İnşaat sektöründe oluşan iş değişiklik taleplerini azaltacak bir proje yönetim sistemi önerisi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 662 - 673, 27.07.2021

Betül Temel , Gürkan Emre Gürcanlı , Senem Bilir Mahçiçek

https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.901239

Cited By: 1

Öz

Hızlı artan nüfus, sosyo-kültürel ihtiyaçların değişimi, ekonomideki gelişim ve değişim inşaat sektörünün önemini zamanla arttırmıştır. Böylelikle, projelerin istenilen süre, kalite ve maliyette başarıyla gerçekleştirilmesini zorlaşmış; işinde tecrübeli, projeyi yönetebilecek kabiliyette proje yönetim firmalarının proje sürecine katılmalarını gerekli kılmıştır. Proje yönetim firmalarının projeyi yönetirken en çok karşılaştıkları sorun ise proje boyunca sıklıkla oluşan iş değişikliği talepleridir. Bu sebeple, sistematik bir iş değişikliği yönetimi ve iş değişikliğini azaltacak bir proje yönetim sistemi, projenin başarısı açısından hayati öneme sahip olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, değişiklik taleplerine duyarlı, çeşitli sorunlar nedeniyle ortaya çıkan hak taleplerini azaltacak bir proje yönetim sistemi önerisi sunulmuştur. Bu sistem hazırlanırken proje yönetim firmalarının bir projenin başından sonuna kadar yapması gereken işler, literatür ve örnek projeler üzerinden belirlenmiş, tablolar halinde sunulmuştur. Ardından, proje yönetim sistemlerinde revizyonlar yapılarak iş emri değişikliklerinin proje üzerindeki negatif risklerinin düşürülmesi ve iş değişikliklerinin azaltılması hedeflemiştir. Sunulan sistem önerisinden proje yönetimi alanında çalışan tüm proje taraflarının faydalanacaklarına inanılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Proje yönetim firması, hak talepleri, proje yönetim süreçleri, verimlilik

A project management system proposal to reduce change orders in the construction industry

Öz

The rapidly increasing population, change of social-cultural needs, development and change in economy have increased importance of construction industry over time. Furthermore, more complicated projects have begun to be constructed and to realize them successfully in desired time, quality and cost has become difficult. These require involvement of experienced project management companies. Conversely, the most common problem faced by project management companies while managing projects is change order requests. Thus, a systematic change order management and a project management system that reduce change orders is vital. In this study, a change order sensitive project management system for change order requests was established in order to reduce claims arising due to various problems in construction projects. For preparation of this system, steps should be performed by project management companies from the beginning to the end of construction projects were determined through literature review and a case study. Results were presented in tabular form. Afterwards, by making revisions in examined project management system and its process flow, it was aimed to reduce change orders and their negative effects on projects. It is believed that all parties in construction projects will benefit from presented system and recommended flowchart.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Project management company, project management processes, productivity, claims

