The combinations of genotype, trait and genotype by yield, trait in triticale using biplot methods for define adaptation of varieties to environment

Abstract

Identifying high-performing triticale genotypes across multiple traits and the correlations among traits is important in a triticale breeding program. In this regard, three cultivars as controls and one promising line cultivar, totaling four genotypes, were evaluated using a Randomized Complete Block Design with four replicates at three locations during two growing seasons. Quantita-tive traits such as days to heading time, plant height, test weight, thousand grain weight, protein content, and yield were recorded. In our study, GT and GYT biplot analyses were used to identify the associations between various traits and select superior cultivars bot-tomed on multiple traits. Among the genotypes, the highest yield in kg per hectare was obtained from the Egeyıldızı variety. The evaluated genotypes exhibited grain yield ranging from 4481 to 5640 kg/ha-1, heading date from 102 to 114 day, plant height from 124 to 133 cm, test weight from 71 to 75 kg/hl, thousand grain weight from 28 to 41 g, from 14 to 17%. The results revealed that the GT biplot explained a smaller proportion of the total variation (95.53%) than the GYT biplot (97.98%). A significant and positive correlation was observed between head-ing date (HD) and protein content (PC). Tacettinbey and Egeyıldızı varieties useful culti-vars were identified using the ATC of the GYT biplot, which could be directly utilized or incorporated into further cultivation for region. the conclusion, it was determined that the candidate variety was weak in competition with existing varieties in terms of some traits, while it was confirmed that its yield potential was higher than the varieties.

Keywords

• Triticale
• Genotype
• Environmet
• Trait

Tritikale'de genotip, özellik ve genotip verim, özellik kombinasyonlarının biplot yöntemi kullanılarak çeşitlerin çevreye adaptasyonunun belirlenmesi

Öz

Tritikale ıslah programında, birden fazla özelliğe sahip yüksek performanslı tritikale genotiplerinin belirlenmesi ve bunların korelasyonu önemlidir. Bu bağlamda, üç adet kontrol çeşidi ve bir aday çeşit adayı olmak üzere toplam dört genotip, iki yetiştirme sezonu boyunca üç lokasyonda dört tekrarlamalı olarak Tesadüf Blokları Deneme Desenine göre değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmada başaklanma süresi, bitki boyu, hektolitre ağırlığı, bin tane ağırlığı, protein içeriği ve verim gibi özellikler incelenmiştir. Çalışmamızda, özellikler ile genotipler arasındaki ilişkileri belirlemek için GT ve GYT biplot analizleri kullanılmıştır. En yüksek verim kg/dekar Egeyıldızı çeşidinden elde edilmiştir. Değerlendirilen genotiplerin tane verimi 448-564 kg/da, başaklanma tarihi 102-114 gün, bitki boyu 124-133 cm,hektolitre ağırlığı 71-75 kg/hl, bin tane ağırlığı 28-41 g, protein oranı 14-17 arasında değişmiştir. Sonuçlar, GT biplotunun toplam varyasyonun daha azını (%95,53) GYT biplotuna (%97,98) göre açıkladığını göstermiştir. Başaklanma tarihi (HD) ile protein içeriği (PC) arasında önemli ve pozitif bir korelasyon gözlenmiştir. GYT biplotunun ATC değerleri kullanılarak Tacettinbey ve Egeyıldızı çeşitleri için bölge için doğrudan kullanılabilecek veya daha sonraki ekimlere dahil edilebilecek faydalı çeşitler olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, aday çeşidin bazı özellikler bakımından mevcut çeşitlerle rekabette zayıf olduğu belirlenirken, verim potansiyelinin çeşitlerden daha yüksek olduğu doğrulanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tritikale
• Genotip
• Çevre
• Özellik

Kaynakça

1. Akcura, M., Sabandüzen, B., Hocaoğlu, O. (2018). Using GGE biplot analysis to evaluate ınterrelationships between yield and yield components of oat genotypes in different growing seasons. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 10, 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892018-0194-0
2. Al-ashkar, I., Sallam, M., Al-suhaibani, N., Ibrahim, A., Alsadon, A.(2022). Multiple stresses of wheat in the detection of traits and genotypes of high-performance and stability for a complex ınterplay of environment and genotypes. Agronomy, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102252
3. Bakhshi, B. Shahmoradi, S. S. (2023). Simultaneous selection of high-yielding and drought-tolerant barley landrac-es using GT, GYT and GYSI methodologies. Cereal Research Communications. 51(1), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-022-00290-1
4. Bavandpouri, F., Farshadfar, E., Farshadfar, M. (2023). Comparison of bread wheat genotypes and correlation analysis of traits in different moisture conditions based on GT-biplot method. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 54(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2023.352540.654959
5. Đekić, V., Milivojević, J., & Branković, S. (2018). The interaction of genotype and environment on yield and quality components in triticale. Biologica Nyssana, (1), 459. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1470850
6. Đekić, V., Milovanović, M., Popović, V., Milivojević, J., Staletić, M., Jelić, M., Perišić, V. (2014). Effects of fertiliza-tion on yield and grain quality in winter triticale. Romanian Agricultural Research, 31, 175-183. https://fiver.ifvcns.rs/handle/123456789/1347
7. Derejko, A., Studnicki, M., Wójcik-Gront, E., Gacek, E. (2020). Adaptive grain yield patterns of Triticale (× Triti-cosecale Wittmack) cultivars in six regions of Poland. Agronomy, 10(3), 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030415
8. Dumbravă, M., Ion, V., Epure, L. I., Băşa, A. G., Ion, N., Duşa, E. M. (2016). Grain yield and yield components at triticale under different technological conditions. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 10, 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.09.023

