Beden Eğitiminde İhtiyaç Destekleyici Öğretim Stili Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Liu ve Chung (2017) tarafından geliştirilen Beden Eğitiminde İhtiyaç Destekleyici Öğretim Stili Ölçeğinin-BEİDÖSÖ Türkçeye uyarlanması ve ölçeğin geçerlik-güvenirliğine ilişkin analizlerin yapılmasıdır. Verilerin toplanmasında tanımlayıcı bilgi formu, BEİDÖSÖ ve Temel İhtiyaçların Karşılanması Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS 22 ve AMOS 18 programlarında analiz edilmiştir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi-DFA ile ölçüt bağıntılı geçerliği ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği Pearson korelasyon testi ile belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlığı için Cronbach Alfa ve Bileşik Güvenirlik değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda uyum iyiliği değerlerinin uygun sınırlar içinde, iç tutarlık ve test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayılarının ise yüksek olduğu saptanmıştır. Ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik için yapılan analizde ölçekler arasında orta düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu bulunmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular, BEİDÖSÖ’nün 3 faktör ve 15 maddeden oluşan orijinal yapısını koruduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuçlar, ölçeğin beden eğitimi öğretmeninden algılanan ihtiyaç desteğini ölçmede kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İhtiyaç desteği
• öğretim stili
• uyarlama
• beden eğitimi
• spor

Adaptation of the Need Supportive Teaching Style Scale for Physical Education to Turkish

Öz

The aim of this study was to adapt the Need-Supportive Teaching Style Scale in Physical Education-NSTSSPE to Turkish language which was developed by Liu and Chung (2017) and to analyze validity and reliability of the scale. Descriptive information form, NSTSSPE, Basic Psychological Needs Scale were used to collect data. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS 22 and AMOS 18. The construct validity of the scale was determined by Confirmatory Factor Analysis-CFA, criterion validity and test-retest reliability were determined by Pearson correlation test. Cronbach Alpha and Composite Reliability values were calculated for the internal consistency of the scale. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that goodness-of-fit indices were within the appropriate limits, internal consistency and test-retest reliability coefficients were found to be high. Criterion validity analysis showed that there was a moderately significant relationship between the scales. Findings revealed that NSTSSPE maintains its original structure consisting of 3 factors and 15 items. The results showed that the scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to measure the middle school students’ perception of teaching style of their physical education teacher.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• need support
• teaching style
• adaptation
• physical education
• sport

Kaynakça

1. Acar, Z. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin beden eğitimi ve ders dışı etkinliklere katılım motivasyonlarının incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
2. Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J. & Haerens, L. (2014). Fostering a need-supportive teaching style: Intervention effects on physical education teachers’ beliefs and teaching behaviors. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(6), 595-609.
3. Bailey, R., Cope, E. J. & Pearce, G. (2013). Why do children take part in, and remain involved in sport? A literature review and discussion of implications for sports coaches. International Journal of Coaching Science, 7(1), 56-75.
4. Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N. & Th⊘gersen-Ntoumani, C. (2009). A review of controlling motivational strategies from a self-determination theory perspective: Implications for sports coaches. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(2), 215-233.
5. Başol, G. (2016). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Pegem Atıf İndeksi.
6. Bayrakdar, A. (2010). Çocuklarda fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri ve beden kitle indeksinin değerlendirilmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Muğla.
7. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
8. Bursal, M. (2017). SPSS ile temel veri analizleri. Anı Yayıncılık.

