Dost-düşman ayrımının ötesinde: Hans Morgenthau’da siyasal olanın ontolojik ve trajik yapısı

Öz

Bu çalışma, uluslararası ilişkiler düşüncesinin önemli figürlerinden Hans J. Morgenthau'nun erken dönem siyasal olana yönelik düşüncelerini ahlak ile kurduğu karmaşık ilişkiye odaklanarak incelemektedir. Morgenthau, siyaseti salt bir güç mücadelesi olarak gören geleneksel realpolitik perspektiften farklı olarak, siyaset ve ahlak arasında ontolojik bir ilişkiyi varsayan bir siyaset düşüncesine sahiptir. Morgenthau, siyasal olanı sabit ya da özsel bir kategori olarak değil, ontolojik olarak belirli bir ilişkiselliği içeren bir “nitelik” olarak görür. Bu yönüyle siyaset, hayatın her alanına nüfuz edebilen bir yoğunluk ilişkisi olarak işleme potansiyeliyle bir sınır mantığını da içermelidir. Yani siyaset, insan doğasının sınırlılıkları ve çelişkileriyle şekillenir; bu da Morgenthau’nun "siyasetin trajedisi" dediği durumu ifade eder. Bu noktayı daha da derinleştirmek için bu çalışmada, Morgenthau’nun düşünceleri Carl Schmitt’in siyasal olanı dost-düşman ayrımı üzerinden tanımlayan yaklaşımıyla ilişkili olarak tartışılacaktır. Bu tartışma, siyaseti çatışma ve mücadele bağlamında bir ontolojiyle ilişkilendiren iki düşünürün hangi noktalarda siyaset ile ahlak (morality) arasındaki ilişkiye farklı yaklaştığını inceleyerek, Morgenthau’nun siyasal olanı nasıl tanımladığı noktasında daha detaylı bir inceleme sağlamış olacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri
• Siyasal Ontoloji
• Hans J. Morgenthau
• Realizm
• Carl Schmitt

Beyond the friend-enemy distinction: The ontological and tragic structure of the political in Hans Morgenthau

Öz

This study examines the political philosophy of Hans J. Morgenthau, an important figure in international relations thought, with a particular focus on a discussion of the relationship between power and morality. Morgenthau departs from the traditional realpolitik perspective, which sees politics as a mere struggle for power, to a political thought in which politics and morality are inextricably linked. This relationship is intimately bound up with human nature and is deeply related to the conceptualization of the will to power that Morgenthau uses to define the political. In this context, Morgenthau's ideas will be discussed in relation to Carl Schmitt's approach that defines the political in terms of the friend-enemy distinction. This discussion will provide a more detailed examination of how Morgenthau defines the political by examining at which points the two thinkers, who have a similar approach to the relationship between power and politics, approach the relationship between politics and morality differently. In doing so, this study will present a discussion of the relationship between politics and morality in the context of human nature, taking into account recent studies that reconsider Morgenthau's classical realist approaches to power politics, and will help to address the complex relationship between politics and morality in Morgenthau's definition of international politics on a more detailed level.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• International Relations Theories
• Political Ontology
• Hans J. Morgenthau
• Realism
• Carl Schmitt

Kaynakça

1. Behr, H. (2010). A history of international political theory: ontologies of the international. Palgrave Macmillan
2. Behr H. & Rösch, F. (2012). Introduction. H. Behr & F. Rösch (Ed.), Hans Morgenthau: The Concept of the Political içinde (ss. 2-79). Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Behr, H & Rösch F. (2013). The ethics of anti-hubris in the political philosophy of international relations: Hans J. Morgenthau. J. Troy (Ed.), Religion and the Realist Tradition: From Political Theology to International Relations Theory and Back içinde (ss. 111–128). Routledge.
4. Brown C. (2007). The twilight of international morality'? Hans j. Morgenthau and Carl Schmitt on the end of jus publicum europaeum. M. C. Williams (Ed.), Realism Reconsidered içinde (ss. 42-61). Oxford University Press.
5. Chou, M. (2011). Morgenthau, the tragic: On tragedy and the transition from Scientific Man to Politics Among Nations. Telos, 157, 109–128. https://doi.org/10.3817/1211157109
6. Cristol, J. (2009). Morgenthau vs. Morgenthau? ‘the six principles of political realism’ in context. American Foreign Policy Interests, 31 (4), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803920903136247
7. Klusmeyer, D. (2009). Beyond tragedy: Hannah Arendt and Hans Morgenthau on responsibility, evil and political ethics. International Studies Review 11 (2), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00851.x
8. Levine, D. J. (2013). Why Hans Morgenthau was not a critical theorist (and why contemporary ir realists should care). International Relations, 27(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117812460878

