KAVRAMSAL VE TARİHSEL OLARAK VATANDAŞLIK

Öz

Vatandaşlık kavramı, modern ulus-devletin ortaya çıkmasıyla birlikte kişilerin devlete karşı hak ve sorumluluklarının belirlendiği, ulusal topluluğa üyelik ve bu üyeliğin getirdiği haklar ve yükümlülükler üzerine odaklanan çok katmanlı bir durumu ifade eder. 1990'lı yıllardan itibaren küreselleşme tartışmaları, uluslararası göç ve ekonomik örgütlerin etkisiyle vatandaşlık konusunu karmaşık hale getirmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, vatandaşlık kavramına dair literatür derlemesi sunmanın yanı sıra küreselleşme literatüründeki vatandaşlık bakış açısını sorgulamaktır. Türkiye'deki uygulamalara örnek olma ve gelişmeleri yakalama amacıyla, kamu yönetimi bakış açısında vatandaşlık konusunu değerlendirmek, siyasi-hukuki işlemlerin farklı boyutlarını ortaya koymak hedeflenmektedir. Vatandaşlık tanımı, dil farklılıklarına rağmen belirli hak ve görevlere dayanan bir aidiyet biçimi olarak kabul edilir. Günümüzde, küreselleşme, çok kültürlülük, terörle mücadele gibi faktörler vatandaşlık kavramını evrimsel bir sürece sokmuş ve vatandaşlık hakları giderek değişen bir dinamizme sahip olmuştur. Son olarak, vatandaşlık tarihsel gelişimi incelendiğinde, Antik Yunan'dan başlayarak siyasi üyelik ve ulus-devlet anlayışına kadar uzandığı görülmektedir. Günümüzde küreselleşme, çok kültürlülük, insan hakları gibi etkilerle vatandaşlık kavramı sürekli evrim geçirmekte ve bu değişimler kamu yönetimi alanında daha kapsamlı araştırmaları gerektirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Vatandaşlık
• Kamu Yönetimi
• Modern Dönemde Vatandaşlık

CITIZENSHIP: A CONCEPTUAL AND HISTORICAL FRAMEWORK

Öz

The concept of citizenship refers to a multi-layered situation in which the rights and responsibilities of individuals towards the state are determined with the emergence of the modern nation-state, focusing on membership in the national community and the rights and obligations that come with this membership. Since the 1990s, discussions on globalization have complicated the issue of citizenship under the influence of international migration and economic organizations. This study aims to present a literature review on the concept of citizenship and questions the citizenship perspective in globalization literature. To set an example for practices in Türkiye and catch up with developments, it aims to evaluate the issue of citizenship from the perspective of public administration and reveal the different dimensions of political-legal transactions. The definition of citizenship is considered a form of belonging based on certain rights and duties despite language differences. Today, factors such as globalization, multiculturalism, and the fight against terrorism have brought the concept of citizenship into an evolutionary process, and citizenship rights have an increasingly changing dynamism. Finally, when the historical development of citizenship is examined, it is seen that it extends from Ancient Greece to political membership and the understanding of the nation-state. Today, the concept of citizenship is constantly evolving due to influences such as globalization, multiculturalism, and human rights, and these changes require more comprehensive research in the field of public administration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Citizenship
• Public Administration
• Citizenship in the Modern Era

Kaynakça

1. Andersen, J.G. (2005). Citizenship, unemployment, and welfare policy. In JG Andersen, AM Guillemard, PH Jensen and B. Pfau-Effinger (Eds.), The Changing Face of Welfare: Consequences and Outcomes from a Citizenship Perspective, (pp. 75–91). Bristol: Policy Press.
2. Brysk, A., & Shafir, G. (2004). Conclusion: Globalizing Citizenship? In A. Brysk & G. Shafir (Eds.), People Out of Place: Globalization, Human Rights and the Citizenship Gap, (pp. 209-215). New York: Routledge.
3. Cesarani, D., & Fulbrook, M. (2003). Introduction, Cesarani, D. and Fulbrook, M. (Eds.) (pp.1-16), Citizenship, Nationality, and Migration in Europe. London: Routledge.
4. Chidester, D. S. (2003). Global citizenship, cultural citizenship and world religions in religion education.
5. Jackson, Robert (Eds.). International perspectives on citizenship, education and religious diversity, (pp.29-45). London & NY: Routledge.
6. Collins, S. D. (2006). Aristotle and the Rediscovery of Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Esendemir, Ş. (2008). Türkiye’de ve dünyada vatandaşlık: eski sorular, yeni arayışlar. Ankara: Birleşik Yayınevi.
8. Evans, D. (2013). Sexual citizenship: The material construction of sexualities. London: Routledge.

