Öz
Araştırmanın amacı Türkiye’de okul yöneticisi atama sisteminin değerlendirilmesi ve bu konudaki önerileri ortaya koymaktır. Araştırma nitel tarama modelinde olup fenomenolojik yaklaşımla desenlenmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu; öğretmenler, eğitim yöneticileri ve eğitim yönetimi alanı uzmanları olmak üzere 40 kişi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu mülakat yoluyla uygulanmış ve toplanan veriler içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre Türkiye’nin okul yöneticisi atama sisteminin mevcut durumunun yetersiz olduğu, yazılı sınav ve mülakatın yeterliliği ölçmediği, nitelikli ve liyakatli yönetici belirlemede başarılı olunmadığı görülmektedir. Mülakatın yetkin ve bağımsız komisyonlarca olumsuz algılara mahal vermeyecek şekilde adaletli yapılması gerekmektedir. Atama sisteminin geniş bir perspektifle belirlenmesi, yönetici atamalarında objektif değerlendirme ölçütleriyle adil ve şeffaf bir yönetici atama sisteminin oluşturulması önerileri öne çıkmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Okul yöneticisi Yönetici atama Eğitim paydaşları Olgubilim araştırması
Kaynakça
- Ada, S. (2000). Developing school administrators in primary education institutions. Pamukkale University Faculty of Education Journal, 7(7), 132-137.
- Altın, F. and Vatanartıran, S. (2014). School administrator training, appointment and continuous improvement model proposal in Turkey. Kirsehir Education Faculty Journal, 15 (2), 17-35.
- Aslanargun, E. (2011). School administration and appointment regulations in Turkey. Education Sciences, 6 (4), 2646-2659.
- Aydın, A., Selvitopu, A. and Kaya, M. (2018). A comparative analysis of investments in education and PISA 2015 results. Elementary Education Online, 17 (3), 1283-1301.
- Aydın, M. (2007). Education management. Ankara: Hatiboğlu Publications.
- Balcı, A. (2016). Research in the social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
- Balyer, A. and Gündüz, Y. (2011). Training school principals in different countries: A model proposal for the Turkish education system. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, 4 (2), 182-197.
- Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S. and Demirel, F. (2016). Qualitative studies. Scientific research methods. (Eleventh Edition). Ankara: Pegem A. Publishing.
- Cemaloglu, N. (2005). The current situation, possible future developments and problems in the training and employment of school administrators in Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 25 (2), 249-274.
- Creswell, JW (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication.
- Creswell, JW (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (pp. 146-166). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Öz
The aim of the research is to evaluate the school administrator appointment system in Turkey and to present suggestions on this subject. The research is in the qualitative survey model and was designed with a phenomenological approach. The study group of the research; It consists of 40 people, including teachers, education administrators and education administration experts. As a data collection tool in the research, a semi-structured interview form developed by the researcher was applied through interview and the collected data was subjected to content analysis. According to the results of the research, it is seen that the current situation of the school administrator appointment system in Turkey is insufficient, the written exam and interview do not measure the adequacy, and there is no success in determining the qualified and qualified administrators. The interview should be done fairly by competent and independent commissions so as not to cause negative perceptions. Suggestions for determining the appointment system with a broad perspective and establishing a fair and transparent manager appointment system with objective evaluation criteria in manager appointments become prominent.
Anahtar Kelimeler
School administrator Administrator appointment Education stakeholders Phenomenological research
Kaynakça
- Ada, S. (2000). Developing school administrators in primary education institutions. Pamukkale University Faculty of Education Journal, 7(7), 132-137.
- Altın, F. and Vatanartıran, S. (2014). School administrator training, appointment and continuous improvement model proposal in Turkey. Kirsehir Education Faculty Journal, 15 (2), 17-35.
- Aslanargun, E. (2011). School administration and appointment regulations in Turkey. Education Sciences, 6 (4), 2646-2659.
- Aydın, A., Selvitopu, A. and Kaya, M. (2018). A comparative analysis of investments in education and PISA 2015 results. Elementary Education Online, 17 (3), 1283-1301.
- Aydın, M. (2007). Education management. Ankara: Hatiboğlu Publications.
- Balcı, A. (2016). Research in the social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
- Balyer, A. and Gündüz, Y. (2011). Training school principals in different countries: A model proposal for the Turkish education system. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, 4 (2), 182-197.
- Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S. and Demirel, F. (2016). Qualitative studies. Scientific research methods. (Eleventh Edition). Ankara: Pegem A. Publishing.
- Cemaloglu, N. (2005). The current situation, possible future developments and problems in the training and employment of school administrators in Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 25 (2), 249-274.
- Creswell, JW (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication.
- Creswell, JW (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (pp. 146-166). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Alan Eğitimleri |
| Bölüm | Makaleler - Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 13 Mayıs 2024 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 23 Mayıs 2024 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2024 |