Medyada Göç Raporlama Konusunda Aracılı Kamusal Alanın Yeniden Yapılandırılması: Küresel Göç Film Festivali Örneği

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 248 - 260, 27.01.2020

Dilan Cıftcı

https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.519909

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, modern demokrasilerdeki dört
kamusal alan modelini ve genel olarak göç konularına vurgu yapan ve üç önemli
Küresel Göç Filmi Festivali'ne özel önem veren aracılı kamusal alanların
kavramsal gelişimini araştırmaktır. Bu çalışma, küresel göç olayları üzerinde
halihazırda var olan çalışmaları kullanarak göçmen algılarındaki olumsuzlukları
haritalamak amacıyla dünyadaki göç medyası kapsamına ilişkin literatür
taramasına genel bir bakış sunmaktadır. Mevcut veriler, genel olarak aracılı
kamu alanlarının ve daha kesin olarak sinemanın, göç eden sorunları pozitif
olarak algılama yeteneğine sahip olmalarına yardım eden topluluklar üzerinde olumlu
bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bulgulara göre, farklı ülkelerdeki ve
yerlerdeki farklılaştırılmış filmler ve gösterimlerin yardımı ile Küresel Göç
Film Festivali'nin, göç konusundaki senaryoların ardındaki yüksek farkındalığı
değil, aynı zamanda küresel göç algıları konusunda da daha fazla empati
gösterdiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Göç, kamusal alan, aracılı kamusal alan, Küresel Göç Film Festivali, sinema, çerçeveleme, medya

The Reconstruction of the Mediated Public Sphere on Media Reporting of Migration: The Case of The Global Migration Film Festival

Öz

The aim of the current study
is to explore the four models of public spheres in modern democracies and the
conceptual development of mediated public spheres with an emphasis on the migration
issues in general and  special focus on
the three important Global Migration Film Festival. This study provides an
overview for the literature review on the migration media coverage around the
world in order to map the negativity in migrant perceptions by using already
existed studies on the global migration phenomena. The present data suggests
that mediated public spheres in general, and more precisely cinema have a positive
impact on the helping communities to have an ability to perceive migration
issues positively. In findings indicate that The Global Migration Film Festival
with the help of the differentiated films and screening in different countries
and places demonstrated not only higher awareness on the behind scenarios on
migration, but also higher empathy in the perceptions on global migration as
well

Anahtar Kelimeler

Migration, public sphere, mediated public sphere, The Global Migration Film Festival, cinema, framing, media

