Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Readability Analysis of Information on the Internet about Clear Aligner Treatment

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 7 - 11, 29.04.2022

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Yeap C, Slack‐ Smith L. Internet information on child oral health and the first dental visit. Aust Dental J. 2013;58:278-82
  • 2. Cheng C, Dunn M. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information. Aust NZ J Publ Heal. 2015;39:309-14
  • 3. Çoban A. Okunabilirlik Kavramına Yönelik Bir Derleme Çalışması. Deed. 2014;1:96-111
  • 4. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32:221-33
  • 5. Ateşman E. Measuring readability in Turkish. AU Tömer Language Journal. 1997;58:171-4
  • 6. Edmunds MR, Denniston AK, Boelaert K, Franklyn JA, Durrani OM. Patient information in Graves' disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: readability assessment of online resources. Thyroid. 2014;24:67-72
  • 7. Svider PF, Agarwal N, Choudhry OJ, Hajart AF, Baredes S, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology–head and neck surgery departments. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34:31-5
  • 8. White DW, Julien KC, Jacob H, Campbell PM, Buschang PH. Discomfort associated with Invisalign and traditional brackets: a randomized, prospective trial. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:801-8
  • 9. Lu H, Tang H, Zhou T, Kang N. Assessment of the periodontal health status in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and Invisalign system: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97:e0248
  • 10. Kumar K, Bhardwaj S, Garg V. Invisalign: A transparent braces. JAMDSR. 2018;6:148-50
  • 11. Ke Y, Zhu Y, Zhu M. A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:24
  • 12. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8:e27
  • 13. Basch CH, Maclean SA, Romero R, Ethan D. Health information seeking behaviour among college students. J Community Health. 2018;43:1094–9
  • 14. Erişim tarihi: 09-03-2022, https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/all/turkey/#monthly-202101-202201
  • 15. Leira Y, Castelo-Baz P, Pérez-Sayáns M, Blanco J, Lorenzo-Pouso AI. Available patientcentered Internet information on peri-implantitis. Can our patients understand it? Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:1569-74
  • 16. McMorrow SM, Millett DT. Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information. J Orthod. 2016;43:186-92
  • 17. Patel U, Cobourne MT. Orthodontic extractions and the Internet: quality of online information available to the public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:e103-9
  • 18. Weiss BD. Health literacy: A manual for clinicians. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association Foundation and American Medical Association; 2003
  • 19. Weiss BD, Coyne C. Communicating with patients who cannot read. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:272–4
  • 20. Cotugna N, Vickery CE, Carpenter-Haefele KM. Evaluation of literacy level of patient education pages in health-related journals. J Community Health. 2005;30:213–9
  • 21. Doak LG, Doak CC, Meade CD. Strategies to improve cancer education materials. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:1305–12 22. Meade MJ, Dreyer CW. Orthodontic treatment consent forms: A readability analysis. J Orthod. 2022;49:32-8
  • 23. Meade MJ, Dreyer CW. Orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a qualitative evaluation of Internet information available to the general public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158:612-20
  • 24. Meade MJ, Dreyer CW. Web‐based information on orthodontic clear aligners: a qualitative and readability assessment. Aust Dent J. 2020;65:225-32
  • 25. Meade MJ, Dreyer CW. An assessment of the treatment information contained within the websites of direct‐to‐consumer orthodontic aligner providers. Aust Dent J. 2021;66:77-84
  • 26. Alpaydın MT, Buyuk SK, Canigur Bavbek N. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment—an assessment of content, quality, and readability. J Orofac Orthop. 2021;16:1-12

İnternet Ortamındaki Şeffaf Plak Tedavisi ile İlgili Bilgilerin Okunabilirlik Analizi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 7 - 11, 29.04.2022