9. Elfanah, A. M. S. S., Darwish, M. A., Selim, A. I., Shabana, M. M. A. A., Elmoselhy, O. M. A. A., Khedr, R. A., Ali, A. M., Abdelhamid, M. T. (2023). Spectral Reflectance Indices ’ Performance to Identify seawater salinity tolerance in bread wheat genotypes using genotype by yield * trait biplot approach. Agronomy. 13(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020353
10. Faheem, M., Arain, S. M., Sial, M. A., Laghari, K. A., Qayyum, A. (2023). Genotype by yield* trait (GYT) biplot analysis: a novel approach for evaluating advance lines of durum wheat. Cereal Research Communi-cations, 51(2), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-022-00298-7
11. Güngör, H., Çakir, M. F., Dumlupinar, Z. (2022). Evaluatıon of Trıtıcale: genotype by envıronment interactıon and GGE bıplot analysıs. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 32(6), 1637. https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2022.6.0573
12. Kara, R. (2016). Evaluation of flag leaf physiological traits of triticale genotypes under eastern Mediterranean condi-tions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 21(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.66594
13. Karahan, T. and Akgün, I. (2020). Selection of barley (Hordeum vulgare) genotypes by GYT (genotype× yield× trait) bip-lot technique and its comparison with GT (genotype× trait). Applied Ecology and Environmental Re-search, 18(1), 1347-1359. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1801_13471359
14. Karkaji, F. A. Hervan, E. M. Roustaii, M. Bihamta, M., Mohammadi, S. (2023). Comprehensive stability analysis of wheat genotypes through multi-environmental trials. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(1), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.999060
15. Kendal, E. and Sayar M.S. (2016). The stability of some spring triticale genotypes using biplot analysis. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 26(3),754-765. https://thejaps.org.pk/docs/v-26-03/26.pdf
16. Kendal E. (2019). Comparing durum wheat cultivars with genotype×yield×trait (GYT) and genotype× trait (GT) by bip-lot method. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 79(04), 512-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392019000400512
17. Kendal, E. (2022). Using biplot analysis technique to selection in Tritikale breeding studies. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32(1), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1035375
18. Kızılgeçi, F. (2019). Assessment of yield and quality of some Triticale genotypes in South-Eastern Anatolia. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 9(1), 545-551. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458477
19. Kociuba, W. And Kramek, A. (2014). Variability of yield traits and disease resistance in winter triticale genetic resources accessions. Acta Agrobotanica, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2014.027
20. Mohammadi, R. and Amri, A. (2011). Graphic analysis of trait relations and genotype evaluation in durum wheat. Journal of Crop Improvement, 25(6), 680–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2011.601437
21. Papanna, R., Koraboyana, V. K., Kalakanti, R., Hemanth, P., Keerthi, B. N., Gupta, S. K. (2024). Improving the pro-cess of identification of superior pearl millet populations using Genotype by Yield×Trait (GYT) biplot. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 15(3), 585–591. https://doi.org/10.37992/2024.1503.078
22. Ponomarev, S. N., Ponomareva, M. L., Mannapova, G. S., Ilalova, L. V. (2021). Yield and protein content in grain of winter triticale collection samples. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 22(4), 495-506. https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2021.22.4.495-506
23. Shojaei, S. H. and Ansarifard, I. (2023). Comparison of genotype × trait and genotype × yield-trait biplots in Sunflower cultivars. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 7(1), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2023.1.17
24. Sofi, P. A., Saba, I., Ara, A., Rehman, K. (2022). Comparative efficiency of GY* T approach over GT approach in ge-notypic selection in multiple trait evaluations: case study of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) grown under temperate Himalayan conditions. Agricultural Research. 11(3), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-021-00577-5
25. Yan ,W. and Rajcan I.R. (2002). Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Canadian Journal Plant Science, 42, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1100
26. Yan, W. and Frégeau-Reid, J. (2018). Genotype by yield* trait (GYT) biplot: a novel approach for genotype selection based on multiple traits. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26688-8 .
27. Yue, H., Wei, J., Xie, J., Chen, S., Peng, H., Cao, H. (2022). A Study on genotype-by environment Interaction Analysis for agronomic traits of maize genotypes across Huang-Huai-Hai Region in China. Phyton, 91(1): 57. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2022.017308