Kaynakça

• Abid, R.Z., S.A. Manan and Z.A. Rahman (2017). ‘A flood of Syrians has slowed to a trickle’: The use of metaphors in the representation of Syrian refugees in the online media news reports of host and non-host countries. Discourse & Communication, 11(2):121–140.
• Anderson, B. (2013). Us and them?: The dangerous politics of immigration control. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Bachrach, P. (1967). The theory of democratic elitism: A critique. Little Brown.
• Banda, F. and A. Mawadza (2015). Foreigners are stealing our birth right: Moral panics and the discursive construction of Zimbabwean immigrants in South African media. Discourse & Communication, 9(1):47–64.
• Beckett, C. (2010). The Value of Networked Journalism. Polis Journalism and Society, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London. Available from www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/POLIS/Files/ networkedjournalism.pdf.
• Blinder, S. and W. Allen (2016). Constructing immigrants: Portrayals of migrant groups in British national newspapers, 2010–2012. International Migration Review, 50(1):3–40.
• Boomgaarden, H.G. and R. Vliegenthart (2009). How news content influences anti-immigration attitudes: Germany, 1993–2005. European Journal of Political Research, 48(4):516–542.
• Cacciatore, M.A., D.A. Scheufele and S. Iyengar (2016). The end of framing as we know it... and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1):7–23.
• Carey, J. W. (1987). The press and the public discourse. Center Magazine, 20(2), 4-16.
• Caviedes, A. (2015). An emerging ‘European’ news portrayal of immigration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(6):897–917.
• Chavez, L. (2013). The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford University Press, Redwood City, California.
• Cherry, J.F. and T.P. Leppard (2015). Experimental archaeology and the earliest seagoing: the limitations of inference. World Archaeology, 47(5):740–755.
• Çiftçi, H. (2018). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Vatandaşlarının Suriyeli Sığınmacılara Yönelik Tutum, Algı ve Empatik Eğilimlerinin Analizi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7 (3), 2232-2256.
• Clayman, S. E. (2004). Arenas of interaction in the mediated public sphere. Poetics, 32(1), 29-49.
• Cunningham, S. (2010). Joseph A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 16(1), 20-22.
• Curran, J. (1991). Rethinking the media as a public sphere. Communication and citizenship, 27-57.
• Esser, F. (1999). Tabloidization'of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European journal of communication, 14(3), 291-324.
• Esses, V.M., S. Medianu and A.S. Lawson (2013). Uncertainty, threat, and the role of the media in promoting the dehumanization of immigrants and refugees. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3):518–536.
• Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W., Gerhard, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31(3), 289-324.
• Freedom House (2016). Freedom of the Press 2016: The Battle for the Dominant Message. Available from https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_FTOP_2016Report_Final_04232016.pdf.
• Freedom House 2017). Freedom of the Press 2017: Press Freedom's Dark Horizon. Available from https://freedomhouse.org/ sites/default/files/FOTP_2017_booklet_FINAL_April28.pdf.
• Gabrielatos, C. and P. Baker (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding. A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1):5–38.
• Greenslade, R. (2005). Seeking Scapegoats: The Coverage of Asylum in the UK Press. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
• Gripsrud, J. (2000). Tabloidization, popular journalism and democracy. Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards, 285-300.
• Hainmueller, J. and D.J. Hopkins (2014). Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1):225–249.
• Hobolt, S.B. and J. Tilley (2016). Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West European Politics, 39(5):971–991.
• Igartua, J.J., L. Cheng and C. Muñiz (2005). Framing Latin America in the Spanish press: A cooled down friendship between two fraternal lands. Communications, 30(3):359–372.
• Khondker, H.H. (2011). Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations, 8(5):675–679.
• Lan, S. (2016). The shifting meanings of race in China: A case study of the African diaspora communities in Guangzhou. City & Society, 28(3):298–318.
• Luo, Y. (2014). The Internet and agenda setting in China: The influence of online public opinion on media coverage and government policy. International Journal of Communication, 8:1289-1312.
• McAuliffe, M., W. Weeks and K. Koser (2015). Media and migration: Comparative analysis of print and online media reporting on migrants and migration in selected countries (Phase II). Occasional Paper Series, Belconnen, ACT: Department of Immigration and Border Protection. Available from www.border.gov.au/ReportsandPublications/Documents/research/ mcauliffe-weeks-koser.pdf.
• Mill, J. S. (1861). Considerations on representative government. Parker, son, and Bourn.
• Patler, C. and R.G. Gonzales (2015). Framing citizenship: Media coverage of anti-deportation cases led by undocumented immigrant youth organisations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(9):1453–1474.
• Philo, G., E. Briant and P. Donald (2013). Bad news for refugees. London: Pluto Press.
• Pickering, S. (2000). The hard press of asylum. Forced Migration Review, 8:32–3.
• Santa Ana, O. (1999). 'Like an animal I was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society, 10(2):191–224.
• Schulz, W. (1997). Changes of mass media and the public sphere. Javnost – The Public, 4(2), 57-69.
• Sciortino, G. and A. Colombo (2004). The flows and the flood: the public discourse on immigration in Italy, 1969–2001. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 9(1):94–113.
• Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3):341–362.
• Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2005). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public administration, 83(3), 573-596.
• Spoonley, P. and A. Butcher (2009). Reporting superdiversity. The mass media and immigration in New Zealand. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 30(4):355–372.
• Sullivan, J. and B. Renz (2010). Chinese migration: still the major focus of Russian Far East/Chinese North East relations? The Pacific Review, 23(2):261–285.
• Sunstein, C.R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
• Suro, R. (2011). Introduction. In: Writing immigration: Scholars and journalists in dialogue (M. Suarez-Orozco, V. Louie and R. Suro, eds). University of
• California Press, Berkeley, pp. 1–18
• Örnebring, H., & Jönnsson, A. M. (2004). Tabloid journalism and the public sphere: A historical perspective on tabloid journalism. Journalism Studies, 5, 283-295.
• Uribe, R., & Gunter, B. (2004). Research note: The tabloidization of British tabloids. European Journal of Communication, 19(3), 387-402.
• van Klingeren, M., H.G. Boomgaarden, R. Vliegenthart and C.H. de Vreese (2015). Real world is not enough: The media as an additional source of negative attitudes toward immigration, comparing Denmark and the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 31(3):268–283.
• Wessler, H. (2008). Investigating deliberativeness comparatively. Political Communication, 25.
• Wessler, H., & Rinke, E. M. (2014). Deliberative performance of television news in three types of democracy: Insights from the United States, Germany, and Russia. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 827-851.
• Wiggen, M. (2012). Rethinking anti-immigration rhetoric after the Oslo and Utøya terror attacks. New Political Science, 34(4):585–604.
• Wodak, R., M. KhosraviNik and B. Mral (eds) (2013). Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. Bloomsbury, London.