Kapsayıcı Eğitim Modülü Eğitimi Seminerinin Aday Öğretmenlerin Kapsayıcı Eğitim İlkelerini Benimseme Düzeylerine Etkisi

Öz

Kapsayıcı eğitimin kapsayıcı okul iklimi, açık beklentiler, kapsayıcı ders içerikleri, erişilebilirlik ve yansıtma olmak üzere beş temel ilkesi bulunmaktadır. Bu araştırmada, Aday Öğretmenlik Programı Kapsayıcı Eğitim Modülü Eğitimi Seminerinin (AÖPKEMES) aday öğretmenlerin kapsayıcı eğitim ilkelerini benimseme düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Nicel araştırma yönteminin kullanıldığı bu araştırmada, deneysel modellerden biri olan tek grup ön test-son test modelinden faydalanılmıştır. Çalışmaya 2021 yılında Iğdır iline atanan 27 aday öğretmenden oluşan bir deney grubu katılmıştır. Bu gruba araştırmacılardan biri tarafından AÖPKEMES verilmiştir. Bu seminer, 10 saatlik kapsayıcı kültür, 10 saatlik kapsayıcı yapı ve 5 saatlik kapsayıcı uygulamalar derslerini içermektedir. Bu araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen “Kapsayıcı Eğitim İlkelerini Benimseme Ölçeği (KEİBÖ)” kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler Bağımlı Gruplar için t Testi ve Wilcoxon İşaretli Sıralar Testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre Kapsayıcı Eğitim Modülü Eğitimi Semineri, aday öğretmenlerin kapsayıcı eğitimle ilgili kapsayıcı okul iklimi, açık beklentiler, kapsayıcı ders içerikleri, erişilebilirlik ve yansıtma ilkelerini benimseme düzeylerini anlamlı bir biçimde ve olumlu yönde değiştirmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kapsayıcı eğitim
• kapsayıcı eğitim semineri
• aday öğretmenler

The Effect of Inclusive Education Module Training Seminar on Novice Teachers’ Adoption Levels of Inclusive Education Principles

Öz

Inclusive education has five basic principles: inclusive school climate, clear expectations, inclusive course content, accessibility and reflection. In this study, it was aimed to examine the effect of Novice Teacher Program Inclusive Education Module Training Seminar (NTPIEMTS) on the level of adopting inclusive education principles of novice teachers. In this study, in which the quantitative research method was used, one group pre-test-post-test model, which is one of the experimental models, was used. An experimental group consisting of 27 novice teachers assigned to the province of Igdir in 2021 participated in the study. NTPIEMTS was given to this group by one of the researchers. This seminar includes 10 hours of inclusive culture, 10 hours of inclusive structure and 5 hours of inclusive practices. In this study, the “Inclusive Educational Principles Adoption Scale” developed by the researchers was used as a data collection tool. Obtained data were analyzed with Paired Samples t-Test and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. According to the findings obtained from the research, the Inclusive Education Module Training Seminar significantly and positively changed the level of adopting the principles of inclusive education, namely inclusive school climate, clear expectations, inclusive course contents, accessibility, and reflection.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kapsayıcı eğitim
• kapsayıcı eğitim semineri
• aday öğretmenler

