Investigating the effect of surface properties on the relationship between textural properties and the abrasivity of rocks using different test apparatus

Abstract

The rock-cutting or drilling tool interaction will not be the same on saw-cut and rough rock surfaces. Therefore, the effects of the textural properties of the rocks, which vary depending on their mineralogical and petrographical characteristics, on the wear of the cutting toll will also vary. In this study, the effect of the surface properties of rocks on the relationship between their textural and abrasivity properties was investigated. Cerchar abrasivity index (CAI) values of rocks were determined on saw-cut and rough surfaces using two different Cerchar test apparatus (classic and West) on 11 different rock samples. Textural coefficient (TC) and ratio of total mineral area to cross-sectional area values (AW) were determined from thin-section images to define the textural properties of rocks. The relationships between CAI values, determined with both test devices, and TC and AW were statistically analyzed for rough and saw-cut surfaces. It was revealed that the effect of the textural properties of rocks on their abrasivity is higher on rough surfaces.

Keywords

• Rock abrasivity
• Cerchar abrasivity index
• Rock texture

Kayaçların dokusal özellikleri ile aşındırıcılıkları arasındaki ilişkiye yüzey özelliği etkisinin farklı deney aletleri ile araştırılması

Öz

Düz ve pürüzlü kayaç yüzeylerinde kesici ve delici uç ile kaya etkileşimi aynı olmayacaktır. Dolayısıyla, bu yüzeylerde kayaçların mineralojisine bağlı olarak değişen dokusal özelliklerinin kesici uç aşınmasına etkileri de değişiklik gösterecektir. Bu çalışmada kayaçların dokusal özellikleri ile aşındırıcılıkları arasındaki ilişkiye numune yüzey özelliğinin etkisi araştırılmıştır. 11 farklı kayaç numunesi üzerinde iki farklı Cerchar deney aleti (klasik ve West) kullanılarak kayaçların Cerchar aşındırıcılık indeks değerleri (CAI) testere ile kesilmiş ve pürüzlü yüzeylerde belirlenmiştir. Kayaçların dokusal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla da ince kesit görüntüleri üzerinden doku katsayısı ve mineral toplam alanının kesit alanına oranı (AW) değerleri belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bu değerler ile her iki deney aleti kullanılarak belirlenen CAI değerleri arasındaki ilişkiler pürüzlü ve kesilmiş (düz) yüzeyler için istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Kayaçların dokusal özelliklerinin aşındırıcılıkları üzerindeki etkisinin pürüzlü yüzeylerde daha fazla olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kaya aşındırıcılığı
• Cerchar aşındırıcılık indeksi
• Kayaç dokusu

Kaynakça

1. G. Külekçi, The relation of the method used in tunneling operations with the geological structure example of the Black Sea Coastal Road. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction, 11(4),255-263d, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32732/jcec.2022.11.4.255.
2. LCPC Abrasivemeter Standard, Norm Fr 18–579, 1990.
3. B. Nilsen, F. Dahl, J. Holzhäuser, P. Raleigh, Abrasivity testing for rock and soils, Tunnels Tunn Int,, 2006.
4. F. J. Macias, F. Dahl, A. Bruland, New rock abrasivity method for tool lise assessments on hard rock tunnel boring; the Rolling indentation abrasion test (RIAT), Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49, 1679–1693, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0854-3.
5. M. Alber, O. Yarali, F. Dahl, A. Bruland, H. Kasling, T. N. Michalakopoulos, M. Cardu, P. Hagan, H. Aydin, A. Ozarslan, ISRM suggested method for determining the abrasivity of rock by the cerchar abrasivity test, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 47, 261–266, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07713-0_7.
6. CERCHAR—Centre d’ Etudes et, in: S, Recherches de Charbonnages de France (Ed,), Verneuil, The CERCHAR abrasiveness index, 1986.
7. S. I. Al-Ameen, M. D. Waller, The influence of rock strength and abrasive mineral content on the Cerchar Abrasive Index. Engineering Geology, 36(3-4), 293-301, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(94)90010-8.
8. S. Kahraman, M. Alber, M. Fener, O. Günaydın, The usability of Cerchar abrasivity index for the prediction of UCS and E of misis fault breccia: Regression and artificial neural networks analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8750-8756, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.039.

