-

Öz

This paper deals with the validity of Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis for 18 OECD countries in the 1960-2008 period. Due to the fact that for these countries the relationship between environmental pollution and economic growth is seen as a result of Breitung Panel unit root test and panel cointegration tests, it is concluded that the given hypothesis is valid in the long term. This relationship of short and long-term is estimated with by means of panel error correction model

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Environmental Pollution, Economic Growth, Panel Unit Root

ÇEVRE KİRLİLİĞİ İLE GELİR ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ: PANEL EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME ANALİZİ VE HATA DÜZELTME MODELİ

Öz

Bu çalışmada, 1960–2008 döneminde 18 OECD ülkesi için Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi (EKC) hipotezinin geçerliliği sınanmıştır. Breitung Panel birim kök testi ve ardından yapılan panel eşbütünleşme testleri neticesinde 18 OECD ülkesi için çevre kirliliği ile ekonomik büyüme arasında ilişki oluğu görüldüğünden uzun dönemde söz konusu hipotezin geçerli olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Kısa ve uzun dönemli bu ilişki, panel hata düzeltme modeli yardımıyla tahmin edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevre Kirliliği, Ekonomik Büyüme, Panel Birim Kök, Panel Eşbütünleşme, Panel Hata Düzeltme Modeli

Kaynakça

1. ARELLANO, M. ve Bover, O., ”Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models”, Journal Of Econometrics, 1995, 68 , pp. 29-52.
2. BALTAGI, B. H. (2005), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Third Edition, Chichester: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.
3. BREITUNG, J., “The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. In: B. Baltagi (Ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels”, Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15, JAI: Amsterdam, 2000, pp. 161–178.
4. BRUVOLL, A. ve Medin H., “Factoring the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Norway”, Discussion Papers, No. 275., 2000, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
5. COLE, M.A., Rayner A.J. ve Bates J.M., ”The Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Empirical Analysis”, Environment and Development Economics, 1997, 2 (04), 401–416.
6. DASGUPTA, S., Laplante B., Wang H. ve Wheeler, D., “Confronting the Enviromental Kuznets Curve”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, Vol. 16, No. 1. Pp. 147-168.
7. DIJKGRAAF, E. ve Vollebergh, H.R.J., “Growth and/or (?) Environment: Is There A Kuznets Curve for Carbon Emissions?”, 2nd Biennial Meeting of The European Society of Ecological Economics, 1998, 4-7 March, Geneva.
8. GROSSMAN, G.M. ve Krueger A., “Environmental Impacts of A North American Free Trade Agreement”, Nber Research Working Paper, 1991, No. 3194, Cambridge.

9. GROSSMAN, G.M. ve Krueger A., “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(2), 353–377.
10. GUJARATI, D. (2004), Basic Econometrics (4.Edition), New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
11. HALKOS, G.E., “Environmental Kuznets Curve For Sulfur: Evidence Using GMM Estimation and Random Coefficient Panel Data Models”, Environment and Development Economics, 2003, Vol:8, pp. 581–601.
12. HOLTZ, E. D. ve Selden M.T., “Stoking The Fires? CO2 Emissions And Economic Growth”, NBER Working Paper, 1992, #4248.
13. KAO, C., “Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data”, Journal of Econometrics, 1999, 90, pp. 1-44.
14. KUZNETS, S., “Economic Growth and Income Inequality”, American Economic Review, 1955, 45, pp 1-28.
15. PEDRONI, P., “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Repressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1999, Special Issue, 653-670.
16. PEDRONI, P., “Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis”, Econometric Theory, 20, 2004, 597–625.
17. PERMAN, R. ve Stern D. I., “Evidence From Panel Unit Root and Cointegration Tests That the Environmental Kuznets Curve Does Not Exist”, The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2003, 47:3, 325–347.
18. PESERAN, M.H. ve Smith R. P., “Estimating Long-Run Relationships from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 1995, 68, pp. 79-113.
19. PESERAN, M.H., Shin Y. ve Smith R. P., “Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1999, 94, pp. 621-634.
20. TORRAS, B. ve Boyce J.K., “Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve”, Ecological Economics, 1998, 25, pp. 147- 162.
21. SELDEN, T.M. ve Song D., “Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions?”, Journal Of Environmental Economics And Management, 1994, 27, pp. 147-162.
22. STERN, D. I. ve Common M. S., “Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Environmental Management, 2001, 41, pp. 162-178.
23. SONG, T., Zheng T. ve Tong L., “An Empirical Test of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in China: A Panel Cointegration Approach”, China Economic Review, 2008, 19, 381–392.
24. YERDELEN TATOĞLU, F. (2012), İleri Panel Veri Analizi (1.Baskı), İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş.
25. ZEREN, F. ve Arı A., “CO2 Emisyonu ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Panel Veri Analizi“, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 2011, Cilt:18 Sayı:2.
26. ZARZOSO, I.M. ve Morancho A.B., “Pooled Mean Group Estimation of an Environmental Kuznets Curve For CO2”, Department of Economics, 2004, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castello´N, Spain.