İklim Değişikliği Eğitimine Yönelik Eğitim Programı Uyarlama Becerilerinin Sorgulama Temelli Öğretimle Desteklenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırma, öğretmen adaylarının iklim değişikliği eğitimi bağlamında sorgulama temelli etkinlikler planlama ve mevcut eğitim programlarını esnek bir şekilde uyarlama becerilerini geliştirmelerine odaklanmaktadır. Çalışmada kullanılan etkinlik şablonu, “Sorgula, Araştır, İlham Ver” adımlarını temel alarak tasarlanmıştır. Bu yapılandırma, öğretmen adaylarının öğrencilerin aktif katılımını teşvik eden ve sorgulama odaklı bir öğrenme ortamı kurgulamasına yardımcı olmayı amaçlamaktadır. Süreç boyunca öğretmen adayları, "Merak ediyorum..." soruları geliştirerek ders planlarının başlangıç noktasını oluşturmuş, bu sayede karmaşık çevresel konuları öğrencilerin anlayabileceği somut öğrenme deneyimlerine dö-nüştürmeyi öğrenmişlerdir. Çalışmaya farklı bölümlerinden toplam 57 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Katılımcılar, sorgulama temelli etkinlik şablo-nunu kullanarak iklim değişikliği konulu etkinlik planları geliştirmiştir. Bu planlar kontrollü bir eğitim ortamında uygulanmış ve uygulama sonrasında süreç değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmanın verileri, katılımcıların hazırladığı yazılı etkinlik planları ve uygulama sonrası gerçekleştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmelerden elde edilmiştir. Toplanan veriler beş ana başlık altında incelenmiştir: oluşturulan sorgulama sorularının açıklığı ve programa uygunluğu, sorgulama temelli öğrenme stratejilerinin etkinliklere entegrasyonu, planların uygulanabilirlik düzeyi, öğrenci katılımını artırma potansiyeli ve değerlendirme yöntemlerinin niteliği. Görüşme verileri ise öğretmen adaylarının şablonu kullanma deneyimlerini, karşılaştıkları zor-lukları ve mesleki gelişim süreçlerini anlamaya yönelik tematik olarak analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, etkinlik şablonunun düzenli kullanımı sayesinde öğretmen adaylarının iklim değişikliği gibi disiplinler arası bir ko-nuyu sorgulama temelli ve yerel bağlama uygun bir şekilde ele alma becer-ilerini geliştirdiğini göstermektedir. Katılımcılar, sadece etkinlik hazırla-makla kalmayıp, öğrencilerin anlamlı öğrenme deneyimleri yaşamalarını hedefleyen planlar geliştirdiklerini ifade etmiştir. Ancak programın esnek olmaması, zaman kısıtları ve farklı yaş gruplarına uygunlaştırma konuları sürecin önündeki başlıca engeller olarak belirtilmiştir. Çalışma, öğretmen eğitiminde sorgulama temelli planlama yaklaşımlarının desteklenmesi gerek-tiğini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eğitim programı uyarlaması
• etkinlik şablonu
• iklim değişikliği eğitimi
• öğretmen adayları
• sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmada, Yükseköğretim Kurumları Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Yönergesi’nde belirtilen tüm kurallara uyulmuştur. Yönergede “Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiğine Aykırı Eylemler” başlığı altında tanımlanan eylemlerin hiçbiri gerçekleştirilmemiştir. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Etik Kurulu, 2025/143, 09.04.2025

Empowering Pre-Service Teachers to Adapt Curriculum for Better Climate Change Education Using an Inquiry-Based Activity Template

Öz

This study explores how an inquiry-based activity planning template—structured around Inquire, Investigate, and Inspire stages—supports pre-service teachers in designing climate change education activities. The tem-plate encouraged participants to generate "I wonder" questions, promote student-led inquiry, and transform complex environmental topics into ac-tionable lessons. Pre-service teachers from various disciplines developed and simulated activity plans using the template. Data sources included written plans and post-implementation interviews. Document analysis focused on inquiry clarity, curricular relevance, feasibility, student engagement, and assessment design. Thematic analysis revealed that using the template itera-tively enhanced participants’ pedagogical skills, fostering interdisciplinary, inquiry-based approaches, and increasing confidence in lesson design. Par-ticipants also reported improved collaboration, real-time lesson refinement, and deeper awareness of student engagement and assessment. Challenges included aligning with rigid curriculum standards and adapting tasks to diverse developmental levels. The study highlights the need for flexible cur-ricular tools and sustained mentorship in teacher education to support in-quiry-based learning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Activity template
• climate change education
• curriculum customization
• inquiry-based learning
• pre-service teachers