Kaynakça

1. Ainscow, M. (2005). Understanding the development of inclusive education system. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(3), 5-20. http://repositorio.ual.es/bitstream/handle/10835/746/Art_7_109_eng.pdf?sequence=1
2. Ainscow, M., ve César, M. (2006). Inclusive education ten years after Salamanca: Setting the agenda. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(3), 231-238. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23421604
3. Akgün, Z. (2019), Bilgiyi benimseme modeli, bilgiye karşı tutum ve algılanan risk çerçevesinde instagramın üniversite öğrencilerinin satın alma davranışına etkisi: Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi MYO örneği, Turkish Journal of Marketing, 4(2), 62-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.30685/tujom.v4i2.44
4. Appert, L., Jungels, A., Bean, C., Klaf, S., Irvin, A., and Phillipson, M. (2018). Guide for inclusive teaching at Columbia. Columbia Centre for Teaching and Learning. https://ctl.columbia.edu/resources-and-technology/resources/inclusive-teaching-guide/
5. Armstrong, F. (2008). Inclusive education. In G. Richards, and F. Armstrong (Eds.), Key issues for teaching assistants: Working in diverse and inclusive classrooms (s. 1-18). Routledge
6. Booth, T., Ainscow, M., and Kingston, D. (2002). Index for inclusion: Developing play, learning and participation in early years and childcare. https://eenet.org.uk/resources/docs/Index%20EY%20English.pdf Boroson, B. (2017). Inclusive education: lessons from history. Educational Leadership, 74(7), 18-23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1138108
7. Browne, M., and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen and J. Long, (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (s. 136-162). Sage Publications.
8. Butakor, P. K., Ampadu, E., and Suleiman, S. J. (2020). Analysis of Ghanaian teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(11), 1237-1252, https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1512661

