ZİHİNSEL YETERSİZLİĞİ OLAN ÖĞRENCİLERE FEN EĞİTİMİ: YÖNTEM VE STRATEJİLER

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 4, 2241 - 2261, 31.12.2021

Tansel Yazıcıoğlu , Aydın Kızılaslan

https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1025041

Cited By: 1

Öz

Türkiye’de hafif düzeyde zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrenciler çoğunlukla olağan gelişim gösteren akranlarıyla tam zamanlı kaynaştırma yoluyla eğitimlerini sürdürmekte ve genel eğitim programlarını takip etmektedirler. Başka bir ifadeyle bireyselleştirilmiş eğitim programına dayalı olarak olağan gelişim gösteren akranlarının aldığı dersleri almaktadırlar. Bu derslerden birisi de fen bilimleri dersidir. Fen Bilimleri dersinin bilişsel performansı gerektirmesi, fen alanının soyut kavramlardan oluşması zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin bilgiyi işlemleme performanslarını olumsuz etkilemekte ve bu derste zorlanmalarına neden olmaktadır. Bu nedenle hafif düzeyde zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencilere Fen Bilimleri konularının içeriği kadar, öğrencilere bu içeriğin hangi yöntem ve tekniklerle aktarılacağı da oldukça önemlidir. Bu sayede zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin hem yaşadıkları çevreyi tanıyabilmelerine, hem de fen ile ilişkili kavramları öğrenip dünyaya farklı gözle bakabilmelerine katkı sağlanmaktadır. Zihinsel yetersizlik alanındaki mevcut yayınlara bakıldığında büyük bir kısmının zihinsel yetersizliği olan bireylerin eğitimine, genel eğitime erişimlerini ve katılımlarını teşvik edecek yöntemlere, uygulamalara ya da uyarlamalara odaklanıldığı görülmektedir. Ancak zihinsel yetersizliği olan bireylere yönelik diğer akademik içerik alanları da dâhil olmak üzere fen eğitimine yönelik çalışmalar istenilen düzeyde değildir. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada fen eğitiminin zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrenciler için önemi üzerinde durulmuş, bu öğrencilere yönelik fen eğitiminin öğretim yöntem ve stratejilerine yer verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Zihinsel Yetersizlik, Fen Eğitmi, Fen Eğitimi Yöntem ve Stratejileri

