Askıda Kalanlar: Oryantalizm ve Oksidentalizm Arasında Kültürlerarası Anlamın Zorluğu Üzerine

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 318 - 334, 31.12.2025

Murat Şengöz

Öz

Bu makale, göçmenlerin farklı kültürel bağlamlarda yaşadıkları epistemik kırılganlık ve “askıda kalma” durumunu ele almaktadır. Göçmenler, ne tamamen geldikleri kültüre ne de yeni toplumlarına ait olamadıkları bir ara alanda bulunur; bu durum kimlik, bilgi ve yorumlama süreçlerinde kırılganlığa yol açar. Makale, Bourdieu’nün habitus, Geertz’in kalın betimleme, Hall’un kültürel temsil, Bhabha’nın üçüncü mekân ve Turner’ın eşik mekânı kavramları üzerinden, kültürlerarası anlamın inşasında bağlam, gündelik pratikler ve çoklu perspektifin önemini tartışmaktadır. Ayrıca, oryantalizm ve oksidentalizm ekseninde, göçmen yorumlarının duygusal ve epistemik temelleri analiz edilmekte; dilsel yeterlilik, kavramsal çerçeve ve kültürel farkındalığın yorumları nasıl etkilediği gösterilmektedir. Makale, göçmen deneyimini hem kültürel hem de felsefi boyutuyla değerlendirerek, kültürlerarası anlayış literatürüne kavramsal bir katkı sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Göçmenlik , Kültürel Anlam , Aidiyet , Dil ve Kültür , Habitus , Kalın Betimleme , Üçüncü Alan , Kozmopolit Yurttaşlık , Oryantalizm , Oksidentalizm

Suspended in Between: The Challenge of Intercultural Meaning Between Orientalism and Occidentalism

Öz

This article examines the epistemic vulnerability and “suspended” position experienced by migrants navigating multiple cultural contexts. Migrants often exist in an intermediate space, belonging neither fully to their origin culture nor to the host society, which generates cognitive and interpretive fragility. Drawing on Bourdieu’s habitus, Geertz’s thick description, Hall’s cultural representation, Bhabha’s third space, and Turner’s liminality, the study highlights the importance of context, everyday practices, and multiple perspectives in constructing intercultural meaning. Additionally, through the lens of Orientalism and Occidentalism, it analyzes how emotional and epistemic factors shape migrant interpretations, emphasizing the roles of language proficiency, conceptual frameworks, and cultural awareness. By addressing migration from both cultural and philosophical perspectives, the article offers a conceptual contribution to the literature on intercultural understanding.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Migration , Cultural Meaning , Belonging , Language and Culture , Habitus , Thick Description , Third Space , Cosmopolitan Citizenship , Orientalism , Occidentalism

Kaynakça

• Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.
• Appadurai, A. (2013). The future as cultural fact: Essays on the global condition. Verso.
• Bauböck, R. (2018). Refugee protection and burden-sharing: What role for transnational citizenship? Global Policy, 9(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12532
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
• Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.
• Bhattacharya, G. (2021). Cultural hybridity and migrant belonging in the digital era. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 42(6), 745–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2021.1972823
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press.
• Buruma, I., & Margalit, A. (2004). Occidentalism: The West in the Eyes of Its Enemies. Penguin.
• De Fina, A., & Perrino, S. (2013). Transnational discourse and shifting identities. Language in Society, 42(4), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000416
• Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.
• Glick Schiller, N., & Salazar, N. (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.723253
• Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage.
• Levitt, P., & Glick Schiller, N. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x
• Metin, A. (2020). Occidentalism: An Eastern Reply to Orientalism. Bilig, 93, 183-199. dergipark.org.tr
• Nedelcu, M., & Soysüren, I. (2020). Digital crossings in Europe: Revisiting the “transnational” in migration studies. Social Sciences, 9(10), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100176
• Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Harvard University Press.
• Papastergiadis, N. (2018). The turbulence of migration: Globalization, deterritorialization and hybridity (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
• Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
• Sapir, E. (1929). The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5(4), 207–214.
• Sen, A. (2006). Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. Norton.
• Turner, V. (1969). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Aldine.
• Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465
• Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press.
• Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. Sage.