9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Atıf İndeksi.
10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
11. Cañabate, D., Colomer, J., & Serra, T. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ reflective narratives on cooperative learning: confıgurations of need-supportive teaching in higher education. In INTED2018 Proceedings (pp. 4017-4021). IATED.
12. Chua, S. N., Wong, N. & Koestner, R. (2014). Autonomy and controlling support are two sides of the same coin. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 48-52.
13. Cihangir-Çankaya, Z. (2005). Öz belirleme modeli: Özerklik desteği, ihtiyaç doyumu ve iyi olma. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
14. Curran, T. & Standage, M. (2017). Psychological needs and the quality of student engagement in physical education: Teachers as key facilitators. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(3), 262-276.
15. Davis, L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5, 104–107.
16. De Meyer, J., Tallir, I. B., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., Van den Berghe, L., Speleers, L. & Haerens, L. (2014).
17. Does observed controlling teaching behavior relate to students’ motivation in physical education?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 541.
18. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(1), 14–23.
19. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Optimizing students’ motivation in the era of testing and pressure: A self-determination theory perspective. Liu, W. C., Wang, J. C. K., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). In Building autonomous learners (pp. 9-29). Springer.
20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Self-determination and intrinsic motivation in human behavior. Springer.
21. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of human motivation (p. 85–107). Oxford University Press.
22. Doğan, N. (2019). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
23. Dost-Gözkan, A. (2016). Ergenlerin-ebeveynleri ile bilgi paylaşma davranışı: Bireye ve aileye ilişkin belirleyici faktörler ve olumlu gelişim. Tübitak proje #115K324, yayınlanmamış pilot çalışma.
24. Elliot, A. J., Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application. Guilford Publications.
25. Erkuş, A. (2019). Davranış bilimleri için bilimsel araştırma süreci. Ankara: Seçkin.
26. Esen, G. (2010). İlköğretim okulları 2. kademe öğrencilerinin beden eğitimi dersine ve ders dışı spor etkinliklerine yönelik tutumlarında beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin rolü. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
27. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
28. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162.
29. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
30. Gorsuch, R. L. (2015). Factor Analysis: Classic Edition. Routledge.
31. Güneş, A. (2004). Okullarda beden eğitimi ve oyun öğretimi. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
32. Gürbüz, S. (2019). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
33. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Felsefe-yöntem-analiz. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
34. Haerens, L., Vansteenkiste, M., De Meester, A., Delrue, J., Tallir, I., Vande Broek, G., Goris, W. & Aelterman, N. (2018). Different combinations of perceived autonomy support and control: Identifying the most optimal motivating style. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(1), 16-36.
35. Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2007). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Human Kinetics.
36. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Anderson, R. E., & Babin, B. J. (2018). Multivariate data analysis. Cengage Learning EMEA. Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
37. Hastie, P. A., Rudisill, M. E., & Wadsworth, D. D. (2013). Providing students with voice and choice: lessons from intervention research on autonomy-supportive climates in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 38-56.
38. Jang, H., Reeve, J. ve Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of educational psychology, 102(3), 588 – 600.
39. Kandemirci, D. (2018). Sınıf öğretmenlerine yönelik özerklik desteği eğitim programının etkililiğinin incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir.
40. La Guardia, J. G., Couchman, C. E. & Deci, E. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 367-384.
41. Leenknecht, M. J., Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M. & Rikers, R. M. (2017). Need-supportive teaching in higher education: Configurations of autonomy support, structure, and involvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 134-142.
42. Li, C., Kee, Y. H., Kong, L. C., Zou, L., Ng, K. L., & Li, H. (2019). Autonomy-supportive teaching and basic psychological need satisfaction among school students: The role of mindfulness. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(14), 2599.
43. Liu, J. D. & Chung, P. K. (2014). Development and initial validation of the psychological needs satisfaction scale in physical education. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 18(2), 101-122.
