bilimler alanında tez ve makale yazım sürecinin son aşaması olan raporlaştırma sorunsalı ele alınmıştır. Bu kapsamda, literatürde sık yapılan hata ve eksikliklerden hareketle ideal bir rapor yazmaya yardımcı olabilecek kuramsal ve uygulamalı bilgilerin verilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu doğrultuda bu çalışmada, "Bir tezin veya bilimsel makalenin problemi, araştırma soruları, amacı, önemi, sınırlılıkları ve varsayımları nasıl ifade edilir?" ve "Bir tezin veya bilimsel makalenin bulgular, sonuçlar, tartışma ve öneriler bölümleri nasıl ifade edilir?” sorularına cevap aranmıştır. Ayrıca nicel ve nitel araştırma yaklaşımlarına göre farklı raporlaştırma yönelimleri de sunulmuştur. Literatürde raporlaştırma konusunu farklı araştırma yaklaşımları temelinde ele alan bir çalışmaya henüz rastlanılamamış olması, bu araştırmanın öncü karakterine vurgu yapmaktadır. Çalışma ile sosyal bilimler alanında bilimsel yayın yapmak isteyen araştırmacılara rehberlik edilmesi umulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Araştırma Yöntemleri, Raporlaştırma, Akademik Yazma, Araştırma Raporu, Nitel Araştırma, Nicel Araştırma

Kaynakça

• Almalki, S. (2016). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data in Mixed Methods Research--Challenges and Benefits. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), s. 288-296.
• Alvesson, M. ve Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. New York: Sage Inc.
• Antwi, S. K. ve Hamza, K. (2015). Qualitative and Quantitative Research Paradigms in Business Research: A Philosophical Reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), s.217-225.
• Ary, D. Jacobs, L. C. Irvine, C. K. S. ve Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to Research in Education. New York: Cengage Learning.
• Bell, E. Bryman, A. ve Harley, B. (2018). Business Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bernard, H. R. (2012). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. New York: Sage Inc.
• Bogdan, R. ve Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative Research for Education. Boston: Allyn ve Bacon Inc..
• Borrego, M. Douglas, E. P. ve Amelink, C. T. (2009). Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), s.53-66.
• Brannen, J. (2017). Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative research. New York: Routledge.
• Carey, M. (2017). Qualitative Research Skills for Social Work: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
• Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Creswell, J. W. ve Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. New York: Sage.
• Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: Routledge.
• Edmonds, W. A. ve Kennedy, T. D. (2016). An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. New York: Sage.
• Flick, U. (2015). Introducing Research Methodology: A Beginner’s Guide to Doing A Research Project. New York: Sage.
• Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), s.597-606.
• Hammersley, M. (2003). Social Research Today: Some Dilemmas and Distinctions1. Qualitative Social Work, 2(1), s.25-44.
• Hickson, H. (2016). Becoming A Critical Narrativist: Using Critical Reflection and Narrative Inquiry as Research Methodology. Qualitative Social Work, 15(3), s.380-391.
• Howes, L. M. (2017). Developing The Methodology for An Applied, Interdisciplinary Research Project: Documenting The Journey toward Philosophical Clarity. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), s.450-468.
• Humphries, B. (2017). Re-thinking Social Research: Anti-Discriminatory Approaches in Research Methodology. New York: Routledge.
• Johnson, B. ve Christensen, L. (2008). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. New York: Sage.
• Keeves, J. P. (1997). Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: An International Handbook. New York: Sage.
• Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M. ve Altman, D. G. (2010). Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The Arrive Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. Plos Biology, 8(6), s.55-75.
• Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. London: New Age Inc.
• Kovach, M. (2015). "Emerging from The Margins: Indigenous Methodologies." içinde Research as Resistance: Revisiting Critical, Indigenous, and Anti-Oppressive Approaches, s.43-64 (ed. Leslie Brown ve Susan Strega), Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.
• Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology: A Step-By-Step Guide For Beginners. New York: Sage.
• Leavy, P. (2016). Essentials of Transdisciplinary Research: Using Problem-Centered Methodologies. New York: Routledge.
• Ledford, J. R. ve Gast, D. L. (2018). Single Case Research Methodology: Applications In Special Education and Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge.
• Leppink, J. (2017). Revisiting The Quantitative–Qualitative-Mixed Methods Labels: Research Questions, Developments, and The Need for Replication. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 12(2), s.97-101.
• Lund, T. (2012). Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Some Arguments for Mixed Methods Research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(2), s.155-165.
• Mackenzie, N. ve Knipe, S. (2006). Research Dilemmas: Paradigms, Methods and Methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16(2), s.193-205.
• Mackey, A. ve Gass, S. M. (2015). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. New York: Routledge.
• Marczyk, G. DeMatteo, D. ve Festinger, D. (2005). Essentials of Research Design and Methodology. New York: John Wiley ve Sons Inc.
• McCusker, K. ve Gunaydin, S. (2015). Research Using Qualitative, Quantitative or Mixed Methods and Choice Based on The Research. Perfusion, 30(7), s.537-542.
• McKenney, S. ve Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting Educational Design Research. New York: Routledge.
• McMillan, J. H. ve Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry. New York: Pearson.
• Melchers, R. E. ve Beck, A. T. (2018). Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. New York: John Wiley ve Sons.
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education: Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education. New Yor: Jossey-Bass.
• Merriam, S. B. ve Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis. New York: Jossey-Bass.
• Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. New York: Sage.
• Miles, M. B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. New York: Sage.
• Morse, J. M. (2016). Mixed Method Design: Principles and Procedures. New York: Routledge.
• Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing Survey Research: A Guide to Quantitative Methods. New York: Routledge.
• Newman, I., Benz, C. R., ve Ridenour, C. S. (1998). Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring The Interactive Continuum. London: SIU Press.
• Olsen, W. (2004). Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really Be Mixed. Developments in Sociology, 20(1), s.103-118.
• Patten, M. L. ve Newhart, M. (2017). Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of The Essentials. New York: Routledge.
• Pyrczak, F. (2016). Writing Empirical Research Reports: A Basic Guide For Students of The Social And Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge.
• Reinharz, S. ve Davidman, L. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sale, J. E., Lohfeld, L. H. ve Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting The Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research. Quality and Quantity, 36(1), s.43-53.
• Scott, D. (2007). Resolving The Quantitative–Qualitative Dilemma: A Critical Realist Approach. International Journal of Research ve Method in Education, 30(1), s.3-17.
• Tashakkori, A. ve Creswell, J. W. (2007). Exploring The Nature of Research Questions in Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles: Sage.
• Tashakkori, A. ve Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. New York: Sage.
• Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R. ve DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. New York: John Wiley ve Sons.
• Thomas, R. M. (2003). Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods İn Theses and Dissertations. New York: Corwin Press.
• Tobi, H. ve Kampen, J. K. (2018). Research Design: The Methodology for Interdisciplinary Research Framework. Quality & Quantity, 52(3), s.1209-1225.
• Vagle, M. D. (2018). Crafting Phenomenological Research. New York: Routledge.
• Venable, J. R., Pries-Heje, J. ve Baskerville, R. (2017). Choosing A Design Science Research Methodology. 28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Sydney: University of Tasmania.
• Vogt, W. P. (2006). Quantitative Research Methods for Professionals in Education and Other Fields. Columbus: Allyn ve Bacon.
• Walliman, N. (2017). Research Methods: The Basics. New York: Routledge.
• Wiggins, B. J. (2011). Confronting The Dilemma of Mixed Methods. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 31(1), s.44-68.
• Yoshikawa, H., Weisner, T. S., Kalil, A. ve Way, N. (2008). Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Developmental Science: Uses and Methodological Choices. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), s.344-368.