9. Lang, A. F. (2007). Morgenthau, agency, and Aristotle. M. C. Williams (Ed.), Realism reconsidered: The legacy of Hans Morgenthau in international relations içinde, (ss.18-41). Oxford University Press.
10. Lebow, N. (2003). The tragic vision of politics. Cambridge University Press.
11. Molloy, S. (2009). Aristotle, Epicurus, Morgenthau and the political ethics of the lesser evil. Journal of International Political Theory. 5(1), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1755088209000342
12. Morgenthau, H. J. (1945). The Evil of Politics and the Ethics of Evil. Ethics, 56(1), 1–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2988705
13. Morgenthau, H. J. (1961). Death in the nuclear age. Commentary, 32(3), 231–234.
14. Morgenthau, H. J. (1962). Scientific man vs power politics. The University of Chicago Press.
15. Morgenthau, H. J. (2006). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. McGraw Hill.
16. Morgenthau, H.J. (2012). The concept of the political. H. Behr ve F. Rösch (Ed.). Palgrave Macmillian.
17. Murray, A. J. H. (1996). The moral politics of Hans Morgenthau. The Review of Politics, 58(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500051676
18. Osborne, T. (2022). Tragedy, modernity and political life. Society, 59(5), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00644-1
19. Paipais, V. (2014). Between politics and the political: Reading Hans J. Morgenthau’s double critique of depoliticisation. Millennium, 42(2), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813515040
20. Pichler, H. (1998). The godfathers of “truth”: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in Morgenthau's theory of power politics. Review of International Studies, 24(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598001855
21. Petersen, U. (1999). Breathing Nietzsche’s air: New reflections on Morgenthau’s concepts of power and human nature. Alternatives, 24(1), 83–118. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40644933
22. Scheuerman, W. E. (2007a). Carl Schmitt and Hans Morgenthau: Realism and beyond. M. C. Williams (Ed.), Realism reconsidered içinde, (ss. 62-92). Oxford University Press.
23. Scheuerman, W. E. (2007b). Was Morgenthau a realist? revisiting scientific man vs. power politics Constellations, 14(4), 506–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2007.00464.x
24. Scheuerman, W. E. (2009). Hans Morgenthau: Realism and beyond. Polity Press.
25. Schmitt, C. (1996). The concept of the political (G. Schwab, Çev.). University of Chicago Press.
26. Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty (G. Schwab, Çev.). University of Chicago Press.
27. Söllner, A. (1987). German conservatism in America: Morgenthau's political realism. Telos, 72, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.3817/0687072161
28. Strauss, L. (1996). Notes on Carl Schmitt. C. Schmitt, The concept of the political içinde (ss. xx–xx). University of Chicago Press.
29. Strong, T. B. (1996). Dimensions of the new debate around Carl Schmitt. C. Schmitt, The concept of the political içinde (ss. ix–xxxi). University of Chicago Press.
30. Strong, T. B. (2012). Politics without vision: Thinking without a banister in the twentieth century. University of Chicago Press.
31. Williams, M.C. (2004). Why ideas matter in international relations: Hans Morgenthau, classical realism, and the moral construction of power politics. International Organization, 58(4), 633–665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304040202
32. Williams, M. C. (2005). The realist tradition and the limits of international relations. Cambridge University Press.