THE EFFECTS OF PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT ON ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationships among organizational support, organizational cynicism and organizational identification. In the study, the effect of perceived organizational support on organizational identification through the mediating role of organizational cynicism was investigated. First, a literature review was carried out with respect to the studies associating the mentioned variables. Later in light of the literature review, hypotheses were formulated. To test the hypotheses, data were gathered through a survey conducted on 218 bank employees operating in Aksaray province. After statistic analyses, it was observed that organizational support has a positive effect on organizational identification and organizational support has a negative effect on organizational cynicism. Furthermore, it was observed that the effect of organizational support on organizational identification is partially mediated by organizational cynicism

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Perceived Organizational Support, Cynicism, Organizational Cynicism

Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Örgütsel Özdeşleşmeye Etkisi: Örgütsel Sinizmin Aracı Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel destek, örgütsel sinizm ve örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişkileri ele almaktır. Çalışmada örgütsel desteğin sinizm aracılığıyla özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Çalışmada öncelikle değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi ele alan araştırmalar incelenmiş ve bu doğrultuda hipotezler oluşturulmuştur. Hipotezlerin testi için Aksaray ilinde faaliyette bulunan 218 banka çalışanından anket tekniğiyle veri toplanmıştır. Gerekli istatistiksel analizler yapıldıktan sonra örgütsel desteğin özdeşleşmeyi olumlu, sinizmi ise olumsuz yönde etkilediği gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca analiz sonuçları örgütsel desteğin özdeşleşmeye etkisinde örgütsel sinizmin kısmi aracı rol üstlendiğini de göstermiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Algılanan Örgütsel Destek, Sinizm, Örgütsel Sinizm, Örgütsel

Kaynakça

1. Akova, O. ve Kılıç, T. (2014) “Kamu Çalışanlarının Örgütsel Sinizm Düzeyleri ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti İlişkisi”, Bartın Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(12), 117-136.
2. Alan, H. ve Fidanboy, C. Ö. (2012) “Sinizm, Tükenmişlik ve Kişilik Arasındaki İlişkiler: Bilişim Sektörü Kapsamında Bir İnceleme” [Bildiri], 11. Ulusal Büro Yönetimi ve Sekreterlik Kongresi, 4-6 Ekim, (ss. 121-128), Isparta: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Uzaktan Eğitim Meslek Yüksekokulu.
3. Andersson, L. (1996) “Employee Cynicism: An Examination Using a Contract Violation Framework”, Human Relations, 49, 1395-1418.
4. Andersson, L.M. ve Bateman, T.S. (1997) “Cynicism in the Workplace: Some Causes and Effects”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449-463.
5. Armstrong-Stassen, M. ve Ursel, N.D. (2009) “Perceived Organizational Support, Career Satisfaction and The Retention of Older Workers”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 201-220.
6. Ashforth, B.E. ve Mael, F. (1989) “Social Identity Theory and the Organization”, The Academy of Management Review, 14(1) 20-39.
7. Ashforth, B.E., Harrison, S., ve Corley, K. (2008) “Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions”, Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374.
8. Bakker, E.D. (2007) “Integrity and Cynicism: Possibilities and Constraints of Moral Communication”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 20, 119-136.

