Banka Dijitalleşmesi ile Performans Arasındaki Kısa ve Uzun Dönemli Etkiler: Panel Fourier Nedensellik ve CS-ARDL Bulguları

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren 20 mevduat bankasında dijitalleşme ile banka kârlılığı, istikrarı ve riskliliği arasındaki nedenselliği ve bu nedenselliğin yönünü araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla çalışmada 2010-2024 dönemine ait yıllık veriler kullanılarak panel Fourier Granger nedensellik ve panel Fourier Toda–Yamamoto nedensellik testleri uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca yatay kesit genişletilmiş ve yaygın şokları dikkate alan CS–ARDL (Cross-Sectionally Augmented AutoRegressive Distributed Lag) modeli ile de kısa ve uzun dönem katsayıları tahmin edilmiştir. Nedensellik testi sonuçlarına göre, Türkiye’deki aktif internet bankacılığı müşteri sayısından bankaların aktif kârlılığı ile net faiz marjı değişkenlerine ve maddi olmayan duran varlıkların kendi içindeki değişiminden bankaların aktif kalitesine doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik tespit edilmiştir. CS-ARDL sonuçlarına göre ise dijital dönüşüm bankaların performanslarını kısa dönemde pozitif yönde etkilerken, uzun dönemde anlamlı bir etkinin olmadığı görülmüştür. Tüm bu bulgular, dijitalleşme göstergelerinin etkilerinin kullanılan göstergeye ve döneme göre farklılaştığını ve etkilerin ağırlıklı olarak kısa dönemde ortaya çıktığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijitalleşme
• Kârlılık
• İstikrar
• Risk
• Panel Fourier Causality
• CS-ARDL Tahmincisi

Short-Term and Long-Term Effects Between Bank Digitalization and Performance: Panel Fourier Causality and CS-ARDL Findings

Öz

This study aims to investigate the causality and direction of this causality between digitalization and bank profitability, stability, and riskiness across 20 deposit banks operating in Türkiye. For this purpose, panel Fourier Granger causality and panel Fourier Toda–Yamamoto causality tests were conducted using annual data for period 2010–2024. Furthermore, short- and long-term coefficients were estimated using CS–ARDL (Cross-Sectionally Augmented AutoRegressive Distributed Lag) estimator, which incorporates an expanded cross-section and common shocks. The analysis findings reveal that digitalization has positive effects on bank profitability, stability, and riskiness. According to the causality test results, unidirectional causality was identified, running from the number of active internet banking customers in Türkiye to banks' asset profitability and net interest margin variables, and from changes in intangible assets to banks' asset quality. For all other variables, a bidirectional causal relationship was found. According to the CS-ARDL results, digital transformation positively impacted bank performance in the short term, but had no significant long-term impact.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digitalization
• Profitability
• Stability
• Risk
• Panel Fourier Causality
• CS-ARDL Estimator

Kaynakça

1. Arora, H., & Arora, P. (2013). Effect of investments in information technology on bank performance: empirical evidence from Indian public sector banks. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 13 (4), 400-417.
2. Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurumu (BDDK) (2021). Dijital bankalar ve servis modeli bankacılığına ilişkin yönetmelik. 29 Aralık 2021 tarihli ve 31704. sayılı Resmî Gazete.
3. Barjaktarović, L., & Stefanović, N. (2019). What is the effect of intangible assets on earnings of the Serbian banking sector?. Industrija, 47(1), 61-75.
4. Beccalli, E. (2007). Does IT investment improve bank performance? evidence from Europe. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(7), 2205-2230.
5. Beybur, M. (2022). Şubesiz dijital bankacılık ve Türk bankacılık sektörü için öneriler. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1), 286-303.
6. Beyoğlu, A. (2025). Türk bankacılık sektöründe dijital bankacılık verimlilik analizi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(2), 232-248.
7. Cao, X., Han, B.- Huang, Y., & Xie, X. (2022). Digital transformation and risk differentiation in the banking industry: evidence from Chinese commercial banks. Asian Economic Papers, 21 (3), 1-21.
8. Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393- 420