9. A. H. Deliormanli, Cerchar abrasivity index (CAI) and its relation to strength and abrasion test methods for marble stones, Construction and Building Materials, 30, 16-21, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.conbuildmat.2011.11.023
10. M. Capik, A. O. Yilmaz, Correlation between Cerchar abrasivity index, rock properties, and drill bit lifetime, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10(15), 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2798-7
11. S. Er, A. Tuǧrul, Correlation of physico-mechanical properties of granitic rocks with Cerchar Abrasivity Index in Turkey. Measurement, 91, 114-123, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.034
12. M. V. Ozdogan, A.H. Deliormanli, H. Yenice, The correlations between the Cerchar abrasivity index and the geomechanical properties of building stones, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3958-8.
13. T. Y. Ko, T. K. Kim, Y. Son, S. Jeon, Effect of geomechanical properties on Cerchar Abrasivity Index (CAI) and its application to TBM tunnelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (57), 99-111 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tust.2016.02.006
14. Ö. Ündül, S. Er, Investigating the effects of micro-texture and geo-mechanical properties on the abrasiveness of volcanic rocks. Engineering Geology, 229(7), 85-94, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.enggeo.2017.09.022.
15. M. Moradizadeh, A. Cheshomi, M. Ghafoori, S. TrighAzali, Correlation of equivalent quartz content, Slake durability index and Is50with Cerchar abrasiveness index for different types of rock, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 86, 42-47 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijrmms.2016.04.003.
16. R. Comakli, N. Bilim, S. Kahraman, A. E. Dursun, B. Kekec, Investigation of the relations between the cerchar abrasivity index and percentage of the abrasive minerals for volcanic rocks, in: Proc, Twent, Proceedings of the Twentieth International Symposium on Mine Planning, Sel, MPES’11, Almaty, 826–834, 2011.
17. S. R. Zhang, L. She, C. Wang, Y.J. Wang, R. L. Cao, Y. L. Li, K. L. Cao, Investigation on the relationship among the Cerchar abrasivity index, drilling parameters and physical and mechanical properties of the rock. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 112, 103907, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103907.
18. F. J. Torrijo, J. Garz´on-Roca, J. Company, G. Cobos, Estimation of Cerchar abrasivity index of andesitic rocks in Ecuador from chemical compounds and petrographical properties using regression analyses, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78, 2331–2344, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1306-6.
19. R. Plinninger, H. K¨asling, K. Thuro, G. Spaun, Testing conditions and geomechanical properties influencing the CERCHAR abrasiveness index (CAI) value, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 40(2), 259-263, 2003. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00140-5
20. H. Aydın, Investigating the effects of various testing parameters on Cerchar abrasivity index and its repeatability, Wear, 418–419, 61-94 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2018.11.001.
21. O. Yaralı, H. Duru, Investigation into effect of scratch length and surface condition on Cerchar abrasivity index. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 60, 111-120 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.08.005.
22. G. Zhang, H. Konietzky, Z. Song, S. Huang, Study of some testing condition-based factors affecting the Cerchar abrasivity index (CAI). Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12517-020-06254-1.
23. H. Aydın, O. Yaralı, H. Duru, the effects of specimen surface conditions and type of test apparatus on Cerchar Abrasivity Index. Karaelmas Fen ve Müh. Derg. 6(2), 293-298, 2016.
24. D. F. Howarth, J. C. Rowlands, Development of an index to quantify rock texture for qualitative assessment of intact rock properties. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 9, 169–179, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10627J.
25. C. A. Ozturk, E. Nasuf, S. Kahraman, Estimation of rock strength from quantitative assessment of rock texture. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 114, 471–480, 2014.
26. R. Comakli, U. Atici, Investigation of the relationship between the mineral shape properties and destruction specific energy in granitic rocks (in Turkish). Scientific Mining Journal, 56, 173–180, 2017.
27. A. Esmailzadeh, S. Behnam, R. Mikaeil, Relationship between texture and uniaxial compressive strength of rocks, Civil Engineering Journal, 3, 480–486, 2017.
28. R. Comakli, S. Cayirli, A correlative study on textural properties and crushability of rocks, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78, 3541–3557, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1357-8.
29. J. Rostami, A. Ghasemi, E. Alavi Gharahbagh, C. Dogruoz, F. Dahl, Study of dominant factors affecting cerchar abrasivity index, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 47, 1905–1919 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0487-3.
30. ISRM, 2007. Ulusay, R., Hudson, J.A., (Eds.), The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974–2006, Ankara, Turkey.