Adaptation Study of The ‘Moral Emotional Questionnaire’ Into Turkish

Öz

Moral emotions such as guilt, pride, and shame play an important role in the socio-emotional development of children during early childhood. These emotions regulate children’s social behaviors and support their ability to act in accordance with moral standards. This study aimed to adapt the Moral Emotions Scale, which assesses children’s behavioral responses related to moral emotions based on parental reports, into Turkish culture. Data obtained from 355 parents were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The CFA results indicated that the three-factor structure (shame, guilt, and pride) demonstrated an acceptable level of model fit (χ²/df = 1.31; RMSEA = .030; CFI = .934; TLI = .923; SRMR = .060). Factor loadings ranged from .30 to .66. AVE values indicate limited convergent validity, and HTMT findings show that discriminant validity is achieved. The internal consistency of the scale was examined using Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω coefficients; it was determined that the shame and guilt subdimensions provided acceptable reliability, and the pride subdimension provided tolerable reliability for research purposes. The findings suggest that the Turkish version of the Moral Emotions Scale can be used to assess children’s moral emotions during early childhood through parental reports; however, due to certain psychometric limitations, it should be used with caution in research contexts.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• early childhood
• moral emotions
• scale adaptation
• validity
• reliability

Ahlaki Duygular Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması

Öz

Suçluluk, gurur, utanç gibi ahlaki duygular erken çocukluk döneminde çocukların sosyal duygusal gelişiminde önemli bir role sahiptir. Bu duygular çocukların sosyal davranışlarını düzenler ve ahlaki standartlara uygun hareket etmelerini sağlar. Bu çalışmada çocukların ahlaki duygularına ilişkin davranışsal tepkilerini ebeveyn raporlarına dayalı olarak değerlendirmeyi amaçlayan Ahlaki Duygular Ölçeği’nin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında 355 ebeveynden elde edilen veriler doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ile incelenmiştir. DFA sonuçları, üç faktörlü yapının (utanç, suçluluk ve gurur) kabul edilebilir düzeyde uyum gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur (χ²/SD = 1.31; RMSEA = .030; CFI = .934; TLI = .923; SRMR = .060). Faktör yükleri .30 ile .66 arasında değişmektedir. AVE değerleri yakınsak geçerliğin sınırlı düzeyde kaldığını gösterirken, HTMT bulguları ayırt edici geçerliğin sağlandığını göstermektedir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılığı Cronbach’s α ve McDonald’s ω katsayıları ile incelenmiş; utanç ve suçluluk alt boyutlarının kabul edilebilir, gurur alt boyutunun ise araştırma amaçlı kullanımlar için tolere edilebilir düzeyde güvenirlik sağladığı belirlenmiştir. Bulgular, Ahlaki Duygular Ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun erken çocukluk dönemindeki çocukların ahlaki duygularını ebeveyn raporları aracılığıyla değerlendirmede kullanılabileceğine işaret etmekle birlikte, bazı psikometrik sınırlılıkların varlığı nedeniyle araştırma amaçlı kullanımlarda temkinli bir şekilde ele alınmasının uygun olacağını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• erken çocukluk dönemi
• ahlaki duygular
• ölçek uyarlama
• geçerlilik
• güvenirlik

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmada "Yükseköğretim Kurumları Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Yönergesi"nde belirtilen kurallara uyulduğunu ve "Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiğine Aykırı Eylemler"e dayalı hiçbir işlem yapmadığımızı beyan ederiz. Aynı zamanda tüm yazarların çalışmaya katkıda bulunduğu, yazarlar arasında herhangi bir çıkar çatışmasının bulunmadığını, tüm etik ihlallerde tüm sorumluluğun makale yazarlarına ait olduğunu beyan ederiz.

Kaynakça

1. Arsenio, W. F., Gold, J., & Adams, E. (2006). Children’s conceptions and displays of moral emotions. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 581–610). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Barrett, K. C. (1995). A functionalist approach to shame and guilt. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 25–63). Guilford Press.
3. Beer, J. S., Heerey, E. A., Keltner, D., Scabini, D., & Knight, R. T. (2003). The regulatory function of self-conscious emotion: Insights from patients with orbitofrontal damage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.85.4.594
4. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
5. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak Kılıç, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (28. bs.). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
6. Campos, J. J., Campos, R. G., & Barrett, K. C. (1989). Emergent themes in the study of emotional development and emotion regulation. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 394–402. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.394
7. Campos, J. J., Frankel, C. B., & Camras, L. (2004). On the nature of emotion regulation in early development. Social Development, 13(2), 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9507.2004.00264.x
8. Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis (3rd ed.). Continuum.

9. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15328007SEM0902_5
10. Covert, M. V., Tangney, J. P., Maddux, J. E., & Heleno, N. M. (2003). Shame-proneness, guiltproneness, and interpersonal problem solving: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.22.1.1.28862
11. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2006). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
12. Da Silva, B. M. S., Ketelaar, L., Veiga, G., Tsou, Y. T., & Rieffe, C. (2022). Moral emotions in early childhood: Validation of the Moral Emotions Questionnaire (MEQ). International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221075031
13. Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665
14. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi. org/10.2307/3151312
15. Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
16. Goleman, D. (1996). Duygusal zeka (B. S. Yener, Çev.). Varlık Yayınları.
17. Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., van Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., den Brok, P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., Savran Gencer, A., & BouJaoude, S. (2014). Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11165-014-9438-6
18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
19. Halle, T. G. (2003). Emotional development and well-being. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes, & K. A. Moore (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 125–138). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
20. Harter, S. (2019). The construction of the self developmental and sociocultural foundations (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
21. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt,M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
22. Ishikawa, T. (2010). Development of guilt [In Japanese]. Japenese Psychological Review, 53(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.2156/pr.53.77
23. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
24. Lewis, M., Sullivan, M. W., Stanger, C., & Weiss, M. (1989). Self-development and self-conscious emotions. Child Development, 60(1), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131080
25. Lewis, M., & Ramsay, D. (2002). Infant emotional and cortisol responses to goal blockage. Child Development, 73(2), 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00417
26. Lewis, M. (2007). Self-conscious emotional development. In J. L. Tracy, R. W. Robins, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 134–153). The Guilford Press.
27. Lewis, M. (2014). The rise of consciousness and the development of emotional life. Guilford Press.
28. Li, Z., Dong, D., & Qiao, J. (2022). The role of social value orientation in Chinese adolescents’ moral emotion attribution. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/ bs13010003
29. Malti, T. (2016). Toward an integrated clinical-developmental model of guilt. Developmental Review, 39, 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.11.001
30. Mascolo, M. F., & Fischer, K. W. (2007). The co-development of self-awareness and self-evaluative emotions across the toddler years. In C. A. Brownell & C. B. Kopp (Eds.), Transitions in early socioemotional development: The toddler years (pp. 66–99). Guilford Press.
31. Saarni, C., Campos, J. J., Camras, L. A., & Witherington, D. (2006). Emotional development: Action, communication, and understanding. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 226–299). Wiley.
32. Salvucci, S., Walter, E., Conley, V., Fink, S., & Saba, M. (1997). Measurement error studies at the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 97-464). U.S. Department of Education.
33. Söylemez, S., Koyuncu, M., & Amado, S. (2018). Evaluation of shame and guilt emotions in the scope of cognitive psychology. Studies in Psychology, 38(3), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.26650/ sp2018-0021
34. Stoica, A. M., & Roco, M. (2013). The role of emotional intelligence in kindergarten children’s development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 150–154. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.269
35. Tangney, J. P. (2001). Constructive and destructive aspects of shame and guilt. In A. C. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive & destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, and society (pp. 127–145). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10433- 006
36. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. Guilford Press.
37. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2003). Shame and guilt. Guilford Press.
38. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145
39. Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P., Fletcher, C., & Gramzow, R. (1992). Shamed into anger? The relation of shame and guilt to anger and self-reported aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 669–675. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.669
40. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). The psychological structure of pride: A tale of two facets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 506–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.92.3.506
41. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). The prototypical pride expression: Development of a nonverbal behavior coding system. Emotion, 7(4), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.789
42. Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., & Lagattuta, K. H. (2005). Can children recognize pride? Emotion, 5(3), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.251
43. Yang, M. L., Yang, C. C., & Chiou, W. B. (2010). When guilt leads to other-orientation and shame leads to egocentric self-focus: Effects of differential priming of negative affects on perspective taking. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(5), 605–614. https:// doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.5.605