DIVORCE PREDICTION USING CORRELATION BASED FEATURE SELECTION AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Öz
Within the scope of this research, the divorce prediction was carried out by using the Divorce Predictors Scale (DPS) on the basis of Gottman couples therapy. Of the participants, 84 (49%) were divorced and 86 (51%) were married couples. Participants completed the “Personal Information Form” and “Divorce Predictors Scale”. In this study, the success of DPS, was investigated using Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network and C4.5 Decision tree algorithms. In addition, the study also aims to find the most significant features/items in the Divorce Predictors Scale that affect the divorce. The most effective 6 features and their values of significance obtained by applying the correlation-based feature selection method on the divorce data set. When we look at these features, they are related to creating a common meaning and failed attempts to repair, love map and negative conflict behaviors. When the direct classification methods were applied to the divorce data set, the highest success rate was 98.23% obtained with the RBF neural network. After selecting the most effective 6 features using the correlation-based feature selection method on the same data set, the highest accuracy rate obtained was 98.82% with ANN. According to the results, DPS can predict divorce. Family counselors and family therapists can use this scale for contribute to the preparation of case formulation and intervention plan. Also it can be said that the divorce predictors in the Gottman couples therapy were confirmed in the Turkish sampling.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Babcock, J.C., Gottman, J., Ryan, K. & Gottman, J. (2013). A component analysis of a brief psycho‐educational couples' workshop: one‐year follow‐up results. Journal of Family Therapy 35(3): 252-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12017
- Baca-García, E., et al. (2006). Using data mining to explore complex clinical decisions: a study of hospitalization after a suicide attempt. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67(7): 1124-1132. http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v67n0716
- Bae, S. M., Lee, S. H., Park, Y. M., Hyun, M. H., & Yoon, H. (2010). Predictive factors of social functioning in patients with schizophrenia: exploration for the best combination of variables using data mining. Psychiatry investigation, 7(2): 93-101. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.93
- Barnacle, R. ES, & Abbott, D. A. (2009). The development and evaluation of a Gottman-based premarital education program: A pilot study. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy; 8(1): 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332690802626734
- Çelik, E., Atalay, M. & Bayer, H. (2014). Yapay Sinir Ağları ve Destek Vektör Makineleri ile Deprem Tahmininde Sismik Darbelerin Kullanılması. IEEE 22nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conferance (SIU), 730-733.
- Eriksson, R., Werge, T., Jensen, L. J., & Brunak, S. (2014). Dose-specific adverse drug reaction identification in electronic patient records: temporal data mining in an inpatient psychiatric population. Drug safety, 37(4): 237-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0158-7
- Ertunc, H. M., Ocak, H. & Aliustaoglu, C. (2013). ANN-and ANFIS-based multi-staged decision algorithm for the detection and diagnosis of bearing faults. Neural Computing and Applications, 22(1): 435-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0912-7
- Fayyad, U. M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P. & Uthurusamy, R. (1996). Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. American Association for Artificial Intelligence Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Haziran 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
4 Nisan 2019
Kabul Tarihi
13 Haziran 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1