9. Cihangir, Ç. K., Yenice, S., & Uğurlu, E. (2024). Finansal dijitalleşme ve sahiplik yapısına göre banka finansal performansına ve risk düzeyine etkileri: Türk bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 27(2), 726-745.
10. Çalış, N., Yıldırım, H., & Sakarya, Ş. (2025). Dijital bankacılık uygulamalarının bankaların karlılığına etkisi: bankacılık sektörü üzerine bir uygulama. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(1), 215-225.
11. Dadoukis, A., Fiaschetti, M., & Fusi, G. (2021). IT adoption and bank performance during the Covid-19 pandemic. Economics Letters, 204, 109904.
12. Daeli, E. C., & Wedari, L. K. (2025). Exploring the digital transformation impacts on bank profitability in Indonesia: a textual and sentiment analysis approach. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(1), 271-281.
13. Demir, Y., & Görür, Ç. (2020). OECD ülkelerine ait çeşitli enerji tüketimleri ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkinin panel eşbütünleşme analizi ile incelenmesi. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 32, 15– 33.
14. Demirel, S. (2021). Covid-19 pandemisinin kredi ve mevduata etkisi 2019-2020. Bankacılık ve Sermaye Piyasası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(12), 22-37.
15. Deniz, F. (2023). Dijital bankacılık hizmetlerinin banka performansına etkisi. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 58 (3), 2654-2669.
16. Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
17. Egorov, A. (2023). Impact of intangible assets on bank performance in emerging capital markets: evidence from Russia. Journal of Corporate Finance Research, ISSN: 2073-0438, 17(1), 44-53.
18. Emirmahmutoglu, F., & Kose, N. (2011). Testing for granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panels. Economic Modelling, 28, 870–876.
19. Enders, W. & Jones, P. (2016). Grain prices, oil prices, and multiple smooth breaks in a VAR. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 20(4),399-419.
20. Ergün, T. (2023). Dijitalleşme ile bankacılık kȃrlılığı arasındaki etkileşim: ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (34), 206-227.
21. Gartner, (2022). Gartner forecasts worldwide IT spending to grow 5.1% in 2023”, https:// www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2022-10-19-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-itspending-to-grow-5-percent-in-2023 (Erişim Tarihi: 15.09.2025).
22. Güven, P. (2022). Banka etkinliği ve inovasyon ilişkisine yönelik bir panel veri analizi. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives, 10(1), 1-11.
23. Ho, S.J., & Mallick, S.K. (2010). The impact of information technology on the banking industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 6, 211-221.
24. Kasman, A. (2012). Cost efficiency, scale economies, and technological progress in Turkish banking. Central Bank Review, 2 (1), 1-20.
25. Jia, K., & Liu, X. (2024). Bank digital transformation, bank competitiveness and systemic risk. Frontiers in Physics, 11, 1297912.
26. Kriebel, J., & Debener, J. (2020). Academy of management annual meeting proceedings. New York, NY, USA, Academy of Management.
27. Kolodiziev, O., Krupka, M., Shulga, N., Kulchytskyy, M., & Lozynska, O. (2021). The level of digital transformation affecting the competitiveness of banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 16 (1), 81-91.
28. Kwan, A., Lin, C., Pursiainen, V., & Tai, M. (2024). Stress testing banks’ digital capabilities: evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 59(6), 2618-2646.
29. Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of financial economics, 93(2), 259-275.
30. Melnyk, V. (2024). Transforming the nature of trust between banks and young clients: from traditional to digital banking. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 16(4), 618-635.
31. Nguyen, Q. T., Ho, L. T. H., & Nguyen, D. T. (2023). Digitalization and bank profitability: evidence from an emerging country. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 41(7), 1847-1871.
32. Nguyen, N. B., & Nguyen, H. D. (2024). Impacts of digital transformation and Basel III implementation on the credit risk level of Vietnamese commercial banks. International Journal of Financial Studies, 12(3), 91.
33. Nwachukwu, C., Chima, O., & Okolo, M. (2025). Digital transformation in banking: impact of technological innovation and an integrated framework for customer relationship success. Gulf Journal of Advance Business Research, 3(9), 1245–1283.