9. Falk, R. (2004). Citizenship and globalism: markets, empire, and terrorism. In A. Brysk & G. Shafir (Eds.), People Out of Place: Globalization, Human Rights and the Citizenship Gap, (pp. 177-189). New York: Routledge.
10. Glick Schiller, N., & Caglar, A. (2008). And ye shall possess it, and dwell therein: social citizenship, global Christianity, and non-Ethnic immigrant incorporation. In D. Reed-Danahay & C. Brettell (Eds.), In Citizenship, political engagement, and belonging: Immigrants in Europe and the United States, (pp. 203-225). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
11. Hansen, A. (1993). The mass media and environmental issues. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
12. Harris, J. (2009). Customer-citizenship in modernised social work. Harris, J., & White, V. (Eds.). Modernising social work: Critical considerations, (pp.67-88). Bristol: The Policy Press.
13. Hays-Mitchell, M. (2008). Who are the victims, where is the violence: the spatial dialectics of Andean violence as revealed by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Peru? D. Cowen and E. Gilbert (Eds.). In War, citizenship, territory, (pp. 199-218). London and New York: Routledge.
14. Heater, D. (2004). Citizenship: the civic ideal in world history, politics and education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
15. Howard-Hassmann, R. E., & Walton-Roberts, M. (Eds.). (2015). The human right to citizenship: A slippery concept. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
16. Hutchings, K., & Dannreuther, R. (Eds.). (1999). Cosmopolitan citizenship. New York: St. Martin's Press.
17. Jackson, R. (2003). Citizenship, religious and cultural diversity and education. Jackson, Robert (Eds.). International perspectives on citizenship, education and religious diversity, (pp.1-28). London & NY: Routledge.
18. Joppke, C. (2013). Transformation of citizenship: status, rights, identity. E.F., Nyers, P., & Turner, B.S. (Eds.), In Citizenship between past and future (pp. 36-47). London: Routledge.
19. Khoo, S. M., & Baudrillard, J. (2007). Globalisation, terror and the future of ‘development’: citizenship beyond bare life? In Mullard, M., & Cole, B. (Eds.). Globalisation, Citizenship and the War on Terror, (pp.189-211), Edward Elgar Publishing.
20. Kiviniemi, M., (2005). Profiles of citizenship elaboration of a framework for empirical analyses, In J. Bussemaker (Eds.), Citizenship and welfare state reform in Europe, (pp. 115-130). London: Routledge.
21. Koshaker, P., & Ayiter, K. (1977). Roma özel hukukunun ana hatları, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları.
22. Kostakopoulou, D. (2008). The future governance of citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lister, M. & Pia, Emily. (2008). Citizenship in contemporary Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
24. Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Marshall, T. H., & Bottomore, T. B. (1992). Citizenship and social class. (Vol. 2). London: Pluto Press.
26. Mullard, M., & Cole, B. (2007). Introduction, Mullard, M., & Cole, B. (Eds.), Globalisation, citizenship and the war on terror, (pp.1-12). Edward Elgar Publishing.
27. Murdock, G. (1994). New times/hard times: Leisure, participation and the common good. Leisure Studies, 13(4), 239-248.
28. Muxel, A. (2009). EU movers and politics: towards a fully-fledged European citizenship? Recchi, E., & Favell, A. (Eds.). In Pioneers of European integration: Citizenship and mobility in the EU. (pp.156-178). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
29. O'Byrne, D. (2003). The dimensions of global citizenship: political identity beyond the nation-state. London: Frank Cass.
30. Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world. McKinsey Quarterly, (3), 3-19.
31. Ong, A. (1999). Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics of transnationality. Durham-London: Duke University Press.
32. Polat, E. G. (2010). Anayasal Vatandaşlık, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
33. Power, D. J. (2016). “Big Brother” can watch us. Journal of Decision systems, 25(sup1), 578-588.
34. Rudrappa, S. (2004). Ethnic routes to becoming American: Indian immigrants and the cultures of citizenship. USA: Rutgers University Press.
35. Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanunu. www.mevzuat.gov.tr. Erişim Tarihi, December 10, 2023, internet adresi, http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.5901.pdf
36. Temelat, N. (2013). Bazı ülke anayasalarında vatandaşlık tanımları, Ankara: TBMM Araştırma Merkezi Yayınları.
37. Tobler, J. (2003). Learning the difference: religion education, citizenship and gendered subjectivity. Jackson, Robert (Eds.). International perspectives on citizenship, education and religious diversity, (pp.112-129). London & NY: Routledge.
38. Turner, B. S. (1993). Citizenship and Social Theory. California: SAGE Publications.
39. Weber-Pillwax, C. (2008). Citizenship and its exclusions: The impact of legal definitions on Métis people(s) of Canada. In Abdi A.A. and Shultz, L. (Eds). Educating for Human Rights and Global Citizenship, (pp.193–204), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.