Araştırma Makalesi

Yıldırma Sonucu Tutum Ölçeği (YSTÖ): Geliştirilmesi, Geçerliliği ve Güvenirliği

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 7 Temmuz 2017
PDF İndir
EN TR

Mobbing Attitude Scale (MAS): Development, Validity and Reliability

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a scale to determine the possible attitudes of employees towards the workplace after the mobbing. During the scale development phase was created a Likert-type pre-test form. As a result of pre- experiment applications, the draft form was formed from 78 items. The draft form prepared on the internet was e-mailed to the academic staff of 30 of the 181 universities affiliated to the Council of Higher Education (CoHE) and the data were obtained according to the returned results. 1,326 recipients of 26,431 academic staff forms were returned. 561 pieces of draft scale data that were exposed to mobbing were taken into consideration. 22 items without contribution to substance analysis were removed from the scale. The appropriateness of 56 items to factor analysis was examined and the value of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) was obtained 0.918. When it is investigated the eigenvalues of 56 items, four factors with the highest eigenvalue are selected and the scale finally consists of 33 items. KMO value of confirmatory factor analysis was 0.907 and the result of Bartlett test was 4131,431. Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient was found as 0.925 in the reliability analysis. There are four factors in the scale and it is composed of 33 items, 10 of which are positive and 23 of which are negative. The “Mobbing Attitude Scale” (MAS) developed in this research can be used to determine the attitudes of the employees towards the workplace after the mobbing. It is not only developed for academic staff, but it can also be applied to employees in other workplaces outside this profession.


Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Beydağ, K. D. & Arslan, H. (2008). Kadın doğum kliniklerinde çalışan ebe ve hemşirelerin profesyonelliklerini etkileyen faktörler. Fırat Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, 3(7), 75-87.
  2. Björkqvist, K., Österman, K. & HjelBack, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173-184.
  3. Craig, W. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123-130.
  4. Doğan, N. & Başokuçu, T. O. (2010). İstatistik tutum ölçeği için uygulanan faktör analizi ve aşamalı kümeleme analizi sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. Eğitim ve Psikolojide Ölçme Değerlendirme Dergisi. 1 (2), 65-72.
  5. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D. & Cooper, C. L. (2003). The concept of bullying at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (1st ed). (pp. 3-30). London: Taylor and Francis Group.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Ekonomi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

7 Temmuz 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

7 Temmuz 2017

Kabul Tarihi

19 Haziran 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bozyiğit, E., & Gülel, F. E. (2017). Yıldırma Sonucu Tutum Ölçeği (YSTÖ): Geliştirilmesi, Geçerliliği ve Güvenirliği. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 167-174. https://izlik.org/JA32AD64YA

Bilginin ışığında aydınlanmak dileğiyle…

ODÜSOBİAD