Etik Beyan

In this study, all the rules stated in the Directive on Scientific Research and Publication Ethics of Higher Education Institutions have been followed. None of the actions defined under the title Violations of Scientific Research and Publication Ethics in the directive have been committed.

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, Alison. “Climate Change Education for Mitigation and Adaptation.” Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 6(2) (2012), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408212475199
2. Anderson, Doug, Comay, Julie, and Chiarotto, Lorraine. Natural Curiosity 2nd Edition: A Resource for Educators —The Importance of Indigenous Perspectives in Children’s Environmental Inquiry. Toronto: Natural Curiosity, 2017, 7–21.
3. Bardsley, Douglas K. - Bardsley, Amanda M. “A Constructivist Approach to Climate Change Teaching and Learning.” Geographical Research 45(4) (2007), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00475.x
4. Beatty, Joy D. - Feldman, Allan. “Inquiry-Based Science Instruction and Teaching about Nature of Science: Are They Happening?” Journal of Science Teacher Education 23(7) (2012), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9298-x
5. Boon, Helen J. “Pre-Service Teachers and Climate Change: A Stance on Climate Change Education.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 41(11) (2016), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n11.3
6. Bybee, Rodger W. “NGSS and the Next Generation of Science Teachers.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 25(2) (2014), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9381-4
7. Choi, Angela - Pak, Alice. “Teaching for Climate Action: The Role of Inquiry in Global Citizenship Education.” International Journal of Educational Development 98 (2023), 102765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102765
8. Cimer, Atilla. “Effective Teaching in Science: A Review of Literature.” Journal of Turkish Science Education 4(1) (2007), 20–44. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/657