34. Ortaköy, S., & Özsürünç, Z. (2019). The effect of digital channel migration, automation and centralization on the efficiency of operational staff of bank branches. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 938-946.
35. Oikonomou, M., Pierri, N., & Timmer, Y. (2023). IT shields: technology adoption and economic resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic. Labour Economics, 81, 102330.
36. Ojeka, S.A., & Ikpefan, O. A. (2011). Electronic commerce, automation and online banking in Nigeria: challenges and benefits. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies (Formerly known as Iranian Journal “of Management Studies), 4(2), 29-52.
37. Öner, M. H., & Lökçe, A. (2024). Yapay zekâ tabanlı dijitalleşmenin bankaların kârlılığı üzerindeki etkisi: Türk bankacılık sektöründen örnekler. Uluslararası Finansal Ekonomi ve Bankacılık Uygulamaları Dergisi, 5(2), 211-234.
38. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper No. 1229.
39. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.
40. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105–127.
41. Porter, M., & Millar, V. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63 (4), 149-160.
42. Pham, T. P., Popesko, B., Quddus, A., & Nguyen, N. T. K. (2021). Innovation and bank efficiency in vietnam and pakistan. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 29(2), 1184.
43. Rachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, C., Vorraber, W., & Schirgi, E. (2019). Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1143-1160.
44. Rozhkova, D., & Rozhkova, N. - Tozhihonov, S. (2020). International conference on comprehensible science. Springer.
45. Sezal, L., Yalçın, Ç. K., & Yenice, S. (2024). Does digitalisation have an impact on profitability? evidence from the Turkish banking sector. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(4), 2754-2765.
46. Sheth, J.N., Jain, V., Roy, G., & Chakraborty, A. (2022). AI-driven banking services: the next frontier for a personalised experience in the emerging market. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40 (6), 1248-1271.
47. TBB. (2025). Dijital, internet ve mobil bankacılık istatistikleri – Mart 2025. İstanbul: Türkiye Bankalar Birliği Yayınları.
48. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250.
49. Turovets, Y. (2021). Intangible assets and the efficiency of manufacturing firms in the age of digitalisation: the Russian case. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 13(1), 7-26.
50. Ulusoy, A., & Demirel, S. (2022). Türk bankacılık sisteminde dijitalleşme-kârlılık etkileşimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(1), 184-200.
51. Verhoef, P.C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J.Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901.
52. Wijayanti, R.P., Al Azizah, U.S., Daulay, Y., & Nugroho, A.W. (2021). The effect of digital banking innovation on the performance of conventional commercial banks in Indonesia. International Journal Economic and Business Applied, 2 (2), 1-14.
53. Yanık, R., Dilmaç, M., & Sumer, S. (2018). Banka kârlılığı ve maddi olmayan duran varlıklar arasındaki ilişki: BİST’te işlem gören bankalar üzerine bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(4), 2531-2540.
54. Yilanci, V., & Gorus, M. S. (2020). Does economic globalization have predictive power for ecological footprint in MENA counties? A panel causality test with a Fourier function. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(32), 40552-40562.
55. Yilanci, V., & Kilci, E. N. (2021). The feldstein-horioka puzzle for the next eleven countries: a panel data analysis with fourier functions. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(3), 341-364.
56. Yu, Z., & Liu, J. (2025). The digital revolution in banking: unpacking risk management in the age of transformation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 104444.
57. Zhao, Q., Tsai, P.-H., & Wang, J. L. (2019). Improving financial service innovation strategies for enhancing china’s banking industry competitive advantage during the fintech revolution: a hybrid MCDM model. Sustainability, 11 (5), 1419.
58. Zhao, J., Li, X., Yu, C. H., Chen, S., & Lee, C. C. (2022). Riding the fintech innovation wawe: fintech, patents bank performance. Journal of International Money and Finance, 122, 102552.
59. Zhai, H., Yang, M., & Chan, K.C. (2022). Does digital transformation enhance a firm’s performance? evidence from China. Technology in Society, 68, 101841.