9. Başar, U. ve Basım, N. (2015) “Effects of Organizational Identification on Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Organizational Politics”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 22(2), 663-683.
10. Başar, U. ve Sığrı, Ü. (2015) “Effects of Teachers’ Organizational Justice Perceptions on Intention to Quit: Mediation Role of Organizational Identification”, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(1), 45- 59.
11. Bedeian, A. (2007) “Even if the Tower is ‘Ivory’, It isn’t white: Understanding the Consequences of Faculty Cynicism”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 9-32.
12. Bergami, M. ve Bagozzi, R.P. (2000) “Self Categorization, Affective Commitment and Group Selfesteem as Distinct Aspects of Social Identity in The Organization”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555-577.
13. Bernerth J.B., Armenakis A.A., Feild, H.S. ve Walker, H.J. (2007) “Justice, Cynicism, and Commitment: A Study of Important Organizational Change Variables”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(3), 303-326.
14. Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., Dean, J. W. (1999) “Does Organizational Cynicism Matter?: Employee and Supervisor Perspectives on Work Outcomes”, 36th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Academy of Management, Philadelphia PA., 1-34.
15. Buchanan, B. (1974) “Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Managers in Work Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533-546.
16. Byrne, Z.S. ve Hochwarter, W.A. (2008) “Perceived Organizational Support and Performance: Relationships across Levels of Organizational Cynicism”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(1), 54-72.
17. Chen Z., Eisenberger, R., Johnson, K.M. Sucharski, I.L. ve Aselage, J. (2009) “Perceived Organizational Support and Extra-Role Performance Which Leads to Which?”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 119-124.
18. Chen, S.Y., Wu, W.-C., Chang, C.-S., Lin, C.-T., Kung, J.-Y., Weng, H.-C., Lin, Y-T. ve Lee, S. (2015) “Organizational Justice, Trust and Identification and Their Effects on Organizational Commitment in Hospital Nursing Staff”, BMC Health Services Research, 15, 1-17.
19. Cheung, M.F.Y. ve Law, M.C.C. (2008) “Relationships of Organizational Justice and Organizational Identification: The Mediating Effects of Perceived Organizational Support in Hong Kong”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(2), 213-231.
20. Chiaburu, D.S., Peng, A.C., Oh, I., Banks, G.C. ve Lomeli, L.C. (2013) “Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Organizational Cynicism: A Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 181-197.
21. Cho, J. ve Treadway, D.C. (2016) “Organizational Identification and Perceived Organizational Support As Mediators of the Procedural Justice–Citizenship Behaviour Relationship: A Cross-Cultural Constructive Replication”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(5), 631-653.
22. Çakınberk, A., Derin, N. ve Demirel, E.T. (2011) “Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Örgütsel Bağlılıkla Biçimlenmesi: Malatya ve Tunceli Özel Eğitim Kurumları Örneği”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 89-121.
23. Dawley, D., Houghton, J.D. ve Bucklew, N.S. (2010) “Perceived Organizational Support and Turnover Intention: The Mediating Effects of Personal Sacrifice and Job Fit”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(3), 238-257.
24. Dean, J.W., Brandes, P. ve Dharwadkar, R. (1998) “Organizational Cynicism”, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341-352.
25. Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M., ve Harquail, C.V. (1994) “Organizational Images and Member Identification”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
26. Eaton, J.A. (2000), A Social Motivation Approach to Organizational Cynicism (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Toronto: York University.
27. Eder, P. ve Eisenberger, R. (2008) “Perceived Organizational Support: Reducing the Negative Influence of Coworker Withdrawal Behavior”, Journal of Management, 34(1), 55-68.
28. Edwards, M. ve Peccei, R. (2007) “Organizational Identification: Development and Testing of a Conceptually Grounded Measure”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(1), 25–57.
29. Eisenberger R., Huntington R. Hutchison S. ve Sowa, D. (1986) “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Pschology, 71(3), 500-507.
30. Ertürk, A. (2010) “Exploring Predictors of Organizational Identification: Moderating Role of Trust on The Associations Between Empowerment, Organizational Support and Identification”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(4), 409-441.
31. Eryeşil, K. ve Fındık, M. (2011) “Örgütsel Sinizm”. Aykut Bedük (Ed.), Örgüt Psikolojisi: Yeni Yaklaşımlar, Güncel Konular (ss. 97-118) içinde. Konya: Atlas Akademi.
32. Gillet, N., Huart, I., Colombat, P. ve Fouquereau, E. (2013) “Perceived Organizational Support, Motivation, and Engagement Among Police Officers”, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44(1), 46-55.
33. Guillaume. P.R. (2015), Permanent and Seasonal Employees: An Investigation of Differences in Perceived Organizational Support, Job Engagement and Dedication to Service Quality. (Doktora Tezi). Davenport: The Doctoral Faculty Counsil of St. Ambrose University.
34. Hall, D.T., Schneider, B. ve Harold, T.N. (1970) “Personal Factors in Organizational Identification”, Administrative Science Quarterly. 15(2): 176–190.
35. He, H., Pham, H.Q., Baruch, Y. ve Zhu, W. (2014) “Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Identification: Joint Moderating Effects of Employee Exchange Ideology and Employee Investment”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(20), 2772-2795.
36. İplik, E., İplik, F.N. ve Efeoğlu, İ.E. (2014) “Çalışanların Örgütsel Destek Algılarının Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Rolü”, Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 6(12), 109-122.
37. James M.S.L. (2005), Antecedents and Consequences Of Cynicism In Organizations: An Examination of the Potential Positive and Negative Effects on School Systems. (Doktora Tezi), USA: The Florida State University.
38. Johnson, J.L. ve O’leary-Kelly, A.M. (2003) “The Effects of Psychological Contract Breach and Organizational Cynicism: not all Social Exchange Violations are Created Equal”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 627-647.