44. Liu, J. D. & Chung, P. K. (2017). Factor structure and measurement ınvariance of the Need-Supportive Teaching Style Scale for Physical Education. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 124(4), 864-879.
45. Liu, J., Bartholomew, K., & Chung, P. K. (2017). Perceptions of teachers’ interpersonal styles and well-being and ill-being in secondary school physical education students: The role of need satisfaction and need frustration. School Mental Health, 9(4), 360-371.
46. Liu, W. C., Wang, J. C. K. & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Understanding motivation in education: theoretical and practical considerations. Liu, W. C., Wang, J. C. K., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). In Building autonomous learners (pp. 1-7). Springer, Singapore.
47. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing research.
48. Memduhoğlu, H. B., Yılmaz, K. (2019). Eğitime giriş. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
49. Mercier, K., Donovan, C., Gibbone, A., & Rozga, K. (2017). Three-year study of students’ attitudes toward physical education: grades 4–8. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 88(3), 307-315.
50. Meydan, C. H. ve Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
51. Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2014). Is relatedness enough? On the importance of need support in different types of social experiences. Weinstein N. (Eds.). In Human motivation and interpersonal relationships (pp. 77-96). Springer, Dordrecht.
52. Orhan, R. ve Yoncalık, O. (2016). Türkiye’deki ortaokul öğrencilerinin beden eğitimi ve spor alışkanlıkları. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 353-376.
53. Otundo, J. O., & Garn, A. C. (2019). Student interest and engagement in middle school physical education: Examining the role of needs supportive teaching. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(2), 137-161.
54. Peterson, R. A. & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 194- 198.
55. Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497.
56. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467.
57. Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L. & Wylie C. (Eds). In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer.
58. Reeve, J. & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of educational psychology, 98(1), 209 –218.
59. Rocchi, M., Pelletier, L., Cheung, S., Baxter, D., & Beaudry, S. (2017). Assessing need-supportive and need-thwarting interpersonal behaviours: The Interpersonal Behaviours Questionnaire (IBQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 423-433.
60. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
61. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2007). Active human nature: Self-determination theory and the promotion and maintenance of sport, exercise, and health. Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (Eds.). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport (pp. 1-19). Human Kinetics.
62. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
63. Seçer, İ. (2015a). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Anı yayıncılık.
64. Seçer, İ. (2015b). SPSS ve LİSRELL ile pratik veri analizi: Analiz ve raporlaştırma. Anı Yayıncılık.
65. Seifert, K., & Sutton, R. (2009). Educational psychology. Switzerland: The Global Text Project.
66. Skinner, E. A. & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4), 571–581.
67. Stroet, K., Opdenakker, M. C. & Minnaert, A. (2015). Need supportive teaching in practice: a narrative analysis in schools with contrasting educational approaches. Social Psychology of Education, 18(3), 585-613.
68. Stroet, K., Opdenakker, M. C., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents’ motivation and engagement: A review of the literature. Educational research review, 9, 65-87.
69. Subramaniam, P. R. ve Silverman, S. (2007). Middle school students’ attitudes toward physical education. Teaching and teacher education, 23(5), 602-611.
70. Tekinalp, B. E. ve Terzi, Ş. I. (2015). Eğitimde pozitif psikoloji uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
71. Van den Berghe, L., Cardon, G., Tallir, I., Kirk, D., & Haerens, L. (2016). Dynamics of need-supportive and need-thwarting teaching behavior: The bidirectional relationship with student engagement and disengagement in the beginning of a lesson. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(6), 653-670.
72. van Dongen, B., Finn, T., Hansen, V., Wagemakers, A., Lubans, D., & Dally, K. (2018). The ATLAS school-based health promotion programme: Does a need-supportive learning context help to motivate adolescent boys?. European Physical Education Review, 24(3), 330-348.
73. Weinstein, N., & DeHaan, C. R. (2014). On the mutuality of human motivation and relationships. Weinstein N. (Eds.). In Human Motivation and Interpersonal Relationships (pp. 3-25). Springer.
74. Yang, Y. & Green, S. B. (2011). Coefficient alpha: A reliability coefficient for the 21st century?. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 377-392.
75. Yaratan, H. (2017). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Temel İstatistik SPSS Uygulamalı. Anı Yayıncılık.
76. Yıldırım, E. (2017). İstatistiksel Araştırma Yöntemleri Su Tüketim Bilinci Üzerine Bir Kamuoyu Araştırması. Ankara, Seçkin Yayınevi.
77. Zencirkıran, M. (2017). Davranış bilimleri. Dora.