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı internet ortamındaki şeffaf plak tedavisi ile ilgili bilgilerin okunabilirlik analizini yapmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler : ‘Şeffaf plak’ terimi kullanılarak şeffaf plak ile ilgili metinlere ulaşmak amacıyla internet araması yapıldı. Arama motoru olarak Google kullanıldı ve ilk 50 web sitesi kaydedildi. Hasta bilgilendirme ve eğitimi ile ilgili Türkçe metinler dahil edildi. Metin kaynakları diş hekimi, ortodontist, özel sağlık kuruluşu, üniversite hastanesi ve gazete olacak şekilde kaydedildi. Her bir metin için Ateşman okunabilirlik indeksine göre ve online okunabilirlik aracı vasıtasıyla okunabilirlik analizi yapıldı. İstatistiksel değerlendirmede Kolmogorov–Smirnov testi ve betimleyici istatistikler kullanıldı. p<0,05 istatistiksel olarak anlamlı kabul edildi.
Bulgular: 50 web sitesinin 46’sı dahil edilme kriterlerini karşıladı. Bunlar metin kaynağına göre en çok özel sağlık kuruluşları (%63) tarafından oluşmaktaydı ve bunu ortodontistler (%15,2), diş hekimleri (%10,9), gazeteler (%6,5) ve üniversite hastaneleri (%4,3) izledi. Ortalama Ateşman okunabilirlik indeksi 59,32±8,59’du. Değerlendirilen metinlerin %89,1’i orta düzeyde okuma zorluğundaydı.
Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın limitasyonları dahilinde, internet ortamında şeffaf plaklarla ilgili metinlerin okunabilirliğinin orta zorlukta olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Yazılı hasta bilgilendirme ve eğitim metinleri yayınlanmadan önce daha kolay okunabilmesi için okunabilirlik araçlarından faydalanılabilir.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Yeap C, Slack‐ Smith L. Internet information on child oral health and the first dental visit. Aust Dental J. 2013;58:278-82
  • 2. Cheng C, Dunn M. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information. Aust NZ J Publ Heal. 2015;39:309-14
  • 3. Çoban A. Okunabilirlik Kavramına Yönelik Bir Derleme Çalışması. Deed. 2014;1:96-111
  • 4. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32:221-33
  • 5. Ateşman E. Measuring readability in Turkish. AU Tömer Language Journal. 1997;58:171-4
  • 6. Edmunds MR, Denniston AK, Boelaert K, Franklyn JA, Durrani OM. Patient information in Graves' disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: readability assessment of online resources. Thyroid. 2014;24:67-72
  • 7. Svider PF, Agarwal N, Choudhry OJ, Hajart AF, Baredes S, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology–head and neck surgery departments. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34:31-5
  • 8. White DW, Julien KC, Jacob H, Campbell PM, Buschang PH. Discomfort associated with Invisalign and traditional brackets: a randomized, prospective trial. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:801-8
  • 9. Lu H, Tang H, Zhou T, Kang N. Assessment of the periodontal health status in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and Invisalign system: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97:e0248
  • 10. Kumar K, Bhardwaj S, Garg V. Invisalign: A transparent braces. JAMDSR. 2018;6:148-50
  • 11. Ke Y, Zhu Y, Zhu M. A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:24
  • 12. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8:e27
  • 13. Basch CH, Maclean SA, Romero R, Ethan D. Health information seeking behaviour among college students. J Community Health. 2018;43:1094–9
  • 14. Erişim tarihi: 09-03-2022, https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/all/turkey/#monthly-202101-202201
  • 15. Leira Y, Castelo-Baz P, Pérez-Sayáns M, Blanco J, Lorenzo-Pouso AI. Available patientcentered Internet information on peri-implantitis. Can our patients understand it? Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:1569-74
  • 16. McMorrow SM, Millett DT. Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information. J Orthod. 2016;43:186-92
  • 17. Patel U, Cobourne MT. Orthodontic extractions and the Internet: quality of online information available to the public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:e103-9
  • 18. Weiss BD. Health literacy: A manual for clinicians. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association Foundation and American Medical Association; 2003
  • 19. Weiss BD, Coyne C. Communicating with patients who cannot read. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:272–4
  • 20. Cotugna N, Vickery CE, Carpenter-Haefele KM. Evaluation of literacy level of patient education pages in health-related journals. J Community Health. 2005;30:213–9
  • 21. Doak LG, Doak CC, Meade CD. Strategies to improve cancer education materials. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:1305–12 22. Meade MJ, Dreyer CW. Orthodontic treatment consent forms: A readability analysis. J Orthod. 2022;49:32-8
  • 23. Meade MJ, Dreyer CW. Orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a qualitative evaluation of Internet information available to the general public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158:612-20
  • 24. Meade MJ, Dreyer CW. Web‐based information on orthodontic clear aligners: a qualitative and readability assessment. Aust Dent J. 2020;65:225-32
  • 25. Meade MJ, Dreyer CW. An assessment of the treatment information contained within the websites of direct‐to‐consumer orthodontic aligner providers. Aust Dent J. 2021;66:77-84
  • 26. Alpaydın MT, Buyuk SK, Canigur Bavbek N. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment—an assessment of content, quality, and readability. J Orofac Orthop. 2021;16:1-12
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Diş Hekimliği
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ
Yazarlar

Ayşe Selenge Akbulut 0000-0003-3254-9535

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Nisan 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Mart 2022
Kabul Tarihi 18 Nisan 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Akbulut AS. İnternet Ortamındaki Şeffaf Plak Tedavisi ile İlgili Bilgilerin Okunabilirlik Analizi. NEU Dent J. 2022;4(1):7-11.