39. Karacaoğlu, K. ve İnce, F. (2012) “Brandes, Dharwadkar ve Dean’in (1999) Örgütsel Sinizm Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması: Kayseri Organize Sanayi Bölgesi Örneği”, Business and Economics Research Journal, 3(2), 77-92.
40. Karacaoğlu, K. ve İnce, F. (2013) “Pozitif Örgütsel Davranışın Örgütsel Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkileri: Kayseri İlindeki İmalat Sanayi İşletmelerinde Bir Uygulama”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 181-202.
41. Kasalak, G. ve Aksu, M.B. (2014) “The Relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Cynicism of Research Assistants”, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 125-133.
42. Kurtessis, J.N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M.T., Buffardi, L.C., Stewart, K.A. ve Adis, C.S. (2015) “Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory”, Journal of Management, XX(X), 1-31.
43. Luthans, F. (2011), Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
44. Mael, F. ve Ashforth, B.E. (1992) “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of The Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
45. Mowday, R.T., Steers. R.M. ve Porter. L.W. (1979) “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
46. Nafei, W. (2014) “Job Attitudes as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Cynicism and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: An Applied Study on Teaching Hospital in Egypt”, International Journal of Business Administration, 5(1), 31-52.
47. Nartgün, Ş.S. ve Kalay, M. (2014) “Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Destek, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ile Örgütsel Sinizm Düzeylerine İlişkin Görüşleri”, Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9(2), 1361-1376.
48. Patchen, M. (1970), Participation, Achievement, and Involvement on the Job, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
49. Polat, M. ve Meydan C. H. (2010) “Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Sinizm ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti İle İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 145-172.
50. Rhoades, L. ve Eisenberger, R. (2002) “Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714.
51. Riketta, M. (2005) “Organizational Identification: A Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358- 384.
52. Robbins, S.P. ve Judge, T.A. (2013), Organizational Behavior, ABD: Pearson Education Inc.
53. Salahieh, Z. (2015), The Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support on the Relationship between Bullying and Work Behaviors (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). San Jose: San Jose State University, The Faculty of the Department of Psychology.
54. Shelton, M. (2013), Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Cyber Security Practitioners’ Turnover Intentions (Doktora Tezi). Minneapolis: Walden University, Applied Management and Decision Sciences Faculty.
55. Shen, Y., Jackson, T., Ding, C., Yuan, D., Zhao, L., Dou, Y. ve Zhang, Q. (2014) “Linking Perceived Organizational Support with Employee Work Outcomes in a Chinese Context: Organizational Identification as a Mediator”, European Management Journal, 32, 406-412.
56. Sluss, D.M., Klimchak, M. ve Holmes, J.J. (2008) “Perceived Organizational Support as A Mediator Between Relational Exchange and Organizational Identification”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 457-464.
57. Srivastava, A. ve Adams, J.W. (2011) “Relationship between Cynicism and Job Satisfaction: Exploration of Mechanisms”, Psychological Reports, 108(1), 27-42.
58. Stanley, D.J., Meyer, J.P. ve Topolnytsky, L. (2005) “Employee Cynicism and Resistance to Organizational Change”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(4), 429-459.
59. Tokgöz, N. (2011) “Örgütsel Sinisizm, Örgütsel Destek ve Örgütsel Adalet İlişkisi: Elektrik Dağıtım İşletmesi Çalışanları Örneği”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(2), 363-387.
60. Turunç, Ö. ve Çelik, M. (2010) “Çalışanların Algıladıkları Örgütsel Destek ve İş Stresinin Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve İş Performansına Etkisi”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 17(2), 183-206.
61. Türkiye Bankalar Birliği. Türkiye’de Bankacılık Sistemi Seçilmiş Göstergelerin İllere ve Bölgelere Göre Dağılımı. Haziran 2016.
62. Van Dick, R. (2004) “My Job is my Castle: Identification in Organizational Contexts”, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 19, 171-203.
63. Van Dick, R. ve Wagner, U. (2002) “Social Identification among School Teachers: Dimensions, Foci and Correlates”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 129-149.
64. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J. ve Christ, O. (2004) “The Utility of Broader Conceptualization of Organizational Identification: Which Aspects Really Matter?”, Journal of Occupation and Organizational Psychology, 77(2), 171-191.
65. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J. ve Christ, O. (2005) “Category Salience and Organizational Identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 273-285.
66. Van Knippenberg, D., Dick, R.V. ve Tavares, S. (2007) “Social Identity and Social Exchange: Identification, Support and Withdrawal From the Job”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 457-477.
67. Wann-Yih, W. ve Htaik, S. (2011) “The Impacts of Perceived Organizational Support, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Job Performance in Hotel Industry”, The 11th International DSI and the 16th APDSI Joint Meeting, July 12-16 2011, Taiwan.
68. Yoshimura, K. E. (2003), Employee Traits, Perceived Organizational Support, Supervisory Communication, Affective Commitment, and Intent to Leave: Group Differences (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from repository.lib.ncsu.edu.
69. Yücel, İ. ve Çetinkaya, B. (2015) “Örgütsel Sinizm ile Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişki ve Çalışanların Yaşının Bu İlişki Üzerindeki Etkisi- “Bazen Hoşlanmasak da Kalmak Zorunda Olabiliriz ””, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(3), 247-271.
70. Yüksel, İ. (2006) “Örgütsel Destek Algısı ve Belirleyicilerinin İşten Ayrılma Eğilimi ile İlişkisi”, İ.Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 7-32.
71. Zagenczyk, T.J., Gibney, R., Few, W.T. ve Scott, K.L. (2011) “Psychological Contracts and Organizational Identification: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Labor Research, 32, 254-281.