Kaynakça

• İNTES, Türkiye İnşaat Sanayicileri İşveren Sendikası, İnşaat Sektörü Raporu, 2020.
• A. E. Keleş ve M. K. Keleş, İnşaat sektöründe kullanımı artan bilgisayar yazılımları ve bilgi teknolojilerinin irdelenmesi. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 5(2), 610-617, 2018. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.386469.
• M. Syal, J. Diffendal, D. Duah, Change order guidelines for electrical and low voltage contractors. Project Rep., ELECTRI International. Bethesda, 2014.
• H. R. Thomas, M. J. Horman, R. E. Minchin Jr., and D. Chen, Improving labor flow reliability for better productivity as lean construction principle, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.129 (3), 251–261, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:3(251).
• M. Staiti, M. Othman, A. A. Jaaron, Impact of change orders in construction sector in the West Bank. In International conference on industrial engineering and operations management. Kuala Lumpur, Malezya, 8-10 Mart 2016.
• F. M. Arain, Strategic management of variation orders for institutional buildings: Leveraging on information technology. Project Management Journal. Dec;36(4):66-77, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 875697280503600408.
• I. A. Motawa, C. J. Anumba, A. El-Hamalawi, P.W. Chung, M. Yeoh., M. Sun, Development a fuzzy system for change prediction in construction projects. Inproceedings of the Xth International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Weimar, Germany, Jun 2 (pp. 02-04), June 2004.
• S. Isaac, R. Navon, Feasibility study of an automated tool for identifying the implications of changes in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Feb;134(2):139-45, 2008.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)07339364(2008)134:2(139).
• J. K. Ssegawa, K. M. Mfolwe, B. Makuke, B. Kutua, Construction variations: a scourge or a necessity. InProceedings of the First International Conference of CIB W107, 11-13, Nov 11, 2002.
• A. H. Memon, I. A. Rahman and M. F. A. Hasan, Significant causes and effects of variation orders in construction projects. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(21), 4494-4502, 2014.
• M. F. Al-Hams, Simulation model of change orders and their impact on building projects performance in Gaza strip. Master theses, The Islamic University, Gaza, 2010.
• S. A. Assaf, S. Al-Hejji, Causes of delay in large construction projects. International Journal of project management. 24(4), 349-357, 2006. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.010.
• J. Desai, J. Pitroda and J. Bhavasar, Analysis of Factor Affecting Change Order in Construction Industry Using RII Method. International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Research, 2, 344-347, 2015.
• M. E. Abd El-Razek, H. A. Bassioni, A. M. Mobarak, Causes of delay in building construction projects in Egypt. Journal of construction engineering and management. 134(11), 831-41, 2008. https://doi.org/1 0.1061/(ASCE)07339364(2008)134:11(831).
• Kank Sık Wei, Causes, Effects And Methods Of Minimizing Delays In Contructıon Projects, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University Technology Malaysia. 2010.
• C. Charoenngam, S. T. Coquinco and B. H. W. Hadikusumo, Web-based application for managing change orders in construction projects. Construction Innovation, 3(4), 197-215, 2003. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/14714170310814936.
• A. S. Alnuaimi, R. A. Taha, M. Al Mohsin, and A. S. Al-Harthi, Causes, effects, benefits, and remedies of change orders on public construction projects in Oman. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136(5), 615-622, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)CO.19437862.0000154
• T. R. Taylor, M. Uddin, P. M. Goodrum, A. McCoy and, Y. Shan, Change orders and lessons learned: Knowledge from statistical analyses of engineering change orders on Kentucky highway projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(12), 1360-1369, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)CO.19437862.0000550.
• O. U. Jadhav and A. N. Bhirud, An analysis of causes and effects of change orders on construction projects in Pune. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 3(6), 2015.
• The PMI Standards Committie, A Guide to The Project Management Body of Language, 2017 edition, Newtown Square, Pensylvania, USA, 2017.
• G. A. Caupin, Vision of the PM Competence, VI. Project Management International Seminar, Sao Paulo, Brazil, October 4-6, 2006.
• International Project Management Association, Building Bridges Worldwide Between People and Competences, 2017.
• CMAA, Construction Management Association of America, Standard CM Services and Practice. 2nd Edn., Reston, VA, 1993.
• PRINCE2, Process Map, 2020, https://www. prince2.com/eur/downloads
• IPMA, International Project Management Association, 2020. https://www.ipma.world/integrated-project-delivery-ipd-an-action-guide-for-leaders/
• PMCC, Project Management Professionals Certification Center, P2M: A Guidebook of Project and Program Management for Enterprise Innovation, Tokyo, Japan, 2008.
• S. O. Revay, Coping with Extras, The Revay Report., 21(2), 2002.
• A. T. Baxendale and T.J. Schofield, Planning and progressing project variations in; D.A. Lagfield and A. Retik, eds. The organization and management of construction: Shaping theory and practice, London: E& FN SPON. 2, 1986.
• D. Turner, Standard Contracts for Building, George Godwin, England, 1984.
• P. Galloway, Cumulative impact. Nielsen-Wurster Communique, 2(6), 2007.
• H. Mokbel, G. Salazar, Assessing the parametric building model capabilities in minimizing change orders, WIT Press, 73, 2004.
• P. Keane, B. Sertyesilisik, A.D. Ross, Variations and change orders on construction projects. Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction. May, 2(2), 89-96, 2010. https://doi.org/ 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.19434170.0000016.
• F. M. Arain, L.S. Pheng, The potential effects of variation orders on institutional building projects. Facilities. Sep 1, 2005.
• E. Boot, Change order management. School planning and management, 5(1), 2005.
• M. T. Callahan, Construction Change Order Claims. Aspen Publishers Online, 2005.
• J. J. O'Brien, Construction change orders: impact, avoidance, documentation. McGraw Hill Professional, 1998.
• E. R. Fisk, W. D. Reynolds, Construction project administration. Wiley,1988.
• A. Senouci, A. Alsarraj, M. Gunduz, N. Eldin, Analysis of change orders in Qatari construction projects, International Journal of Construction Management. 17(4), 280-92, 2017. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15623599.2016.1211973.
• R. H. Clough, G. A. Sears, S. K. Sears, Construction project management. John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
• T. Y. Hsieh, S. T. Lu, C. H. Wu, Statistical analysis of causes for change orders in metropolitan public works. International Journal of Project Management. Nov 1, 22(8), 679-86, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijproman.2004.03.005.
• A. A. Zeitoun, G. D. Oberlender, Early warning signs of project changes. Construction Industry Institute, 91, 1993.