Experimental investigation of the vibration damping properties of structures produced with different printing parameters on a lathe using fused deposition modeling

Abstract

With the advancement of fused deposition modeling technology, it has become possible to produce materials and structures designed with desired properties. Studies have shown that structural printing parameters such as printing angle, infill density, and internal structure significantly affect the mechanical properties of the produced structure. In this study, the vibration damping properties of structures produced with different infill densities and internal structures were experimentally investigated on a lathe. The experiments revealed that internal structure and infill density significantly influence the damping properties of the structure. Consequently, it was demonstrated that isolators with application-specific and desired damping properties can be designed using different printing parameters.

Keywords

• Fused deposition modelling
• 3D printing
• Infill rate
• Internal structure
• Vibration damping
• Additive manufacturing

Eriyik yığma modelleme ile farklı yazdırma parametrelerinde üretilen yapıların titreşim sönümleme özelliklerinin torna tezgâhı üzerinde deneysel araştırılması

Öz

Eriyik yığma modelleme teknolojisinin gelişimi ile istenilen özelliklerde tasarımı yapılan malzemelerin ve yapıların üretilmesi mümkün hale gelmiştir. Özellikle yazdırma açısı, doluluk oranı ve içyapı gibi yapısal yazdırma parametrelerinin, üretilen yapının mekanik özellikleri üzerinde son derece etkili olduğu yapılan çalışmalarda ortaya konulmuştur. Bu çalışmada ise, farklı doluluk oranı ve içyapılarda üretilen yapıların titreşim sönümleme özellikleri, bir torna tezgâhı üzerinde deneysel olarak incelenmiştir. Deneyler sonucunda, içyapı ve doluluk oranının yapının sönümleme özelliği üzerinde etkili olduğu saptanmış ve bu sayede farklı yazdırma parametreleriyle uygulamaya özel ve istenilen sönüm özelliğini gösterebilecek izolatörlerin tasarlanabileceği ortaya konulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eriyik yığma modelleme
• 3B yazıcı
• Doluluk oranı
• İçyapı
• Titreşim sönümleme
• Eklemeli imalat

Kaynakça

1. S.C. Joshi and A. A. Sheikh, 3D printing in aerospace and its long-term sustainability. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 10, 175-185, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1111519
2. A. Aimar, A. Palermo and B. Innocenti, The role of 3D printing in medical applications: A state of the art, Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5340616
3. H. Gao, W. Zhang, Z. Yu, F. Xin and M. Jiang, Emerging Applications of 3D printing in biomanufacturing, Trends Biotechnology, 39(11), P1114-1116, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.04.005
4. ISO/TC 261; Additive manufacturing ISO/ASTM 52900:2021 (En), Additive Manufacturing—General Principles—Fundamentals and Vocabulary. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
5. V. Shanmugam, O. Das, K. Babu, U. Marimuthu, A. Veerasimman, D. J. Johnson, R. E. Neisiany, M. S. Hedenqvist, S. Ramakrishna and F. Berto, Fatigue behaviour of FDM-3D printed polymers, polymeric composites and architected cellular materials. International Journal of Fatigue, 143, 106007, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007
6. D. Popescu, A. Zapciu, C. Amza, F. Baciu, and R. Marinescu, FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review. Polymer Testing, 69, 157–166, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020
7. T. J. Gordelier, P. R. Thies, L. Turner and L. Johanning, Optimising the FDM additive manufacturing process to achieve maximum tensile strength: A state-of-the-art review, Rapid Prototype Journal, 25(6), 953–971, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2018-0183
8. F. M. Mwema and E. T. Akinlabi, Basics of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM). In: Fused Deposition Modeling, Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48259-6_1

9. F. Bárnik, M. Vaško, M. Sága, M. Handrik and A. Sapietová, Mechanical properties of structures produced by 3D printing from composite materials, MATEC Web of Conferences, 254, 01018, 2019.
10. P. Wang, B. Zou, S. Ding, L. Li and C. Huang, Effects of FDM-3D printing parameters on mechanical properties and microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 34, 236–246, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.040
11. J. C. Camargo, Á.R. Machado, E. C. Almeida, and E. F. M. S. Silva, Mechanical properties of PLA-graphene filament for FDM 3D printing, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,103, 2423–2443, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03532-5
12. J. Fernandes, A. M. Deus, L. Reis, M. F. Vaz and M. Leite, Study of the influence of 3D printing parameters on the mechanical properties of PLA, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing, Singapore, 14–17 May 2018.
13. D. Lee and G. Y. Wu, Parameters affecting the mechanical properties of three-dimensional (3D) printed carbon fiber-reinforced polylactide composites, Polymers, 12, 2456, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112456
14. R. Gautam and S. Idapalati, Compressive Properties of Additively Manufactured Functionally Graded Kagome Lattice Structure, Metals, 9(5), 517, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9050517
15. J. T. Cantrell, S. Rohde, D. Damiani, R. Gurnani, L. DiSandro, J. Anton, A. Young, A. Jerez, D. Steinbach, C. Kroese, and P. G. Ifju, Experimental characterization of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS and polycarbonate parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 23(4), 811-824, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2016-0042
16. M. Al Rifaie, A. Lian and R. Srinivasan, Compression behavior of three-dimensional printed polymer lattice structures, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 233, 1574–1584, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420718770475
17. G. J. Calise and A. Saigal, Anisotropy and failure in octahedral lattice structure parts fabricated using the fdm technology. In Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, 3–9 November 2017.
18. M. Helou, S. Vongbunyong, and S. Kara, Finite Element Analysis and Validation of Cellular Structures. Procedia CIRP, 50, 94–99, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.018
19. J. Bauer, S. Hengsbach, I. Tesari, R. Schwaiger and O. Kraft, High-strength cellular ceramic composites with 3D microarchitecture, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(7), 2453–2458, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315147111
20. J. Fei, B. Lin, S. Yan, M. Ding, J. Xiao, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, C. Ji, and T. Sui, Chatter mitigation using moving damper, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 410, 49–63, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.08.033
21. G. Stepan, A. K. Kiss, B. Ghalamchi, J. Sopanen and D. Bachrathy, Chatter avoidance in cutting highly flexible workpieces, CIRP Annals, 66(1), 377–380, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.054
22. X. L. Yang, H. T. Wu, B. Chen, S. Z. Kang and S. L. Cheng, Dynamic modeling and decoupled control of a flexible Stewart platform for vibration isolation, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 439, 398–412, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.10.007