Kaynakça

• Abels, S. (2015). Implementing Inquiry-Based Science Education to Foster Emotional Engagement of Special-Needs Students. In Kahveci, M. & Orgill, M (Ed.), Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education (p.107-133), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
• Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı (2021). Engelli ve Yaşlı İstatistik Bülteni (Ağustos-2021). https://www.aile.gov.tr/media/89297/eyhgm_istatistik_bulteni_agustos2021.pdfadresinden 6 Kasım 2021 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Alberto P. A, & Troutman A. C. (2009). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
• Algozzine, B. and Ysseldyke, J. (2006). Teaching Students with Mental Retardation: A Practical Guide for Every Teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Cor­win.
• Alshamri, K. H. (2019) Evaluation of Education Students with Intellectual Disability in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(1), 131-137.
• American Psychiatric Association (2013). "Highlights of Changes from DSM-IV to DSM-5". Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
• American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (2018). Definition of Intellectual Disability. Retrieved November 4, 2021, from http://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition#.WpWgD1rwbDc
• Apanasionok, M. M., Hastings, R. P., Grindle, C. F., Watkins, R. C. And Paris, A. (2019). Teaching Science Skills and Knowledge to Students with Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(7), 847-880.
• Baker, J. N., Rivera, C. J., Morgan, J. J. And Reese, N. (2015). Teaching Algebraic Equations to Middle School Students with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 7, 29-43.
• Bay, M., Staver, J. R., Bryan, T., & Hale, J. B. (1992). Science instruction for the mildly handicapped: direct instruction versus discovery teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 555-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290605
• Brigham, F. J., Scruggs, T. E. and Mastropieri, M. A. (2011). Science Education and Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26(4), 223-232.
• Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392-408.
• Cawley, J., Haden, S., Cade, E. And Baker-Krocyznski, S. (2002). Including Students with Disabilities into the General Education Science Classroom. Exceptional Children, 68(4), 423-435.
• Courtade, G., Browder, D. M., Spooner, F. H., & DiBiase, W. (2010). Training teachers to use an inquiry-based task analysis to teach science to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 45, 378-399.
• Courtade, G. R., Spooner, F., & Browder, D. M. (2007) Review of studies with students with significant cognitive disabilities which link to science standards. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 1, 43–49.
• Çapraz, C. (2020). Özel Gereksimli Olan Öğrencilere Fen Eğitimi, Aydın Kızılarslan ve Çiğdem Nilüfer Umar Kaya (Ed.), .Zihinsel Yetersizliği Olan Öğrenciler ve Fen Eğitimi (s. 103-116), Ankara: Pegem Yayınevi.
• Dalton, B., Morocco, C. C., Tivnan, T. And Rawson Mead, P. L. (1997). Supported Inquiry Science: Teaching for Conceptual Change in Urban and Suburban Classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(6), 670-684.
• Dermitzaki, I., Stavroussi, P., Bandi, M. And Nisiotou, I. (2008) Investigating Ongoing Strategic Behaviour of Students with Mild Mental Retardation: Implementation and Relations to Performance in a Problem-solving Situation. Evaluation and Research in Education, 21(2), 96-110.
• Engelmann, S., & Camine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction. New York: lrvington.
• Evans, P. (2000) Evidence based practice: how will we know what works? Special Education Re-formed: Beyond Rhetoric. H. Daniels (ed.). London: Falmer Press.
• Fetko, E. E., Collins, B. C., Hager, K. D., & Spriggs, A. D. (2013). Embedding science facts in leisure skill instruction conducted by peer tutors. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(3), 400– 411.
• Fidler, D. J., Hodapp, R. M. And Dykens, E. M. (2002). Behavioral Phenotypes and Special Education: Parent Report of Educational Issues for Children with Down Syndrome, Prader Willi Syndrome, and Williams Syndrome. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 80–88.
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 34-44.
• Fuchs, D., & Thompson, L.A. (2001). Is reading ımportant in reading-readiness programs? a randomized field trial with teachers as program ımplementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 251-267.
• Fuller, J. L. (2001, May). An integrated hands–on inquiry based cooperative learning approach: The impacts of the PALMS approach on student growth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, Seattle, WA.
• Gerston, R., Schiller, E. and Vaughn, S. (2000). Contemporary Special Education Research. Yahweh, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164.
• Gerston, R., Schiller, E. and Vaughn, S. (2000). Contemporary Special Education Research. Yahweh, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
• Haegele J. A. and Park, S. Y. (2016). Utilizing Generalization Tactics to Promote Leisure-Time Physical Activity for Students with Intellectual Disabilities, Strategies, 29(4), 19-23.
• Hargreaves, D. (1997). In defence of research for evidence-based teaching: a rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. British Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 405-419.
• Hodapp, R. M. and Dykens, E. M. (2001). Strengthening Behavioral Research on Genetic Mental Retardation Syndromes. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 106, 4–15.
• Hodapp, R. M. and Fidler, D. J. (1999). Special Education and Genetics: Connections for the 21st Century. Journal of Special Education, 33, 130–137.
• Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A. And Rojahn, J. (2007). Handbook of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. New York: Springer.
• Jimenez, B. A., Browder, D. M., Spooner, F. And Dibiase, W. (2012). Inclusive Inquiry Science Using Peer-Mediated Embedded Instruction for Students with Moderate Intellectual Disabilitiy. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 301-317.
• L Govinda, R. (2008). Education of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities in India. Salud Publica Mex, 50(2), 205-212.
• Kaneshiro, N. K. (2015), "Intellectual disability", MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Retrieved from the 15 September 2021 https://www.nlm.nih.gov.
• Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co–constructing inquiry–based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645. doi:10.1002/tea.1023
• Knight, V. F., Collins, B., Spriggs, A. D., Sartini, E., & Mcdonald, M. J. (2018) Scripted and unscripted science lessons for children with autism and intellectual disability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48, 2542–2557.
• Knight, V. F., Spooner, F., Browder, D. M., Smith, B. R., Charles L. And Wood, C. L. (2013). Using Systematic Instruction and Graphic Organizers To Teach Science Concepts to Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Intellectual Disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28(2), 115–126.
• Lynch, S., Taymans, J., Watson, W. A., Ochsendorf, R. J., Pyke, C. And Szesze, M. J. (2007). Effectiveness of A Highly Rated Science Curriculum Unit for Students with Disabilities In General Education Classrooms. Exceptional Children, 73(2), 202-223.
• Maroney, S. A., Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Jensen, M. M. (2003). Preparing for successful inquiry in inclusive science classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(1), 18-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990303600102
• Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1992). Science for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 62, 377-411.
• McKenzie, K., Milton, M. And Smith, G. (2016). Systematic Review of The Prevalence and Incidence of Intellectual Disabilities: Current Trends and Issues. Curr Dev Disord Rep, 3, 104-15.
• McCarthy, C. B. (2005). Effects of Thematic-Based, Hands-On Science Teaching Versus A Textbook Approach for Students with Disabilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 245-263.
• Mete, P., Çapraz, C. And Yıldırım, A. (2017). Zihinsel Yetersizliğe Sahip Öğrenciler İçin Fen Eğitimi. Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 21(1), 289-304.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018a). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği. T.C. Resmi Gazete, 30471, 7 Temmuz , 2018.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018b). Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı. (İlkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8.Sınıflar). https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937 adresinden 3 Kasım 2021 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018c). Beslenme Sağlık ve Güvenlik Dersi Öğretim Programı. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937 adresinden 3 Kasım 2021 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2021). Milli Eğitim İstatistikleri Örgün Eğitim 2020-2021. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2021_09/10141326_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2020_2021.pdf 6 Kasım 2021 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Moeschler, J. B. and Shevell, M.(2014). Committee on Genetics. Comprehensive Evaluation of The Child with Intellectual Disability or Global Developmental Delays. Pediatrics, 134, 903-918.
• Queensland Government (2015). Intellectual disability, Retrieved from the 6 November 2021 qld.gov.au.
• Patton, J. R. and Bailey, J. W. (2014). Fen, 1. Baskı, (Çev.) E. Sazak Pınar, Özel Gereksinimi Olan Öğrenciler Için Öğretim Starejileri, 1. Baskı, (Çev.) (Ş. yücesoy Özkan, Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Nobel
• Riehl, C. (2000). The principal's role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: a review of normative, empirical and critical literature on the practice of educational administration. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 55-81.
• Rizzo, K. L., & Taylor, J. C. (2016). Effects of inquiry-based instruction on science achievement for students with disabilities: an analysis of the literature. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 19, 1, 1–16.
• Salvador-Carulla, L., Reed, G. M., Vaez-Azizi, L. M., Cooper, S. A., Martinez-Leal, R. And Bertelli, M. (2011). "Intellectual developmental disorders: towards a new name, definition and framework for "mental retardation/intellectual disability" in ICD-11". World Psychiatry. 10 (3), 175–80.
• Sawyer, R. K. (2008). Optimising learning: Implications of learning sciences research. In Innovating to Learn, Learning to Innovate. Paris: OECD, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1787/97892 64047983-4-en.
• Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A. And Bradely, V. J. (2009). Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports (11th ed). Washington, DC: AAIDD.
• Scruggs, T. E. and Mastropieri, M. A. (1994). The Construction of Scientific Knowledge by Students with Mild Disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 28, 307-321.
• Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (2000). The effectiveness of mnemonic instruction for students with learning and behavior problems: an update and research synthesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10(2-3), 163-173.
• Shapiro, B. K. and Batshaw, M.L. (2016). Intellectual disability. In Kliegman R. M., Stanton, B. F, Schor, N. F (Ed.), Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, (p. 216-22), Philadelphia: Elsevier.
• Smith, B. R., Spooner, F., Jimenez, B. A., & Browder, D. (2013). Using an early science curriculum to teach science vocabulary and concepts to students with severe developmental disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(1), 1–31.
• Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D., Jimenez, B., & Dibiase, W. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practice in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 1–2, 62–75.
• Stavroussi, P., Papalexopoulos, P. F. And Vavougio, D. (2010). Science education and Students with Intellectual Disability: Teaching Approaches and Implications. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 19, 103-112.
• Tekin-İftar, E. and Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2012). Özel Eğitimde Yanlışsız Öğretim Yöntemleri. Vize yayıncılık.
• Topsakal, S. (2005). Eğitim Fakülteleri ve Öğrencileri Fen Bilgisi ve Sınıf Öğretmenleri Için Fen ve Tekonoloji Öğretimi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Vavougios D., Xanthakou Y., Chionidou M. And Kaila, M. (2003). Physics and Didactics: A creativity based proposal for primary teachers’ in service training. In P. Fokiali, V. Triarchi Herrmann, M. Kai­la (Eds.), Issues on teachers’ in service training and further education (pp. 907–928). München: Dillingen Akademie.
• Verdugo, M. A., Navas, P., Gomez, L. E. And Schalock, R. L. (2012). The concept of quality of life and its role in enhancing human rights in the field of intellectual disability, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56 (2), 1036-1045.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01585.x
• Wehmeyer, M. L. (2002). Teaching Students with Mental Retardation: Providing Access to The General Curriculum. Baltimore: P. H. Brookes.
• Wehmeyer, M. L., Lance, G. D. And Bashinski, S. (2002). Promoting Access to The General Curriculum for Students with Mental Retardation: A Multilevel Model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 223–234.
• Woodward, J. (1994). The Role of Models in Secondary Science Instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 94-104.
• World Health Organization (2018). 2018 Annual review of diseases prioritized under the Research and Development Blueprint, Retrieved from 5 November 2021 from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/2018prioritization-report.pdf?ua=1
• Vuran, S. & Çelik S. (2013). Concept teaching with examples. Vize Publishing.