9. Crawford, Barbara A. “Learning to Teach Science as Inquiry in the Rough and Tumble of Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44(4) (2007), 613–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20157
10. Dewey, John. Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan, 1938.
11. Drewes, Andrea - Henderson, Joseph - Mouza, Chrystalla. “Professional Development Design Considerations in Climate Change Education: Teacher Enactment and Student Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 40(1) (2017), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1397798
12. Dupigny-Giroux, Leslie A. “Exploring the Challenges of Climate Science Literacy: Lessons from Students, Teachers, and Lifelong Learners.” Geography Compass 4(9) (2010), 1203–1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749- 8198.2010.00368.x
13. Elster, Doris - Barendziak, Theresa - Dienst, Christina. “Socio-Scientific Issues in Pre-Service Teacher Education: Assessing Knowledge, Attitudes and Competencies.” European Journal of Teacher Education 37(4) (2014), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.912628
14. Evagorou, Maria - Dillon, Justin. “Climate Change Education: A Challenging Context for Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Environmental Education Research 27(5) (2021), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1892355
15. Favier, Timothy - Van Gorp, Bert - Cyvin, Jan B. - Cyvin, Jan. “Learning to Teach Climate Change: Students in Teacher Training and Their Progression in Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 45(4) (2021), 594–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.1900080
16. Fernández, María L. “Investigating How and What Prospective Teachers Learn through Microteaching Lesson Study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26/2 (2010), 351-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.012
17. Hamilton, Emily - Marckini-Polk, Leah. “The Impact of Place-Based Education on Middle School Students’ Environmental Literacy and Stewardship.” Cogent Education 10(1) (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2163789
18. Harrell, Pamela E. - Subramaniam, Karthigeyan. “Integrating Socio-Scientific Issues in the Classroom to Improve Critical Thinking: A Review of Literature.” International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 10(3) (2015), 347–366.
19. Hofman-Bergholm, Maria. “Climate Change Education for Sustainable Development: A Review of Research and Trends.” Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education 12(1) (2021), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2021-0002
20. Högström, Petter - Gericke, Niklas - Wallin, Jonas. “Teaching Socioscientific Issues: A Systematic Review.” Science & Education (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00542-y
21. Hulme, Mike. “Building Teacher Capacity for Curriculum Renewal: Insights from Scotland.” Education 3–13 (2025), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2025.2505661
22. Kolb, David A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1984.
23. Korthagen, Fred A. J. “Inconvenient Truths about Teacher Learning: Towards Professional Development 3.0.” Teachers and Teaching 23/4 (2017), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
24. Kwauk, Christina. “Roadblocks to Quality Education in a Time of Climate Crisis.” Brookings Institution, 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/research/roadblocks-to-quality-education-in-a-time-of-climate-crisis/
25. Lazonder, Ard W. - Harmsen, Ruth. “Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning: Effects of Guidance.” Review of Educational Research 86(3) (2016), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
26. Lincoln, Yvonna S. - Guba, Egon G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. California: Sage.
27. McKenney, Susan – Thomas C. Reeves. Conducting Educational Design Research. London: Routledge, 2013, 7- 22.
28. Mochizuki, Yoko - Bryan, Audrey. “Climate Change Education in the Context of Education for Sustainable Development: Rationale and Principles.” Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 9(1) (2015), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408215569109
29. Monroe, Martha C. - Plate, Renee - Oxarart, Audrey - Bowers, Alison - Chaves, Walter A. “Identifying Effective Climate Change Education Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Research.” Environmental Education Research 25(6) (2019), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842
30. Munge, Birgitta - Thomas, Greg - Heck, Debbie. “Outdoor Fieldwork in Higher Education: Learning from Multidisciplinary Experience.” Journal of Experiential Education 41(1) (2018), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825917742165
31. Ojala, Maria. “Climate Change Skepticism Among Adolescents.” Journal of Youth Studies 18(9) (2015), 1135– 1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1020927
32. OECD. “What Students Need to Learn for the 21st Century.” OECD Future of Education and Skills Report, 2024. https://www.oecd.org/education/
33. Orr, David W. Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992, 83-105.
34. Pedaste, Margus - Mäeots, Marika - Siiman, Liina A. - de Jong, Ton - van Riesen, Sanne A. - Kamp, Ewa T. - Tsourlidaki, Eleftheria. “Phases of Inquiry-Based Learning: Definitions and the Inquiry Cycle.” Educational Research Review 14 (2015), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
35. Priestley, Mark - Philippou, Stavroula. “Curriculum Making as Social Practice: Complexities and Professional Responsibility.” Curriculum Perspectives 38(1) (2018), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-018-0043-2
36. Reid, Alan - Jensen, Bjarne Bruun - Nikel, Jutta - Simovska, Violetta. Participation and Learning: Perspectives on Education and the Environment, Health and Sustainability. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.
37. Schwab, Joseph J. “The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum.” School Review 81(4) (1973), 501–522.
38. Shenton, Andrew K. “Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects.” Education for Information 22/2 (2004), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
39. Simonneaux, Luc - Simonneaux, Jean. “Educational Configurations for Teaching Environmental Socioscientific Issues within the Perspective of Sustainability.” Research in Science Education 42 (2012), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9266-6
40. Simmie, Geraldine M. “Teacher Design Teams (TDTs)—Building Capacity for Innovation, Learning and Curriculum Implementation in the Continuing Professional Development of In-Career Teachers.” Irish Educational Studies 26(2) (2007), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323310701295914
41. Stevenson, Robert B. - Wals, Arjen E. J. - Dillon, Justin - Brody, Michael. “Introduction: An Orientation to Environmental Education and the Handbook.” In Stevenson, R. B., Brody, M., Dillon, J., Wals, A. E. J. (eds.), International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education. Routledge, 2013, 1–6.
42. UNESCO. Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2021. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707
43. UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development: Progress Review of SDG 4.7. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2023. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385747
44. UNESCO. Greening Education Partnership: Getting Every Learner Climate-Ready. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2024. https://www.unesco.org/en/greening-education-partnership
45. Vygotsky, Lev S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. ed. & trans. Michael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner, Ellen Souberman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
46. Zeichner, Kenneth. “The Turn Once Again toward Practice-Based Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 63/5 (2012), 376-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112445789