İlkokul Düzeyindeki Öğrenciler İçin Hikâye Kitabı Seçimi: Öğretmen, Ebeveyn ve Öğrenci Görüşleri

Öz

Uygun hikâye kitaplarının seçimi erken çocukluk döneminde okuryazarlığın, duygusal gelişimin ve bilişsel becerilerin desteklenmesinde kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Ancak kitap seçme süreci çoğu zaman öğretmenler, ebeveynler ve çocuklar arasında farklı öncelikleri yansıtmaktadır. Bu nitel durum çalışması ilkokul öğretmenlerinin, ebeveynlerin ve öğrencilerin hikâye kitaplarını seçerken dikkate aldıkları ölçütleri incelemektedir. Veriler 10 öğretmen, 10 ebeveyn ve 10 öğrenciden yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmış ve Miles ve Huberman’ın tematik analiz yaklaşımı kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular bibliyografik bilgiler, dil ve üslup, içerik, yaratıcılık, kitap tasarımı ve okuma sonrası etkinlikler olmak üzere altı temel boyutu ortaya koymuştur. Öğretmenler ve ebeveynler gelişimsel ve pedagojik değeri öncelerken, çocuklar eğlenceyi ve ilgi çekiciliği ön plana çıkarmıştır. Bu çalışma çocuklarda yaşam boyu okuma alışkanlığını teşvik etmeyi amaçlayan eğitimciler, yayınevleri, program geliştiriciler ve ebeveynler için çıkarımlar sunarak kitap seçme ölçütlerine karşılaştırmalı bir bakış açısı kazandırmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hikaye kitabı seçimi
• okuma alışkanlığı
• ilkokul öğrencileri
• öğretmen, ebeveyn ve öğrenci görüşleri

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu araştırma için yazarlara herhangi bir finansal destek sağlanmamıştır.

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, bilimsel araştırma etiğinin temel ilkelerine uygun olarak yürütülmüştür. Araştırmaya katılım gönüllülük esasına dayalıdır ve tüm katılımcılardan aydınlatılmış onam alınmıştır. On sekiz yaşın altındaki katılımcılar için veri toplama süreci öncesinde ebeveyn onayı sağlanmıştır. Katılımcılara kimlik bilgilerinin gizli tutulacağı ve toplanan verilerin yalnızca bilimsel amaçlarla kullanılacağı bildirilmiştir. Ayrıca katılımcılar, araştırmanın herhangi bir aşamasında hiçbir yaptırıma maruz kalmaksızın çalışmadan çekilme haklarının bulunduğu konusunda bilgilendirilmiştir.

Storybook Selection for Primary School Students: Perspectives of Teachers, Parents, and Students

Öz

Selecting appropriate storybooks plays a critical role in supporting literacy, emotional development, and cognitive skills in early childhood. However, the selection process often reflects diverging priorities among educators, parents, and children. This qualitative case study explores the criteria considered by primary school teachers, parents, and students when choosing storybooks. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 10 teachers, 10 parents, and 10 students, and analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s thematic analysis approach. The findings revealed six core dimensions: bibliographic information, language and style, content, creativity, book design, and post-reading activities. While adults prioritized developmental and pedagogical value, children emphasized entertainment and engagement. This study contributes to the field by offering a comparative perspective on book selection criteria, with implications for educators, publishers, curriculum designers, and parents aiming to foster lifelong reading habits in children.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• storybook selection
• reading habit
• primary school students
• teacher, parent and student perspectives

Destekleyen Kurum

The authors received no financial support for this research.

Etik Beyan

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of scientific research. Participation in the study was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. For participants under the age of 18, parental consent was secured prior to data collection. Participants were informed that their identities would remain confidential and that the data collected would be used solely for scientific purposes. Participants were also informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any stage without any consequences.

Kaynakça

1. Al-mizragee, G. (2022). Criteria for children’s literature: Julia Donaldson’s The Gruffalo and The Gruffalo’s child as a study case. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 4(1), 55-71. https://izlik.org/JA24ZY25HG
2. Aram, D., Fine, Y., & Ziv, M. (2013). Enhancing parent–child shared book reading interactions: Promoting references to the book's plot and socio-cognitive themes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(1), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.03.005
3. Arizpe, E., & Styles, M. (2016). Children Reading Pictures: Interpreting Visual Texts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315683911
4. Ateş, N. T. (2023). An evaluation of preschool children‟s books with respect to the principle of appropriateness for children. Research on Education and Psychology (REP), 7(Special Issue 2), 242-269. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1356828
5. Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel araştırmalarda örnekleme yöntemleri ve örnek hacmi sorunsalı üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. BEÜ SBE Derg.,7(1), 231-274. https://izlik.org/JA98FN96XR
6. Bus, A. G., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170476
7. Cremin, T., Mottram, M., Collins, F., Powell, S., & Safford, K. (2014). Building communities of engaged readers: Reading for pleasure. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315772585
8. Duke, N. K., & Carlisle, J. (2011). The development of comprehension. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. IV (pp. 199-228). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840412

9. Gambrell, L. B. (2011). Seven rules of engagement: What’s most important to know about motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01024
10. Glesne, C. (2010). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Pearson Publication.
11. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research,3, 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
12. Kaarbo, J., & Beasley, R. K. (1999). A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political psychology. Political Psychology, 20(2), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00149
13. Karpouza, E, Zampanioti, A., & Karakitsios, A. (2014). Children’s books in education: Teacher’s and students’ selection criteria [Paper Presentation]. 10-12 April International Annual Conference The Child and the Book Conference “Time, Space, and Memory in Literature for Children and Young Adults”, Athens, Greece.
14. Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x
15. McGeown, S. P., (2013). Reading motivation and engagement in the primary school classroom: Theory, research, and practice. UKLA, The United Kingdom Literacy Association.
16. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Inc.
17. Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267-296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890
18. Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R. S., & Sondergaard, J. (2009). Qualitative description– the poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52
19. Nikolajeva, M. (2013). Did you feel as if you hated people?: Emotional literacy through fiction. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship, 19(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2013.813334
20. Öznur, S. & Sadrazam, E. (2020). Principles in selecting children books in primary schools: North Cyprus case. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 15(4), 870 - 876. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i4.5069
21. Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.1.3
22. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage.
23. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240x
24. Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00417
25. Jackson, K. M. (2023). When diversity ısn't the point: Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors in the classroom. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 22 (1). Retrieved from https://oasis.library.unlv.edu/taboo/vol22/iss1/6
26. Stewart, C. J. (1974). Interviewing: principles and practices. McGraw-Hill.
27. Yaden, D. B., Rowe, D. W., & MacGillivray, L. (2000). Emergent literacy: A matter (polyphony) of perspectives. In Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R.(Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III) 1-40. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Yazıcı, E. (2023). Examination of parents' selection of children books. International Journal of Educational Research Review,8(1),9-17. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1185111
29. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayınevi.