Sistematik Derlemeler ve Meta Analiz
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Çoklu Zekâ Kuramının İngilizce Dil Becerileri Öğretimindeki Uygulamalarına Yönelik Yapılan Çalışmaların İncelenmesi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 189 - 216, 30.06.2024

Öz

Bu çalışma, Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı’nın İngilizce dil becerilerinin öğretiminde uygulanmasına ilişkin tezlerin incelenmesine odaklanan bir doküman analizi çalışmasıdır. Çalışmanın amacı, 2000-2023 yılları arasındaki yüksek lisans ve doktora tezlerini incelemektir. Bir başka amaç ise incelenen çalışmaları tek bir kaynakta toplayarak araştırmacılara gelecekteki çalışmaları için kolay ulaşabilecekleri bir kaynak sağlamaktır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi veri tabanında erişime açık olan yüksek lisans ve doktora tezleri oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmacılar tarafından on yedi tez çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Bu çalışmada doküman analizinin kullanıldığı nitel bir araştırma deseni kullanılmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacılar incelenecek olan tezleri sınıflandırmak için bir tez inceleme formu oluşturmuşlardır. Tezler türleri, yazım dilleri, yayın yılları, hazırlandığı üniversiteler, çalışma grupları, araştırma yöntemleri, veri toplama araçları, araştırma amaçları ve sonuçlarına göre incelenmiştir. Tezlerin incelenmesi sırasında araştırma sorularına cevap bulmak için betimsel ve içerik analizi yöntemlerinden yararlanılmıştır.
Araştırmanın sonunda, yüksek lisans tezlerinin sayısının doktora tezlerinin sayısından daha fazla olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Tezlerin çoğunun İngilizce yazıldığı ve çoğunlukla 2004 yılında yayınlandığı görülmüştür. Tezlerin çoğunlukla Selçuk Üniversitesi’nde hazırlandığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. İncelenen tezlerde çalışma grubu olarak çoğunlukla üniversite öğrencileri tercih edilmiş ve en çok nicel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. En çok tercih edilen veri toplama araçlarının “Kelime Testi”, “Çoklu Zekâ Envanteri” ve “Yazma Testi” olduğu görülmüştür. Çoklu zekâ temelli İngilizce derslerinin öğrencilerin dil becerilerini daha çok geliştirdiği, bilginin kalıcılığını sağladığı, bunun da uygulama sırasında başarı getirdiği ve öğrencilere öğrenme süreçlerinde daha iyi bir performans sergileme fırsatı verdiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca çoklu zekâ temelli öğretimin öğrencilerin İngilizce dersine karşı olumlu bir tutum geliştirmelerine yardımcı olduğu ve bunun öğrencilerin öğretim esnasında motive olmalarını sağladığı görülmüştür. Çoklu zekâ temelli öğretimin geleneksel öğretim yöntemlerinden daha etkili olduğu da ulaşılan bir başka önemli sonuçtur. Çalışmanın sonunda önerilere yer verilerek ilerleyen çalışmalara yol göstermek amaçlanmıştır.

Proje Numarası

ÖGR-2023-04

Kaynakça

  • Abdulkader, F.A., Gundogdu, K., & Eissa, M.A. (2009). The effectiveness of a multiple intelligences-based program on improving certain reading skills in 5th-year primary learning disabled students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(2), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v7i18.1340
  • Alavinia, P. & Farhady, S. (2012). Teaching vocabulary through differentiated instruction: insights from multiple intelligences and learning styles. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 2(4), 73-90.
  • Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel araştırmalarda örnekleme yöntemleri ve örnek hacmi sorunsalı üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 231-274. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bitlissos/issue/38061/399955
  • Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel araştırma süreci: Nitel bir araştırma nasıl yapılır?. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 368-388. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.598299
  • Bas, G. & Beyhan, Ö. (2010). Effects of multiple intelligences supported Project-based learning on students’ achievement levels and attitudes towards English lesson. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3), 365-386. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/245
  • Baş, G. (2014). İngilizce dersinde çoklu zekâ yaklaşımı temelli öğretimin öğrenci görüşleri açısından değerlendirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 22(1), 177-201. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefdergi/issue/22603/241522
  • Bhat, P. (2012). Multiple intelligence (MI) approach in teaching writing skill. [Master’s Thesis, Tribhuvan University].
  • Canbay, S. (2006). İlköğretim birinci kademede çoklu zekâ kuramı uygulamalarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (Yalova örneği) [Master’s Thesis, Sakarya University]. https://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/handle/20.500.12812/444623
  • Chen, S.F. (2005). Cooperative learning, multiple intelligences, and proficiency: Application in college English language teaching and learning. [Doctor of Education Thesis, Australian Catholic University]. https://doi.org/10.4226/66/5a94b7b25e4cd
  • Demirel, Ö., Başbay, A., & Erdem, E. (2006). Eğitimde çoklu zeka: Kuram ve uygulama. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Doğan, C. (2019). Revisiting multiple intelligence theory to boost writing performance. The Literacy Trek, 5(2), 47-67. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/literacytrek/issue/50626/620398
  • Eng, L.L., & Mustapha, G. (2010). Enhancing writing ability through multiple-intelligence strategies. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 18(S), 53-63.
  • Faidah, R.T., Fauziati, E., & Suparno, S. (2019). Teachers beliefs on multiple intelligence based English teaching for young learners. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris, 8(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v8i1.2051
  • Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
  • Geimer, M., Getz, J., Pochert, T., & Pullam, K. (2000). Improving student achievement in language arts through implementation of multiple intelligences strategies. [Unpublished Master’s Action Research Project]. Saint Xavier University and SkyLight Field-Based Master’s Program.
  • Güçlü, M. (2019, 19 – 22 Haziran). Çoklu zeka kuramının yabancı dil derslerinde kullanımı üzerine genel bir değerlendirme. ERPA International Language Education Congress (ss.24-29). Sakarya, Türkiye.
  • Hassan, S.R.R. (2017). Using MI-based activities for developing EFL speaking Skills and self-efficacy of preparatory stage visually-impaired pupils. Al-Azhar Journal of Education, 36(3), 807-850. https://doi.org/10.21608/jsrep.2017.98748
  • Ibragimova, N. (2011). Multiple intelligences theory in action in EFL classes: A case study [Master’s Thesis, Eastern Mediterranean University]. http://hdl.handle.net/11129/183
  • Karataş, Z. (2017). Sosyal bilim araştırmalarında paradigma değişimi: Nitel yaklaşımın yükselişi. Türkiye Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 68-86. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tushad/issue/31792/350444
  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
  • Reidel, J., Tomaszewski, T., & Weaver, D. (2003). Improving student academic reading achievement through the use of multiple intelligence teaching strategies. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No: ED 479 204.
  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rihani, D. (2016). Integrating multiple intelligences in English language classrooms to enhance learners’ participation. [Master Thesis, University of Mohamed Kheider Biskra].
  • Saban, A. (2005). Çoklu zeka teorisi ve eğitim. Nobel Yayın.
  • Sak, R., Sak, Ş., Şahin, İ. T., Şendil, Ç. Ö., & Nas, E. (2021). Bir araştırma yöntemi olarak doküman analizi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 227-250. http://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.843306
  • Soleimani, H., Moinnzadeh, A., Kassaian, Z., & Ketabi, S. (2012). The effect of instruction based on multiple intelligences theory on the attitude and learning of general English. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p45
  • Uhlir, P. (2003). Improving student academic reading achievement through the use of multiple intelligence teaching strategies. An Action Research Project (Report No: CS 512 365), Saint Xavier University. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No: ED 479 914.
  • Akçin, S. (2009). The effects of using activities based on multiple intelligence theory on 11th grade students’ learning and retention of English vocabulary. [Master’s Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Aksoy, H. (2015). The impact of kinect-based gaming on L2 speaking skills and its implications on bodily kinesthetic intelligence, learner motivation and learner autonomy. [Master’s Thesis, Gazi University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Altunkaya, D. (2008). Learner achievement effect of the multiple intelligences theory based teaching in reading skills at the upper secondary education. [Master’s Thesis, Dicle University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Azap, S. (2012). The effect of cooperative learning activities based on multiple intelligences theory on vocabulary learning EFL classes. [Master’s Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Bozoğlan, B. (2004). An application of writing in ELT depending on multiple intelligences theory. [Master’s Thesis, Selçuk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Çoker, D. (2009). Teaching phrasal verbs to upper-intermediate students through multiple intelligence. [Master’s Thesis, Ankara University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Demirel, Z.T. (2019). The effects of multiple intelligence based activities on reading performance of EFL learners. [Master’s Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Doğan, C. (2004). Achieving progress in writing performance of Selçuk University Preparatory Classes depending on multiple intelligence theory. [Master’s Thesis, Selçuk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Elgün Gündüz, Z. (2017). Effects of multiple intelligences activities in a content-based context on grammar, vocabulary, writing and reading comprehension and attitudes of learners and teachers of English. [Doctoral Dissertation, Atatürk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • İzzetova, Z. (2013). Teaching vocabulary to very young learners with reference to multiple intelligence theory. [Master’s Thesis, Gazi University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Kartal, S. (2019). Teaching writing to 11th grade students through the multiple intelligences theory. [Master’s Thesis, Ufuk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Pekderin, S. (2006). The effectiveness of multiple intelligence activities on vocabulary learning in elementary school classes. [Master’s Thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Sarar, S. (2008). A comparative study of overcoming the difficulties of reading through multiple intelligence theory in English preparatory classes at school of foreign languages at Selçuk University. [Master’s Thesis, Selçuk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Servi, M. (2004). The relationship between learning and teaching vocabulary and multiple intelligences: A comparative study on vocabulary teaching regarding and disregarding multiple intelligences. [Master’s Thesis, Selçuk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Subaşı, S. (2014). A case study on a vocabulary development program based on multiple intelligence theory. [Master’s Thesis, Çağ University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Yavuz, B. (2010). The effects of multiple intelligences activities on vocabulary achievement and attitudes of learners of English. [Doctoral Dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Zaman, S. (2013). The effects of multiple intelligence theory on the improvement of grammar skills. [Master’s Thesis, Çağ University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.

An Investigation of Studies on the Applications of Multiple Intelligence Theory in Teaching English Language Skills

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 189 - 216, 30.06.2024

Öz

This research is a document analysis review that focuses on investigating the theses about the implementation of Multiple Intelligences Theory in teaching English language skills. Examining doctoral dissertations and master's theses written between 2000 and 2023 is the aim of this study. Collecting the examined studies in a single, easily accessible source is another goal of the study, which will aid the researchers in their future studies. Doctoral dissertations and master's theses accessible in the Council of Higher Education (CoHE) National Thesis Center database are included in the research's sample group. The researchers included seventeen theses in the study. For this research, a qualitative research design with document analysis is used. To categorize the theses, the researchers created a thesis examination form as a data collection tool. Theses are analyzed based on their thesis results, research objectives, data collection tools, research method, sample group, universities where they were prepared, publication year, languages, and types. During the study's examination, content and descriptive analysis methods were employed to address research questions.
At the end of the research, it has been revealed that the number of doctoral dissertations is less than that of master’s theses. Most of the theses were published mainly in 2004 and were written in English. The theses that were examined used the quantitative research method the most for their research design. It has also been observed that MIT-based instruction in English classes maximize students’ language skills more and boost the retention of information. It has been revealed that English lessons with MIT-based instruction foster learners to perform better in their language learning period. Furthermore, it has been deduced that MIT-based instruction encourages students to have a positive attitude towards the English lesson, and it guides students to be motivated during the application. It is concluded that applying traditional teaching methods is less effective than utilizing MIT in the lessons. Following the conclusion part, some recommendations were offered to provide some ideas for future studies.

Destekleyen Kurum

Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University

Proje Numarası

ÖGR-2023-04

Teşekkür

We would like to thank our esteemed supervisor – Associate Professor Kamil Arif KIRKIÇ for all his advice and support during our research project. We also thank Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University for the financial support on our study.

Kaynakça

  • Abdulkader, F.A., Gundogdu, K., & Eissa, M.A. (2009). The effectiveness of a multiple intelligences-based program on improving certain reading skills in 5th-year primary learning disabled students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(2), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v7i18.1340
  • Alavinia, P. & Farhady, S. (2012). Teaching vocabulary through differentiated instruction: insights from multiple intelligences and learning styles. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 2(4), 73-90.
  • Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel araştırmalarda örnekleme yöntemleri ve örnek hacmi sorunsalı üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 231-274. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bitlissos/issue/38061/399955
  • Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel araştırma süreci: Nitel bir araştırma nasıl yapılır?. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 368-388. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.598299
  • Bas, G. & Beyhan, Ö. (2010). Effects of multiple intelligences supported Project-based learning on students’ achievement levels and attitudes towards English lesson. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3), 365-386. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/245
  • Baş, G. (2014). İngilizce dersinde çoklu zekâ yaklaşımı temelli öğretimin öğrenci görüşleri açısından değerlendirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 22(1), 177-201. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefdergi/issue/22603/241522
  • Bhat, P. (2012). Multiple intelligence (MI) approach in teaching writing skill. [Master’s Thesis, Tribhuvan University].
  • Canbay, S. (2006). İlköğretim birinci kademede çoklu zekâ kuramı uygulamalarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (Yalova örneği) [Master’s Thesis, Sakarya University]. https://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/handle/20.500.12812/444623
  • Chen, S.F. (2005). Cooperative learning, multiple intelligences, and proficiency: Application in college English language teaching and learning. [Doctor of Education Thesis, Australian Catholic University]. https://doi.org/10.4226/66/5a94b7b25e4cd
  • Demirel, Ö., Başbay, A., & Erdem, E. (2006). Eğitimde çoklu zeka: Kuram ve uygulama. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Doğan, C. (2019). Revisiting multiple intelligence theory to boost writing performance. The Literacy Trek, 5(2), 47-67. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/literacytrek/issue/50626/620398
  • Eng, L.L., & Mustapha, G. (2010). Enhancing writing ability through multiple-intelligence strategies. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 18(S), 53-63.
  • Faidah, R.T., Fauziati, E., & Suparno, S. (2019). Teachers beliefs on multiple intelligence based English teaching for young learners. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris, 8(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v8i1.2051
  • Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
  • Geimer, M., Getz, J., Pochert, T., & Pullam, K. (2000). Improving student achievement in language arts through implementation of multiple intelligences strategies. [Unpublished Master’s Action Research Project]. Saint Xavier University and SkyLight Field-Based Master’s Program.
  • Güçlü, M. (2019, 19 – 22 Haziran). Çoklu zeka kuramının yabancı dil derslerinde kullanımı üzerine genel bir değerlendirme. ERPA International Language Education Congress (ss.24-29). Sakarya, Türkiye.
  • Hassan, S.R.R. (2017). Using MI-based activities for developing EFL speaking Skills and self-efficacy of preparatory stage visually-impaired pupils. Al-Azhar Journal of Education, 36(3), 807-850. https://doi.org/10.21608/jsrep.2017.98748
  • Ibragimova, N. (2011). Multiple intelligences theory in action in EFL classes: A case study [Master’s Thesis, Eastern Mediterranean University]. http://hdl.handle.net/11129/183
  • Karataş, Z. (2017). Sosyal bilim araştırmalarında paradigma değişimi: Nitel yaklaşımın yükselişi. Türkiye Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 68-86. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tushad/issue/31792/350444
  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
  • Reidel, J., Tomaszewski, T., & Weaver, D. (2003). Improving student academic reading achievement through the use of multiple intelligence teaching strategies. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No: ED 479 204.
  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rihani, D. (2016). Integrating multiple intelligences in English language classrooms to enhance learners’ participation. [Master Thesis, University of Mohamed Kheider Biskra].
  • Saban, A. (2005). Çoklu zeka teorisi ve eğitim. Nobel Yayın.
  • Sak, R., Sak, Ş., Şahin, İ. T., Şendil, Ç. Ö., & Nas, E. (2021). Bir araştırma yöntemi olarak doküman analizi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 227-250. http://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.843306
  • Soleimani, H., Moinnzadeh, A., Kassaian, Z., & Ketabi, S. (2012). The effect of instruction based on multiple intelligences theory on the attitude and learning of general English. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p45
  • Uhlir, P. (2003). Improving student academic reading achievement through the use of multiple intelligence teaching strategies. An Action Research Project (Report No: CS 512 365), Saint Xavier University. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No: ED 479 914.
  • Akçin, S. (2009). The effects of using activities based on multiple intelligence theory on 11th grade students’ learning and retention of English vocabulary. [Master’s Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Aksoy, H. (2015). The impact of kinect-based gaming on L2 speaking skills and its implications on bodily kinesthetic intelligence, learner motivation and learner autonomy. [Master’s Thesis, Gazi University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Altunkaya, D. (2008). Learner achievement effect of the multiple intelligences theory based teaching in reading skills at the upper secondary education. [Master’s Thesis, Dicle University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Azap, S. (2012). The effect of cooperative learning activities based on multiple intelligences theory on vocabulary learning EFL classes. [Master’s Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Bozoğlan, B. (2004). An application of writing in ELT depending on multiple intelligences theory. [Master’s Thesis, Selçuk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Çoker, D. (2009). Teaching phrasal verbs to upper-intermediate students through multiple intelligence. [Master’s Thesis, Ankara University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Demirel, Z.T. (2019). The effects of multiple intelligence based activities on reading performance of EFL learners. [Master’s Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Doğan, C. (2004). Achieving progress in writing performance of Selçuk University Preparatory Classes depending on multiple intelligence theory. [Master’s Thesis, Selçuk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Elgün Gündüz, Z. (2017). Effects of multiple intelligences activities in a content-based context on grammar, vocabulary, writing and reading comprehension and attitudes of learners and teachers of English. [Doctoral Dissertation, Atatürk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • İzzetova, Z. (2013). Teaching vocabulary to very young learners with reference to multiple intelligence theory. [Master’s Thesis, Gazi University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Kartal, S. (2019). Teaching writing to 11th grade students through the multiple intelligences theory. [Master’s Thesis, Ufuk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Pekderin, S. (2006). The effectiveness of multiple intelligence activities on vocabulary learning in elementary school classes. [Master’s Thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Sarar, S. (2008). A comparative study of overcoming the difficulties of reading through multiple intelligence theory in English preparatory classes at school of foreign languages at Selçuk University. [Master’s Thesis, Selçuk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Servi, M. (2004). The relationship between learning and teaching vocabulary and multiple intelligences: A comparative study on vocabulary teaching regarding and disregarding multiple intelligences. [Master’s Thesis, Selçuk University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Subaşı, S. (2014). A case study on a vocabulary development program based on multiple intelligence theory. [Master’s Thesis, Çağ University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Yavuz, B. (2010). The effects of multiple intelligences activities on vocabulary achievement and attitudes of learners of English. [Doctoral Dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
  • Zaman, S. (2013). The effects of multiple intelligence theory on the improvement of grammar skills. [Master’s Thesis, Çağ University]. CoHE National Thesis Center.
Toplam 44 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Alan Eğitimleri (Diğer)
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Müberra Sarı 0000-0002-8796-9337

Betül İkra Yıldırım 0000-0002-0166-7021

Kamil Arif Kırkıç 0000-0002-8902-437X

Proje Numarası ÖGR-2023-04
Erken Görünüm Tarihi 21 Haziran 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Ocak 2024
Kabul Tarihi 17 Mart 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Sarı, M., Yıldırım, B. İ., & Kırkıç, K. A. (2024). An Investigation of Studies on the Applications of Multiple Intelligence Theory in Teaching English Language Skills. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Ereğli Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 189-216.