9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (16. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
10. Campbell, J., Waliczek, B. T. M., and Zajicek, J. M. (1999). Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students, The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(3), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601873
11. Cattell, R.B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. Plenum.
12. Çayır, K. (2022). Etik sorumluluk, insan hakları ve kültürel-ahlaki gerekçeler geriliminde Türkiye’de kapsayıcı eğitim. Reflektif Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2022.56
13. Çelik, Ç. (2022). Tanıma ve yanlış tanıma: kapsayıcı eğitim, okullar ve etnisite. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 25(2), 146-168. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.1111340
14. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
15. Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
16. Donohue, D., ve Bornman, J. (2014). The challenges of realising inclusive education in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 34(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412071114
17. Dreyer, L. M. (2017). Inclusive education. In L. Ramrathan, L. Le Grange, and P. Higgs (Eds.), Education studies for initial teacher development (s. 383-400). Juta.
18. Eutsler, J., ve Lang, B. (2015). Rating scales in accounting research: The impact of scale points and labels. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 27(2), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51219
19. Eşici, H., ve Doğan, Y. (2020). Psikolojik danışman ve sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının kapsayıcı eğitim günlükleri. Journal of Inclusive Education in Research and Practice, 1(2), 29-53. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jierp/issue/59335/840837
20. Forlin, C., and Chambers, D. (2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2010.540850
21. Göransson, K., and Nilholm, C. (2014). Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings–a critical analysis of research on inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933545
22. Halinen, I., and Järvinen, R. (2008). Towards inclusive education: the case of Finland. Prospects, 38(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-008-9061-2
23. Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
24. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (23. Basım). Nobel Yayıncılık.
25. Kim, Y. W. (2014). Inclusive education in South Korea. International journal of inclusive education, 18(10), 979-990. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.693402
26. Knight, C., and Crick, T. (2022). Inclusive education in Wales: Interpreting discourses of values and practice using critical policy analysis. ECNU Review of Education, 5(2), 258-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311211039858
27. Kozikoğlu, İ., ve Yıldırımoğlu, S. (2021). Öğretmenlerin çokkültürlü eğitime yönelik tutumları ile kapsayıcı eğitimde sınıf içi uygulamaları arasındaki ilişki. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (51), 226-244. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.827397
28. Kryshtanovych, M., Kryshtanovych, S., Stechkevych, O., Ivanytska, O., and Huzii, I. (2020). Prospects for the development of inclusive education using scientific and mentoring methods under the conditions of post-pandemic society. Postmodern Openings/Deschideri Postmoderne, 11(2), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/160
29. Lancaster, J., and Bain, A. (2010). The design of pre-service inclusive education courses and their effects on self-efficacy: A comparative study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598661003678950
30. Meydan, C.H., ve Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık. Meyers, L.S, Gamst, G., and Guarino, A.J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. SAGE Publications.
31. Minott, M. (2019). Reflective teaching, inclusive teaching and the teacher’s tasks in the inclusive classroom: A literary investigation. British Journal of Special Education, 46(2), 226-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12260
32. Moriña, A. (2017). Inclusive education in higher education: challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254964
33. Nilholm, C. (2021). Research about inclusive education in 2020–How can we improve our theories in order to change practice? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(3), 358-370. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08856257.2020.1754547
34. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows third edition. Open University Press.
35. Peters, S. J. (2003). Inclusive education: Achieving education for all by including those with disabilities and special education needs. Washington, The World Bank, 26690, 1-133. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/614161468325299263/pdf/266900WP0English0Inclusive0Education.pdf
36. Peters, S. J. (2007). “Education for all?” A historical analysis of international inclusive education policy and individuals with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 18(2), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073070180020601
37. Pivik, J., McComas, J., and Laflamme, M. (2002). Barriers and facilitators to inclusive education. Exceptional children, 69(1), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290206900107
38. Preston, C. C., and Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta psychologica, 104(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
39. Sakız, H. (2022). Kapsayıcı eğitimin psikolojisi: Güncel eğilimler, güncellenen uygulamalar. Turkish Journal of Special Education Research and Practice, 4(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.37233/TRSPED.2020.0120
40. Sarıcı Bulut, S., Sabancı, O., Şahin, M. G., Dağlıoğlu, H. E., Turupcu Doğan, A., Ömeroğlu, E., Karataş, S., Kukul, V., ve Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2018). Üstün yetenekli ve zekâlı öğrencilerin bulunduğu kapsayıcı eğitim ortamlarında eğitimsel uygulamalar ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi - İlkokul öğretmen formu. Turkish Studies - Educational Sciences, 13(11), 1153-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.
41. Schuelka, M. J. (2018). Implementing inclusive education. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/14230/374_Implementing_Inclusive_Education.pdf?sequence=1
42. Seçer, İ. (2015). SPSS ve LISREL ile pratik veri analizi: Analiz ve raporlaştırma (2. Baskı). Anı Yayıncılık. Shaeffer, S. (2019). Inclusive education: A prerequisite for equity and social justice. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(2), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09598-w
43. Stella, C. S. C., Forlin, C., and Lan, A. M. (2007). The influence of an inclusive education course on attitude change of pre‐service secondary teachers in Hong Kong. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660701268585
44. Suhr, D. D. (2006). Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis [Sözlü Bildiri], 31st Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, SAS Institute, Inc, Cary.
45. Taneri, P. O. (2017, 27-29 Nisan). Demokratik ve kapsayıcı eğitimin önündeki engelleri aşmada ilk adım: öğretmen eğitimi [Sözlü Bildiri]. ULEAD 2017 Annual Congress, Çanakkale 18 Mart Üniversitesi, Çanakkale.
46. Taneri, P. O., Özbek, Ö. Y., Altunoğlu, A., Avcı, E., ve Aşiret, S. (2020, 23-24 Aralık). Kapsayıcı eğitime yönelik tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Sözlü Bildiri]. 8. Uluslararası Sosyal Beşeri ve Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi. Niğde Ömer Halis Demir Üniversitesi, Online.
47. United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2016). General comment No. 4 (2016) on the right to inclusive education. 1620881 (un.org)
48. Ünal, R., ve Aladağ, S. (2020). Kapsayıcı eğitim uygulamaları bağlamında sorunlar ve çözüm önerilerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 23-42. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jietp/issue/54500/698889
49. Yada, A., Tolvanen, A., and Savolainen, H. (2018). Teachers' attitudes and self-efficacy on implementing inclusive education in Japan and Finland: A comparative study using multi-group structural equation modelling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.011
50. Zoller, N. J., Ramanathan, A. K., and Yu, M. (1999). The relationship between school culture and inclusion: How an inclusive culture supports inclusive education. Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(2), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183999236231